See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: It Starts Good, Then A Turd Can Grow Into A Huge Pile Of Elephant Crap
Source:
Free Republic
URL Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a37fd954b027c.htm
Published: Oct 7, 1999
Author: Jim Robinson
Post Date: 2008-02-01 05:54:13 by Uncle Bill
Keywords: The, Dungbot, Principle
Views: 570
Comments: 25
Free Republic Invaded By Kooks Against Bush To: Professional Bush is so clever that he's got all the right-wingers thinking he's a liberal. And this strategy is just to garner the swing voters who tend to be lefties. But there's more of them than there are right-wingers so it's a good gamble. Then after he wins the Presidency then he's gonna make a major swing back to the right (he is a conservative, after all), laugh at his liberal supporters and welcome the right-wing back into his compassionate conservative fold. He's so clever that he's just about the first guy on the planet to manage fooling all the people all the time. 23 Posted on 10/08/1999 00:24:27 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: Yellow Rose of Texas Nothing personal. I am opposed to a second Bush presidency for several reasons. The most important are that I do not feel that Bush will properly defend the Constitution and that he will take the country further to the left. Second, I do not believe that it is wise to elect the son of a prior president. I believe that it is dangerous to have so much power wrapped up in one family. 51 Posted on 10/08/1999 00:50:59 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: aligyrl-02 Those are other people's words not mine. You have posted your last lie on this site. Go back to your filthy lying friends on AntiFreepers and have yourself a ball. To those who are interested, what I said was that the CIA (under George Bush as CIA Director, then VP then President) was complicit in drug running in Southeast Asia, Central and South America. Whether Bush knew about or not I do not care. Those who did know about were either complicit or they looked the other way. They've admitted to as much in their own reports which are posted on the CIA website. 69 Posted on 10/08/1999 01:04:29 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: Professional "GW does seem genuinely more conservative & he tends to have genuinely conservative advisors, as well." I disagreed with this part of his post. Also, he seems to downplay the danger in having all the power concentrated in one family. I do not agree with him. 81 Posted on 10/08/1999 01:17:59 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: Professional I think you are confused. You seem to agree that it's dangerous to have one family with all the political power, yet because the GOP (which is really nothing more than one super-sized political family with concentrated power) wants him, then you are willing to go along. BTW: stay or go. That's your choice. The poster who said that this is an anti-Bush site is wrong. This is a pro-constitution site. I'd say that over half the participants here are in favor of Bush. It's only the right-wing nuts (like me) who are opposed. My opinions are simply my own. I do not speak for anyone else and no one speaks for me. Your opinions carry as much weight as anyone else. 98 Posted on 10/08/1999 01:31:34 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: gutsyme What do you mean the higher ups don't approve of it? They're still doing it and the higher ups are still approving it. The CIA is still working with known drug runners, this time in Kosovo. The KLA is a drug running and terrorist group and our government including the President, the CIA and the Congress all approve of it. Working with gangsters and drug runners has been government policy for the last forty years or more. 161 Posted on 10/08/1999 02:37:26 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: L.N. Smithee Well, I do not believe that G W Bush became Governor of Texas and his brother Governor of Florida by accident. And I do not believe that they did it solely on their own merits. Their father and his backers are among the most powerful men on this earth and they are responsible for cleaning up young Bush, borning him again, and moving him into the Statehouse. Young Bush had absolutely no experience and no reason to be Governor of Texas except to prime him for a run on the Presidency. If you don't think Bush II won't simply be a continuence of Bush I (same people, same policies) then you're crazy. And follow that with Bush III. No thanks. Our forefathers rebelled against a Royal Family two centuries ago. I don't think we should be so anxious to usher in another. 181 Posted on 10/08/1999 02:53:18 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: gutsyme Well just a few moments ago you denied that they (the CIA and our government) were running drugs and now you admit it, but say it is justified. Tell me, just where in the Constitution is the clause that gives our President the power to use criminal gangs to covertly or overtly bring down foreign governments? 183 Posted on 10/08/1999 02:57:36 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) And finally, just to make sure that I piss off all of the Republicans who can see no evil, I do be-lieve that the CIA trafficked in drugs in South East Asia and in South America. And I believe that George Bush was involved, first at the CIA and then later as VP and President. Or in the very least, it happened during his watch, which ultimately makes him responsible. Posted on 05/19/99 20:07:34 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: DonMorgan His involvement was that he was the man in charge. First at the CIA. Then as VP he was in charge of Iran Contra. Then as President he was in charge of the entire shooting match. You people are the ones claiming I said he was a drug dealer. I never said that, because I do not believe it, yet you and your friends continue to lie about. Now you've earned your banishment as well. 244 Posted on 10/08/1999 09:49:09 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) To: OrphanAnnie What I'm saying is our government through the CIA was complicit in running drugs. This is a fact. Their own reports on their own website do not deny this, in fact, they are full of situations where they were working with known drug runners and criminals and looking the other way. They even had the laws changed so that they did not have to report it. This is now standard operating procedure for our government. The policy is justified (they say) as long as the criminal group is helping us overthrow another government that the President has targeted. The people at the top are responsible for these policies. George Bush was at the top of the CIA, then as VP with Iran/Contra, then as President. The policy was continued under Clinton. And now they want to put Young Bush in to continue the policy. The policy is unconstitutional and just plain wrong! The Constitution does not give the President the authority to run this kind of an operation. 252 Posted on 10/08/1999 10:27:18 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com) "Free Republic has been rallying in support of President Bush. Therefore, we wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine." 
Jim Robinson - Free Republic
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
#1. To: christine, Jethro Tull (#0)
I know, I know, but I was bored.
Posted on 01/31/2008 2:09:25 PM PST by Jim Robinson My friends, I have to admit that I've been in a bit of a quandary since the Real Conservatives ® Thompson and Hunter dropped out of the race leaving us to to place our bets on one the four headless horsemen. But after having a day or three to sort it all out, I'm beginning to see a ray of hope. Number one, my worst fear that the pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun social liberal Rudy Giuliani might be nominated, and thereby bring an abrupt and unholy end to the pro-life conservative movement within the GOP has been allayed. His evil culture of death platform has been soundly rejected by the Republican voters. Thank God! If nothing else is gained, that alone is a huge victory for us! And that leaves us with the unwelcome slippery task of having to determine and select the least evil of the three remaining RINOs. But wait! When choosing between evils, why not choose the good? McCain is insane and there are many good reasons not to choose him, but I'll list just five: McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Lieberman, the Keating 5, and the Gang of 14. No thanks. McCain is out! Romney ran on a pro-abortion platform, is pro gay rights, is prone to BIG government solutions, promises anything to anyone for a vote, and flip-flops on important issues. Can't trust him. Now Governor Huckabee. Could this be the good vs evil? He's a Baptist minister. A genuine 100% pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, Southron Christian social conservative! And that would be my reason no. 1 to support Huckabee. He has the trust and backing of the Christian evangelicals and the support of the Bible Belt. You cannot win the presidency without the South, and I believe the pro-God, pro- life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-America Mike Huckabee is the most likely of the three GOP hopefuls to carry the South. And that's a pretty darn good reason! My number two reason is that he is NOT McCain (and that's a pretty darn good reason too). Number three (and this will be a tough one for a lot of my FReeper Friends) is that he is NOT Romney. Numbers four and five are he's NOT Hillary and NOT Obama. Oohrah! Number six, he plays a mean bass and he's a traditional favorite at Free Republic's infamous quadrennial Inaugural Balls in Washington, DC. Perhaps we could persuade President Huckabee to drop by our ball and perform his rocking rendition of "Sweet Home Alabama!" Now, wouldn't that be a hoot! Number seven, if we can keep Huckabee in the race all the way through, thus preventing McCain or Romney from gaining enough delegates to win the nomination, then maybe, just maybe a deadlocked convention might seek out another candidate. One who can re-unite the Reagan Coalition, save the GOP, and put us back on the conservative track. Of course, my personal favorite to be that man would be FRed Thompson. Woo hoo!! Let it ring out through grassroots America and on to the convention! Support life! Support the GOP! Support Huckabee! And re-draft FRed Thompson!! Never give in, never give up, and never lose hope. Long live the Reagan Revolution! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1962819/posts?page=51,38 J.R. is insane and fully sounds it. So, Huckaboob plays a mean bass at FReeper balls, therefore vote for him and maybe he'll play that gig again. Yeah, great thinking JR. Nice piece you wrote telling FReepers basically to stop complaining, shut the hell up, never lose hope because you don't have a prayer anyway, and too drink your damn Kool-Aid.
Egads!
There are no replies to Comment # 23. End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#18. To: Uncle Bill (#1)
(Edited)
Seven good reasons to support Mike Huckabee [be sure to read reason number seven] The dark and jumbled recesses of my aging feeble brain | January 31, 2008 | Jim Robinson
#23. To: Ferret Mike (#18)
And that would be my reason no. 1 to support Huckabee.
Replies to Comment # 23.