Since we are digging in to our day of reflection here, I came upon a similar thought.
As technologically advanced as the RP volunteer team is and was, it did not seem to reach the old tech crowd (so to speak). So, your point is right. Ron Pauls strategy must include outreach at every level.
And to a point by Robin earlier, some of his messages need to be fine tuned and simplified. Concise and understandable.
you are a great baton twirler, Peppa when we have our celebration party on eve of Ron Paul's Inauguration and thank each other for all we did your baton twirling will have first mention kisses, Palo
because there is an ocean of support for him out there
Palo dear, I believe that like I believe in the Age of Aquarius. I don't. That's where you and I come in. We need effective action, not just hopes. If you want to pray for something, pray to help us figure out how to focus the media on Ron Paul effectively and positively, without games, and without impropriety.
The media is controlled by a small number of corporations, and operated by managers/editors/producers who are often CFR members and members of other elite think tanks that have staked their whole programs on preventing a Ron Paul from being elected.
Are we an intelligent enough electorate to deal with this?
It is up to us. I am very serious right now. Are we? Let's find out.
If people simply wake up, channelling it towards peaceful revolution would seem to be the best response.
a poster on Digg called electing Ron Paul president now, a bloodless revolution which it is this is my kind of revolution, I am non-violent I will give it all I've got Love, Palo
Palo dear, the corporations and special interests that control the media and education where most of the opinion-making about Ron Paul is being done for the voters in all states have BILLIONS in assets to deploy.
Money is helpful, but we need to make history. Can we? Will we? Let's try.
you are a great baton twirler, Peppa when we have our celebration party on eve of Ron Paul's Inauguration and thank each other for all we did your baton twirling will have first mention kisses, Palo
If people simply wake up, channelling it towards peaceful revolution would seem to be the best response.
Please pay attention to this: Obama and Huckabee have alerted the media that they ARE the revolution. Do you understand this? I came to understand this sinister effect on TOS. People are led to believe that the "MSM" is in charge, and that small pockets of resistance (e.g. TOS) are leading the velvet junta to throw off the chains. Splinters of leadership are broken away from the "Establishment" to resurface behind these new "movements." They are fake. But they work. People still at TOS think they're the vast right wing conspiracy.
How do the elites do this? Well how do they keep one of these splinters alive? The use fear, uncertainty, doubt, religious appeal, and heart-strings appeals. No doubt they have industrial psychologists advising Obama and Huckabee right now on this very ploy.
People will actually vote for Huckabee because they are worried about immigration and he promises to do something about it. I am not kidding!
Are we intelligent enough to counter this form of manipulation honestly?
(Palo) there is an ocean of support for Ron Paul out there
(buckeye) Palo dear, I believe that like I believe in the Age of Aquarius.
LOL just because I am new age doesn't mean I am a ditz :) I gave my grounds for an ocean of support for Ron Paul what is the latest statistic of those who donated money? something like 114,000 people, it could be higher now I explained for each one who gave cold hard cash, there are 50 who support him just as passonately who didn't not everyone has extra cash right now
added to that number, and that must be millions
are those who really like Ron Paul and will vote for him in the general election but will not lift a finger to do much else (I have some friends in that category)
also let's not forget about critical mass this is how critical mass works
"Some people assume that critical mass is one more than half, but it is not. Nor is it 25 percent of the whole, nor even 10 percent of the whole, nor even 5 percent of the whole. Critical mass is reached when 2 to 4 percent of the whole is affected.
''Watch the surface of water as it's brought to a boil. The boiling point is not reached at the point when over half of the surface is bubbling, but long before. The effect of critical mass is exponential. That's what makes it so powerful. A few bubbles break the surface of the water... then, in a sudden rush, all of the water is boiling.''
The problem is that the MSM has people convinced that they do not need to boil the ocean, or that they already are. I think we have to crack this nut to win.
Are we intelligent enough to counter this form of manipulation honestly?
I think so.
Please pay attention to this: Obama and Huckabee have alerted the media that they ARE the revolution. Do you understand this?
I hadn't heard this, but I had heard about Huck stealing RP's message.
First, this whole process is a show to keep the sheep believing in a two-party system.
I can see where this is leading and it isn't going to be pretty. The fact that I too am a non-violent peaceful sort, doesn't mean I'm going to put my head between my knees and kiss my butt goodbye. I prefer a peaceful world and there is no harm in working as hard as possible to bring about change no matter how small, through it.
We are used to practicing war. We are not used to practicing Peace. So we stick to what is familiar, yet creates the most carnage. There is a better way, but we must also work to learn how to get to levers that can create it.
I know people will think that is an absolutely nutty position to take. But it hurts no one to try.
First, this whole process is a show to keep the sheep believing in a two-party system.
Yes, I agree. I think Ron Paul's campaign (and we independently) need to show that there are simple, if not a little difficult, steps to take to change the country for the better that will not be done under any other candidacy.
1. Show the people that the "media-backed rebels" are false. 2. Show the people that Ron Paul has a non-revolutionary set of changes that are positive, and that he's honest.
I don't know what else to do, but this should help.
Most of the Ron Paul meetups I've attended involved holding signs and passing out slim-jims (campaign fliers). We get a good response, maybe one in thirty will honk, and maybe one in one hundred will wave and shout in approval.
"Most of the trouble in this world has been caused by folks who can't mind their own business, because they have no business of their own to mind, any more than a smallpox virus has." - William S Burroughs
First, this whole process is a show to keep the sheep believing in a two-party system. Yes, I agree. I think Ron Paul's campaign (and we independently) need to show that there are simple, if not a little difficult, steps to take to change the country for the better that will not be done under any other candidacy.
1. Show the people that the "media-backed rebels" are false. 2. Show the people that Ron Paul has a non-revolutionary set of changes that are positive, and that he's honest.
I don't know what else to do, but this should help.
How would you approach #1?
As for #2, I think we already have a very good guide to work from, and RP's record stands solid.
#507. To: buckeye, Peppa, who knows what evil, ALL (#500)
Please pay attention to this: Obama and Huckabee have alerted the media that they ARE the revolution. Do you understand this? I came to understand this sinister effect on TOS. People are led to believe that the "MSM" is in charge, and that small pockets of resistance (e.g. TOS) are leading the velvet junta to throw off the chains. Splinters of leadership are broken away from the "Establishment" to resurface behind these new "movements." They are fake. But they work. People still at TOS think they're the vast right wing conspiracy.
How do the elites do this? Well how do they keep one of these splinters alive? The use fear, uncertainty, doubt, religious appeal, and heart-strings appeals. No doubt they have industrial psychologists advising Obama and Huckabee right now on this very ploy.
People will actually vote for Huckabee because they are worried about immigration and he promises to do something about it. I am not kidding!
Are we intelligent enough to counter this form of manipulation honestly?
Tancredo was the anti-immigration candidate and he got nowhere so that issue is not decisive in this election
I am not concerned right now that Obama is being billed as the anti- establishment candidate I will deal with that when Ron Paul has to run against Obama in general election
What we found out in Iowa is all voters now want the anti-establishment candidate (both Dem and Pub voters) We know Ron Paul is the only real McCoy
We knew from the get-go media would not help us, and would do everything in their power to sabotage us We would be foolish to expect anything from the media now they won't help us
So it comes down to Ron Paul has to get out his message to ALL because we found out voters want that message and will want him Love, Palo
I don't know what we can do to help Ron Paul get out his message it was thought giving him all the money would do it but obviously it isn't doing it because the money has to be used to get out his message effectively to ALL and we don't know if his campaign staff has the talent to do that
I have no talent in this department but others do they should post their two cents and post it on the Ron Paul official site too
that site links to DIGG
I just wish I could help in the brainstorming of how his message could reach everyone but there are others on this forum who do have good ideas on this I have read their posts Peppa has some good ideas, and who knows what evil has good ideas too and so do many others I am the only one who is not good at this...
Well as I've said, ads are not going to work because the people expect to be told about their candidates by talk programs on TV and radio. And guess who owns that? But here's the general idea:
People are led to believe that the "MSM" is in charge, and that small pockets of resistance (e.g. TOS) are leading the velvet junta to throw off the chains. Splinters of leadership are broken away from the "Establishment" to resurface behind these new "movements."
Huckabee is really Anyone But Ron Paul, so when he speaks of dismantling the IRS the smart GOP operatives see this as a way to co-opt free thinking.
"Most of the trouble in this world has been caused by folks who can't mind their own business, because they have no business of their own to mind, any more than a smallpox virus has." - William S Burroughs
Most of the Ron Paul meetups I've attended involved holding signs and passing out slim-jims (campaign fliers). We get a good response, maybe one in thirty will honk, and maybe one in one hundred will wave and shout in approval.
excellent Dakmar, that is great my Ron Paul meet-up group has been indefatigable altho I am not a good member they have an action every week-end they work non-stop to elect Ron Paul mostly they hold up signs too, in front of the mall, etc
I will say the only yard-signs I have seen in Tucson are for Ron Paul Love, Palo
Tancredo was the anti-immigration candidate and he got nowhere so that issue is not decisive in this election
You're wrong about this Palo. Americans are very afraid of illegal immigration. Their fears are easy to use against them though. Consider the fear that was raised about terrorism after 9/11. Americans decided to give Bush a pass on the Iraq invasion, which would not prevent any future terror, and might have encouraged more. See the pattern? Illegal immigration has been tolerated by the Establishment much to the harm of America. Yet the very fears it has raised will be easily coopted by the splinter "pseudo-rebels."
You and I know that Ron Paul's views of illegal immigration are more sophisticated than that, and he wants to solve the problem with real economic reforms. Again, the proper formula is to go on the attack. Change the debate! Point out that someone is stealing the terms of the debate, if necessary.
We would be foolish to expect anything from the media now
This is wrong, Palo. Without the media, your true peaceful revolution will not happen. You can take that to the bank. But we have something on our side. It's a secret weapon. And you are one of the best people to wield it. Journalists and educators love to think that they are very fair. I heard Gretta Sustern complaining that she thought that Ron Paul deserved airtime, and that was the American way. We used to think of ourselves as a very fair people, before your time. We still are, and journalists go into their fields to uphold these values. Someone else comes along and takes that love away from them.
We can awaken it.
I think you are a MASTER at awakening a sense of fairness in people. I'm going to give you an assignment, if you are willing to accept. Why don't you pick three top journalistic media personalities each of whom you believe has a strain of fairness, or the potential to have it awakened, and make it your personal mission to contact their offices with the idea of persuading them to give Ron Paul effective, honest, and critical coverage? No need for their flattery. No need for them to hide anything. Just give him coverage.
#514. To: buckeye, Peppa, Dakmar, lodwick, ALL (#504)
(buckeye) I think Ron Paul's campaign (and we independently) need to show that there are simple, if not a little difficult, steps to take to change the country for the better that will not be done under any other candidacy.
1. Show the people that the "media-backed rebels" are false. 2. Show the people that Ron Paul has a non-revolutionary set of changes that are positive, and that he's honest.
I don't know what else to do, but this should help.
that was the other insight I had last week you didn't buy my first insight that there is an ocean of support for Ron Paul out there the second inisght is Ron Paul is the only candidate who cannot be bought off this is crucial, because it is the one thing needed
it is important what you say about Ron Paul's honesty
I personally don't think it is possible to show anyone anything I am going by my own experience on this I was unwilling to be shown anything by anyone I had to be willing to see it on my own but once I was willing to see truth, it jumped out at me, it couldn't be missed
Caucusing at malls and berms isn't everyone's idea of a good time, I get it. Have you given any thought to helping with letter writing campaign?
"Most of the trouble in this world has been caused by folks who can't mind their own business, because they have no business of their own to mind, any more than a smallpox virus has." - William S Burroughs
I personally don't think it is possible to show anyone anything
Of course it is! But keep in mind that the SHOWING is done via the media, to a large extent. This is why we need to keep a very strong focus on encouraging them to cover the story of the century.
This video beats around the bush, though. It should QUOTE Huckabee saying that he's not linked to the elites or the establishment, and then show that taxes are FOR the Establishment, and FOR elite agendas.
That vid is outstanding and heartbreaking. Whoever put it together did an excellent job. It does drag, so how can this be reassembled for max impact to match the attention span of voters. That's the question. I like a total picture of his record, but in snapshots rather than novel form. A few alternate versions of the same with added information.
I can almost see it in my mind with a Huck v Paul bullet to bullet montage (I hate that word). But the imagery behind it can carry the message farther than the words.
...I'm going to give you an assignment, if you are willing to accept. Why don't you pick three top journalistic media personalities each of whom you believe has a strain of fairness, or the potential to have it awakened, and make it your personal mission to contact their offices with the idea of persuading them to give Ron Paul effective, honest, and critical coverage? No need for their flattery. No need for them to hide anything. Just give him coverage.
I think you can do it.
Brit Hume is honest and fair I don't know if I can get his ear again, I bombarded him with emails last week when Ron Paul was excluded from the Fox GOP debate on January 6th Has Fox reversed that decision yet?
Altho in the midde of the bombardment of emails about this, I did say to him that he gives the best interviews of everyone and I would very much like him to interview Ron Paul
Brit Hume is the news director at Fox he is fair, he is honest
I don't know who else to write to, because so many of the others lost my trust during the clinton Impeachment Only Brit Hume held onto it
Of course I have not watched TV since I went on net in Jan 2000 I became addicted to posting on political forums maybe there are are new journalists around who are honest and trustworthy I'll start to watch TV again
Not that I know. They probably won't. And in any case, that's symptomatic of a larger set of issues. You're an articulate person with a lot of persuasive power. I think you can strike a chord in the conscience of one or more senior journalist/editors and persuade him/her to take strong action.
(Palo) I don't think it is possible to show anyone anything
(buckeye) Of course it is!
(Peppa) People will only see it when they are ready to wake up.
I agree with you Peppa People do what they want to do, if they want to see they will see, if they don't want to see they won't No one can deceive us, we can only deceive ourselves The truth is always out there to be seen if we put some other value ahead of truth, we will not see truth IMHO Love, Palo
People do what they want to do, if they want to see they will see, if they don't want to see they won't No one can deceive us, we can only deceive ourselves
The voters have to KNOW who Ron Paul is, first. Ads alone won't do it. The Internet alone won't do it.
I'm not being dark and gloomy, I'm problem-solving here. I'd rather talk details and situations, and plan effective action than dream.
(Palo) I personally don't think it is possible to show anyone anything
(buckeye) Of course it is! But keep in mind that the SHOWING is done via the media, to a large extent. This is why we need to keep a very strong focus on encouraging them to cover the story of the century
it's the story of the millennium but I don't think they will cover it
Big media, both Parties, and the military industrial complex are all in bed with each other The military industrial complex sets the foreign policy for our government now to serve their greed Ron Paul will change all that
I will think about this some more, but right now I don't see how big media will give Ron Paul a fair shake?
Glen Beck did a nice interview with Ron Paul on New Years Day and of course Brit Hume is a GREAT interviewer, I would love him to do an interview with Ron Paul. Brit is the best
Are you committed to the idea we can't win without big media I say we will win, no matter what big media does do or doesn't do Love, Palo
I will think about this some more, but right now I don't see how big media will give Ron Paul a fair shake?
As I've suggested, persuasive, enchanting, and sweet people like you should sign up to persuade them that they are being unfair and conspiratorial if they don't cover Ron Paul's story.
Are you committed to the idea we can't win without big media
Not at all. I'm an optimist, otherwise you would never have encountered me on these boards.
Caucusing at malls and berms isn't everyone's idea of a good time, I get it. Have you given any thought to helping with letter writing campaign?
Hi sweetheart I was a political activist in my early twenties I loved it I had a ball political activism is a lot of fun
I am sorry to be such a couch potato for Ron Paul now altho they do say when minds join for truth, nothing can stop it happening isn't that what we are doing on net together
I have Ron Paul bumper stickers front and back bumpers on both truck and 2nd hand car and I want a Ron Paul yardsign but haven't figured out how to get one
the election season has just begun maybe I will be more activist I hope so Love, Palo