See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Carl Cameron to Ron Paul: Are you "electable?" "Are you really a Republican?" Paul: Yes you stupid ass.
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 12, 2008
Author: Ron Paul
Post Date: 2008-01-12 17:17:31 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President 2008* Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
Keywords: None
Views: 2276
Comments: 188
Neo-cons are not Republicans. Ron Paul is a Republican. Ron Paul---Actual Republican
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 34.
#8. To: Gay Old Patroons (#0)
Actually Paul isn't a Republican given what has happened to the party over the past 20-30 years, so the question was somewhat appropriate. Why RP stays among that mix of gay internationalists is the real question.
Probably because if he wasn't running for their presidential nomination, he would not get a nano second of air time.
jasoncin The Daily Paul January 11th, 2008 We just go back from the straw poll in Scottsdale Arizona! The vote total was 515 votes. 414 went to Ron Paul 80%!! 64 for McCain 12%, 13 votes for Romney, Giuliani 7, Fred Thompson 6, Huckabee 1, and Hunter 3. My Husband, and I watched the ballot box all night. Suddenly, a group of McCain supporters took the box to count the votes without anyone noticing but us! My Husband John followed them. They went to a corner to count the votes and John jumped in to help count. They informed him that they did not need his help. He pushed his way into the group and let them know that he too would be assisting with the counting. They chose reluctantly not to argue! My husband is a cowboy and was not taking no for an answer. The pile of votes for Ron Paul was so high, that the pile kept falling over onto the John McCain pile. Of course no one was going to recount them but John. He had to keep grabing the McCain pile to separate all the Ron Paul votes from it! It was obvious that they did not intend for him to be there helping! Thank goodness he was there. We need to take matters into our own hands now and then. We had a huge room of Ron Paul supporters tonight. It was a wonderful crowd to be around. But with all of us there, no one else jumped in to assist with counting. This needs to be done at all futures straw polls. They are very sneaky! Ron could have lost a lot of votes tonight.
As is said in the stockyards, "It's coming down to cutting time." Either we clean it up now, or there will be blood in the streets. No one here is going to be frog-marched off to the camps.
The frog needs to be boiled until electronic ID cards are standard, all firearms have been registered, and more waves of unassimilated immigration have been completed. The economy will need to be wreaked, possibly more than one more time, as well. This should be happening in due time, but we're not there yet. Someone in the Ron Paul campaign now could still run for President later. Hopefully many of his followers will consider running for Congress, the Senate, and local posts as well. There is still hope.
As has been said, "As long as there's life, there's hope." And that keeps me going with what we're doing. The Fat Lady has not opened her yap, yet...
Now is the time to speak up with clarity, as you have. Later it will be against the law to say that the government is out of control.
Now is the time to speak up with clarity, as you have. Later it will be against the law to say that the government is out of control. lol it goes withut saying without Ron Paul in our Oval Office this time next year
Not necessarily. Also, putting Ron Paul in the White house does not ensure our freedom, either.
#43. To: buckeye (#34)
(buckeye) Not necessarily. Also, putting Ron Paul in the White house does not ensure our freedom, either. honey, I think it'll be police state if we don't get Ron Paul in our White House next year so I guess I stick with what I said altho fine you see it differently it will probably follow the course it is taking in UK also I notice they no longer can have political demonstrations in UK I don't want to alarm anyone because I know President Ron Paul will be in Office, and he will veto all these bills here
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#9. To: Jethro Tull (#8)
Why RP stays among that mix of gay internationalists is the real question.
#11. To: Critter (#9)
#14. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, thread (#11)
(Edited)
#17. To: noone222, everyone here (#14)
#19. To: lodwick (#17)
#21. To: buckeye (#19)
#22. To: lodwick (#21)
#32. To: buckeye, lodwick, ALL (#22)
(buckeye to lodwick)
freedom of speech in our country is dead
Fortunately President Ron Paul will be there
#34. To: palo verde (#32)
without Ron Paul in our Oval Office this time next year freedom of speech in our country is dead
Replies to Comment # 34. (Palo) without Ron Paul in our Oval Office this time next year, freedom of speech in our country is dead
and if we do, we are safe
that's what a forum is, each puts in their two cents
Love, Palo
I notice their posters can still say what they want on net
but their citizens are spied on everywhere
the new law just passed there is huge fine ($250) for talking on cellphone while driving, smoking a cig while driving,
or eating while driving
they have new technology which takes the pic, sends it instantly to cops
and bingo before you've gone ten more miles the cops have you
they also can take away your drivers license
plus cops are now licensed to shoot to kill for domesic violence or stalking
this is how it starts...
we are safe!
End Trace Mode for Comment # 34.