[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Elon Musk at Charlie Kirk Memorial: "Charlie Kirk was killed by the DARK.."

Netflix as Jewish Daycare for Women

Warning America About Palantir: Richie From Boston

I'm not done asking questions about the killing of Charlie Kirk.

6 reasons the stock market bubble is worse than anyone expected.

Elon Musk: Charlie Kirk was killed because his words made a difference.

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Chinese Navy Confronted USS Kitty Hawk
Source: http://policestateusa.net/
URL Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index. ... e&code=20080116&articleId=7823
Published: Jan 17, 2008
Author: Newsmax
Post Date: 2008-01-17 06:18:27 by PSUSA
Ping List: *Resource Warfare*     Subscribe to *Resource Warfare*
Keywords: None
Views: 431
Comments: 20

A Chinese attack submarine and destroyer confronted the U.S. carrier Kitty Hawk and its battle group in the Taiwan Strait, sparking a tense 28-hour standoff that brought both sides to a battle-ready position.

The American ships were heading to Japan following China’s sudden cancellation of a scheduled Thanksgiving port call in Hong Kong when they encountered the Chinese vessels, according to the Navy Times, which cited a report in a Chinese-language newspaper in Taiwan.

The Times reported that the encounter caused the carrier group “to halt and ready for battle, as the Chinese vessels also stopped amid the 28-hour confrontation.”

The encounter ended without incident, however, and the U.S. ships continued on to Japan. The two Chinese vessels were also headed for a port call in Japan.

The Chinese destroyer, Shenzhen, is armed with anti-ship missiles, while the Song-class attack sub is equipped with anti-ship missiles and a variety of torpedoes.

China has expressed “grave concern” to the U.S. over the Kitty Hawk’s transit through the Taiwan Strait, the Times notes. Beijing claims Taiwan is Chinese territory.

But Admiral Timothy Keating, head of the U.S. Pacific Command, told reporters Tuesday: “We don’t need China’s permission to go through the Taiwan Strait. We will exercise our free right of passage whenever and wherever we choose.”

Shortly before the Kitty Hawk battle group was denied entry to Hong Kong, China had refused safe harbor for two U.S. Navy minesweepers seeking refuge from a storm.

As Newsmax has reported, some U.S. politicians have rung alarm bells about China's increased military spending and technological revamping of its armed forces.

China’s military budget had an average annual growth rate of nearly 16 percent from 1994 to 2004, and China's reported 2006 military budget is about $35 billion, according to Beijing.

But Pentagon sources have said these numbers fail to demonstrate the true scope of the growth, and the real 2006 figure could be as much as $105 billion.

In recent years China has upgraded its nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles; bought state-of-the-art warships, fighter planes and submarines from Russia; and begun development of a number of so-called "asymmetrical" weapons, including informational warfare and anti-satellite systems.

In November, Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda warned that China’s continuing military buildup could eventually pose a “major threat” if the Chinese government decides to exercise its power. Subscribe to *Resource Warfare*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#1. To: PSUSA (#0)

China’s military budget had an average annual growth rate of nearly 16 percent from 1994 to 2004, and China's reported 2006 military budget is about $35 billion, according to Beijing.

But Pentagon sources have said these numbers fail to demonstrate the true scope of the growth, and the real 2006 figure could be as much as $105 billion.

Gee, guess I better start soiling myself since China's military expenditures seem to still be over five times less than ours. Maybe they'll keep increasing their budget and we'll only spend more than the next 11 countries combined instead of the next 12 combined.

I wonder what percentage of their GDP that number is, since there are calls that our military budget needs to be 4% of GDP.

historian1944  posted on  2008-01-17   7:23:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: historian1944 (#1)

They can take us out without firing a shot.

They can do it anytime they want to do it.

PSUSA  posted on  2008-01-17   7:29:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: PSUSA (#2)

In a most humiliating way, too. What shaky foundations our empire are built on.

historian1944  posted on  2008-01-17   7:45:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

#10. To: historian1944 (#3)

What shaky foundations our empire are built on.

I don't myself consider it to be 'our' empire. IMHO it belongs to the people who rule us, not us.

also, their military budget the article says is something like $105 billion, ours is $550 billion before the extra funding for the war, something near $800 billion after the war funding. but dollar spent in china go far far further than dollar spent here due to our extreme costliness. speaking of costliness, here is a bible verse.

"Revelation 18:19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas, that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate."

between the 1'st pres bush & clinton they made an agreement with china to set their currency artificially inexpensive to ours' and ours artificially expensive to theirs'. that agreement where the currencies were pegged lasted from about 1994 to 2005. since then it's only been modified slightly with their currency still tremendously under-valued to ours'. This special relationship makes the dollar artificially valuable. It means that during this time we've lost a lot of industrial capacity. and given that we must compete with the chinese to build back that capacity, even if our currency were to trade at what market forces would value it rather than political agreements, we would have a very difficult time building that capacity back. Our industry has been destroyed as if we were in a war which we lost and the foreign enemy destroyed our industry.

they are the ones now that could if they chose to build a massive military machine that could invade us. we could not duplicate the performance of 1942- 1945 when we built such a military machine. because our industry is destroyed.

some things for an historian to contemplate.

Red Jones  posted on  2008-01-17 11:42:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]