[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why) Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them America Is Reaching A Boiling Point The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani Man puts down ABC's The View on air Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But.. Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’ Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics, BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk, Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up! Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It! Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!] 1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires. Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!! Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances "NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: N.A.U.: DOES THE QUEEN OF CANADA BECOME THE QUEEN OF UNITED STATES?
Source: NewsWithViews.com
URL Source: http://www.newswithviews.com/Veon/joan48.htm
Published: Dec 15, 2007
Author: Joan Veon
Post Date: 2007-12-15 12:34:48 by richard9151
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 508
Comments: 44

August 22, 2007 NewsWithViews.com

In November, 2004, President Bush told Canada’s then Prime Minister Paul Martin, “It’s good to be home.” Exactly what did he mean? Was he inferring that America has been integrated into Canada’s system of government? Was this “code language” to reveal to a group of insiders that Canada’s queen is the Queen of the United States?

Let’s take a look at what we know about our relationship with Canada. They have become America’s largest trading partner—surpassing our trade with Japan. On a daily basis the volume is over $1B or about $400B a year. Twenty-three percent of American exports are sent to Canada and more than 80% of Canada’s exports come to us. They are the largest export market for 39 of the 50 states. We import 80% of Canada’s wood, paper, and pulp and 17% of their oil and 18% of their natural gas. Furthermore, we not only share energy grids all across the northern borders, but New England obtains most of their power from Quebec.

Financially, the Nasdaq Stock Exchange owns 30% of the London Stock Exchange and there are plans to erase the barriers between the Canadian and American stock exchanges. Recently the U.S. adopted the UK style of securities regulation. The currencies between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico are becoming one. This new currency, the Amero, will be the common currency for this hemisphere.

From a military standpoint, over the past 46 years, America has been inextricably linked to Canada through our joint military efforts through the North American Aerospace Defense Command-NORAD. On September 11, 2001, it was a Canadian general who was holding the chair at NORAD and who gave the order to initiate our defenses. As a result, more than 200 commercial planes were diverted to airports across the U.S. and from coast to coast. Since then both countries have implemented measures to strengthen military cooperation as well as law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In 2002, the two countries established the Bi-national Planning Group to develop joint plans for maritime and land defense and for military support to civil authorities in times of emergency. There are plans to move ahead with a common ballistic missile defense system.

Under the new partnership called “Common Security, Common Prosperity, A New Partnership in North America”, the U.S. and Canada, will cooperate to expand business opportunities, protect the environment, improve intelligence-sharing and cross-border law enforcement, counter-terrorism, increase critical infrastructure such as transportation, energy, and communications networks, and renew the NORAD agreement. In addition there are plans to cooperate on clean air and clean water initiatives, especially in the Great Lakes Region.

In June 2007, the Financial Times reported that Bush is going to back a treaty to “tackle one of the most contentious issues in relations between the two countries by allowing Britain to buy defense products from American companies without having to obtain export licenses. [T]he treaty would represent a victory for the UK prime minister who has lobbied George W. Bush over this long-standing disagreement between the two.” Currently only Canada has a waiver! Do we see the integration of our countries yet? Therefore in order to ask if the Queen of Canada will become the Queen of America, we need to take a look at Canada’s political structure. While it appears to be like ours, it is not. There is an executive level which we do not have which consists of the queen, the queen’s representative and her Privy Council.

According to Wikipedia, Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy with Queen Elizabeth II as its head of state and queen of Canada with a federal system of parliamentary government. The Canadian Constitution, renamed the Constitution Act of 1867 in 1982, states that Canada’s constitution is “similar in principle to that of the UK” and divides the powers between the federal and provincial governments. The governmental structure is made up of the Executive Branch which is comprised of: the Executive (the Queen), the Governor General, the queen’s representative in Canada who formally appoints the prime minister and their cabinet; the Queen’s Privy Council, the Prime Minister and the Cabinet; the Legislature and the Judiciary. You can see that the Queen has her own Council which is over the rest of the government!

Wikipedia states that The Privy Council is the council of advisers to the Queen of Canada whose members are appointed by the Governor General of Canada for life on the advice of the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister and his Cabinet are all sworn into the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and become MINISTERS OF THE CROWN.

The Queen’s Privy Council for Canada was established by the British North America Act and is modeled after Britain’s Privy Council. The formal authority of the council is vested in the Canadian Monarch but is exercised by the Prime Minister and the Canadian Cabinet who make up a minority of the Council’s members. Every member of the Privy Council declares an oath to the queen which in part is,

I [name] do solemnly and sincerely swear that I shall be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, as a member of Her Majesty’s Privy Council for Canada. Generally, in all things I shall do as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Majesty. The Queen is represented in Canada by the Governor General which she appoints on the advice of the Prime Minister. Every Canadian Providence has a Lieutenant Governor who represents the queen there. Upon taking office, the Governor General takes an Oath of Allegiance:

I [name] do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her Heirs and successors, according to law. So Help me God. The Governor General’s functions are primarily ceremonial. As representative of the Sovereign, the Governor General performs some of the functions normally associated with heads of state. He or she makes state visits abroad, hosts foreign heads of state, receives ambassadors and high commissioners, meets ceremonial groups, and awards medals, decorations and prizes. He or she serves the symbolic role as the Commander-in-Chief of Canadian Forces and fills this position in the name of the queen. The Armed Forces of Canada swear allegiance to the Canadian Crown and not to the sitting and transient government.

The Governor General and the Lieutenant Governors are also representatives of “The Crown.” The concept of the Crown took form under the feudal system, evolving from various concepts of kingship. Under England’s feudal system, all rights and privileges were ultimately granted by the ruler. The rights of the Crown are exercised by the Queen’s representatives in her various realms and dominions. It is the queen who is the Commander in Chief of the Canadian Armed Forces. The queen through the Governor General also has the power to dissolve parliament.

The Queen’s official title is “Elizabeth the Second by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.” When the queen ascended the throne, there was discussion as to her official title, then Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent said, “Her Majesty is now Queen of Canada but she is the Queen of Canada because she is the Queen of the United Kingdom…It is not a separate office.” Furthermore, the style, “Queen of Canada” is included in the Oath of Allegiance, as well as the Oath of Citizenship. While the prime minister is considered head of government, it is the queen who is head of state.

If the governmental structure of Canada is like that of the UK, we need to consider the ties Canada has with England. In November 2004 when Bush declared it was “good to be home,” he pledged the following:

My country is determined to work as far as possible within the framework of international organizations and we’re hoping that other nations will work with us to make those institutions more relevant and more effective in meeting the unique threats of our time. Was Bush talking about the Commonwealth, the United Nations or both? If he was speaking about the Commonwealth, we need to understand that the Commonwealth is a brilliant plan devised back in the 1920s by the Royal Institute for International Affairs, which is financed by the estate of Cecil Rhodes, to make it appear that the various colonies, territories and dominions of the United Kingdom were given “independence” and were totally free of British rule. However, that is not the real case. Although they were given “independence,” the British never left. They just changed the structure of government to accommodate the sovereign as head of state and not head of government. This historical feat was accomplished through the Balfour Declaration in 1926 when Britain and its dominions agreed they were

equal in status, in no way subordinate one to another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs, though united by common allegiance to the Crown and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations. This was formalized by the Statute of Westminster in 1931. While colonies were given legislative independence, it automatically set the basis for continuing the relationship through the Commonwealth in which they share allegiance to the monarch! Pretty amazing.

The Queen is not only Queen of Canada, but Queen of the following Commonwealth countries in our hemisphere: Antigua and Barbuda; The Bahamas; Barbados; Belize; Grenada; Guyana, Jamaica; For St Kitts and Nevis: St. Christopher and Nevis; St. Lucia; and St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Trinidad and Tobago.

The Commonwealth today has 53 sovereign states with Queen Elizabeth II as head of the Commonwealth. The Queen’s position is recognized by each state and as such is the symbol of the free association of the organization’s members. The 16 members where the queen is head of state are called Commonwealth Realms. Decolonization started in 1931 with Canada, South Africa and Australia; in the 1940s: India, New Zealand, and Sir Lanka; in the 1950s: Ghana and Malaysia; In the 1960s: twenty more: Barbados, Botswana, Cyprus, Gambia, Guyana, Jamaica, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Malta, Mauritius, Nauru, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Swaziland, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda and Zambia. During the 1970s, nine more: the Bahamas, Bangladesh, Dominica, Fiji, Grenada, Kiribati, Papua New Guinea, St. Lucia, St. Vincent & the Grenadines, Samoa, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Tuvalu. During the 1980s, seven more: Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, Brunei, Maldives, Pakistan, St. Kitts and Nevis, and Vanuatu and in the 1990s, three more: Cameroon, Mozambique and Namibia.

As each country obtained independence, they received a vote at the United Nations. Therefore, the Commonwealth has the potential of 54 votes at the United Nations. Throughout the entire international structure, the United States is OUTVOTED by the Commonwealth. In the Group of Eight, Canada and the United Kingdom outvote the U.S. While the U.S. has 50 states, we only receive one vote at the United Nations! Furthermore in this hemisphere there are 13 Commonwealth countries that swear allegiance to the queen.

While the Commonwealth bills itself as a free and voluntary association, several years ago, I separately interviewed three representatives from three different African countries. When I asked why they don’t go to Britain for help, they said there was no help from them. When I asked why they don’t withdraw from the Commonwealth, they each looked at me with terror and said they could not.

We Americans would be extremely naive if we thought that Britain was a good loser over the outcome of the American Revolution and the Battle of New Orleans in 1812. As explained in a previous article, “Treason in the Congress,” there is a very, very powerful group of men whose money runs the world both here in Britain and the U.S. These Pilgrims swear allegiance to the Crown and have been working since 1902 and 1903 respectively to bring America back under British rule. While it appears Senator Charles Schumer is a Pilgrim, maybe we need to ask if our president, who is distantly related to the queen, is also a Pilgrim. It appears he does not swear allegiance to the Constitution! Perhaps NAFTA was the beginning of a bloodless coup and the Common Security and Prosperity Partnership sealed the merger between the U.S., Canada, and Britain. Just maybe the Queen of Canada is indeed the Queen of the United States! It is time for TRUE AMERICANS TO WAKE UP!

Related Article:

1, ¡Está aquí! Amero Makes Coinage Debut

And there are people who 'believe' that the Queen/King of England have no power. Silly people. Believing something that comes from the Major Media.

Click for Full Text! Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Join the Ron Paul Revolution

Lod  posted on  2007-12-15   12:39:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

North American Union Already Starting to Replace USA

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2007-12-15   12:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The Governor General of Australia dismissed Labour Prime Minister Gough Whitlam a couple of decades back under very suspicious circumstances.

I wonder if the Governor General of Canada could get away with something like that.

The actor Raymond Massey was the son of a Governor General of Canada (although at a time when Canada considered itself a part of the British Empire to a much greater extent than it does today.)

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-12-15   12:50:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And there are people who 'believe' that the Queen/King of England have no power. Silly people. Believing something that comes from the Major Media.

The Governor General's office is ceremonial and its powers are limited. But believe and fear what you want.

www.cbc.ca/news/backgr ound/governorgeneral/

Duties:

The Governor General's duties, which are largely ceremonial, include: Representing the Crown and ensuring there is always a prime minister.

*Acting on advice of prime minister and cabinet ministers to give royal assent to bills passed in the Senate and House of Commons.

*Signing state documents.

*Reading throne speech.

*Presiding over swearing-in of prime minister, chief justice and cabinet ministers.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-15   14:44:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The Queen doesn't wear a crown on Canadian coins anymore.

Just throwin' that out there.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-15   16:03:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Does anyone know why?

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-15   16:09:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

But believe and fear what you want.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_of_Canada

The monarchy of Canada, also known as the Canadian monarchy[1][2] is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign of Canada, holding the position of head of state; the incumbent is Elizabeth II, ...

... The Canadian monarch, besides reigning in Canada, separately serves as head of state for each of fifteen other Commonwealth countries.

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3846.htm

GOVERNMENT

The United Kingdom does not have a written constitution. The equivalent body of law is based on statute, common law, and "traditional rights." Changes may come about formally through new acts of Parliament, informally through the acceptance of new practices and usage, or by judicial precedents. Although Parliament has the theoretical power to make or repeal any law, in actual practice the weight of 700 years of tradition restrains arbitrary actions.

Executive power rests nominally with the monarch but actually is exercised by a committee of ministers (cabinet) traditionally selected from among the members of the House of Commons and, to a lesser extent, the House of Lords. The prime minister is normally the leader of the largest party in the Commons, and the government is dependent on its support.

Principal Government Officials

Head of State--Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/postcomment.cgi?an=68530&cn=7&ac=R

Scrap Queen's powers' LIB DEMS AT BRIGHTON.(News)

Gee.... I wonder why this is neccessary if the Queen holds no power... could it be because she can call for elections AT ANY TIME, whenever the government in power displeases her? Could be.....

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-12-15   17:00:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The Queen doesn't wear a crown on Canadian coins anymore.

Just throwin' that out there.

The only possible reason for that change could have something to do with Canada re-patriating its constitution from the Crown ( ie. the UK). That happened in the early 1980's as I recall.

I'm not sure if this is the reason. I'm just thrown' that out there...( ha, ha)...

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-15   17:01:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I think that she rarely, if ever, exercises any power over Canadian government.

I honestly don't know too much about politics at all, but I believe her 'power' is reserved for emergencies such as hostile government takeovers or that sort of thing. Otherwise, she is only a ceremonial figurehead.

For instance, she appoints governors, but they are actually chosen by the politicians and only approved by her on paper.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-15   17:09:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Gee.... I wonder why this is neccessary if the Queen holds no power... could it be because she can call for elections AT ANY TIME, whenever the government in power displeases her? Could be.....

It has nothing to do with what you suggest.

I believe it is related to the parliamentary system of government. If the majority party fails due to a loss of confidence vote in Parliament ( the other parties vote as a block against the party in power), the Governor General or Monarch is there as a symbolic safe guard so the nation has a semblance of a "leader" for the short time period( a few hours) until the majority party leader tenders his official resignation and a date for a general election is set.

In other words, it's ELECTED politicians who bring down the ELECTED majority party. The Queen/Governor General have nothing to do with bringing down the majority party in government whenever they please. You are caught in Henry VIII times regarding the supreme powers of the monarchy. That period of history is long gone.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-15   17:11:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yes, thank you, except that they only changed that (no crown on the coins) recently.

I'm looking now at a 2003 coin with her crown and a 2005 coin without.

I get the same sort of feeling while wondering this as I got when I was looking at the American bills with the creepy 'All-seeing eye' etc.

Who knows what them ****ers are up to?

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-15   17:13:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yes, thank you, except that they only changed that (no crown on the coins) recently.

I'm looking now at a 2003 coin with her crown and a 2005 coin without.

Okay. My wild guess was wrong. Then I'm not sure why the change took place.

Postscript: you got to admit my guess had a certain symbolic romance to it. Repatriation of the constitution from the crown - loss of crown from the monarch on the coinage.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-15   17:16:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yes.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-15   17:24:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm guessing it had something to do with 9/11, the NWO etc.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-15   17:28:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It has nothing to do with what you suggest.

Really? (I was wondering if someone would challenge me on it!)

http://american_almanac.tripod.com/privy.htm

Her Majesty's Prerogative Powers

by Scott Thompson

Printed in The American Almanac, August 25, 1997.

The idea of a ``constitutional monarchy'' is a myth. All that exists are ``oaths of allegiance'' to the monarch. Without the need for parliamentary authority, Queen Elizabeth has Royal Prerogative Powers. The following partial list of those powers is from the authoritative Burke's Peerage and Baronetage:

the Queen alone may declare war at her pleasure;

as commander-in-chief, the Queen may choose and appoint all commanders and officers by land, sea, and air;

the Queen may convoke, adjourn, remove, and dissolve Parliament;

the Queen may dismiss the prime minister and choose whom she will as the replacement;

the Queen can choose and appoint all judges, councillors, officers of state, magistrates;

the Queen can choose and appoint all archbishops (including the Archbishop of Canterbury, who is primus inter pares in the Anglican Communion), bishops, and high ecclesiastical dignitaries;

as ``the Sovereign is first in honor, dignity and in power--and the seat and fountain of all three,'' the Queen may bestow all public honors, including creating a peerage for membership in the House of Lords or bestowing an order of chivalry;

the Queen alone may conclude treaties;

the Queen may initiate criminal proceedings, and she alone can bestow a pardon.

Some of these powers are exercised on the advice of cabinet ministers or others, and the principal vehicle through which the Queen receives such advice-- apart from weekly or more frequent meetings with the prime minister--is through a body known as the Privy Council.

And etc. By all means, the rest of the info is quite informative, so please read on at the site.

Oh, and remember Blair? He served at the Queen's pleasure, and if she WAS NOT in favor of Iraq and backing her cousin, the Smirking Decider, then nothing would have happened, cause she could have dismissed Blair in a moment.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-12-15   19:55:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Ah, hell, this is too good not to post!

The Privy Council

According to the Privy Council's own public documents, there are 390 members of the Council, who are appointed for life. The Privy Council serves as a vehicle for the Queen's use of her Prerogative Powers, because it is a council with representatives from all branches of the Venetian oligarchy, including: peers from the House of Lords, the prime minister, the Law Lords, all cabinet officers, leaders of the Loyal Opposition in Parliament, prominent individuals in the City of London, and leading members of the established Anglican Communion. The Privy Council is above Parliament, including the House of Lords, because of the Queen's Prerogative Powers. However, the Privy Council not only serves as a vehicle for exercise of the Queen's Prerogative Powers, but its offices also enact statutory powers delegated by various Acts of Parliament. It has its own Order of Precedence, which begins with HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, KG, KT, OM, GBE; then, HRH Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, KG, KT GCB; next come George Leonard Carey, Archbishop of Canterbury, and Lord High Chancellor Lord Mackey of Clashfern; and finally arriving at [former] Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury John Major, and, very far down the list, Labour Party leader [now Prime Minister] Anthony Charles Lynton Blair. The fact that Tony Blair was made a member of the Privy Council on July 27, 1994, helps explain why there is not a dime's worth of difference between his policies and those of Tory Prime Minister Major or his predecessor, Lady Margaret Thatcher. As Blair's factional opponent in Labour, Anthony Wedgwood Benn, revealed, based upon personal experience: All members of the Privy Council must take an oath of allegiance to uphold the Queen and her actions. Such oaths are the basis of the myth that the British Empire represents a ``constitutional monarchy.''

As readers of the French Renaissance author François Rabelais would appreciate, the term ``Privy Council'' comes from the earlier days, when only the sovereign's most trusted advisers could approach, while said sovereign was engaged upon the commode.

The Privy Council takes on special importance in terms of the Prerogative Powers during times of the sovereign's marriage or demise, which are the only times the Privy Council meets as a whole body. Likewise, the Privy Council takes on added authority in the event of the sovereign's illness or absence abroad. On a change of government, which is one of the Queen's more notorious powers to exercise, or a reconstruction involving ministerial changes, the Privy Council makes the necessary arrangements. Other special duties include the preparation of proclamations for such events as the dissolution and summoning of Parliament and the declaration of national emergency. And, Prerogative Powers include the consideration of applications for the grant (or amendment) of Royal Charters of Incorporation to bodies covering a wide field, such as the original charter for the British East India Company. Crown or Privy Council nominees are often appointed to governing boards.

The Privy Council also has statutory powers that have been conferred by a variety of enactments, and they are exercised either by ``Orders in Council'' (i.e., by the sovereign in Council) or by ``Orders of Council'' (i.e., by the Lords of the Privy Council). For example, under the Local Government Act of 1972, borough status and other rights and privileges of district councils are submitted through the Privy Council. The Privy Council Office is also responsible for the annual nomination and appointment of High Sheriffs of the counties of England and Wales, pursuant to the Sheriffs Act 1887. One of the Queen's Prerogative Powers is to instigate criminal investigations, and the Privy Council assists in the preparation and issuance of warrants.

There are often junior Privy Councils in the 17 nations of the British Empire where the Queen is sovereign. There used to be a separate Privy Council for Northern Ireland, but this no longer meets and no further appointments can be made to it: Its functions have been transferred to the secretary of state for Northern Ireland. All the most important laws for Northern Ireland today are made by the Queen's Privy Council through ``Orders in Council,'' which is simply one type of secondary legislation authorized by statute (in this case the Northern Ireland Act of 1974).

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-12-15   19:58:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

LOL!

The Queen can barely hold on to her fortune and land. The Brits are split 50-50 about dumping their monarchy - not because of the secret power the Queen wields but rather because the Royal Family is a financial burden to the taxpayer and very often a national embaressment ( Charles talking to plants and pretending he is a tampon and the Royal Prince(s) getting arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct). Please. Get real.

As for the Governor General in Canada, the appointees are politically correct ethnic "librul" media elites in the main. No seething power-hungry Attila the Hun need apply for the position.

You are barking up the wrong NAU tree with regards to the current inbred UK monarchy and their milquetoast representatives abroad.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-15   20:34:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Didn't she buy up a bunch of land around Denver?

Close to that airport?

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-15   20:41:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The Queen can barely hold on to her fortune and land. The Brits are split 50-50 about dumping their monarchy - not because of the secret power the Queen wields but rather because the Royal Family is a financial burden to the taxpayer and very often a national embaressment ( Charles talking to plants and pretending he is a tampon and the Royal Prince(s) getting arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct). Please. Get real.

She is the richest woman in the world, by a bunch. Goggle it if you wish.

As to the rest, nothing has changed since 1066!

Royal Prince(s) getting arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct

As if that is something new! And have you seen the movies about the insanity amoung the so-called royalty of England, including the king? Really tuned down from the truth!

I know all of this flies in the face of what you have been taught, but I suspect that is the same about the Constitution and Washington, DC, so why would you expect the truth here to be different?

You need to do some more reading, and I would suggest that you start with The Committee of 300, and start learning that the governments of the world are nothing but fronts to hide the Hidden Hand behind the scences. Which, by the way, would be another excellent book for you to read!

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-12-15   21:44:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You need to do some more reading, and I would suggest that you start with The Committee of 300, and start learning that the governments of the world are nothing but fronts to hide the Hidden Hand behind the scences. Which, by the way, would be another excellent book for you to read!

Thanks for your title suggestions but it's a matter of time. Too many enemies of the republic and too little time to read up on them or to prepare against them.

I think the zioneoconlibs present enough of a challenge to me for now.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-16   1:09:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You might find THIS interesting.

.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   1:15:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You might find THIS interesting.

.

Thanks for the veiled tip, but I am already familiar with the "Illuminati." Everyone and their dog has heard about them.

I tend to prioritize my nation's enemies. Here is my list of enemies of the state:

#1 AIPAC

#2 neocons and neolibs

#3 Mossad

#4 Welfare Queen Israel

#4000 UK monarchy

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-16   2:04:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No, sorry, I didn't mean it to be veiled. I was only pointing it out in regards to the argument on this thread. I mean, the thread is about the Queen. The Article I linked to mentions the Queen as being part of the whole scheme. Of course, I'm not intending to suggest where you focus your efforts, except, imho, attention to the source of the problem would be wise.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   2:22:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Of course, I'm not intending to suggest where you focus your efforts, except, imho, attention to the source of the problem would be wise.

Why don't you tell me the "source" of the problem...please go beyond vague descriptors like "The Illuminati"...thanks.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-16   2:34:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Well, I certainly don't suppose I know more than you do about this sort of thing, I just mean that the AIPAC, Israel, Mossad and the Neocons and Neo Libs are only extensions of the elite and to understand the problem we must understand who and what they are. The elite, I mean.

I have a hard time recalling all the details and honestly, I'm kinda lazy ;^)

I guess that's why I posted that link, it explains it far better than I could.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   2:46:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't know how much of that you read or watched, but there are a few videos if one scrolls down that probably amount to a few hours of watching. I watched an hour or so before I fell asleep last night. It was quite informative. I got the link from Itisa1mosttoolate's previous post, btw.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   3:00:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't know how much of that you read or watched, but there are a few videos if one scrolls down that probably amount to a few hours of watching.

I'm a book person myself because videos have no bibliography of original sources. I suggest you ask Santa for a copy of The Israel Lobby by Professors Mearsheimer and Walt to see where the money leads. It has an extensive bibliography. Frankly I could care less about videos and stories about The Illuminati. It's all a distraction. I fear the known enemy of the republic not the fictionalized version. It's always about the money.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-16   3:33:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Okay.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   3:34:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Okay.

Fine.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-12-16   5:31:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's just that Santa never visits my house anymore. I'm afraid he's too busy or something. Maybe I was bad...who knows. I will, however, seriously and with an open mind, consider what you've said and look for this information on the Internet. Do you have any links in mind that you could suggest, please?

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   6:03:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The Israel Lobby by Professors Mearsheimer and Walt

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   6:15:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

John Mearsheimer, a University of Chicago political science professor, and Stephen Walt, a professor of international relations at Harvard University's Kennedy School, said the U.S. government's unstinting support for Israel's recent war in Lebanon once again placed the agenda of what they call the Israel lobby ahead of U.S. strategic interests.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   6:20:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Two scholars who created a controversy earlier this year when they wrote that the pro-Israel lobby exerted too much influence over U.S. foreign policy said Monday that the recent Israel-Hezbollah war in Lebanon was yet another example of what they view as a dangerous tendency.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   6:23:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In the recent study "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy", the authors of the paper, Professor Stephen Walt of Harvard University and John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, charge that the United States has willingly set aside its own security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of Israel. In addition the study accuses the pro-Israeli lobby, particularly AIPAC of manipulating the U.S. media, policing academia and silencing critics of Israel by labeling them as anti-Semitic.

A new article in the New York Review of Books examines the controversial report and the reaction to it. It's called "The Storm Over the Israel Lobby." It was written by media critic Michael Massing, who joins Amy Goodman for the interview. Michael is a contributing editor of the Columbia Journalism Review and frequently writes for the New York Review of Books.

You can read the transcript of the interview HERE.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   6:33:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#1 AIPAC

#2 neocons and neolibs

#3 Mossad

#4 Welfare Queen Israel

#4000 UK monarchy

The Papacy is the primary force behind the flood of illegals invading America. It appears that other support for this invasion is also catholic/Roman in nature.

CINTRA is owned by "King" Juan Carlos and is being awarded the prime contracts related to the NAU Highway system and associared toll roads. Spain is a Catholic country. CINTRA is represented legally by Rudy Giuliani's Law firm. Rudy claims to be Catholic (and is knighted).

The illegal invaders are Catholic, and are being assisted in large part by the church in relocating and finding their way through the maze and into the mainstream.

I agree with your list and would simply add the Roman Church which has secular designs, a diminishing presence in America prior to the invasion and is a geo- political player little noticed but always there.

I believe we are witnessing a re-emergence of the Roman Empire, operating under Roman Civil Law currently powered by America, Great Britain and the European Industrialized Nations.

Capitoline Hill, Rome, October 29, 2004 - Signing the new EU constitution in the Appartamento dei Conservatori, Sala degli Orazi e Curiazi, before the bronze statue of Pope Innocent X by Alessandro Algardi.

If a large group of people formed a corporation purposed to produce and market automobiles (like GM), could they then hire gunmen as salespersons to increase their sales? Well that's exactly what governments do.

noone222  posted on  2007-12-16   6:51:09 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Illuminati Fact:

Saddam Hussein is a 33rd level Freemason and, imho, still alive.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   6:58:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Holy tossin' balls, wudidiz, izzat so?

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.” ~ Nikola Tesla

WTF?  posted on  2007-12-16   7:01:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Apparently, WTF?

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   7:03:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

How'd ya find that shits out?

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.” ~ Nikola Tesla

WTF?  posted on  2007-12-16   7:09:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Internets.

... seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you...

wudidiz  posted on  2007-12-16   7:10:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I tend to prioritize my nation's enemies. Here is my list of enemies of the state:

#1 AIPAC

#2 neocons and neolibs

#3 Mossad

#4 Welfare Queen Israel

#4000 UK monarchy

Actually you could tie the Queen in at number 2 on your list there - the British Crown is tied into the Rothschilds (Think Bank of England) who are basically founders of modern Zionism. Without Rothschild money backing him Theodore Herzl would have been just another crank. They financed the Zionist Hostile Takeover of Judaism by financing Herzl and the World Zionist Organization; which in turn bought enough Rabbis to turn a Jewish Heresy into the controlling force in modern Judaism. Through that avenue it ties back to the NeoTrotskyCons who are nothing more than Marxist-Zionists under Rothschild suzerainty.

Google "Israeli Supreme Court Building" for an eyeful. It was "donated" by the Rothschilds. It has about every Illuminist/Masonic symbol in the book incorporated into its architecture - including the "all seeing eye of Horus".

"When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather - not screaming in terror like his passengers." - Unk.

Original_Intent  posted on  2007-12-16   23:23:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]