Title: Carl Cameron to Ron Paul: Are you "electable?" "Are you really a Republican?" Paul: Yes you stupid ass. Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jan 12, 2008 Author:Ron Paul Post Date:2008-01-12 17:17:31 by Itisa1mosttoolate Ping List:*Ron Paul for President 2008*Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008* Keywords:None Views:2404 Comments:188
Neo-cons are not Republicans. Ron Paul is a Republican.
Either we clean it up now, or there will be blood in the streets.
No one here is going to be frog-marched off to the camps.
You know they passed and Bush signed that Veterans Disarmament Act. It's horrendous and disqualifies many from legal firearms ownership. Even a "restraining order" having been filed is a disqualifier. What nonsense ... millions of restraining orders are filed where no one has even said boo.
The blood in the streets days are just over the horizon.
"Give us liberty and give them death" ... Doug Scheidt 1-10-08
There is hope with or without Ron Paul. Liberty the idea is eternal, and public recognition of our situation (loss of value and respect for freedom) is growing.
Now is the time to speak up with clarity, as you have. Later it will be against the law to say that the government is out of control.
lol it goes withut saying without Ron Paul in our Oval Office this time next year freedom of speech in our country is dead Fortunately President Ron Paul will be there
Liberty the idea is eternal, and public recognition of our situation (loss of value and respect for freedom) is growing.
with Ron Paul as our president this time next year we are safe without it we will have police state for next four years we are at critical turning point JMHO of course
happily for me I know Ron will be our President in '09
I'm pinging angle because he expressed doubt when I wrote that they are panicking now.
Before it's over they'll be asking, "Congressman Paul, isn't it true that you became a gynecologist because of your unnatural sexual appetites? Or, was it because there is no specialty for little boys' asses?"
And, no matter how many dirty curves they throw, Paul answers and kicks their asses!
I'm sure Cameron is sorry he got stuck with that question. He looks like a horse's ass now....
(Palo) without Ron Paul in our Oval Office this time next year, freedom of speech in our country is dead
(buckeye) Not necessarily. Also, putting Ron Paul in the White house does not ensure our freedom, either.
honey, I think it'll be police state if we don't get Ron Paul in our White House next year and if we do, we are safe
so I guess I stick with what I said
altho fine you see it differently that's what a forum is, each puts in their two cents Love, Palo
it will probably follow the course it is taking in UK I notice their posters can still say what they want on net but their citizens are spied on everywhere the new law just passed there is huge fine ($250) for talking on cellphone while driving, smoking a cig while driving, or eating while driving they have new technology which takes the pic, sends it instantly to cops and bingo before you've gone ten more miles the cops have you they also can take away your drivers license
also I notice they no longer can have political demonstrations in UK plus cops are now licensed to shoot to kill for domesic violence or stalking this is how it starts...
I don't want to alarm anyone because I know President Ron Paul will be in Office, and he will veto all these bills here we are safe!
Hey - good to see someone in even a pisser mood than I.
Get down here and let's throw something good on the grill.
I'm screaming pissed. We're both old enough to know the bastards have stolen our country and replaced it with a chip of the NAU. Anger is the appropriate reaction to globalism, and political parties who harbor it. That said, RP is a fine man terribly miscast as a leader of what might be a movement. We need a red in the face, desk pounding, street fighter to lead us villagers. We’ll supply the torches.
Yeah on the CenTex BBQ. I'm there. Cocktails at noon?
I just don't see how we can continue down police state track with President Paul in Office not only will he veto all the bills, he can go on TV and explain it to everyone plus he can count on everyone who voted for him to be in Oval Office he will have the people behind him
maybe I'm wrong about this, and those who are determined on police state will find a way to get around President Paul but right at this minute it is not how I see it
I think it'll be police state if we don't get Ron Paul in our White House next year and if we do, we are safe
I think we already have the strong beginnings of that with militarized and federally-coordinated local police forces — and the unconstitutional laws and EOs that have been imposed over the past six years.
I notice their posters can still say what they want on net [in the UK]
Not so. BNP activist Nick Griffin in the UK was charged with inciting hatred for speaking out against Islamics in the UK. The BBC caught him on video at a fairly private dinner making the remarks and he was dealing with the UK court system for a long time. If he had published those remarks online, the problem would have been magnified by the more public nature of his words.
Our situation is already becoming similar to the UK's in that respect because it is so risky to speak out about politically incorrect issues now. With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.
#49. To: Jethro Tull, Critter, TwentyTwelve, Peppa, FormerLurker, Wudidiz, all (#18)
When you can show me where pom poms and cheerleading can trump Diebolt machines I’ll be happy to join the squad.
The point isn't will "pom-poms and cheerleading" win out over "Diebold Delivers", but that it is making the point to an awful lot of people who heretofore did not take it seriously that "Diebold Delivers".
This is forcing the hand of the election rigging Plutocrats and their minions and is rubbing peoples' noses in the FACT that the U.S. National (s)Elections are rigged from the get-go - from candidate (s)Election to installment in orofice. A lot of people being woken up to the fact that they have not been getting any lubricant.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
Hi my sweet friend, my friend Helen, forwarded me the email she got from her best friend Wendy, who I gather from email is Obama supporter this is the email, deduce from it what you think? Love, Palo
(Helen forwarded this to me
HI ANNIE THOUGHT YOU'D FIND THIS INTERESTINg
here is forwarded email from Wendy
Guys, I felt IMMEDIATELY that something was wrong with the disparity between all the polls, exit polls and actual numbers re: Obama and Clinton. This website, I hope it is this one, had about 100 posts from really smart people re: numbers and Diebold machines. I found out about this so called loss when I was out last night. Instantly I recalled two friends, Ken A. and Juan C. who lived with Dean in NH during THAT primary. Well, they both claimed that something was seriously askew back then. Apparently, nothing has changed. If you can read all the comments you'lll see that this isn't only pro-Obama people who find last nights' results crazy but all who care about voting rights. I beg you to read at this site. I just donated money, a little, for these guys to get to NH and dig. Because there is still time to make an internet inquiry, or rather for Internet bloggers to get to NH so that they can get the truth. They need to be very smart about how Diebold works, and who might have hacked it, the consensus is the Repugs and since you are the names on the top of my head, please pass this along to anyone who won't think we are conspiracy nuts, but are dealing with something quite obvious: That
in the entire process last night, all the polls were right EXCEPT the Obama Hillary poll which is fishy as hell. And how all the HAND counted votes tallied with polls but the majority of Diebold did not. If you are FOR hillary this is just as important if in a different way: if someone with a bias has control of the 81% of machines then there is no democratic election possible. Also, remember Iowa, where voting is more than open, you are seen as you vote in caucuses? Well, that came out according to polls. I personally cannot believe we still have Diebold machines at all. That's it. This isn't sour grapes, this was my absolute first and stunned thought. Wendy
Thought you might be interested in this article from The BRAD BLOG!
Check out 'NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama' at:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530
so waddya think, Itisalmost too late doesn't it sound like Obama supporters want recount ? Love, Palo
(Palo) I notice UK posters can still say what they want on net
(buckey) Not so. BNP activist Nick Griffin in the UK was charged with inciting hatred for speaking out against Islamics in the UK. The BBC caught him on video at a fairly private dinner making the remarks and he was dealing with the UK court system for a long time. If he had published those remarks online, the problem would have been magnified by the more public nature of his words.
Our situation is already becoming similar to the UK's in that respect because it is so risky to speak out about politically incorrect issues now. With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.
you are awesome I thank you from the bottom of my heart for this great post Love, Palo
With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.
With that in place we need a test case because in an honest court, if we can find one, that law is so patently unconstitutional that it is sickening.
After it is thrown out she should be Horse Whipped, and then put naked in Stocks in the Public Square - in the middle of winter for her lascivious assault upon Lady Liberty.
And you can bet that one of the prime targets of that law WAS, without a doubt, forums such as this and alternative talk radio such as Alex Jones.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
I thank you from the bottom of my heart for this great post
You are a remarkable woman. I know you understand that I do not agree with Nick Griffin in total, but rather I speak up for his right to say what he believes, even if he hates others. The right to speak up and warn one another of threats, cultural, political, legal, and so forth — is essential for liberty to be protected.. HR 1955 makes it illegal to say that the government is no longer legally viable, because that implies that force would be required to make it accountable again.
If I do not defend Nick Griffin, who will defend me? Who will defend you?
I thank you, Palo. You are a brave person, if you are all that you say you are.
but that it is making the point to an awful lot of people who heretofore did not take it seriously that "Diebold Delivers".
To that end, RP has moved the ball down the field. The more people realize that the Elite would never risk their Empire via an honest election the better.
(buckeye) With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.
(Original Intent) With that in place we need a test case because in an honest court, if we can find one, that law is so patently unconstitutional that it is sickening.
After it is thrown out she should be Horse Whipped, and then put naked in Stocks in the Public Square - in the middle of winter for her lascivious assault upon Lady Liberty.
O buckeye, I cry reading that, because you are right what you say is true
Orignal Intent, thank you for your response to it Love, Palo
(buckeye) With Jane Harman's HR 1955 nearly passed, it may soon be technically illegal for us to be having this kind of conversation right, discussing the possibility of a tyrannical police state that should be resisted.
(Original Intent) With that in place we need a test case because in an honest court, if we can find one, that law is so patently unconstitutional that it is sickening.
between you boys you have stated the whole truth thank you Love, Palo
To that end, RP has moved the ball down the field. The more people realize that the Elite would never risk their Empire via an honest election the better.
Exactly. By building enough steam, and enough of an organization, he has forced them virtually out into the open to where the election stealing operations are in nearly plain view.
The faster people realize that the government they have is not one of their choosing, and that it is run by a criminal elite, the better the chance we have of heading off the complete tyranny that they are rushing full speed ahead up our collective, uh, umm, streets. Yeah, that's what I meant "Streets".
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
I also appreciate you for speaking up about this before it passes. I don't agree with all the "truther" conclusions, but I respect their right to pursue, publish, and defend any material they believe is useful to the public. Anyone who objects to that quest is on par with the persecutors of Galileo.
You are welcome Palo. I try to keep as upbeat as I can even though I can see the nightfall darkening our horizon.
I pray that enough people are woken up to forestall the 1984 tyranny that Bush and his Masters have planned for us. Even so I fear many many people are going to die horrible deaths before this is through.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken