Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Why America Needs Jury Nullification
Source: The Fountain of Truth
URL Source: http://www.geocities.com/fountoftruth/apostasy.html
Published: Jan 27, 2008
Author: Doug Newman
Post Date: 2008-01-27 11:23:19 by snoopdougg
Keywords: None
Views: 1681
Comments: 9

Letters to the Editor
Rocky Mountain News
101 W. Colfax Avenue, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202

Editor:

I want to commend Chris Maj on his fine letter of January 24 on the rights of jurors.

Jurors’ rights are the most forgotten rights of all. Indeed, from before the Revolution up through the Civil War, jurors had the power to judge not only the facts of a case but also the law pertaining to that particular case. If a juror thought the law under which the defendant was being tried was unconstitutional, unjust, immoral or just plain stupid, that juror could vote to acquit and the defendant would walk. The best example of jury nullification at work can be found with regard to the Fugitive Slave Laws of the 1850s. If juror Smith opposed these laws, he could, on this basis alone, vote to acquit defendant Jones. As a result, the Fugitive Slave Laws became unenforceable.

Consider some of the onerous laws on the books today and how we could combat them if jurors only knew their rights. Imagine someone on trial for violating a tax law that not even a Harvard-educated tax attorney could understand; imagine a doctor on trial for prescribing marijuana to patients who had exhausted all conventional medical avenues; imagine a woman who uses a gun to ward off a rapist, and then faces charges when it is discovered that said gun is unregistered.

Jury nullification is the ultimate check against bad laws. Today, almost no one even knows about jury nullification. Legislators concoct new laws at a rate unthinkable a few decades ago. And the people think they are powerless in the face of a runaway government.

When I present this subject, people are often skeptical. They say things like, “Why, if a juror can acquit just because he does not like a particular law, this can only result in anarchy! We cannot have people making up laws as they go along!” I respond that jurors exercising their rights are not making up new laws, but acting in defense against bad laws. An unrestrained government – i.e. one that makes whatever laws it willy-nilly wants whenever it willy-nilly wants to -- is far more dangerous than an educated populace that uses every available tool to restrain that government.

Far from being a crackpot “theory”, jury nullification is a cornerstone of constitutional government and a truly free society.

Doug Newman
303-902-5503


If you would like to post this, please e-mail me and include the above URL.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: snoopdougg (#0)

Far from being a crackpot “theory”, jury nullification is a cornerstone of constitutional government and a truly free society.

Indeed it is. However, we have too many "lawyers" that have turned the law into a business.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-27   11:38:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

too many "lawyers" that have turned the law into a business.

The business of enriching themselves at the expense of justice.

"There are indeed two political parties in the US. The state-lovers and the freedom-lovers." - ghostdogtxn

angle  posted on  2008-01-27   11:50:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: angle (#2)

The business of enriching themselves at the expense of justice.

Better than what I could offer.

If you want to infuriate a lawyer, tell them case law needs to be junked, every case decided upon its own merits, not what happened a hundred years ago, and then throw in judges need to be NON lawyers.

Any "lawyer" present will go into catatonic fits.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-27   11:54:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: snoopdougg (#0)

The two magic words that will get you out of jury duty in a criminal case are "jury nullification", and you don't even have to say you believe in it. Just that you even heard of it will get you disqualified.

Ada  posted on  2008-01-27   12:00:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: snoopdougg (#0)

Thanks, I was unaware of jury nullification.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-01-27   14:57:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin (#5) (Edited)

Thanks, I was unaware of jury nullification.

What???? Good heavens.

One good way to get out of jury duty is to tell them you might be related to the criminal.

In my case, I usually am as we is all cuzins here in the hills.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-27   15:08:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Cynicom (#6)

Getting out of jury duty I understand, but this I was not familiar with at all:

The best example of jury nullification at work can be found with regard to the Fugitive Slave Laws of the 1850s. If juror Smith opposed these laws, he could, on this basis alone, vote to acquit defendant Jones. As a result, the Fugitive Slave Laws became unenforceable.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-01-27   15:15:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Cynicom (#6)

One good way to get out of jury duty is to tell them you might be related to the criminal.

Remember, in voir dire you are under oath.

Ada  posted on  2008-01-27   15:37:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Ada (#8)

Truth...We is all cuzins and I most likely would be relation as most of my relatives are pick pockeets, con artists and general ner do wells. Plus I have a guilty looking face, that surely would get me disqualified or charged with some crime. The sheriff would find some crime that fits me. Did I tell you the sheriff is a cuzin and the judge is my nephew??? Both refused to do honest work.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-01-27   16:41:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest