See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Ron Paul's Goodbye (Jeff Rense)
Source:
Rense
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general80/goodbye.htm
Published: Feb 9, 2008
Author: Jeff Rense
Post Date: 2008-02-10 17:10:32 by robin
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President 2008* Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
Keywords: None
Views: 27461
Comments: 501
Ron Paul's Goodbye
Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
2-9-8
No Third Party Run'
Turns Attention To Keeping His Congressional Seat
2-9-8
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-405) not displayed.
.
.
.
#406. To: christine, wbales, rowdee (#403)
And here we stand, in the middle of Main Street, USA, with egg on our face, holding an empty burlap bag with a hole in the bottom, and our Pied Piper has bummed a dollar off us to take a coffee break.
If the man took a dive which some here seem to believe, uhh, why would you support him ever again? It's the 'supporters' that took a dive here... and are trying to drag as many as possible with them. Not a bunch to rally around, as they are just as bad corrupting the process, just like the system already in place. Trust us! We're clean and pure, my ass. Considering there are far better minds that have been elected to office 10 times around here, I'm pretty sure you would want a far better organization than the rag tag bunch of morons that raised a shitload of money for the guy some people want to crap on and vilify.
Considering there are far better minds that have been elected to office 10 times around here, I'm pretty sure you would want a far better organization than the rag tag bunch of morons that raised a shitload of money for the guy some people want to crap on and vilify. There is no excuse for such language.
And you. Please call them to get your money back. Tell me, at what point did the ad fail to go in, before or after the HQ snubbed your phone call. You know what, I think you are a malcontent in need of a soapbox and groupies.
And he could have taken the low road, Cyni, and been laughed off the stage......as being 'thin skinned', a 'whiner', or any other number of charming nicknames the msm would have blasted him with. Then, we'd be sitting here discussing that our candidate has no tact, that he was too stupid to realize he was being set up and that he bought it.......or a gazillion other things. No doubt 9/11 and truthin would have gotten in the mix somehow. I simply don't understand all this 'eating of our own' by people. Surely we're all grown up enough and savvy enough to realize msm wouldn't give him the time of day---but they weren't very good to folks like Tancredo, Hunter, Gilchrist, or Brownback, either. They were extremely effective during the debate periods of keeping the 'ball' out of his hands. And did you notice at the last one, they tried to keep the 'ball' away from Huckleberry, too? Surely we're all grown up enough and savvy enough to know that if he took off on a tangent about gubmint sponsored or endorsed actions resulting in 9/11 that he would definitely been described as a fringe idiot, or worse, and would never be given the chance to explain, or explain adequately his reasoning. I, for one, have never felt you had to 'read between the lines' to get a read of where Ron Paul stands or is coming from. Everytime I've heard him, he seems to know what he is saying and says it plainly. And yet he's challenged on that---look at how many "I thoughts' have been on these several threads. Not what "Ron thought or said", but "I thought". Has everyone lapsed back into bushbot mode?
God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!
I hope not.
As you know, I do try to exercise proper social manners Intentional gross language impresses no one. Never has and never will.
Exactly how many voters do you believe, chrissie, would cross over to vote for a violent person? He'd be laughed off the pages of history with his "Dean" moment.......and it would put a lie to his call for much more diplomacy. I understand the frustration everyone is going through. I've been known to say I'd like to beat the shit outta somebody for this or that. I'd sure get a lot of satisfaction, but without control of myself, what would make me presidential.......more people would be thinking I was acting like a hitler or a stalin, or the current buzz.......a trotsky!
God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!
row... Everyone has their own view and I respect yours. Paul asked for money and support and people responded, however if they were to publish a graph of donations I suspect there would be a steep decline. The fact that he is paring back staff surely is an indicator. I am not the only "malcontent", there seems to be many thousands that have decided enough is enough. Spamming me twice for money to run for Congress in Texas was a personal affront. I supported, I gave a great deal of money and to me that entitles me to withdraw and make my views known. Paul elucidated his views and his intentions very well via email.
Oh, Cyni........go wipe your face off--I didn't notice you have egg on it. :) I've seen more genuine honest to goodness enthusiasm for the beloved Constitution and sound government in this primary election season than any other time in my adult life. I'm rejoicing over that. I'm rejoicing that instead of young people all tattoos, pierced, pinned, or whatever, I was able to see a side of American in our young people that I was damned near convinced no longer existed. No one broke my arm, intimidated, nor threatened me into giving to a cause or person I believed in. I gave freely because I wanted the sounds of freedom to spread. Why don't you send his campaign an email asking for your money back; that it was taken under false pretenses, and outline all of the pretenses you believe to be false. If that fails to gain a response, try emailing his congress addy, or mailing a letter to his home. And above all, find that 'unsubscribe' hyperlink to get out of his system.
God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!
Regarding cutting back on campaign staff.........I read a news article where they all typically do that after the big rush of primaries is over. It conserves funds for the later primaries, hopefully provides to get thru the convention cycle, and once the nominee is declared, they ramp it up again. This is how they have people in states in place to 'jump on the bandwagon' after the convention's official nominee is announced. These are generally ramrodded by party diehards who keep lists of volunteers and the like, so in an instant they are behind the man, or woman. I'll try not to address any of your concerns again, Cyni, because you are certainly entitled to lament whatever wrongs you've been the recipient of. Best regards.....
God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!
That might be a little strong, Pepp. I do believe Cyni is voicing things as he sees it. And, then again, you're entitled to think as you do. I just hope things don't get carried away......frustrations and stress often make people go beyond civility. And while apologies can be made and accepted, once a word is spoken or written, its out there for eternity. Seems there's always a downside to something....many a time I thought I was right and said so, oftentimes in unflattering terms, and while sincerely apologizing, it's still out there and can be brought to mind in an instant.
God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!
I believe I know someone who just *might* need to go in for a thorough vision exam. ;^)
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. The whole world knows that you are upset with Ron Paul. Why don't you use your energy to expose Hillary, Obama, and McCain?
I don't hold RP's unwillingness to run Third Party (a lost cause - if you think he was invisible before, wait until he tries to run Libertarian or Constitution Party again) against him. What I find very strange is that he won't commit his energy, his supporters, and his substantial campaign contributions to keeping up the fight against a McCain victory. It's obvious that he won't win, but if his goal was to be a "message candidate," what better time to get the message out when the likely GOP nominee is the worst that they've ever had? Why won't he come out and say that he will refuse to endorse McCain's candidacy for President?
Let's just let it be a surprise? McHillobama should be a good lesson in 'how to grovel before the man' for all of us. /s
I am a Republican. I love the Republican Party. I've always been a Republican. My parents were Republicans. It's good to be a Republican.
I really hope that's not the long and short of it, but it's beginning to look like that. It's starting to remind me of Pat Buchanan - who started out fighting the good fight, but then gave a glowing endorsement of Bush in 2004 with some idiocy about "coming back home" to the GOP.
I also gave money to his campaign ($25), but have no reason to give any more. While I would have liked to see better use of the money donated, consider this: Much of his legitimacy (little that he had given the inherent bias) from the mainstream media came from the fact of his phenomenal grassroots fund raising. It's the only legitimacy that the gatekeepers recognized. His invitations to the various "debates" would have been much fewer had he only raised 1 or 2 million dollars. What our donations paid for was a foot in the door. I hope that the remaining funds are put to good use somehow. The problem that I see now is that people are ignoring the message that he'd been spreading during his candidacy. The issues he raised are absolutely correct whatever you think of him as a man and the decisions he made. The Ron Paul R3volution is not and should never have been about the man. Listening to him during the campaign, I learned about stuff I thought I already understood. One can only hope that enough people "got it" that these facts can be passed on to our posterity, or even if it is a foreign nation/culture that picks up the banner of liberty. It reminds me of (and in a way the problem is somewhat related) of America's ubiquitous Jesus worshippers who completely ignore Christ's message of how to get along with the rest of the world. They care nothing of the message, only whether or not they are "saved".
I remember all too well. I parted ways with the GOP now.
Jesus didn't quit on the way to the cross.
True, it should be about the message, not the messenger. That doesn't mean that the messenger should just give up the fight, especially not with somebody like McCain as the likely GOP nominee.
You illustrate my point. You are focusing on the personality, not the teaching.
NO, I'm not. Right now, I'm not focusing on anything. I have that right today.
You're right. The real reason for RP's failure is not his mediocre campaign style or even his lack of media coverage. The real reason he failed is that there are millions of people in this country who think that John McCain and Hillary Clinton are good candidates who deserve their support. If they were really unhappy with establishment candidates, voters would actively look for alternatives through alternative media, CNN and Fox be damned.
They have voted for more war and war they shall have.
I did learn how important the Republican Party is. I did learn that a House seat for 11 terms is more important than running a National Campaign through to the McHillobama (s)election in November. Paul might even get an opportunity to formally vote on the North American Community Charter if he stays around long enough.
I don't claim to fully understand his motives, and maybe he was pressured in some unspoken way (re. Trotsky comment)like Perot allegedly was. But it's just speculation at this point. Maybe he can explain it in his memoirs, I hope. I don't think running 3rd party would have helped at this point. What might be nice is if someone else running on Ron Paul's policies as a 3rd party received all the unused campaign money it would help. If it's Obama vs McHitler, I will strongly be inclined to vote Obama if only to prevent complete disaster -- but NOT if Obama is running on a ticket with Hillary (either as prez or vp). Then I would vote 3rd party (again) or not at all. At least Ron Paul's exit this early gives everyone some extra time to consider what happens next.
That's how I'm leaning too. Obama will be terrible for this country - increased welfare, affirmative action, open borders, gun grabbing, and misguided "peacekeeping" missions around the world. It will be like having a younger, darker Jimmy Carter in the WH. But I'll take Jimmy Carter over General Jack T. Ripper (Sterling Hayden's "purity of essence" character in DOCTOR STRANGELOVE) any day. More welfare is a lesser evil than nuclear war. With Hillary though, all bets are off.
I just hope things don't get carried away......frustrations and stress often make people go beyond civility. And while apologies can be made and accepted, once a word is spoken or written, its out there for eternity. Seems there's always a downside to something....many a time I thought I was right and said so, oftentimes in unflattering terms, and while sincerely apologizing, it's still out there and can be brought to mind in an instant. Not strong enough. For Sale: 1 Unity Onion.
you make some good points. still, i agree with Alex Jones who said awhile ago, if he were Ron Paul, he would throw caution to the wind.
The only solution to this mess is to dig a hole big enough to nudge them all in and cover quickly
2012 That is an oblique insult. And I resent it.
*Note to self: DO NOT LAUGH! I REPEAT, DO NOT LAUGH"!! "Additional Note to self: And wipe that silly grin off your face!!!"
God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!
What can I say, other than, "Thank goodness, Ron Paul is the voice of reason and not some hothead, as Alex has been called at times." :) Alex is behind a mic, no election or campaigning, no duty/responsibility to constituents. He can say what he wishes. OTOH, a candidate for office has to tread a thin line. They're under scrutiny all the time by opposition. A fart turns into a hurricane when reported in msm. A burp turns to vomit. Surely, you'll get a handful of votes or applause from those who saw or heard ya.......but when the line of vision or the cord to the mic is pulled by someone, how do you propose to get your hardhitting, calling a spade a spade message across? Smoke signals? That's about all you'll be seen..... All these smart, sharp reports sound great til the rubber meets the road. Same for smacking someone across the chops for treating you like a moron.......forever the image of Howard Dean doing his savage gutteral scream is implanted in the minds of the american sheeple. Its always mentioned.........is that what we want for the guy that is trying to convince americans that foreign policy should be different, or that our monetary policy is killing us, or that the Constitution matters? Some loony bin spouting off about money, foreign policy, economics, Constitution when he should be in some asylum taking meds? Or how about him smacking someones chops and getting tossed in the hoosegow for assault and battery--even if he was let go within 6 hours--there's your jailbird stigma! I'm sure glad I picked a winner, if he never officially wins. He's a man of highest integrity, honesty, principled, a family man, a lover of the Constitution, and a gentle man as well as gentleman. Can all those things be said of the other candidates in the hunt?
God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!
"Additional Note to self: And wipe that silly grin off your face!!!" LOL! Wanna buy and unyum?
if you're referring to the person who claimed to be charoltte iserbyte, she is fully credible. if she claims to have gotten that message its true. the only question is, is the person who posted it really iserbyte. (not that any of it makes much diff anyway '-0
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Thanks, Peppa. YW GDT. Not a pleasant situation.
Who are you voting for in Nov? If those are the only choices then I won't vote. In fact, I'm probably done voting.....forever
"'Schools is educationy' ; A message from our president."
Comments (446 - 501) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#407. To: wbales (#395)
If the man sincerely has the political revolution in his heart, he should abandon the Republican (/Democrat) party. He should abandon the House of Representatives. Ron Paul should announce and organize a third political party not as a candidate but as a figurehead--a leader--a centerpoint under which candidates are groomed and supported at all levels of American government. The seed money is in place. The organization is in place. The time is ripe.
#408. To: Peppa (#407)
It's the 'supporters' that took a dive here... and are trying to drag as many as possible with them. Not a bunch to rally around, as they are just as bad corrupting the process, just like the system already in place. Trust us! We're clean and pure, my ass.
#409. To: Cynicom (#408)
(Edited)
There is no excuse for such language.
#410. To: Cynicom, Anyone who gives a damn anymore (#400)
#411. To: rowdee (#410)
Has everyone lapsed back into bushbot mode?
#412. To: Peppa (#409)
There is no excuse for such language.
#413. To: christine (#402)
#414. To: rowdee (#410)
#415. To: Cynicom (#405)
#416. To: Cynicom (#414)
#417. To: Peppa (#409)
You know what, I think you are a malcontent in need of a soapbox and groupies.
#418. To: wudidiz (#383)
You gotta admit, she looks pretty hot in polka-dots.
Lord Acton
#419. To: Cynicom (#414)
I supported, I gave a great deal of money and to me that entitles me to withdraw and make my views known.
#420. To: Cynicom, LACUMO (#414)
#421. To: TwentyTwelve (#419)
Why don't you use your energy to expose Hillary, Obama, and McCain?
#422. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#420)
#423. To: _______ (#422)
#424. To: robin, Pinguinite, christine, all (#0)
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#425. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#423)
#426. To: PnbC (#424)
#427. To: PnbC (#424)
The Ron Paul R3volution is not and should never have been about the man. Listening to him during the campaign, I learned about stuff I thought I already understood. One can only hope that enough people "got it" that these facts can be passed on to our posterity, or even if it is a foreign nation/culture that picks up the banner of liberty
#428. To: _______ (#426)
Jesus didn't quit on the way to the cross.
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#429. To: PnbC (#428)
#430. To: PnbC (#428)
#431. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#430)
The real reason he failed is that there are millions of people in this country who think that John McCain and Hillary Clinton are good candidates who deserve their support
#432. To: All (#429)
#433. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#427)
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#434. To: PnbC (#433)
(Edited)
If it's Obama vs McHitler, I will strongly be inclined to vote Obama if only to prevent complete disaster -- but NOT if Obama is running on a ticket with Hillary (either as prez or vp). Then I would vote 3rd party (again) or not at all.
#435. To: rowdee (#417)
That might be a little strong, Pepp. I do believe Cyni is voicing things as he sees it. And, then again, you're entitled to think as you do.
#436. To: PnbC, rowdee (#424)
#437. To: TwentyTwelve (#419)
2012
#438. To: rowdee (#435)
#439. To: christine (#436)
#440. To: rowdee (#438)
*Note to self: DO NOT LAUGH! I REPEAT, DO NOT LAUGH"!!
#441. To: robin (#4)
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#442. To: Peppa (#407)
#443. To: rowdee (#439)
#444. To: ghostdogtxn (#442)
Exactly.
#445. To: robin (#394)
....Obama to Hillary and McCain.
.
.
.