[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

16 Things That Everyone Needs To Know About Violent Far-Left Revolution In Los Angeles

Undercover video in Arizona alleges ongoing consumer fraud by Fairlife

Dozens arrested after San Francisco protest turns violent Sunday

Looking for the toughest badasses in the city (Los Angeles)

Democrat Civil War Explodes: DNC Chair Threatens to Quit Over David Hogg

Invaders waving Mexican flags, pour onto the 101 Freeway in Los Angeles

Australian Fake News Journo Hit By Rubber Bullet In L.A. Riot

22-year-old dies after being unable to afford asthma inhaler

North Korean Bulsae-4 Long-Range ATGM Spotted Again In Russian Operation Zone

Alexander Dugin: A real Maidan has begun in Los Angeles

State Department Weighing $500 Million Grant to Controversial Gaza Aid Group: Report

LA Mayor Karen Bass ordered LAPD to stand down, blocked aid to federal officers during riots.

Russia Has a Titanium Submarine That Can ‘Deep Dive’ 19,700 Feet

Shocking scene as DC preps for Tr*mp's military birthday parade.

Earth is being Pulled Apart by Crazy Space Weather! Volcanoes go NUTS as Plasma RUNS OUT

Gavin, feel free to use this as a campaign ad in 2028.

US To Formalize Military Presence in Syria in Deal With al-Qaeda-Linked Govt

GOP Rep Introduces Resolution Labeling Free Palestine Slogan as Anti-Semitism

Two-thirds of troops who left the military in 2023 were at risk for mental health conditions

UK and France abandon plans to recognise Palestinian state at conference

Kamala Backs LA Protests After Rioters Attack Federal Officers

Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox partners move ahead with Knesset dissolution plan

Former Prime Minister of Ukraine: Zelensky will leave the country

Man protesting Paramount ICE raid added to FBI's Most Wanted

JUAN O SAVIN- The Plan to Capture America

US Manufacturing By State: Who Gains Most From 'Made In America'?

Rickards: The Truth About Fort Knox And Gold Leasing

Los Angeles Warzone: "Insurrectionist Mobs" Attack Cops, Set Fires, Block 101 Freeway

The Attack on the USS Liberty (June 8, 1967) - Speech by Survivor Phillip Tourney At the Revisionist History of War Conference (Video)

‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over This’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities,


History
See other History Articles

Title: Auschwitz - The Final Count
Source: Rense.com
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general62/aauc.htm
Published: Jun 17, 2005
Author: Michale Collins Piper
Post Date: 2005-06-17 21:30:29 by Zoroaster
Keywords: Auschwitz, Final, Count
Views: 125
Comments: 27

Auschwitz - The Final Count By Michael Collins Piper Barnes http://Review.org 1-21-5

A thought-provoking new anthology edited by English historian Vivian Bird casts stark new light on what really happened at Auschwitz during World War II. As the evidence shows, the official "facts" just don't add up.

In the summer of 1997 I was invited to speak at a California college seminar about my book, Final Judgment, which contends that Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, played a front-line role in the JFK assassination conspiracy alongside the CIA. Almost instantaneously I was hit by a media barrage orchestrated by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, a lobby for Israel.

The ADL told the press I was "a Holocaust denier" and, for that reason alone, I should not be allowed to discuss my book (which, incidentally, never once mentions the Holocaust). Evidently the ADL was determined to shift the focus away from what my book really does address, so they determined the best way to discredit me was to smear me as "a Holocaust denier" (which I am not).

The ADL's tactic succeeded, setting off a firestorm of opposition-a "holocaust," so to speak-and the seminar was canceled, illustrating one point most clearly: The Holocaust has become a powerful propaganda tool for the state of Israel.

And what is important to remember is this: What did-or did not-happen at the Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland is, in fact, integral to the foundation of the basic story of the Holocaust.

Auschwitz is central to the Holocaust legend. If it can be proved that the official stories we have been told about Auschwitz are not true, the entire fabric of the Holocaust ultimately has to unravel. What, then, did happen at Auschwitz?

On April 18, 1945, in the immediate aftermath of World War II, The New York Times reported that 4 million people died at Auschwitz. This "fact" was reported over and over again during the next half-century, without being questioned.

However, on January 26, 1995, commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation, both The Washington Post and The New York Times itself reported that the Polish authorities had determined that, at most, 1.5 million people (of all races and religions)-not "4 million"-died at Auschwitz of all causes, including natural causes.

Yet this was not the first time this drastically reduced figure appeared in the major media. Almost five years previously, on July 17, 1990, The Washington Times reprinted a brief article from The London Daily Telegraph. That article stated:

Poland has cut its estimate of the number of people killed by the Nazis in the Auschwitz death camp from 4 million to just over 1 million . . . The new study could rekindle the controversy over the scale of Hitler's "final solution" . . .

Franciszek Piper, director of the historical committee of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, said yesterday that, according to recent research, at least 1.3 million people were deported to the camp, of whom about 223,000 survived.

The 1.1 million victims included 960,000 Jews, between 70,000 and 75,000 Poles, nearly all of the 23,000 Gypsies sent to the camp and 15,000 Soviet prisoners of war.

Shmuel Krakowsky, head of research at Israel's Yad Vashem memorial for Jewish victims of the Holocaust, said the new Polish figures were correct: "The 4 million figure was let slip by Capt. Rudolf Hoess, the death camp's Nazi commander. Some have bought it, but it was exaggerated." . . . [P]laques commemorating the deaths of 4 million victims were removed from the Auschwitz museum earlier this month.

This detail of history was intriguing, since, after all, history books had said for a generation that of the 6 million Jews who died during the Holocaust, 4 million died at Auschwitz alone. Thus, if the new facts were correct, the actual overall number of Jewish Holocaust victims had to be considerably less than the much-talked-about figure of 6 million. Put simply: subtract the former 4 million Jews dead at Auschwitz from the popular 6 million, and that leaves 2 million Jews dead. Simple math-and a controversial conclusion indeed.

More recently, Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, jumped into the debate over Auschwitz. On September 8, 1998, The Washington Post published an article by Reich in which he addressed Jewish outrage over a group of elderly Polish nuns who wanted to place crosses in memory of Christians who died at Auschwitz. Reich was responding to what he described as a "well-meaning" August 31, 1998 editorial in The Post about the affair.

Reich commented that the editorial "illustrates how old fictions about Auschwitz have been accepted as facts-fictions that have been used repeatedly to distort the camp's history." Evidently, the Post had forgotten its own report on the Auschwitz numbers that it had published three years previously and chose, instead, to repeat "old fictions . . . accepted as facts." What, then, were those "old fictions . . . accepted as facts"? Here's what Reich had to say:

The Post identified Auschwitz-Birkenau as the death camp "where 3 million Jews and millions of others were murdered by the Nazis." Recent scholarship by a Polish historian has put the number of deaths there conservatively at about 1.1 million, with other estimates ranging to about 1.5 million. Approximately 90 percent of the dead were Jews.

The Post's numbers may have been derived in part from the inflated estimate-originally of Soviet origin and endorsed by Polish authorities after the war-of about 4 million dead. This number, and other numbers of similar magnitude, were repeated so often that they came to be accepted by many as true, even though historians in Poland and elsewhere have revised this number down considerably.

Honest people find no problem with Reich's call (in the essay) for "only words of accurate history" in reportage about Auschwitz. Today, a major first step toward "only words of accurate history" is the release of a new anthology on Auschwitz, assembled by English writer Vivian Bird.

Auschwitz: The Final Count examines the "new" reports in the mainstream media (outlined above) and provides essential additional facts that must be considered in order for the full story of Auschwitz to finally be told. Bird's 109-page book is a compendium (supplemented with commentary by Bird) of four complete, previously published works relating to Auschwitz and the Holocaust.

The book features a fascinating introduction by Bird exploring the little-known but thoroughly documented phenomenon in which the numbers of the official Auschwitz "death toll" have plummeted from a "high" of 9,000,000 dead to a rock bottom of 73,137 (of whom 38,031 were Jews). And readers will note that of the 26 widely varying figures cited by Bird, all come from a variety of "responsible" and mainstream sources. No figure Bird cites comes from any source accused of "denying the Holocaust," whatever that means.

Clearly, the number of people who died at Auschwitz is central to understanding what did happen there. But the figures keep changing. If Bird's book proves anything, it proves that.

However, there's much more to Auschwitz than the changing numbers. The essays in Bird's volume each provide a uniquely different facet to the overall problem:

* The Auschwitz Lie by Thies Christophersen is an insider's view of Auschwitz. The German author, an agrarian, was sent to Auschwitz, not as an inmate, but as a scientist researching the development of synthetic rubber. Working side by side with inmate staff, Christophersen saw, firsthand, day-to-day life at Auschwitz and, in postwar years, was astounded to hear the stories of "gassings" and all the tall tales that we today associate with Auschwitz.

His essay, The Auschwitz Lie, first published in German in 1973, caused great consternation. However, Christophersen would not back down, and, as a consequence, he was variously fined or imprisoned for daring to tell his eyewitness account. Those accustomed to "docu-drama" renditions of Auschwitz will find a new perspective in Christophersen's report.

* Zyklon B, Auschwitz, and the Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch is the second feature in Bird's anthology. Written by a veteran chemist, the late Dr. William Lindsey, this is a carefully documented demolition of the war crimes trial of Dr. Tesch, who was ultimately convicted and hanged. The unfortunate Tesch was co-owner of a company which bought in bulk (from the manufacturers) and then supplied (as the middleman) to the German concentration camp authorities the now-infamous Zyklon B pesticide.

Although we have been told Zyklon B was used to gas millions of Jews to death, Lindsey shows that the compound was used as an insecticide and disinfectant to delouse not only the Auschwitz inmates but also SS members running the camp and to fumigate their clothes, bunkhouses etc. Zyklon B, in short, was used to maintain and sustain human life-not to end it. Lindsey's essay examines the fraudulent evidence and testimony in the Tesch trial and eviscerates another critical element of not only the Auschwitz legend, but of the Holocaust story as a whole.

* Inside the Auschwitz "Gas Chambers" is by Fred A. Leuchter, a spunky American engineer once known as perhaps the foremost U.S. authority on the mechanics of judicial execution. Leuchter describes how he conducted scientific experiments on the structures at Auschwitz that court historians say were used to exterminate vast numbers of people-the infamous gas chambers. Leuchter concluded no such gassings could have ever taken place as the official story describes. For daring to present his findings-the only known such study carried out at the gas chambers-Leuchter was relentlessly harassed. But his point was made. His findings cut right to the core of the matter of Auschwitz.

* The final essay is Why Is "The Holocaust" Important? written by TBR publisher Willis A. Carto, who points out that the Holocaust has become a lucrative industry unto itself, used as a highly effective political tool to not only extort billions of German and American taxpayer dollars to Israel but also to force the United States to conduct its foreign policy in a fashion beneficial to Tel Aviv (and contrary to U.S. national interests). Carto's essay puts the Holocaust in perspective.

Thus, there's clearly much more to the story of Auschwitz and the Holocaust than meets the eye. The facts assembled paint a perhaps much more interesting story about what really did happen.

Bird's book will, in many ways, very much serve as the final judgment on Auschwitz. Auschwitz: The Final Count will outrage many-but as Bird puts it: "For those who care to investigate the facts-not the myths-about the events of World War II, this volume should put at least some of the major legends of the Holocaust to rest."

Michael Collins Piper is the author of Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy and Best Witness. He is a keen student of historical intrigue and hidden political motivations.


Poster Comment:

Since the fall of Communism the gap between Holocaust fact and fiction has narrowed considerably, the death toll of 4-million Jews at Auschwitz has now reached a rock-bottom figure 0f 38,031.

In 1946 the Swiss Red Cross estimated between .5 million and 1.5 million Jews perished in Nazi held territory during World War Two. Subtract 4-million from 6-million and the Swiss estimate seems plausible.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Zoroaster (#0)

The book features a fascinating introduction by Bird exploring the little-known but thoroughly documented phenomenon in which the numbers of the official Auschwitz "death toll" have plummeted from a "high" of 9,000,000 dead to a rock bottom of 73,137 (of whom 38,031 were Jews). And readers will note that of the 26 widely varying figures cited by Bird, all come from a variety of "responsible" and mainstream sources. No figure Bird cites comes from any source accused of "denying the Holocaust," whatever that means.

According to some "Jews" the count is over 6 billion now and they are still not finished counting, 6 trillion is not out of the question.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2005-06-17   21:57:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Very interesting. I could never figure out why the number went from two million Jews/six million total (in the 1970s when I read everything I could about the subject and then those books mysteriously disappeared) to 6 million Jews and zero others. When I asked that question quite innocently on another forum I was new to, I was immediately attacked and cited quite inflated numbers (something like 9 - 12 million Jews and oh, yes, maybe a few thousand 'others'). I didn't realize at the time there are 'plants' on different sites who spit out unwarranted stats.

People died, yes, but it wasn't only one religious/ethnic/racial group. How many more people did Stalin kill? I've heard anywhere from 20 - 60 million. That includes some of my relatives.

rattler  posted on  2005-06-17   22:15:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: RickyJ (#1)

Watching the History Channel one would think untold millions of Jews perished at the hands of the Nazis. Nazis weren't the only losers in World War Two, it was a victory for world Jewry over white folks everywhere. Jews are running the show, gaining more power everyday.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2005-06-17   22:18:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Zoroaster (#0)

There was a good article in the LA Times around 1996 or 1997. I recall that some chemist/historian had obtained a sample of wood from one of the alleged gas chambers. I think from Auschwitz, but I can't recall. His analysis showed that there was insufficient toxins in the wood to support the then current account of what had happened there.

The LA Times story was actually about how the person had been hounded and demonized for reporting this.

As I recall, the structure tha the wood came from was torn down shortly thereafter. This is what cinched it for me.

You'd have to have an archive membership to track this down because of the age. Maybe someone recalls the name of the researcher.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-06-17   22:25:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: rattler (#2)

How many more people did Stalin kill? I've heard anywhere from 20 - 60 million. That includes some of my relatives.

Same here as I have Ukranian and Hungarian Grandparents. I have a bone to pick with the commies.

Scary thing is, there is a Stalinist-Revisionist movement starting that claims that the officer purges and Ukranian famines were frauds and Stalin's Russia was peaches and cream. Never heard about anyone getting deported or jailed over saying such things though.

Guess some genocidal dictators are more equal than others.

"The more I see of life, the less I fear death" - Me.

Pissed Off Janitor  posted on  2005-06-17   22:26:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Michael Collins Piper was interviewed on WingTV today.

Here

christine  posted on  2005-06-17   22:34:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: crack monkey (#4)

I believe his name is Leuchter. Piper mentions him in the article. Before Leuchter made his findings at Auschwitz, he was one of the foremost researchers in the country. Since then he's been slandered by the Jews and hounded into oblivion.

He was also a witness for Ernst Zundel at the Canadian trial.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2005-06-17   22:35:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Pissed Off Janitor (#5)

Scary thing is, there is a Stalinist-Revisionist movement ...

Wow, where is that starting - here or overseas or both? I'm not surprised, since Hollywood and most media have never chosen to portray Stalin in a bad light though we get flooded with Hitler/Holocaust movies, etc. ad nauseum. 'Portray', heck, they won't even bring the discussion to the table!

The horrors my parents lived through, fleeing the Baltics, choosing Hitler or Stalin... but they got out in time. My father's family ended up in one of Hitler's camps for awhile. Better for them than going to Siberia though. My parents and grandparents thought they'd be returning but then FDR sold them out at Yalta.

rattler  posted on  2005-06-17   22:40:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: rattler (#8)

The horrors my parents lived through, fleeing the Baltics, choosing Hitler or Stalin....

I used to work with an old guy from Latvia who had lived under both Hitler and Stalin. He always claimed that Hitler wasn't so bad from the perspective of an ordinary person. Maybe not good, but survivable if you kept your head down and minded your business. He claimed that Stalin was much worse and touched all parts of their everyday lives.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-06-17   22:46:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: crack monkey (#9)

Wow, that sounds just like what my parents say! They were really young, but just old enough to be aware of what was going on. The thing is, as I'm sure you know - Stalin started 'purging' anyone who was educated, not just the "trouble-makers" that evil dictators usually murder right away. Since my grandparents and other relatives were doctors, nurses, engineers, so on, they were about to be shipped off in box cars to the labor/death camps. So, they "chose" Hitler.

rattler  posted on  2005-06-17   22:53:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: rattler (#8)

Wow, where is that starting - here or overseas or both?

Both , but mostly a little noise here and there on web pages. Most of them Russian history pages, that play up the Soviet era, setup on servers in the Russian Federation. Still, it's nothing like the Holocaust revisionist movement...yet. Maybe when Budapest '56 or the Ukranian famine becomes as well known events as Hitler's evil acts will we see moves to discredit these events too.

Right now, most people don't even know about them. Was I the only one that laughed when Putin, trying to smooth US/Russian relations, said on May 8th we should remember whose army(s) were at fault for starting WWII?

"The more I see of life, the less I fear death" - Me.

Pissed Off Janitor  posted on  2005-06-17   22:59:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Revisionism is nothing more than discovering the most accurate historical information possible. Nothing more. That this is punishable by prison in many nations should indicate to any thinking person that something is very wrong.
Ernst Zündel - The Man, His Deeds & His Writings

Holocaust Revisionism in One Easy Lesson

Remarkable Nonsense about the Holocaust

David Cole Interviews Dr. Franciszek Piper, Director, Auschwitz State Museum

The Kingdom of God is within you.

1776  posted on  2005-06-17   23:04:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Even if it was only a few thousand or a few tens of thousands, and even if those who perished did so out of enslavement and housing conditions they were forced into, the holocaust is still a great inhumanity. The facts should be allowed to be presented, tested and debated, but the tragedy is not only that those claiming 6 million are apparently making such defamitory claims against revisionists, but that revisionists fail to consider that even 10,000 perishing is a human tragedy. It is/was a tragedy regardless of the count. Revisionists would do well to underscore that in their presentations.

Pinguinite for Pinguins

Neil McIver  posted on  2005-06-17   23:08:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Neil McIver, zoroaster, Eoghan, Bayonne, Jethro Tull (#13)

It is/was a tragedy regardless of the count. Revisionists would do well to underscore that in their presentations.

Of the scholars who I have read almost without exception they all underscore that at some point in their presentations.

What revisionist scholars are doing is attempting to set the historical record straight. The loss of personal freedoms and personal monies in America and elsewhere can be traced back to this Holocaust mythology, it is a political weapon wielded against us. The ire of Americans should be not against revisionists but against those who told this outrageous lie for their group's personal benefit.

The Kingdom of God is within you.

1776  posted on  2005-06-17   23:15:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: 1776 (#14)

Of the scholars who I have read almost without exception they all underscore that at some point in their presentations.

What revisionist scholars are doing is attempting to set the historical record straight.

That's a good thing.

Yes the record should be straight or set straight. People are funny sometimes in the way they cling to a teaching which they consider blasphemy to ever question, even in a completely secular context. Those ADL'ers are probably more religious than they think, and for the wrong reasons.

Pinguinite for Pinguins

Neil McIver  posted on  2005-06-17   23:23:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Neil McIver (#15)

People are funny sometimes in the way they cling to a teaching which they consider blasphemy to ever question,

That is an astute insight, it is in fact more a "religion" than anything else.

The Kingdom of God is within you.

1776  posted on  2005-06-17   23:26:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Neil McIver (#13)

Agreed, the Nazis should have gone after hard-core Zionist, not decent Jews. Instead the Nazis worked with the Zionists in the early stages of the war to get Jews into what was then Palestine.

Hitler's grandfather may have been Jewish. It's a mystery that in all probability will never be proved one way or the other. I sometimes wonder if the ghost of Hitler's grandfather didn't play a role in Hitler's great strategic blunders of World War Two, blunders that ensured Germany's defeat.

Without Hitler, modern-day Israel would not exist.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2005-06-17   23:29:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Neil McIver (#13)

revisionists fail to consider that even 10,000 perishing is a human tragedy

That's a blanket-condemnation. How do you know that they "fail to consider" ?

Bub  posted on  2005-06-18   15:29:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Neil McIver (#13)

but the tragedy is not only that those claiming 6 million are apparently making such defamitory claims against revisionists, but that revisionists fail to consider that even 10,000 perishing is a human tragedy. It is/was a tragedy regardless of the count. Revisionists would do well to underscore that in their presentations.

Commonsense is a great indicator of intellect. You are one of the few.

Don  posted on  2005-06-18   19:12:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Bub (#18)

but the tragedy is not only that those claiming 6 million are apparently making such defamitory claims against revisionists, but that revisionists fail to consider that even 10,000 perishing is a human tragedy.

I suppose both statements against both sides are blanket statements. I should have inserted the word "some" in a couple places. By no means is the either statement against either side universally true.

Pinguinite for Pinguins

Neil McIver  posted on  2005-06-18   22:44:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Neil McIver, christine (#20)

Proponents of the Holocaust industry, clearly, are now and have been lying about the Six Million number. It is bullshit. I, therefore, characterize them as exaggerationists.

Now (and as you qualify above) "some" revisionists fail to consider that even 10,000 perishing is a human tragedy. I understand that. Don't agree with it nor the premise thereof, but I understand it. I do not, however, agree that "revisionists" is the proper/appropriate term for those you strive to descirbe. Truth cannot be revised. In the context of the WWII Holocuast, "revisionists" are realists--they seek that which is accurate--the truth. That is not revisionism. Perhaps being overly semantic and picky, I cannot consider correting a lie "revisionism".

In any case, the larger offense is that of the exaggerationists using this human tragedy for rank political and propaganda purposes.

If you love America, you'll hate Israel.

wbales  posted on  2005-06-19   20:58:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: christine, Zipporah, Zoroaster (#21)

Hey. I'm going to start focusing on another (and long ignored) WWII Holocaust- -[...2) a thorough destruction involving loss of life...]--that's right--the long, long forgotten and incredibly neglected Hiroshima/Nagasaki Holocaust (TM -- pending) -- every bit as cruel and mean as what Hitler did to the Jews.

"The Diary of Annshi Frankshoi" coming soon to a nearby theater.

If you love America, you'll hate Israel.

wbales  posted on  2005-06-19   22:16:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: wbales (#22)

How many people were killed at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? I dont believe I've ever read how many were killed..

Candles in the Rain

Zipporah  posted on  2005-06-19   22:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Zipporah (#23)

My Cambridge Encyclopedia says 75,000 were killed or wounded at Nsgasaki by the second atomic bomb of World War Two. The atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima killed or wounded 150,000. More German refugees may have been killed or wounded in Churchills' fire-bombing of Dresden in February '45, estimates vary, some go as high as 500,000 Germans.

Churchill, IMO, was a bigger bastard than Hitler.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2005-06-19   23:08:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Zipporah, Zoroaster (#23)

...

In Hiroshima, of a resident civilian population of 250 000 it was estimated that 45 000 died on the first day and a further 19 000 during the subsequent four months. In Nagasaki, out of a population of 174 000, 22 000 died on the first day and another 17 000 within four months. Unrecorded deaths of military personnel and foreign workers may have added considerably to these figures.

It is impossible to estimate the proportion of these 103 000 deaths, or of the further deaths in military personnel, which were due to radiation exposure rather than to the very high temperatures and blast pressures caused by the explosions.

...

http://www.uic.com.au/nip29.htm

Or, using Jewish math, 3 million.

If you love America, you'll hate Israel.

wbales  posted on  2005-06-19   23:13:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Zipporah, Zoroaster, christine (#23)

OK. The number of deaths at Nagasaki and Hiroshima just don't seem to "pop" into one's mind like a certain other number (Hint: it's between 5,999,999 and 6,000,001). Similarly neglected is this number: ask ANY American: How many AMERICANS died in WWII??? Well, heck, no--VERY FEW--American(s) knows....but that other number...what that about Pavlov dogs??

As an aside and for some reason, I feel compelled to put on some ZZ Top.

If you love America, you'll hate Israel.

wbales  posted on  2005-06-19   23:22:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Zoroaster (#24)

Dresden -- there's another Holocaust that doesn't get much press.

If you love America, you'll hate Israel.

wbales  posted on  2005-06-19   23:26:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]