See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: End of Time, 2012: Terrence McKenna, Timewave Zero
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?d ... =10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Published: Dec 21, 2007
Author: terrence mckenna
Post Date: 2007-12-21 18:53:47 by gengis gandhi
Keywords: None
Views: 319
Comments: 18
Novelty theory and "Time Wave: Zero Point" Main article: Novelty theory One of McKenna's most widely-promulgated ideas is known as Novelty theory. It predicts the ebb and flow of novelty in the universe as an inherent quality of time. McKenna developed the theory in the mid-1970s after his experiences in the Amazon at La Chorrera led him to closely study the King Wen sequence of the I-Ching. Novelty theory involves ontology, extropy, and eschatology. The theory proposes that the universe is an engine designed for the production and conservation of novelty. Novelty, in this context, can be thought of as newness, or extropy (a term coined by Max More meaning the opposite of entropy). According to McKenna, when novelty is graphed over time, a fractal waveform known as "timewave zero" or simply the "timewave" results. The graph shows at what time periods, but never at what locations, novelty increases or decreases. Considered by some to represent a model of history's most important events, the universal algorithm has also been extrapolated to be a model for future events. McKenna admitted to the expectation of a "singularity of novelty", and that he and his colleagues projected many hundreds of years into the future to find when this singularity (runaway "newness" or extropy) could occur. The graph of extropy had many enormous fluctuations over the last 25,000 years, but amazingly, it hit an asymptote at exactly December 22, 2012.[18] In other words, entropy (or habituation) no longer exists after that date. It is impossible to define that state. The technological singularity concept parallels this, only at a date roughly three decades later. According to leading expert Ray Kurzweil), another concept called cultural singularity (essentially cultural dissolution, or language dissolution), parallels this as well. Terrence claimed to have no knowledge of the Mayan calendar, which ends one day before the Timewave graph does: December 21, 2012, this is likely to be true as Mckennas timewave theory was published in The Invisible Landscape 12 years before the book which brought the Mayan calendar into public consciousness; José Argüelles's The Mayan Factor[18] Timewave Zero Hello, all right. Have you ever noticed how, um, theres this quality to reality, which comes and goes and kind of, ebbs and flows. And nobody ever mentions it, or has a name for it. Except that some people call it a bad hair day or they say, Things are really weird recently. And I think we never notice it and we never talk about it because were embedded in a culture that expects us to believe that all times are the same, and that your bank account doesnt fluctuate, except according to the vicissitudes of your own existence. In other words, every moment is expected to be the same, and yet this isnt what we experience. And so what I noticed was that, running through reality is the ebb and flow of novelty. And some days, and some years, and some centuries are very novel indeed. And some aint. And they come and go on all scales, differently, interweaving, resonantly. And this is what time seems to be. And science has overlooked this, this most salient of facts about nature, that nature is a novelty-conserving engine. And that from the very first moments of that most improbable Big Bang, novelty has been conserved, because in the very beginning there was only an ocean of energy pouring into the universe. There were no planets, no stars, no molecules, no atoms, no magnetic fields. There was only an ocean of free electrons. And then, time passed. And the universe cooled. And novel structures crystallized out of disorder. First, atoms. Atoms of hydrogen and helium. Aggregating into stars. And at the center of those stars, the temperature and the pressure created something which had never been seen before, which was: fusion. And fusion, cooking in the hearts of stars, brought forth more novelty. Heavy elements, iron, carbon, forvalent carbon. And as time passed, there not only then, elemental systems, but because of the presence of carbon and the lower temperatures in the universe, molecular structures and out of molecules come simple subsets of organisms, the genetic machinery for transcripting information, aggregating into membranes, always binding novelty, always condensing time, always building and conserving upon complexity and always faster and faster and faster... and then, we come to ourselves. And where do we fit into all of this? Five million years ago, we were an animal of some sort. Where will we be five million years from tonight? What we represent is not a sideshow, or an epiphenomenon, or an ancillary something-or-other on the edge of nowhere. What we represent is the nexus of concressent novelty that has been moving itself together, complexifying itself, folding itself in upon itself, for billions and billions of years. There is, so far as we know, nothing more advanced than what is sitting behind your eyes. The human neocortex is the most densely ramified and complexified structure in the known universe. We are the cutting edge of organismic transformation of matter in this cosmos. And this has been going on for awhile. Since the discovery of fire, since the discovery of language, but now, and by now, I mean for the last 10,000 years, weve been into something new: not genetic information, not genetic mutation, not natural selection, but epigenetic activity. Writing, theatre, poetry, dance, art, tattooing, body-piercing, and philosophy. And these things have accelerated the ingression into novelty so that we have become an idea-excreting force in nature that builds temples, builds cities, builds machines, social engines, plans, and spreads over the earth, into space; into the microphysical domain; into the macrophysical domain. We, who five million years were animals, can kindle in our deserts and if necessary upon the cities of our enemies, the very energy which lights the stars at night. Now, something peculiar is going on here. Something is calling us out of nature and sculpting us in its own image. And the confrontation with this something is now not so far away. This is what the impending apparent end of everything actually means. It means that the denouement of human history is about to occur and is about to be revealed as a universal process of concressing and expressing novelty that is now going to become so intensified that it is going to flow over into another dimension. You can feel it. You can feel it in your own dreams. You can feel it in your own trips. You can feel that were approaching the cusp of a catastrophe, and that beyond that cusp, we are unrecognizable to ourselves. The wave of novelty that has rolled unbroken since the birth of the universe has now focused and coalesced itself in our species. And if it seems unlikely to you that the world is about to transform itself, then think of it this way: Think of a pond and think of how, if the surface of the pond begins to boil, thats the signal that some enormous protean form is about to break the surface of the pond and reveal itself. Human history is the boiling of the pond surface of ordinary biology. We are flesh, which has been caught in the grip of some kind of an attractor that lies ahead of us in time, and that is sculpting to its ends. Speaking to us, through psychedelics, through visions, through culture and technology. Consciousness, the language-forming capacity in our species is propelling itself forward, as though it were going to shed the monkey body and leap into some extra-surreal space that surrounds, but that we cannot currently see. Even the people who run the planet, the World Bank, the IMF, you name it, they know that history is ending. They know by the reports which cross their desks, that the disappearance of the ozone hole, the toxification of the ocean, the clearing of the rainforests, what this means is that the womb of the planet has reached its finite limits, and that the human species has now, without choice, begun the descent down the birth canal of collective transformation toward something right around the corner, and nearly completely unimaginable. And this is where the psychedelic shaman comes in. Because I believe that what we really contact through psychedelics is a kind of hyperspace, and from that hyperspace, we look down on both the past and the future and we anticipate the end. And a shaman is someone who has seen the end. And therefore is a trickster, because you dont worry if youve seen the end. If you know how it comes out, you go back and you take your place in the play and you let it all roll on without anxiety. This is what boundary dissolution means; it means nothing less than the anticipation of the end-state of human history. A return to the archaic mode, a rediscovery of the orgiastic freedom of the African grasslands of 20,000 years ago. A techno-escape into a future that looks more like the past than the future, because materialism, consumerism, product fetishism, all of these things will be eliminated and technology will become nanotechnology and disappear from our physical presence. If-- if-- we have the dream. If we allow the wave of novelty to propel us toward the creativity that is inimicable to the human condition. This is what were talking about here-- psychedelics as a catalyst to the human imagination, psychedelics as a catalyst for language, because what cannot be said, cannot be created by the community. So that we need then, is the forced evolution of language, and the way to do that is to go back to agents that created language in the very first place. And that means, the psychedelic plants, the Gaian Logos, and the mysterious beckoning extraterrestrial minds beyond. Hooking ourselves back up, into the chakras of the hierarchy of nature, turning ourselves over to the mind of the Totally Other that created us and brought us forth out of animal organization. We are somehow part of the planetary destiny. How well we do determines how well the experiment of life on earth does. Because we have become the cutting edge of that experiment. We define it, and we hold in our hands the power to make or to break it. This is not a dress rehearsal for the apocalypse. This is not a pseudo-millennium. This is the real thing, folks. This is not a test. This is the last chance before things become so dissipated that there is no chance for cohesiveness. We can use the calendar as a club. We can make the millennium an occasion for establishing an authentic human civilization, overcoming the dominator paradigm, dissolving boundaries through psychedelics, recreating a sexuality not based on monotheism, monogamy, and monotony. All these things are possible. If we can understand the overarching metaphor which holds it all together, which is the celebration of mind as play, the celebration of love as a genuine social value in the community. This is what they have suppressed so long, this is why they are so afraid of the psychedelics, because they understand that once you touch the inner core of your own and someone elses being, you cant be led into thing fetishism and consumerism. The message of psychedelics is that culture can be reengineered as a set of emotional values, rather than products. This is terrifying news. And if we are able to make this point, we can pull back, we can pull back and we can transcend. Nine times in the last million years, the ice has ground south from the poles, pushing human populations ahead of it, and those people didnt fuck up. Why should we, then? We are all survivors. We are the inheritors of a million years of striving for the Unspeakable. And now, with the engines of technology in our hands, we ought to be able to reach out and actually exteriorize the human soul at the end of time, invoke it into existence like a UFO, and open the violent doorway into hyperspace and walk through it, out of profane history and into the world beyond the grave, beyond shamanism, beyond the end of history, into the galactic millennium that has beckoned to us for millions of years across space and time. This is the moment. A planet brings forth an opportunity like this only once in its lifetime. And we are ready, and we are poised, and as a community we are ready to move into it, to claim it, to make it our own. It's there -- go for it! And thank you!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: horse, Itisa1mosttoolate, lodwick, robin, all (#0)
see video also.
Many believe in either intelligent design or evolution...but I am opting for unintelligent design, where god is a retarded kid who likes setting army men on fire and leaving his toys out in the rain. Gengis Gandhi, Troubled Genius
Many believe in either intelligent design or evolution...but I am opting for unintelligent design, where god is a retarded kid who likes setting army men on fire and leaving his toys out in the rain. Gengis Gandhi, Troubled Genius
And big words.
mckenna i think used to be with harvard. fascinating stuff. Just a year ago everyone thought that a phenomenon like paul was entirely absurd. novelty....get some.
Many believe in either intelligent design or evolution...but I am opting for unintelligent design, where god is a retarded kid who likes setting army men on fire and leaving his toys out in the rain. Gengis Gandhi, Troubled Genius
The Timothy Leary Chair in Psychedelics.
"Why look, it's Tiny Doctor Tim. Why are you drinking so much, Timmy my lad?" "Because it's bad for my HULLABALOOSHINS! Makes everything reeeeeel... black and white!" With a tip of the hat to the legendary Firesign Theater
#2. To: All (#0)
#3. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
Novelty theory involves ontology, extropy, and eschatology.
I've already said too much.
#4. To: MUDDOG (#3)
#5. To: gengis gandhi (#4)
mckenna i think used to be with harvard.
I've already said too much.
#6. To: MUDDOG (#5)
 | Gold and silver are REAL money, paper is but a promise. |
#7. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
Nature doesn't actually like singularities, so what really happens? A regime change. The technological singularity concept parallels this, only at a date roughly three decades later. Purely coincidentally, the founding of Israel (~1948) divides the period 1776-2054 in Fibonacci proportion. ~2013 divides the period 1948-2054 in fibonacci proportion. ~2050 American whites might become a minority. A number of solar scientists think the next peak in solar activity (~2012) will be followed by a few decades of a cooler sun and earth. No, the West will end long before any singularity. And the Chinese won't be stupid enough to make machines smarter than themselves.
Mr. O'Leary, an elderly Irish gentleman, was in an accident and sustained extensive damage to his foot. After examination in the emergency room, the doctor informed Mr. O'Leary that the only chance to save his foot was to try a new, experimental procedure that involved encasing his foot in brass. Whereupon Mr. O'Leary cried out in a loud voice, "no, no---don't braze me toe!".
#8. To: gengis gandhi (#0) (Edited)
The universe is periodic but always succeeds in finding a way to never repeat in exactly the same way everywhere at the same time. That takes novelty. The universe succeeds because it is infinite, it is capable of infinite novelty. It's a wave on an infinite "ocean," the "Dirac sea," an energy ocean that is infinitely deep. A singularity is the limit to which matter can submerge, not the bottom of the energy sea. Quantum gravity ensures that, even in the coldest conditions, even over an infinite amount of time, matter distributed sufficiently widely can end up in any one of countless configurations. Quantum gravity does not necessarily force all the matter into a simple (degenerate) state, into a single massive object, a single singularity. A matrix (array) of spaced-apart objects can be formed, some objects need not be singularities. Suppose classical gravity is like an elastic sheet.* Quantum gravity is like a cooling rack below the elastic sheet. The cooler it becomes, the lower the sheet is dropped and the more that the sheet takes on the form of the cooling rack. Suppose jellybeans can represent singularities. If positively and negatively charged jellybeans are placed on the sheet, and then the sheet is placed on the cooling rack, the jellybeans each arrange themselves over different openings in the rack, spaced apart in a variety of possible configurations. If energy is then introduced from outside, it's like pulling up the elastic sheet, the charged jellybeans all rush together, collide, and generate sparks. *There really is nothing fundamentally wrong with the elastic sheet model, by the way, though it relies on gravity, for its surface deformation matches reasonably well with the actual level of gravitational potential energy everywhere, and matter merely seeks the lowest potential within it. Classical gravity could just as well be modeled by an LCD sheet that gets darker in spots where things press against it, and applying the rule that total darkness likes to minimize its size.
#9. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
"Never give up! Never surrender!" -- Galaxy Quest
#10. To: gengis gandhi, *libertarians* (#0)
ping
Fox News Channel is the television version of Free Republic
#11. To: gengis gandhi (#1) (Edited)
This is Hoag's Galaxy. Mass at the center is a coherent source of quantum gravity, a gravity laser. There could be one singularity-type object at the center, there could be a ring of singularities or several concentric rings of singularities at the center instead. Most likely just one singularity there. The dominant visible quantum gravity wavelength of Hoag's galaxy could span the radius of the Milky Way. One might say it generates its own circular cooling rack. Pressing upward on part of the classical "elastic sheet" gravity potential well is a dark ring of antigravity, a negative phase of quantum gravity from the center. It forms a barrier to the ring of stars and planets that circles around it. If the center loses coherence gradually it may lose symmetry and become, in the simplest case, stretched in one direction, causing quantum gravity waves to form along the quantum antigravity barrier, creating a pair of passthroughs that may allow stars in the ring to cross over the barrier, spiralling inward from opposite sides of the ring. But, it is supposed to be cooling, and so the likelihood of that happening may be decreasing over time, at least for the single-singularity center, or it seems it would've happened before the ring became so well defined. As it cools further, it's possible that six points evenly-spaced along the ring may form local attractor basins. A hexagonal-packed cooling rack holding seven singularities. Other configurations could be possible, such as three points on the ring.
#12. To: gengis gandhi (#0) (Edited)
I would've truly enjoyed talking with McKenna at this point in my life. Though I may have seen some of his work before, I didn't have any videos or audio by him, and I had apparently forgotten all about his theory. Novelty theory looks like a take-off on Information Theory. His idea of conservation of novelty is, in my mind, most similar to the need for changing ciphers and passwords. I tend to equate novelty with finding new prime numbers or new mathematically unique random pattern generators, in an information theory context. Novelty could be described as unexpectedness or capacity to surprise and it's there that I'm more reminded of Toffler's "future shock" than anything else. When he speaks of casting nets into the sea and fish falling through the holes he comes so close to the quantum gravity I've been discussing. He is conceptually caught in the Big Bang scenario though, with non-quantum gravity. The Bang is described as a universal creation event usually compared to so- called "virtual particles" which are said to spring into existence in pairs from the vacuum of empty space. The problem with that is that virtual particles are limited in energy and duration by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle such that delta(E) times delta(t) is bound at the upper limit by a very small constant value, where delta (E) is the energy of the added particles and delta (t) is their lifetime. The universe should've disappeared in an instant after it first appeared, according to Heisenberg's principle. The energy gain from the addition of a particle pair is presumably compensated somewhere by a corresponding annihilation of another pair. Though we say the virtual particles are created in a vacuum, they are more precisely described as being created in a vacuum surrounded by a universe. One might say nature is a little shaky and cannot keep its brush from straying over the lines a little. But, does nature get riled up as a result, knock over a paint bucket, and create a new floor? Highly unlikely. Wholly un-called-for. Theoretically the only way a particle can escape being annihilated within its Heisenberg lifetime is if the pair is created next to a singularity. Theoretically, the Big Bang is still stuck nestled up against a Black Hole that would dwarve the universe. The Big Bang is still "turtles all the way down." This is how McKenna gets stuck in a free-will-free mechanical universe of ever larger cycles with a singular beginning and ending. Reality and history may be very much like this, but it is not exactly like it, it may appear to be expanding and cooling, it may truly be doing so to the extent that it appears, but there is no need to shrink the universe until it is so small it's easy to forget, not to mention kicking out any preceding time in the process, if we want to extrapolate backwards in time. Let amateurs join the beginning to the end and make time a completely imaginary concept we can all live with, BB Cosmologists just want to be Creators, but there was never a Creation, never was a Big Bang. It's too cute. Observing proof of the Big Bang is like standing at the foot of a mountain and saying the upward slope suggests it must've been dropped on the Earth from out of the sky. Better yet, all that new snow on top is water freshly condensed from outer space.
#13. To: gengis gandhi (#0) (Edited)
Time does not have to end, the universe does not need to be cold and lifeless everywhere. Time goes on forever. The sun was made from other suns, it's supposedly a third- generation star. The solar system relies on nothing else during the life of the sun. The infinite can radiate and re-radiate forever, all light will be absorbed. Free hydrogen from natural catalysis. Protons from fission. Electrons from gamma waves. The infinite loop is endless, says it is closed, but that really doesn't matter now. Everything doesn't have to fall into a Black hole, it builds a fence around itself, the bigger it gets, the taller the fence, and Black holes are leaky anyway. Maybe some day, a slingshot effect over the fence, some hot electrons, you never know. A whole planet could swing by if so inclined, and take off away, never to see it again. Supposed they're all lined up in rows, that leaves gutters for runoff, right? I can practically see it squirting out equidistant from and perpendicular to three nearest singularities, three quarks of runoff.
#14. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
http://discovermagazine.com/1994/sep/gravitysrim419/article_view? b_start:int=1&-C= I found someone else talking about a "raised lip" on a "gravity well", at this link. Interesting article. The lip is equated to chaos in lunar and planetary orbits, it is solar system gravity chaos with well-defined boundaries next to definitive orbits. Makes me think there could be an entire gravitational spectrum. The solar gravitational system apparently has some properties in common with Wada basins and chaotic reflections in topological manifolds having more than two openings.
#15. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
When 2013 comes, I hope these doomsday prophets go away. I am getting a little tired of this crap.
Novelty theory and "Time Wave: Zero Point"
God is always good!
#16. To: RickyJ (#15)
McKenna is actually not a "doomsday" type. I think he's overstating things a bit, but he is transformational, not doomsday. You should read before you post.
#17. To: RickyJ (#15)
"Where will we be five million years from tonight?" "... technology will become nanotechnology and disappear from our physical presence. If-- if-- we have the dream. If we allow the wave of novelty to propel us toward the creativity that is inimicable to the human condition." Doomsday?
#18. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
I found an odd discussion of Hoag's galaxy that never mentions its name. www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-108232.html " we looked through a young galaxy ring with 140,000 light years wide diameter. The projection of this ring should cover some numbers of galaxies, but not one or two galaxies. In particular, one of these few galaxies is another ring galaxy. Think about the chance of getting this kind of oddity. Second, if they separate 9 billion light years away, should the inner ring galaxy be much less luminous? It seems not much dimmed by the distance. Would the inner ring galaxy be much larger than the outer ring galaxy? If so, would it be much further away? A few more billion light years away? By the way, according to the cosmic micro-wave background radiation, the distribution of observable matter in this 14 billion light years wide universe is quite homogeneous. If stretching 9 billion light years of observation in an abitrary direction we see not many galaxies, that direction must be usual according to your comment. So, this further strengthen my comment that it is very unlikely to get two ring galaxies insight. Emphasize again: two ring galaxies are in line and in sight, stretching possibly 9 billion or more light years apart from each other, and almost no other intervening galaxy, but our commonsense says the observable 14 billion light years wide universe is HOMOGENEOUS. How you explain this oddity? Out of dark void, so suddenly two ring galaxies are in line and insight....."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest