[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Lawyer who beat IRS sues agents
Source: http://policestateusa.net/
URL Source: http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59515
Published: Jan 6, 2008
Author: WND
Post Date: 2008-01-06 06:26:44 by PSUSA
Ping List: *Jack-Booted Thugs*     Subscribe to *Jack-Booted Thugs*
Keywords: None
Views: 129
Comments: 3

A lawyer who was acquitted by a federal court trial jury of Internal Revenue Service accusations he failed to filed income tax returns for two years now is suing several IRS agents over their alleged improper disclosure of his personal information in the case.

A spokeswoman in the office of lawyer Tom Cryer told WND the case was assembled and filed by Cryer between Christmas Day and the end of 2007 and is expected to be placed on the docket in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

Last summer in federal court a jury voted 12-0 to find Cryer, of Shreveport, not guilty of the IRS allegations. He had been indicted on 2006 on government claims he failed to pay $73,000 to the IRS in 2000 and 2001.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Embedded links in article. Subscribe to *Jack-Booted Thugs*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#2. To: PSUSA (#0)

I attended that trial. Tom Cryer doesn't recommend that anyone not pay taxes because the risk of conviction is too great. He said the judge was better than most. Nevertheless, what I witnessed was the judge assisting the prosecution in every way possible including turning over Tom Cryer's and his attorney's notes to the prosecution. The rules state that is privilidged but judges can ignore the rules. That is wrong; it is just the way it is. That allowed the prosecution to avoid traps Tom and his attorney had set.

I don't consider it a trial by jury because so much of the trial the jury is not allow to see. The prosecution can introduce anything or witness they desire; however, the defense was prevent from calling witnesses and was very limited in their testamony. The judge was determined that the jury not learn anything about the law including what Tom Cryer thinks the law in, even though that is permitted by a supreme court ruling.

It appeared that somehow one informed person was on the juror and he must of informed the other jurors.

DWornock  posted on  2008-01-06   8:00:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: DWornock, PSUSA, all, *CAFR* (#2)

Tom Cryer doesn't recommend that anyone not pay taxes because the risk of conviction is too great.

Absolutely good advice. This is particularly important because attorney Cryer owes the tax, and I suspect that he now knows this. As do most others. But in particular, all attorneys owe the tax because of the privileges of their status and lic.

don't consider it a trial by jury

It is not a trial by jury, per se. The jury in any 'court room' wherein flies the United States Commander-in-Chief flag (gold fringe mounting an eagle on the top), is simply an advisory panel; to the judge, who renders his decision through jury instructions. There have been many instantances where judges have thrown out jury decisions and rendered a new decision 'based on the evidence.'

If you truly wish to understand, I suggest that you look up tribunal in a legal dictionary, and you will find a comprehensive discritption of a present day 'court room' under Roman law.

The judge was determined that the jury not learn anything about the law

The judge was determined that the jury not learn anything about the actual bases of the income tax, which is, and always has been, contractual in nature.

This is also why this case, as in the case of ANY decision that goes against what is required to keep the system intact, will never be published, and can NEVER be used/quoted in another case. I posted a through discussion/breakdown about unpublished cases, written by a very informed legal teacher/attorney some time ago.

richard9151  posted on  2008-01-06   11:39:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

        There are no replies to Comment # 3.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]