[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!


Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Carl Cameron to Ron Paul: Are you "electable?" "Are you really a Republican?" Paul: Yes you stupid ass.
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 12, 2008
Author: Ron Paul
Post Date: 2008-01-12 17:17:31 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President 2008*     Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
Keywords: None
Views: 2078
Comments: 188

Neo-cons are not Republicans. Ron Paul is a Republican.

Ron Paul---Actual Republican
Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-45) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#46. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#38)

If they find fraud I hope they trace it back to Hitlery and MacBrainless.

Obama supporters are contributing money for a recount too, of the Dem Primary there

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   19:20:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: palo verde (#43)
(Edited)

I think it'll be police state if we don't get Ron Paul in our White House next year and if we do, we are safe

I think we already have the strong beginnings of that with militarized and federally-coordinated local police forces — and the unconstitutional laws and EOs that have been imposed over the past six years.

I notice their posters can still say what they want on net [in the UK]

Not so. BNP activist Nick Griffin in the UK was charged with inciting hatred for speaking out against Islamics in the UK. The BBC caught him on video at a fairly private dinner making the remarks and he was dealing with the UK court system for a long time. If he had published those remarks online, the problem would have been magnified by the more public nature of his words.

Our situation is already becoming similar to the UK's in that respect because it is so risky to speak out about politically incorrect issues now. With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.

buckeye  posted on  2008-01-12   19:23:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: palo verde (#46)

I didn't know that, got a link?

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2008-01-12   19:26:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Jethro Tull, Critter, TwentyTwelve, Peppa, FormerLurker, Wudidiz, all (#18)

When you can show me where pom poms and cheerleading can trump Diebolt machines I’ll be happy to join the squad.

The point isn't will "pom-poms and cheerleading" win out over "Diebold Delivers", but that it is making the point to an awful lot of people who heretofore did not take it seriously that "Diebold Delivers".

This is forcing the hand of the election rigging Plutocrats and their minions and is rubbing peoples' noses in the FACT that the U.S. National (s)Elections are rigged from the get-go - from candidate (s)Election to installment in orofice. A lot of people being woken up to the fact that they have not been getting any lubricant.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   19:34:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#48)

Hi my sweet friend,
my friend Helen, forwarded me the email she got from her best friend Wendy, who I gather from email is Obama supporter
this is the email, deduce from it what you think?
Love, Palo

(Helen forwarded this to me

HI ANNIE THOUGHT YOU'D FIND THIS INTERESTINg

here is forwarded email from Wendy

Guys, I felt IMMEDIATELY that something was wrong with the disparity between all the polls, exit polls and actual numbers re: Obama and Clinton. This website, I hope it is this one, had about 100 posts from really smart people re: numbers and Diebold machines. I found out about this so called loss when I was out last night. Instantly I recalled two friends, Ken A. and Juan C. who lived with Dean in NH during THAT primary. Well, they both claimed that something was seriously askew back then. Apparently, nothing has changed. If you can read all the comments you'lll see that this isn't only pro-Obama people who find last nights' results crazy but all who care about voting rights. I beg you to read at this site. I just donated money, a little, for these guys to get to NH and dig. Because there is still time to make an internet inquiry, or rather for Internet bloggers to get to NH so that they can get the truth. They need to be very smart about how Diebold works, and who might have hacked it, the consensus is the Repugs and since you are the names on the top of my head, please pass this along to anyone who won't think we are conspiracy nuts, but are dealing with something quite obvious: That

in the entire process last night, all the polls were right EXCEPT the Obama Hillary poll which is fishy as hell. And how all the HAND counted votes tallied with polls but the majority of Diebold did not. If you are FOR hillary this is just as important if in a different way: if someone with a bias has control of the 81% of machines then there is no democratic election possible. Also, remember Iowa, where voting is more than open, you are seen as you vote in caucuses? Well, that came out according to polls. I personally cannot believe we still have Diebold machines at all. That's it. This isn't sour grapes, this was my absolute first and stunned thought. Wendy

Thought you might be interested in this article from The BRAD BLOG!

Check out 'NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama' at:

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530

so waddya think, Itisalmost too late
doesn't it sound like Obama supporters want recount ?
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   19:36:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: buckeye (#47)

(Palo) I notice UK posters can still say what they want on net

(buckey) Not so. BNP activist Nick Griffin in the UK was charged with inciting hatred for speaking out against Islamics in the UK. The BBC caught him on video at a fairly private dinner making the remarks and he was dealing with the UK court system for a long time. If he had published those remarks online, the problem would have been magnified by the more public nature of his words.

Our situation is already becoming similar to the UK's in that respect because it is so risky to speak out about politically incorrect issues now. With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.

you are awesome
I thank you from the bottom of my heart for this great post
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   19:39:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: buckeye, Palo Verde (#47)

With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.

With that in place we need a test case because in an honest court, if we can find one, that law is so patently unconstitutional that it is sickening.

After it is thrown out she should be Horse Whipped, and then put naked in Stocks in the Public Square - in the middle of winter for her lascivious assault upon Lady Liberty.

And you can bet that one of the prime targets of that law WAS, without a doubt, forums such as this and alternative talk radio such as Alex Jones.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   19:39:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: palo verde (#51)

I thank you from the bottom of my heart for this great post

You are a remarkable woman. I know you understand that I do not agree with Nick Griffin in total, but rather I speak up for his right to say what he believes, even if he hates others. The right to speak up and warn one another of threats, cultural, political, legal, and so forth — is essential for liberty to be protected.. HR 1955 makes it illegal to say that the government is no longer legally viable, because that implies that force would be required to make it accountable again.

If I do not defend Nick Griffin, who will defend me? Who will defend you?

I thank you, Palo. You are a brave person, if you are all that you say you are.

buckeye  posted on  2008-01-12   19:44:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Original_Intent (#49)

but that it is making the point to an awful lot of people who heretofore did not take it seriously that "Diebold Delivers".

To that end, RP has moved the ball down the field. The more people realize that the Elite would never risk their Empire via an honest election the better.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-01-12   19:46:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Original_Intent, buckeye, ALL (#52)

(buckeye) With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed,
it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right,
discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.

(Original Intent) With that in place we need a test case because in an honest court, if we can find one,
that law is so patently unconstitutional that it is sickening.

After it is thrown out she should be Horse Whipped, and then put naked in Stocks in the Public Square - in the middle of winter for her lascivious assault upon Lady Liberty.

O buckeye, I cry reading that, because you are right
what you say is true

Orignal Intent, thank you for your response to it
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   19:47:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Original_Intent (#52)

With that in place we need a test case because in an honest court, if we can find one, that law is so patently unconstitutional that it is sickening.

If my reading of this law is correct, and with AE 911 being cited as being among 'violent' groups, it could happen to any of 4's more vocal pundits.

buckeye  posted on  2008-01-12   19:48:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Original_Intent, buckeye, ALL (#52)

(buckeye) With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed,
it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right,
discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.

(Original Intent) With that in place we need a test case because in an honest court, if we can find one,
that law is so patently unconstitutional that it is sickening.

between you boys you have stated the whole truth
thank you
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   19:50:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Jethro Tull (#54)

To that end, RP has moved the ball down the field. The more people realize that the Elite would never risk their Empire via an honest election the better.

Exactly. By building enough steam, and enough of an organization, he has forced them virtually out into the open to where the election stealing operations are in nearly plain view.

The faster people realize that the government they have is not one of their choosing, and that it is run by a criminal elite, the better the chance we have of heading off the complete tyranny that they are rushing full speed ahead up our collective, uh, umm, streets. Yeah, that's what I meant "Streets".

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   19:51:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: palo verde (#43)

the new law just passed there is huge fine ($250) for talking on cellphone while driving, smoking a cig while driving, or eating while driving

What about changing your pants while driving? Is that still allowed?

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2008-01-12   19:51:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Original_Intent (#58)

I also appreciate you for speaking up about this before it passes. I don't agree with all the "truther" conclusions, but I respect their right to pursue, publish, and defend any material they believe is useful to the public. Anyone who objects to that quest is on par with the persecutors of Galileo.

buckeye  posted on  2008-01-12   19:53:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: palo verde (#55)

You are welcome Palo. I try to keep as upbeat as I can even though I can see the nightfall darkening our horizon.

I pray that enough people are woken up to forestall the 1984 tyranny that Bush and his Masters have planned for us. Even so I fear many many people are going to die horrible deaths before this is through.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   19:53:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Jethro Tull (#54)

The more people realize that the Elite would never risk their Empire via an honest election the better.

Most people are unaware of the elite and their empire.

Live free or die.

angle  posted on  2008-01-12   19:55:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: buckeye (#56)

If my reading of this law is correct, and with AE 911 being cited as being among 'violent' groups, it could happen to any of 4's more vocal pundits.

No doubt our criminal elite wants to institute such. However, more likely they will use it as a pretext to simply shut down political forums such as this, and then go after the more active among us.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   19:56:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: buckeye (#53)

I know you understand that I do not agree with Nick Griffin in total,
but rather I speak up for his right to say what he believes,
even if he hates others.

The right to speak up and warn one another of threats, cultural, political, legal, and so forth —
is essential for liberty to be protected..

HR 1955 makes it illegal to say that the government is no longer legally viable, because that implies that force would be required to make it accountable again.

If I do not defend Nick Griffin, who will defend me? Who will defend you?

I agree with you, good post, your are right
I hate no one, I love everyone, Muslims, Mexicans, Arabs, Israelis, Chinese, ALL
but sure if someone wants to shoot their mouth off, big deal

I love freedom of speech for all
I am doing all this to elect Ron Paul our Prez in '09 so our Bill of Rights and Constitution will be saved

Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   19:56:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#59)

What about changing your pants while driving? Is that still allowed?

What about changing your mind? What if one day you agree with your government, and the next, for whatever reason, you don't? What if you believe so deeply that the government is wrong that you say that force may be required to bring it around to the proper direction. That's all you do is say that. Should changing your mind from agreeable citizen to vociferously aggressive opponent of the government be allowed?

buckeye  posted on  2008-01-12   19:57:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: angle (#62)

The more people realize that the Elite would never risk their Empire via an honest election the better.

Most people are unaware of the elite and their empire.

Which is why it is up to us to alert them.

Talk to those who will listen. Have a note card if you need it to keep the points simple.

Those who won't listen after a reasonable presentation ignore and move on. Some people are such cowards that they will not look - even though the reality is that their fate will be much worse if the darkness is allowed to take open and unfettered rule.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   20:00:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Jethro Tull (#18)

Win, lose, draw, or swindled out of it, we don't lose anything by getting ideas out on the big stage. I bet this campaign has added a million new freedom lovers to the fold. If nothing else, that may be another million militias of one.

Tag Line For Rent    (M, 48, NY)

Critter  posted on  2008-01-12   20:02:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Original_Intent (#66)

From the Middle French revolution 14th Century...

2 a: a sudden, radical, or complete change b: a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed c: activity or movement designed to effect fundamental changes in the socioeconomic situation

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-12   20:04:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Critter (#67)

Accepting defeat is easy.

People forget that Perot had 20 million voters, Americans, that wanted redress.

To me to see another affirmation of say 30 million is a plus not a negative.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-12   20:07:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Cynicom (#69)

To me to see another affirmation of say 30 million is a plus not a negative

A huge plus.

Tag Line For Rent    (M, 48, NY)

Critter  posted on  2008-01-12   20:08:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Cynicom (#68)

From the Middle French revolution 14th Century...

2 a: a sudden, radical, or complete change b: a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed c: activity or movement designed to effect fundamental changes in the socioeconomic situation

That is basically what we have had - a slow revolution and hostile takeover by a monied elite.

In order to reclaim our freedom it may well take a revolution against the cabal which has subverted and stolen our government and our country. I am hoping that it will be a relatively bloodless one but fear it will not be. At this late hour the criminals are in essentially full control of the FedGov and many of the State Governments.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   20:11:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Critter (#70)

Critter...

It almost seems to me that some people not only want Paul not to be president, they are trying their best in subtle terms to keep Americans from having a choice.

That is perverse thinking and rather transparent.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-12   20:13:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Original_Intent (#49)

The point isn't will "pom-poms and cheerleading" win out over "Diebold Delivers", but that it is making the point to an awful lot of people who heretofore did not take it seriously that "Diebold Delivers".

This is forcing the hand of the election rigging Plutocrats and their minions and is rubbing peoples' noses in the FACT that the U.S. National (s)Elections are rigged from the get-go - from candidate (s)Election to installment in orofice. A lot of people being woken up to the fact that they have not been getting any lubricant.

Exactly.

Decades of corruption can not be undone in one election cycle.

Decades of dumbing down, can not be corrected in one election cycle.

Decades of divide and conquer politics, can be corrected when people wake up en masse.

It's toward that point, we are heading.

Whether it's survivable or not, who knows.

Peppa  posted on  2008-01-12   20:21:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: buckeye, Original_Dissent, ghostdogtxn, aristeides, robin (#56)

If my reading of this law is correct, and with AE 911 being cited as being among 'violent' groups, it could happen to any of 4's more vocal pundits.

Perhaps - but I suspect that the gubment will use its new found powers per HR 1955 to go after more obvious unsympathetic targets like Storm Front and as we have just learned, 9/11 truther sites. ( ???) After the better known sites are taken down, then the gubment does not need to do anything more - the small political discussion websites will just fold spontaneously due to fear. Mission accomplished!

What I am surprised about is that talk radio has not been more alarmed about H.R. 1955 - the talk jocks make $ by stirring up the pot and regularly saying provocative things and some - like Savage and Beck - say edgey suggestions that can be construed as fomenting physical action - CAIR is probably waiting with bated breath to report Savage and Beck. FR has questionable posts ( under 1955 guidelines) on a regular basis as does LitGrnFtballs etc. Kossacks get very animated and effusive in their criticism of fedgov. Do any of you who post to other forums recall if there's been any outcry against HR 1955?

scrapper2  posted on  2008-01-12   20:25:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: scrapper2 (#74)

Do any of you who post to other forums recall if there's been any outcry against HR 1955?

Ever so slight on TOS2. I've raised it to the highest decibel level I could without what I would have thought were spamming.

buckeye  posted on  2008-01-12   20:30:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Original_Intent, ALL (#61)

I try to keep as upbeat as I can even though I can see the nightfall darkening our horizon

Hi Original Intent
I had an epiphany after watching Ron Paul so intently in the South Carolina FOX debate two nights ago
I woke up the next morning and knew he would be our President
this has had a huge effect on me, because suddenly I am no longer worried about the dark coming
and I used to see the dark so clearly and be so worried about it
it's as if such a bright light went off in my mind, I don't see the dark now
I still participate in these conversations, because it reassures me everyone sees the dark so crystal clearly
but I guess I am 100 per cent optimistic now
Love, Palo

to use your superb image
I try to keep as upbeat as I can even though I can see the nightfall darkening our horizon

I no longer (as of yesterday) see the nightfall darkening our horizon
all is bright for me now...

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   20:31:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Peppa (#73)

Exactly.

Decades of corruption can not be undone in one election cycle.

Decades of dumbing down, can not be corrected in one election cycle.

Decades of divide and conquer politics, can be corrected when people wake up en masse.

It's toward that point, we are heading.

Whether it's survivable or not, who knows.

Data insufficient at this point but we actually have a fighting chance now thanks to the likes of Alex Jones, the often unfairly maligned Church of Scientology, Patriots across the country, Judicial Watch, and others who have been fighting the good fight.

That is why Home Schooling is under such attack - the kids are not robotized by the curriculum and are actually getting an education. That should tell folks something - when a High School Graduate Mom, or Dad, can turn out a better product than a Publik Skool Systum with 10 grand per student then there is a big giveaway as to what is actually going on in the Publik Skools.

Decades of divide and conquer politics, can be corrected when people wake up en masse.

Exactly. We all have much more in common than such trifling differences as to who our Grand Parents were or what color their skin was. Black, White, Red, and Yellow we all want that same priceless commodity - Freedom.

Now if only we can get at the dolts who listen to Rush, the Gay Pill Popping Pedophile, Scumbaugh and post at Gulag Republik to remove their craniums from the rectal cavities.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   20:32:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: palo verde (#76)

I no longer (as of yesterday) see the nightfall darkening our horizon all is bright for me now...

That's because we have a lot of people lighting candles - and more joining them everyday.

I am hoping that the whole fetid mess in the District of Corruption will collapse from its own rot. However, I am not counting on it and am trying to do my little part to speed that collapse.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   20:35:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: scrapper2 (#74)

Do any of you who post to other forums recall if there's been any outcry against HR 1955?

I tried when I was on LP
and I got more response than I thought I would

and I saw some outcry on DIGG while I was posting there
which was heartening

and my Ron Paul Tucson Meet Up group is up in flames about it
I found out about it from them
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   20:35:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Original_Intent (#78)

That's because we have a lot of people lighting candles - and more joining them everyday.

I am hoping that the whole fetid mess in the District of Corruption will collapse from its own rot.
However, I am not counting on it and am trying to do my little part to speed that collapse.

This is a great post
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   20:37:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: Cynicom (#72)

Cyni,

How would you propose RP becomes president?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-01-12   20:38:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: buckeye, scrapper2 (#75)

(scrapper) Do any of you who post to other forums recall if there's been any outcry against HR 1955?

(buckeye) Ever so slight on TOS2. I've raised it to the highest decibel level I could
without what I would have thought were spamming.

I thank you from the bottom of my heart for that, buckeye
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   20:40:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Jethro Tull (#81)

People actually want to help me get groceries off high shelves since I started wearing Ron Paul t-shirt. I used to have to prostrate myself to them, especially the employees.

"Most of the trouble in this world has been caused by folks who can't mind their own business, because they have no business of their own to mind, any more than a smallpox virus has." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2008-01-12   20:41:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: palo verde (#80)

Thank you. Don't give up the ship.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-01-12   20:43:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Jethro Tull (#81)

Jethro...

This is an old quote form Louis Mcfadden...A Congressman that paid with his life for speaking up...

"Our freedom did not drop down like manna from heaven. It has been fought for from the beginning of our history and the blood of men has been shed to obtain it. It is the result of centuries of resistance to the power of the executive and it has brought us equal justice, trial by jury, freedom of worship, and freedom of religious and political opinion. Democracy is far the most difficult form of government because it requires for perfect functioning the participation of everybody.

"Democracy wants constant guarding, and for us to turn to a dictatorship would be an act of consummate cowardice, of surrender, of confession that our strength and courage alike had gone.

The answer to your question lies in the second paragraph.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-12   20:43:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Dakmar (#83)

People actually want to help me get groceries off high shelves since I started wearing Ron Paul t-shirt...

this is great news, Dak, it heartens me to hear it
Love, Palo

palo verde  posted on  2008-01-12   20:43:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (87 - 188) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]