[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: ChipIn: RECOUNT $$$ (Who are these folks?) From the looks of this if Dr. Paul is found to be entitled to another delegate the funds will be returned which means this will have cost us nothing. Your donations will be returned. Won't that be great? We only have a week to get this done so spread this chip in to all of your associates, groups and family. New Hampshire Election Statutes State or Presidential Primary Recounts 660:7 Application. Any person for whom a vote was cast for any nomination of any party at a state or presidential primary may apply for a recount. The application shall be made in writing to the secretary of state and shall be submitted no later than the Friday after the primary for a recount of all ballots cast for such nomination. Each candidate requesting a recount shall pay the secretary of state fees as provided in RSA 660:2. 660:8 Notice of Conduct. Notice shall be given and the recount shall be conducted as provided for in RSA 660:4 and 660:5. 660:9 Declaration of Result, State Primary. If the recount after a state primary election shall show that some candidate other than the one declared nominated upon the original canvass of votes has the greatest number of votes cast for the nomination, such candidate shall be declared nominated and shall be placed upon the official ballot at the following election unless appeal is taken to the ballot law commission in accordance with RSA 665:6, I, I. If the person who applied for the recount was thereby shown to be the one chosen as the candidate of the party, the person shall also have any fee paid returned. 660:9-a Declaration of Result, Presidential Primary. If the recount after a presidential primary election shall show that the applying candidate qualified under RSA 659:93 for at least one more delegate than the original count indicated or that such candidate did qualify for federal election funding, such candidate shall receive such funding or shall be apportioned delegates to the national party convention in accordance with RSA 659:93 unless appeal is taken to the ballot law commission in accordance with RSA 665:6, I. If the person who applied for the recount was thereby shown to be entitled to federal funding or at least one more delegate under RSA 659:93, the person shall also have any fee paid returned. today 12:56am 1199907045000 Recount With all the strange events going on in the primary and with solid statements of actual fraud in NH everyone is calling for a recount which should be take care of by the Campaign staff but that isn't going to happen it seems. Therefore... we the Grassroots will fund our own recount for Dr. Paul. Every cent will be put toward the recounting and we will just see if we can stir up enough attention to really get a good count now. Perhaps it will also give notice to other states not to mess with the counts. Lets get this done before it is too late and facts and figures can be altered. January 9 2:30pm Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#2. To: angle (#0)
Tomorrow? it would appear... RP should use some jack to get this done.
Damn right (he could apply a little of that $20 million for this cause). I apologize, lodwick, but Ron Paul needs to get off rear and assert himself. I still think my idea of NH Ron Paul voters independently sending thier names and county voted in to a RP representative in NH is a good idea. And, again, with about 70% of Americans opposed to the Zio Iraq War, how in the HELL did the war mongers McCain and Clinton get first place in New Hampshire? It does not compute.
I completely agree.
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|