See other Editorial Articles
Title: Whos is going to win South Carolina?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://freedom4um
Published: Jan 26, 2008
Author: me
Post Date: 2008-01-26 19:01:21 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 494
Comments: 57
Is it just Dems? The older I get the stupider I is. Oboma will win (cnn)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-5) not displayed.
.
.
.
#6. To: Cynicom (#5)
White guilt. :-)
Well who wants Hillary? And Edwards doesn't seem to be what they want either.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! I hope Obama wins, that means that MSM is going to have to swallow their bilious hatred of the South.
Yeah, an even bigger "native son" loser than the very forgettable wooden headed Gore.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
Why is there NO Republican vote in SC?
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
Already held.
The U.S. Constitution is no impediment to our form of government.--PJ O'Rourke
Who won?
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
Obama
Republicans, McCain won
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
This from chuck Baldwin... "Therefore, it does not matter to a tinker's dam whether it is Giuliani, McCain, Huckabee, or Romney who wins the election this November. The man behind the curtain will still produce his smoke and mirrors and create more fear and panic over any and every convenient distraction in the hopes that the Munchkins will not wake up in time to realize that the one who needs to be feared (and fought) is none other than the man behind the curtain."
Exciting race, huh?
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
Caroline Kennedy just endorsed Obama.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! Oh, it does indeed. Are there still those here that intend to vote for any one of these stooges?
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
Hillary will be the candidate with VP Obama, lock up the womens, blacks, libs whatever vote for a win.
They stayed home? ;-)
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
Unique strategy. I'll be disappointed if Obama runs with her.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
They will kiss and make up at the convention, the masses will be overjoyed and the love that is exhibited will bring victory. Meanwhile the boys in the back room give each other high fives, swindled the voters again.
A delusional whitewash of total Republican failure and betrayal.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
I voted against Gore and Kerry in frustration. Never again, no more lesser of evils.
I guess my smartest vote was for Goldwater.
Will they change the color of the White House?
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
I doubt if that ever has to be thought about.
That, and Perot were the best that we had to pick.
Join the Ron Paul Revolution It will be a cold day in Hell before I'd vote for any ticket with Hillary on it. If she's the Democratic nominee, even the VP nominee, then I'm going to vote Constitution party yet again.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#7. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#8. To: who knows what evil (#6)
#9. To: robin (#7)
And Edwards doesn't seem to be what they want either.
#10. To: robin (#7)
#11. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#10)
#12. To: DeaconBenjamin (#11)
#13. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#12)
#14. To: Cynicom (#13)
#15. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#14)
#16. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#14)
Republicans, McCain won
#17. To: iconoclast, Itisa1mosttoolate, Cynicom (#16)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#18. To: Cynicom (#15)
"Therefore, it does not matter to a tinker's dam whether it is Giuliani, McCain, Huckabee, or Romney who wins the election this November.
#19. To: robin (#17)
#20. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#10)
Why is there NO Republican vote in SC?
#21. To: Cynicom (#19)
Hillary will be the candidate with VP Obama, lock up the womens, blacks, libs whatever vote for a win.
#22. To: iconoclast (#21)
#23. To: Cynicom (#15)
The man behind the curtain will still produce his smoke and mirrors and create more fear and panic over any and every convenient distraction in the hopes that the Munchkins will not wake up in time to realize that the one who needs to be feared (and fought) is none other than the man behind the curtain."
#24. To: iconoclast (#23)
#25. To: All (#24)
#26. To: Cynicom (#25)
#27. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#26)
#28. To: Cynicom (#25)
I guess my smartest vote was for Goldwater.
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity
#29. To: iconoclast (#21)
Hillary will be the candidate with VP Obama, lock up the womens, blacks, libs whatever vote for a win.
 | Gold and silver are REAL money, paper is but a promise. |
#30. To: lodwick (#28)
Johnson had the biggest popular vote in American history. After the endless parade of bodies it was amazing, no one voted for him. Total fraud I guess.
#31. To: Cynicom (#30)
I don't know how many of our 'advisors' were killed under the Eisenhower and the Kennedy regimes.
Join the Ron Paul Revolution
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity
#32. To: Cynicom (#22)
Yeah, probably ... just like the sainted Ron and Bush I. But, I still hope not.
They will kiss and make up at the convention, the masses will be overjoyed and the love that is exhibited will bring victory.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#33. To: iconoclast, lodwick (#32)
This from 1931..Does it sound familiar????? 1931... ""What they are planning for us; sex, religion, money in the New World Order. Which is more corrupt? The liberal media or the multi-national corporations? Why truly big money wants your children to try drugs, even while they campaign to discourage these evils. How the brilliant scientists have come up with the proven methods to destroy your family. All you have to do is let your guard down." (General von Seckt, Speech delivered on January 24th, 1931, before the Economic Society of Munster, in Westphalia. by C.F. Melville, The Russian Face of Germany, pp. 158-159; The Rulers of Russia, Denis Fahey, pp. 20-21)
#34. To: Cynicom (#24)
Amen, brother. If Hillary still looks probable when our primary rolls around I will vote against her (we can declare/un-declare at the polls). I'll write-in RP in the general.
I voted against Gore and Kerry in frustration. Never again, no more lesser of evils.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#35. To: iconoclast (#34)
Go for it. No Paul - No Vote here.
I'll write-in RP in the general.
Join the Ron Paul Revolution
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity
#36. To: Elliott Jackalope (#29) (Edited)
It looks frighteningly possible ........... the year of the women. And all this time we were supposed to be the gender with our brains between our legs.
If she's the Democratic nominee, even the VP nominee, then I'm going to vote Constitution party yet again.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#37. To: lodwick (#35)
Agreed.
No Paul - No Vote here.
#38. To: robin (#7)
I know only one person who is a Hillary supporter, and I know lots of people. It doesn't make sense.
Well who wants Hillary?
#39. To: Cynicom (#37)
'None of the Above' - a ballot idea that I really like.
Join the Ron Paul Revolution
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity
#40. To: Cynicom (#33)
The book titles puzzle me to say the least. This made the General a Russian?
""What they are planning for us; sex, religion, money in the New World Order. Which is more corrupt? The liberal media or the multi-national corporations? Why truly big money wants your children to try drugs, even while they campaign to discourage these evils. How the brilliant scientists have come up with the proven methods to destroy your family. All you have to do is let your guard down." (General von Seckt, Speech delivered on January 24th, 1931, before the Economic Society of Munster, in Westphalia.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#41. To: Fred Mertz (#38)
On speaking terms with any women? ;-) They are 60% of voters.
I know only one person who is a Hillary supporter, and I know lots of people.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#42. To: iconoclast (#40)
German..One time Chief of Staff.
#43. To: Cynicom, Elliott Jackalope, robin, Fred Mertz, lodwick (#30)
In his victory speech Obama got the translation of E Pluribus Unum correct. That gives him a leg up on Algore. ;-)
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#44. To: lodwick, Cynicom (#39)
Your name is legion. Another little instance of the voice of the people going unheard.
'None of the Above' - a ballot idea that I really like.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#45. To: Cynicom (#42)
That part I got. I just couldn't see the tie-in to Russian related books??? You've got me intrigued though.
German..One time Chief of Staff.
Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?
#46. To: iconoclast (#45)
I was trying to show that this New World Order thing has been around for a long time, that people a hundred years ago were aware. Current generation if they are aware at all believe it is something thought up by our current crop "conspiracy" people. People refuse to see what many people saw long ago and warned about.
.
.
.
Comments (47 - 57) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest