Title: LOOK AT THIS INTERVIEW OF BUSH IN ISRAEL. HE DIRECTLY SAYS HE INTENDS TO START WW111. Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jan 22, 2008 Author:<object width="425" height="373"� Post Date:2008-01-22 20:21:40 by tom007 Keywords:None Views:588 Comments:18
Notice that Bush does not even try to put the "threat" into the perspective of the US for which he is supposed to be the president. Instead he ventures into an interpretation of how Israelis may interpret the "threat" of Iran and how to interpret intelligence in such a way as to make a case for war!
Bush then talkes about " ... strategy to solve this issue diplomatically" (as if the US has any diplomatic dialogue with Iran or is interested in having one).
His use of the word "diplomatically" causes visible disappointment in the female interviewer, who tries to keep up hope by saying: "Is a military strike still an option?" and as Bush hates to disappoint her and his Zionist masters he expresses these words of consolation:
"The US always main(s)tains a military option!" (probably as a general fact of life, not particularly related to Iran!)
Bush excuses himself that he has been too busy to get the war started, but "we will"!
That makes her happy again and she suggests the start of World War III!
and Bush follows up with the statement that "we are making a lot of progress", and he probably has in mind the "threatening" Iranian speed boats in the Straits of Hormuz and the Mossad blast in Argentina as good attempts to start the World War III.
World War III? What is the conflict, who are the participants, how can you take visible delight in the idea of starting World War III?
Is it possible that the American people can accept to be drawn into Israel's World War III without a fight?
As to the interviewer it appears that she is a priestess in the Synagogue of satan! Made Brani | Mon, 2008-01-21 17:15
My guess is that that would almost have to be true cause the international press would have been in an uproar over these reckless statements.
How would you know if there was an uproar in the international press, unless you read several periodicals in foreign languages...you wouldn't expect to hear about it from OUR MSM would you, Tom?
My thoughts, at first, were that the tape was edited, however there seemed to be several fits and starts throughout.