Title: Coulter: I'll campaign for Hillary if McCain is the nominee Source:
Ann Coulter URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuTqgqhxVMc Published:Feb 1, 2008 Author:Ann Coulter Post Date:2008-02-01 12:38:27 by Horse Keywords:None Views:589 Comments:33
Coulter loves Bush and hates McCain. Why???? What's the difference? Both pro- war, both pro-amnesty, both in the back pocket of AIPAC, both "compassionate" (welfare state) conservatives.
It must be McCain's opposition to the use of torture (the one issue where he really parts company with the administration, and his one good quality) that makes people like Coulter hate his guts. I can't think of anything else.
Watching the GOP meltdown over McCain is a pure delight.
I'm happy about it too, but I don't understand it. If they can support Bush and call him a "real conservative," what is there not to like about McCain? He has the same views as Shrub, he's just more shrill about it.
Besides, when November comes, these nitwits will stop their chest thumping and vote for McCain, and once he's President, they'll defend his every move. A lot of these same people pretended to be unhappy with Bush when the 2000 primaries were on.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)
I KNEW this would happen. I didn't think McCain would be the trigger, but I knew that the "establishment" conservatives and neocons would abandon the Republican Party as soon as the Democratic Party became ascendant. I also knew that if the GOP's candidate wasn't sufficiently conservative (I thought McCain was, apparently he's not) they would switch horses and urge their neocon robots to back Hillary.
I knew it would happen if Ron Paul were the nominee, but what's their beef with McCain? He's just an older and crazier version of Bush as far as I can see.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)
#11. To: Brian S, christine, Kamala, TwentyTwelve, Wudidiz, robin, Peppa, Pinguinite, IndieTX, Cynicom, all (#3)
Annie, the Anorexic Chain Smoking Skag, Coulter is a good bellweather.
She is telegraphing ever more strongly, for those willing to look at the obvious, that there is NO REAL difference between Hitlery and Duhbya. They are as two peas in a fungus covered pod.
With Rush Limbaugh making nicey nice noises toward Hitlery anyone, except a Freeptard, can not avoid the obvious - they are selling a message that they are being given to SELL.
Hitlery IS the annointed one and all of the Faux Conservative Perception Management tools are going into play to sell to the gullible that:
"Hitlery ist Der Tag!"
If anyone wanted a good example of mass mind control via Perception Management this is it.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)
Hell, even Ron Paul was getting favorable mention as
the real conservative from a Human Events spokesman on one of the cable channels yesterday.
How can they avoid it ...
The Constitution is inherently conservative and Paul is a Constitutionalist. Even those with agendas that have been thought of as contrary to conservative values get even handed treatment under Constitutional application. They just don't get government funding or a special protected status.
"Give us liberty and give them death" ... noone222 1-10-08
... I didn't think McCain would be the trigger, but I knew that the "establishment" conservatives and neocons would abandon the Republican Party as soon as the Democratic Party became ascendant. I also knew that if the GOP's candidate wasn't sufficiently conservative (I thought McCain was, apparently he's not) they would switch horses and urge their neocon robots to back Hillary.
You're missing the point CONSERVATISM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. McLame is NOT A Conservative he is a Shill being set up to do as did Dole and Kerry - make it look convincing to the Sheople and then "take a dive" for his Masters. It is a FIXED Fight, a RIGGED electoral process.
This is about the REALITY that the "Two Party System" is actually a ONE PARTY System.
The Oilagarchy/Bankers have chosen Hitlery as our Dyketator and that is the reality.
Whether you wish to acknowledge that fact is up to you, but as long as you accept the false dialectic of Lib'rul/CONservative presented by Agents such as Coulter, Limbaugh, or Colmes you are trapped in the Matrix.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)
I agree that this is ONE party, and that the election process is a puppet show for the masses.
But they had at least 4-5 CFR dogs in the fight, and I don't think it really matters to the string
pullers who wins. MY guess is it will turn around again and we'll get Mitt. But it won't really
make a difference.
I think the choice of Hitlery as the Torch Burner is predicated upon a couple of things:
She is evil. That seems to be one of the requirements.
This continues the Hegelian Dialectic by posing Hitlery, allegedly a Democrat, as the polar opposite (actually nearly a perfect identity) to Duhbya.
Also the Oiligarchs are telegraphing it by having such as Annie, Skeletor's Daughter, Coulter and Rush, bumfukker, Limbazoid beginning to preach the "inevitability" of her ascension to the Preznitcy. Of course the real power remains out of sight and Hitlery gets to take responsibility for the crimes as part of her deal.
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
Annie here knows the presidential race is a choice of the shadow government's narrow choices they grudging allow us to peruse anyway. And knowing the system is a 'heads I win, tails you lose' construct anyway, she has the sense of having the luxury to tweak the system's nose in this manner.
I'm sure someone will remind her privately that even she has limits as to where she can safely take her jester's act. They fastidiously and aggressively go after any purveyor of the truth; that there is no real election. The whole thing is one blue pill taking festival.
They don't want anyone playing with the red pill that is the truth of how things actually work here and in the rest of the world.
Also the Oiligarchs are telegraphing it by having such as Annie, Skeletor's Daughter, Coulter and Rush, bumfukker, Limbazoid beginning to preach the "inevitability" of her ascension to the Preznitcy. Of course the real power remains out of sight and Hitlery gets to take responsibility for the crimes as part of her deal.
That is awfully funny in a sad kind of way if you know what I mean.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
It's hard to hide it when you're an arrogant prick. The same reason Cheney's not looking to ascend. The public won't have it.
McCain is an arrogant bastard, but so was Shrub, who during the 2000 election acted like he was entitled to a crown, throne, and scepter. And the look on Hillary's face during every debate radiates the "I'm entitled to the White House, dammit" vibes.
In other words, they're all garbage. So there isn't any reason to single out McCain and sing love songs to Shrub and Hillary. I think that the answer to why Limbaugh, Coulter, and the rest of the talk radio clown show doesn't like Mac is here:
http://rawstory.com//printstory.php?story=9102
Ann Coulter: McCain nomination would make me a 'Hillary girl' 02/01/2008 @ 9:17 am Filed by David Edwards and Muriel Kane
It seems as though the latest game among some conservative pundits is to play "can you top this" in seeing how far they can go to proclaim their distaste for Senator John McCain.
Radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh drew media attention to himself last week when he suggested he might not support McCain if he became the Republican nominee. Now Ann Coulter has upped the ante, telling Fox News host Sean Hannity that if John McCain is the Republican nominee, she's supporting Hillary Clinton.
"If he's our candidate, then Hillary's going to be our girl," Coulter asserted. "Because she's more conservative than he is. I think she would be stronger on the war on terrorism. ... I absolutely believe that. ... I will campaign for her if it's McCain."
Coulter went on to enumerate the areas in which she finds Clinton preferable to McCain, saying, "He has led the fight against -- well, as you say, interrogations, I say torture -- at Guantanamo. She hasn't done that."
"He did support the war," objected Hannity.
"So did Hillary," Coulter shot back, dismissing Hannity's suggestion that Clinton has promised to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq. "When George Bush said at the State of the Union Address that the surge is working in Iraq, Obama sat on his hands, Kennedy sat on his hands -- Hillary leapt up and applauded."
"She lies less than John McCain," Coulter continued. "She's smarter than John McCain, so that when she's caught shamelessly lying, at least the Clintons know they've been caught lying. McCain is so stupid he doesn't even know when he's been caught."
"John McCain is not only bad for Republicans," concluded Coulter, "he is very, very bad for the country."
Conservative bloggers in general reacted to Coulter's remarks by calling her an "idiot" or a "lunatic." However, one commenter at a conservative blog may have been more perceptive in offering the suggestion that "it is possible that Coulter said this to cause trouble for Hillary."
It does seem that Coulter may have been deliberately smearing Clinton on the torture issue. Despite claims last fall that she had been vague on the matter, Clinton clearly said at that time, "I think we have to draw a bright line and say 'No torture abide by the Geneva conventions, abide by the laws we have passed.'" A year earlier, Clinton had decried torture in announcing her opposition to the Military Commissions Act.
3 RINO Quislings that embrace the North American Community integration of Canada, the uSA and Mexico, just for starters.
You're "preaching to the choir" as they say. I wouldn't vote for any of that crowd, not even for dog catcher. I will vote for Ron or stay home and save gas and time. I don't vote for establishment clowns and criminals.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
Coulter: I'll campaign for Hillary if McCain is the nominee
Wow, amazing!
This Coulter guy goes on gop-tv and says that he's going to support the democrat if mccain is the nominee...............
What a desparate cry for help, its sad, really.
The whole tranny thing has been a failure, so now in a pathetic plea for attention, he throws the whole republican party under the wheels of the bus......
What next?
will hannity finally come out of the closet? Will limbaugh join the cast of celebrity rehab?, will jimrob convert to mormanism? what will we do? WHAT WILL WE DO?