[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight


4play
See other 4play Articles

Title: Life-Long Loving with a Sexbot
Source: http://www.spiegel.de/
URL Source: http://www.spiegel.de/international ... ld/0%2C1518%2C522919%2C00.html
Published: Dec 12, 2007
Author: Philip Bethge
Post Date: 2008-01-18 18:41:07 by robin
Ping List: *Humor-Weird News*     Subscribe to *Humor-Weird News*
Keywords: None
Views: 412
Comments: 15

THE FUTURE OF COITUS

Life-Long Loving with a Sexbot

By Philip Bethge

Sexbots have been around forever, but they are getting smarter all the time. David Levy, an artificial intelligence expert, sees a future when people will prefer robots to humans. They will offer, he says, better sex and better relationships.

Andy, whose measurements are 101-56-86 centimeters (40-22-34 inches), has what many men want in a woman: "unlimited patience." At least that's what the manufacturer, a company called First Androids based in Neumarkt near the southern German city of Nürnberg, promises. Andy also comes with options, including a "blowjob system, with adjustable levels," a "tangible pulse," "rotating hip motion" and a "heating system with adjustable controls" to raise the body temperature

PHOTO GALLERY: SEX AND LOVE WITH ROBOTS

Click on a picture to launch the image gallery (3 Photos)


"Except in the feet -- they remain cold, just like in real life," says David Levy. The British scientist's interest in Andy is purely academic, he insists. For Levy, his high-tech sex doll is nothing less than a harbinger of a new world order

Levy is an expert in artificial intelligence. He is fascinated with the idea of "love and sex with robots," and his visions of the future include "malebots" and "fembots" as lovers and life partners. A chess champion and the president of the International Computer Games Association, Levy, 62, has just published a book, "Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships" -- that is provocative in the truest sense of the word. He is convinced that human beings will be having sex with robots one day. They will show us sexual practices that we hadn't even imagined existed. We will love them and respect them, and we will entrust them with our most intimate secrets. All of this, says Levy, will be a reality in hardly more than 40 years from now

"The mere concept of an artificial partner, husband, wife, friend or lover is one that, for most people at the start of the 21st century, challenges their notion of relationships," says Levy. "But my thesis is this: Robots will be hugely attractive to humans as companions because of their many talents, senses and capabilities." Given rapid developments in technology, Levy believes that it is only a matter of time before machines will be capable of offering human-like traits. According to Levy, "love and sex with robots on a grand scale are inevitable."

The idea of love involving androids isn't exactly new. In Greek mythology, the sculptor Pygmalion makes an ivory statue of his ideal woman. He prays to the goddess of love Aphrodite to bring the statue, which he has named Galatea, to life. Aphrodite agrees to help him and when Pygmalion kisses Galatea, she returns the kiss and the two marry

The same thing could soon be happening with robots. Levy already sees signs of budding robophilia wherever he looks. According to Levy, the appeal of Sony's Aibo robot dog and of Furby, a toy robot that looks like a ball of fur with appendages, and a built-in computer circuit board, shows the potential for technology to serve as a sounding board for human emotions. "Nowadays, it is relatively commonplace for people to develop strong emotional attachments to their virtual pets, including robot pets," says Levy. "So why should anyone be surprised if and when people form similarly strong attachments to virtual people, to robot people?"

Even simple computers exert an almost magical attraction on some people. The dedication in Levy's book reads: "To Anthony, an MIT-student who tried having girlfriends but found that he preferred relationships with computers. And to all the other 'Anthonys' past, present, and future, of both sexes." What will computer nerds say when they can play with computers that move, talk, look like people and could possibly even experience emotions

When it comes to sex, robots could soon supplant the original flesh-and-blood human experience, says Levy. The researcher has delved deep into the history of erotic machinery to document Homo sapiens' susceptibility to mechanical sex toys. He discovered documented evidence of early vibrators powered by clockwork mechanisms and steam machines. Levy describes a pedal-driven masturbation machine for women designed in 1926 by engineers in the German city of Leipzig. In a late 17th-century pornographic anthology from Japan, the author read about a "lascivious traveling pillow." The artificial vulva, known as "azumagata" (substitute woman) in Japanese, was made of tortoiseshell and had a hole lined with satin

Dutch seamen shared their bunks on their globe-trotting trading journeys with hand-sewn leather puppets, which explains why the Japanese still refer to sex dolls as "Dutch wives" today -- although today's version is no longer made of leather. The Japanese company Orient Industry sells female dolls that are near-perfect replicas of young Japanese women -- down to the tips of their hair and consistency of their skin. The company's success is based on an earlier model known as "Antarctica," a doll scientists used to take along to Japan's Showa research station to keep warm during the long Antarctic winter

The US company RealDoll, the market leader in the business of life-like sex dolls, sells its "Leah" and Stephanie" models for $6,500 apiece. Customers can order the dolls with bra sizes ranging from 65A (30AA) to 75H (34F). Each doll comes with three "pleasure portals." Another model, "Charlie" even comes with a penis in various sizes, as well as an optional "anal entry."

Are these all just erotic toys designed for the occasional quickie? Not at all, says Hideo Tsuchiya, the president of Orient Industry. "A Dutch wife is not merely a doll, or an object," he insists. "She can be an irreplaceable lover, who provides a sense of emotional healing."

Levy has a similar take on the issue. But will robotic women and men resemble humans so closely within a few decades that they will pass as an equivalent or even better alternative to a human lover

Mimicking human appearance seems to be the least of the challenges. Two years ago, Japanese robot expert Hiroshi Ishiguro unveiled his "Repliee Q1" robot. The awkward name is misleading. Ishiguro's creation can easily pass as the first robot woman in human history. Thanks to 42 actuators driven by compressed air, the gynoid can "turn and react in a humanlike way," says Levy. "Repliee Q1 can flutter her eyelids, she appears to breathe, she can move her hands just like a human, (and) she is responsive to human touch...," he adds enthusiastically

PHOTO GALLERY: SEX AND LOVE WITH ROBOTS

Click on a picture to launch the image gallery (3 Photos)


Much more difficult than external traits, however, will be the challenging of breathing something approaching a soul into the robots. The biggest stumbling blocks are some of the most fundamental of human behaviors. Current robotic sensors, for example, are incapable of reliably distinguishing between individual people, says Levy. He concedes that if a robot fails to recognize its partner, or possibly even confuses him or her with someone else, the relationship is easily ruined

Nevertheless, Levy predicts that advances will come rapidly. For Levy, imbuing robots with such human traits as empathy, humor, understanding and love is merely a question of technology. Empathy, for example, is "essentially a learning task," he says, and therefore "relatively easy to implement in robots." All the machine has to do is observe its partner, make intelligent assumptions about the partner's thoughts and react accordingly

"Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human- Robot Relationships." Harper, New York; 336 pages; $24.95.
Levy sees a future in which artificial intelligence will enable robots to behave as if they had gone through the entire spectrum of human experience, without this actually being the case. He cites emotions as an example. "If a robot behaves as though it has feelings, can we reasonably argue that it does not," he asks? "If a robot's artificial emotions prompt it to say things such as 'I love you,' surely we should be willing to accept these statements at face value, provided that the robots other behavior patterns back them up."

Levy finds the advantages of artificial companions over human partners appealing. Infidelity, moodiness, poor taste, poor hygiene, an unhealthy obsession with soccer -- all of these relationship difficulties would be resigned to the dustbin of history. Robotic partners would even be immortal. Levy envisions backing up the entire personality of his androids on hard disks. If a robot is destroyed, it'll be easy to order a new one

And the sex! Always willing, never disappointed, goodbye migraines -- and with the dirtiest possible fantasies available for download. A robot could be programmed to offer "sexual positions and techniques from around the world" or placed in "'teaching mode' for the sexual novice," says Levy. Everything from vagina dimensions to penis size, body scent to facial hair could be available as options

"Imagine a world in which robots are (almost) just like us," says Levy. "The effect on society will be enormous." He also addresses the potential ethical and moral issues in the days after the great robot invasion. Will it be unethical to lend sexbots to friends or, for instance, "using a friend's sexbot without telling the friend?" Will it be permissible to deceive androids? What will husbands do when their wives tell them: "Not tonight darling, I'm going to make it with the robot?"

Levy is convinced that women, in particular, after initial misgivings, will welcome robots as an alternative to their sweaty husbands. The fact that their sexual appetites often go well beyond the mediocre performance of many men is reflected in the "staggering sales figures" for vibrators, says Levy

And the men? Well, as far they're concerned, all the fuss about artificial intelligence is wasted energy

Men are willing to "have sex with inflatable dolls," says Henrik Christensen, the coordinator of the European Robotics Research Network. It'll be easy to do one better than that. According to Christensen, "anything that moves will be an improvement."

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

(8 images)

Subscribe to *Humor-Weird News*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: robin (#0)

Robotics and computer should advance at about the same rate. Computers have several hundred million transistors. The human brain has several hundred trillion connections. That is a factor of a million to one making computer about as smart as a slug. However, if Moore's law holds up, at a doubling rate of 18 months, in thirty years computers will increase 1 million times and match the human brain in complexity. That is the complexity required to make robots appear to be human.

At that point in time, at least for guys that would have to settle for an average or less girlfriend, a beautiful, sexy female human-like robot that is sweet, intelligent, and with a superior personality will be better than some plump and bitchy wife or girlfriend that the top males pass on.

DWornock  posted on  2008-01-18   19:18:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: robin (#0)

Kittens aren't biscuits just because a cat gives birth in an oven.

YertleTurtle  posted on  2008-01-18   19:44:41 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: robin (#0)

This guy must have just rented and watched AI (the subject here being the cause of the decline of the human race in the movie)...

Government blows and that which governs least blows least...

Axenolith  posted on  2008-01-18   20:04:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: DWornock (#1)

and with a superior personality will be better than some plump and bitchy wife or girlfriend that the top males pass on.

Not the "top males", IMO, but the smart ones pass on them. "Top males" get suckered too, probable more often since they want the trophy wives and go strictly off looks and not personality.

If women werent such totally deranged skanks (except for the women here...) then this kind of robot wouldnt be seen as a potentially good thing.

PSUSA  posted on  2008-01-18   21:08:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: PSUSA (#4)

Not the "top males", IMO, but the smart ones pass on them. "Top males" get suckered too, probable more often since they want the trophy wives and go strictly off looks and not personality.

No man will choose the girl on the right because of personality if he can have the girl on the left.
Photobucket

A common question on all dating sites is "Why do girls choose jerks instead of good guys?" The truth is they want a good looking girl and they don't have enough going for them to rate one. And, they get all bent out of shape when I tell them that they need to stop seeking a pretty girl and settle for a plump homely girl.

Most everyone makes the false statement that looks is not very important. Maybe they even believe it. However, go to any social event where guys and girls go to meet, such as a dance, and stand back and just observe. What you will observe is that, without exception, every guy and girl there act as if looks is the only thing.

All girls, regardless of their claims to the contrary, want a guy that is tall, sexy, handsome, athletic, smart, and rich. After these guys cherry pick the sexy good looking girls with a waist to hip ratio (WHR) of 0.7 or less, guys like me and other average looking and average income guys have to settle for the leftovers. Most of us are not satisfied with the that have a WHR of 0.8 or greater. We would rather have a sexy good looking human appearing robot that could pass for the girl on the left that may be available in thirty years.

DWornock  posted on  2008-01-19   1:26:18 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: DWornock (#5)

All girls, regardless of their claims to the contrary, want a guy that is tall, sexy, handsome, athletic, smart, and rich. After these guys cherry pick the sexy good looking girls with a waist to hip ratio (WHR) of 0.7 or less, guys like me and other average looking and average income guys have to settle for the leftovers. Most of us are not satisfied with the that have a WHR of 0.8 or greater. We would rather have a sexy good looking human appearing robot that could pass for the girl on the left that may be available in thirty years.

OK, I agree with that

But

It's not an either-or choice. You present 2 extremes, and I bet the one on the left doesn't look all that great without the makeup, even if she has a nice body. And if she has the disposition of a cornered wolverine, who would want her for anything but a fuck and chuck, and maybe not even for that?

But there are a lot of variables when it comes to "attractiveness". There is more to it than just good looks. With makeup, these Hollyweird type "beauty queens" look good. But without all the warpaint they look average or even worse.

If I had 1 FRN for every time I heard how HAWT Angelina Jolie was, I could retire in luxury. But I don't think she is that hot, and wouldnt be with her under any circumstances because she is just plain odd. It is one of those rare win-win situations. She doesn't want me and I dont want her.

It seems to me that people want one of these beauty queens, but they want the image, not the reality. I'll take an average looking woman that I can get along with and finding just one of them isnt easy in this country. If one doesn't come along, then that is just too bad. I'd rather be alone.

PSUSA  posted on  2008-01-19   7:34:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: robin (#0)

And the sex! Always willing, never disappointed, goodbye migraines -- and with the dirtiest possible fantasies available for download. A robot could be programmed to offer "sexual positions and techniques from around the world" or placed in "'teaching mode' for the sexual novice," says Levy. Everything from vagina dimensions to penis size, body scent to facial hair could be available as options

Tabloid nonsense.

For even a minimally intelligent man, choosing a mate based solely on good looks makes as much sense as choosing his male compadres on looks. Compatibility (sex included) is the only sensible standard.

Long term, we spend a hell of a lot more time out of bed than in it.

Been there, done that, got the canceled alimony checks to show for it.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-01-19   8:39:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: robin (#0)

The old '40's tune comes to mind .. "I'm gonna buy a paper doll".

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-01-19   8:44:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: DWornock (#5)

No man will choose the girl on the right because of personality if he can have the girl on the left.

I wouldn't take the woman on the right for a multitude of reasons, the first being she doesn't appear to have any self respect and little self discipline.

Sparker  posted on  2008-01-19   11:04:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Sparker, DWornock (#9)

the first being she doesn't appear to have any self respect and little self discipline.

Hey marshmellows are more fun than the pile of coat hangers that skinny girls are.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-01-19   11:20:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: DWornock (#5)

No man will choose the girl on the right because of personality if he can have the girl on the left.

Says you. Ironic enough I worked with lots of "HAWT" women in my early years of working. I never touched them. Why? Every one, minus one or two, of them was an air head or much much worse.

"I'm pregnant. Think I should stop binge drinking every weekend?"

Oh yeah, partner material right there. I wish the above was a joke. It's not. It's a direct quote. And that one is one of the more tame examples.

If other guys want to throw a good woman away because they don't look good enough, just means better prospects for me.

"The more I see of life, the less I fear death" - Me.

Pissed Off Janitor  posted on  2008-01-19   11:21:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Pissed Off Janitor (#11)

If other guys want to throw a good woman away because they don't look good enough, just means better prospects for me.

Mmmm my kinda man!


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-01-19   11:28:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: farmfriend (#10)

Marshmellows are too sweet to eat everyday.

Sparker  posted on  2008-01-19   13:27:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Sparker (#13)

Marshmellows are too sweet to eat everyday.

Well if you prefer sleeping with a bag of coat hangers, I can't stop you.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles,
and the letters get in the wrong places.
-- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2008-01-19   13:40:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: PSUSA, Sparker (#6)

I bet the one on the left doesn't look all that great without the makeup...
...there are a lot of variables when it comes to "attractiveness".

Although there are other markers of sex appeal, men are attracted to women with a waist to hip ratio (WHR) of 0.7 or less, bilateral symmetry, and youth because they are indicators of good genes, good health, and the ability produce babies. See:
dothejanefonda.wordpress....-waist-ratio-vs-bmi-whos- hotter/
www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-41260.html

Makeup may help a women look a little younger; makeup will not change her WHR or bilateral symmetry. All the makeup in the world will not make the girl on the right attractive.

This is a bit off the subject but in prehistoric times when the death rate equaled the birth rate, the survival of humans was iffy, and a one percent advantage was the difference in surviving to produce descendants, men that did not select mates for the above characteristics are not our ancestors.

Women then (and even now) were more devious. Women would mate with men that were dependable and good providers and then, when they were ovulating, they would have sneaky sex with superior males with good genes, typically the Alpha males. They would also climax with the superior male, retaining more of his sperm, and would not climax with her mate (although she might fake it) and expel most of his sperm.

DWornock  posted on  2008-01-19   15:46:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]