[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Hypocrite Kucinich Drafts Legislation To Ban Guns
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/200407banguns.htm
Published: Dec 12, 2007
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2007-12-12 11:09:33 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 1166
Comments: 75

Entertains notion that bloodthirsty Neo-Fascists carried out 9/11, then says we should hand over our only protection against them

Dennis Kucinich has shot himself in the foot, pardon the pun, by alienating a huge majority of his most vocal and active online supporters, the 9/11 Truth Movement, in drafting legislation that will completely ban the purchase, sale, transfer, or possession of handguns by civilians.

Kucinich has effectively ended any minute chance he had of becoming President in 2008.

The Congressman from Cleveland has received plaudits for being the only man on Capitol Hill, besides Ron Paul, to even consider pushing for a new inquiry into the events of 9/11. Though Kucinich warned that the investigation "would be limited," he has promised to organize a committee before the end of the year to focus on "Some specific areas that to me represent the most egregious examples of distortion of truth or lack of information."

"By focusing in on that, I'll be able to bring forward a new dimension to the discussions. And from there, we'll move ahead," said Kucinich.

According to Raw Story, the Congressman has also selected a date to introduce articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney.

Wonderful, empowering, a breath of fresh air - but you know it just sounded too good to be true, because now comes this;

"Kucinich is currently drafting legislation that would ban the purchase, sale, transfer, or possession of handguns by civilians."

That's right - our intrepid warrior in the fight to restore the Constitution, wants to gut the very bedrock of it - the Second Amendment.

Just as the Bush administration exploited the immediate aftermath of 9/11 to ram through the Patriot Act, Kucinich cites the Virginia Massacre as evidence of a "national emergency" that requires an instant assault on the bill of rights to "protect" us all from the madmen.

Kucinich is seemingly willing to entertain the notion that 9/11 was carried out by a ruthless gang of bloodthirsty Neo-Fascists within our own government, yet he thinks we should all hand in our only means of defense against such thugs when the men in black ski-masks come knocking.

Notice Kucinich specifies that only "civilians" will be forced to turn in their weapons - the guardians of the state will still be allowed to arm themselves to the teeth to keep us all safe.

Gun control is a religion, and no matter how many facts you throw out about how guns prevent hundreds of thousands of crimes every year, or arguments about how criminals don't obey laws and gun control only disarms the victims, the majority will never change minds that are already made up.


Poster Comment:

Notice Kucinich specifies that only "civilians" will be forced to turn in their weapons - the guardians of the state will still be allowed to arm themselves to the teeth to keep us all safe.

Kucinich has been outed...he's a Traitor to the American people!!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

#13. To: christine (#0)

I just looked at Congressional Quarterly's list of bills that Kucinich has sponsored in the last 12 months, and I could not find any such bill.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   11:40:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: aristeides (#13) (Edited)

"Kucinich is currently drafting legislation that would ban the purchase, sale, transfer, or possession of handguns by civilians."

If you had read the article you'd know that he's only "DRAFTING" that bill, it's not hit congress yet.

The story lacks credability since no one has seen the alleged bill. IMO Ron Paul should wait until the bill surfaces before condemning it.

hondo68  posted on  2007-12-12   11:56:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: hondo68 (#19)

Well, discrediting Kucinich might be an effective way of discrediting the mounting efforts to impeach Cheney and Bush, might it not?

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   11:58:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: aristeides (#21)

Well, discrediting Kucinich might be an effective way of discrediting the mounting efforts to impeach Cheney and Bush, might it not?

Sure could look at it that way.

I tried to find more, but bumped into this: Very interesting. And there are deal breakers all through his positions for me.

I don't see much use wasting time on him: www.onth eissues.org/2008/...Kucinich_Civil_Rights.htm

Peppa  posted on  2007-12-12   14:01:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Peppa (#46)

Have you noticed that Kucinich has been excluded from the next debate, in Iowa? The powers that be sure seem to have it in for him. That, for me, speaks volumes in his favor.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12   14:02:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: aristeides (#47)

Have you noticed that Kucinich has been excluded from the next debate, in Iowa? The powers that be sure seem to have it in for him. That, for me, speaks volumes in his favor.

Yes. I just picked up on that this morning. Welll, you know, his positions on many civil liberties issues don't align with many of those supporting Ron Paul. This Gun Control ban, if true, is a poison pill. I checked out what I could find about the size of his crowds, very small, his blog, no entries. And, while he may have it right on a couple or three big things, there's much to assess. I'm biased, I wan't no more half-measures addressing a fix to a problem. I just don't see him now rising up as one to beat. However, if it were a contest between Paul and Kucinich, I see a landslide Paul win.

BTW, any thoughts as to who RP might choose as a running mate, as long as we are looking down the road?

Peppa  posted on  2007-12-12   14:18:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 51.

#55. To: Peppa (#51)

BTW, any thoughts as to who RP might choose as a running mate, as long as we are looking down the road?

Sorry, not the foggiest.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-12 14:25:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Peppa (#51)

BTW, any thoughts as to who RP might choose as a running mate, as long as we are looking down the road?

Premature at this point. It won't be Kucinich.

wbales  posted on  2007-12-12 14:26:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]