[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Neocon Nuttery See other Neocon Nuttery Articles Title: Selling America to Arabia one bank at a time You know that an economic issue has jumped the shark when the New York Times's op-editoraliste Maureen Dowd (MoDo) devotes her Sunday column to it. What's unleashed MoDo's moxie is how Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) -- those government investment funds estimated to control between $2 trillion and $15 trillion -- are buying up chunks of the U.S. banking system. The problem against which MoDo rails is that thanks to the policies of George W. Bush, the price of oil has quadrupled and the dollar has plummeted -- thus putting the U.S. at the mercy of those Arabian SWFs whose owners he groveled to this week to lower the price of oil. And while W. was grovelling, so were the CEOs of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) and Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER) -- seeking capital to shore up their Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO)-tarnished balance sheets. MoDo is right that with Bush's $2.4 trillion worth of wars and $1.3 trillion worth of tax cuts, the U.S. has gone from being the world's creditor to its debtor. But another New York Times article sheds more light on the phenomenon of foreign investment in the U.S. -- suggesting that with their $414 billion worth of 2007 purchases in the U.S., foreign investors, including SWFs, spent a record amount of money buying up the U.S. last year -- up 90% from 2006. The Times suggests that this foreign investment comes in different forms -- some of which are beneficial. How so? Most foreign investment comes from relatively 'friendly' countries. Canada still spends the most money buying stakes in American companies -- more than $65 billion in 2007. South Korea's investments totaled $10.4 billion last year, up from just $5.4 million in 2000. But countries at odds with U.S. values are coming on strong -- Russia went to $572 million in 2007 from $60 million in 2000. The bank buying SWFs account for $21 billion of 2007's total. At the center of concern is the growing influence of SWFs, which invested $21.5 billion in American companies in 2007. For some reason, the level of outrage about selling U.S. banks to countries like Saudi Arabia -- which accounted for 15 of 19 9/11 hijackers -- is mild compared to the firestorm that resulted from the proposed sale of port manager, DPWorld, to the United Arab Emirates in 2005. I don't derive comfort from Bush administration assurances that this foreign investment is benign. And I think Americans need to know more about the terms of these SWF investments and how these investors might use the power of their capital to achieve their ends. Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns Citigroup stock and has no financial interest in Merrill Lynch.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
Wages in the U.S. peaked in 1973. Until then, they were going up at a 45-degree angle. Had they continued to rise, the average salary would probably be about $80,000 a year. Instead they've been flat since '73, and since that time the government has sent trillions of dollars of our wealth to the Third Worlders of Arabia, India and China -- countries that are now utterly dependent on us, otherwise they'd still be mired in the poverty that has been their birthright for thousands of years. Countries have no friends, only temporary and changing interest. Arming our enemies -- unbelievable. Please don't give me any nonsense about conspiracies. That's for children.
Glad that reassures you. I know better.
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||