[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Russia's Dark Future

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago


Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: New Hampshire Freedom4um Ad is Ready to Go!
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=66679&Disp=0
Published: Dec 3, 2007
Author: Christine
Post Date: 2007-12-03 11:35:40 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 14346
Comments: 124

Thanks to those here for your time and interest in creating our ad (a special thanks to Critter) for the Manchester Union Leader. Pending agreement with the paper, our plan is to run it on Sunday, January 6th , two days before the New Hampshire primary.

We have two choices. The 4 x 6 Black and White for $1100 and 4 x 6 Color for $1864. Our preference, of course, is the eye catching color!

Several 4um members have pledged financial support and now we need to hear from others who enjoy posting here on a regular basis. I believe that the presidency of Ron Paul is our last chance to Restore our Republic and to save our country.

I would appreciate it so much if we at Freedom4um could do our part in making this happen. You may PM me with your pledges and with complete confidentiality. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 123.

#17. To: christine (#0)

Subliminal messages in the ad:

1. Title statement looks like a fact. For a casual careless observer who does not go deeper than title this could be an ad for the person named in the title.

2. 2nd line "Scare" is negative. Instinctive answer to the question is NO (I don't get scared -> I'm not with you)

3 "scares us" - repeats 2. -> Those who get scared loose.

4. "Put an end to war on drugs"? Like, is he actually FOR them?

5. 5-end stars in the photo can be interpreted as a hint that the object is part of the system.

Just some marketing thoughts...

_ru  posted on  2007-12-03   13:01:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: _ru (#17)

1. Title statement looks like a fact. For a casual careless observer who does not go deeper than title this could be an ad for the person named in the title.

2. 2nd line "Scare" is negative. Instinctive answer to the question is NO (I don't get scared -> I'm not with you)

3 "scares us" - repeats 2. -> Those who get scared loose.

I agree. A lot of poeple won't notice anything but the title and think it is an ad for Hilary and instead of getting scared they might even like it. Instead of going negative like Fred and McCain did in the debate it might be good to only talk about the positives - Ron Paul's stance on the issues.

RickyJ  posted on  2007-12-03   23:19:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: RickyJ (#33)

for me, it works. that headline is an attention grabber and it makes me want to read what comes next. our target audience for the ad is republicans who can and will vote in the NH primary so i think that, in this case, the hillary fear factor is going to sell.

christine  posted on  2007-12-03   23:32:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: christine (#34)

for me, it works. that headline is an attention grabber and it makes me want to read what comes next. our target audience for the ad is republicans who can and will vote in the NH primary so i think that, in this case, the hillary fear factor is going to sell.

New Englanders may be an ornery lot but they are honest. Most will at least speed read the ad and if they already have problems with Hillary it will be reinforced one more time.

We will get a circulation of over 250,000 statewide with a readership in excess of 300,000. Those are people that vote. If we get 30,000 to read the ad and think,our money is well spent.

Voting for the sorry lot of Giuliani and McLame has got to sour the thoughts of many people.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-12-04   4:24:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: *Ron Paul for President 2008* (#35)

BTTT

christine  posted on  2007-12-04   9:28:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: christine (#36)

Lod  posted on  2007-12-04   9:37:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: lodwick (#37)

BTTT

Are you new here?

Cynicom  posted on  2007-12-04   10:36:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: ALL (#38)

Update: We've received pledges for $1200 so far. If everyone gave just $10, we could do this easily. We're getting close! Remember, our goal is $1864 for the color ad.

Thank you all for your consideration.

christine  posted on  2007-12-05   9:55:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: christine (#39)

snail rolling your way ; )

Ron Paul/Businessweek

Who are your economic advisers?

I don't have any. I read Austrian economics, which I've been doing for 30 years. So my advisers have been [von] Mises and Hayek and Sennholz.

and...

a first-hand account of the Chaos at SFRA meeting

hammerdown  posted on  2007-12-05   13:04:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: hammerdown (#51)

thank you, T.

christine  posted on  2007-12-05   21:38:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: christine (#52)

Newsweek's interview with Ron Paul 2007.12.05

hammerdown  posted on  2007-12-06   0:49:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: ALL, Gentle Plea (#53)

BTTT :)

christine  posted on  2007-12-06   15:10:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: christine, Fred Mertz, Cynicom, ghostdogtxn (#54) (Edited)

Ron Paul on Political Chowder - part 1

part 2

Ron Paul in 2009

hammerdown  posted on  2007-12-07   1:51:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: hammerdown, Hayek Fan (#59) (Edited)

People mentioned as potential cabinet appointees in the first video (URL's mentioned: politicalchowder.com and propagandaus.blogspot.com.)

buckeye  posted on  2007-12-07   22:25:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: buckeye (#85)

Walter Williams

Ive met Williams nor am negative in regard to him.. but from the link.. there was this "Video of Milton Friedman On Limited Government" .. I wonder what Williams thoughts are in regard to Milton Friedman?

Zipporah  posted on  2007-12-09   16:00:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: Zipporah (#112)

Ron Paul admires Friedman (Milton Friedman 1912-2006 by Ron Paul). I think at one level, we have people who think in partisan terms, lumping people together with their ideas. At a higher level, there are only ideas.

buckeye  posted on  2007-12-09   16:08:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: buckeye (#113)

Thats unfortunate.. Friedman was a total asshole..

Zipporah  posted on  2007-12-09   18:12:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: Zipporah (#114)

Thats unfortunate.

Do you think his ideas were bad?

buckeye  posted on  2007-12-09   18:19:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: buckeye (#116)

Well yes .. if you consider what role those ideas played in Chile under Pinochet, Friedman's 'guinea pig'..

Heres a short article re Friedman's role

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=11491

Zipporah  posted on  2007-12-09   18:32:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: Zipporah (#117) (Edited)

Ideas are different from actions. Ron Paul's notions of free markets are probably not very different from Milton Friedman's. But I doubt that Ron Paul would have cozied up to a dictator who had been installed with the help of American intervention.

I think we have to decide if we like Ron Paul's ideas about free markets. Have they guided him in the right direction during his life? Has he lived up to his stated ideals, or has he at least done a good job of trying?

buckeye  posted on  2007-12-09   20:45:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: buckeye (#118)

think we have to decide if we like Ron Paul's ideas about free markets. Have they guided him in the right direction during his life? Has he lived up to his stated ideals, or has he at least done a good job of trying?

RP has discussed his positions on Trade. Free Trade. He said, he supported some agreements, and others he did not. He does not support trade where there is no mutal benefit to such agreements. Meaning, if America loses, he does not support it. In the interview I saw, he gave more specifics as to which he did not support.

He believes in Trade, but ONLY where there is mutual benefit.

Seems he might be the only one that truly looks at when it is good for us and when it is not.

Ron Paul Library:

Link to Free Trade Speeches:

www.ronpaullibrary.org/topic.php?id=12

Peppa  posted on  2007-12-09   21:25:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: Peppa (#119)

I don't think he intends to impose any serious trade restrictions. He didn't oppose the Dubai ports deal. He doesn't oppose MFN status for China. He says that NAFTA/CAFTA are wrong because they are "managed" trade, not because they allow free (unfettered) trade.

Ron Paul won't be saving the middle class with "fair" trade. He would work to save the middle class by opening up competition to our fiat currency. That could do more to help than imposing arbitrary fair trade standards.

It remains to be seen.

buckeye  posted on  2007-12-09   21:31:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#122. To: all (#120)

Nite all.

Peppa  posted on  2007-12-09   21:38:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: Peppa (#122)

Nite.

buckeye  posted on  2007-12-09   21:40:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 123.

        There are no replies to Comment # 123.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 123.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]