[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams

FEMA whistleblowers revealed a treasonous misuse of taxpayer funds.

Exposing how useless FEMA is in Asheville, NC.

Kamala Harris Admin ARRESTED a man for bringing a helicopter full of supplies to Hurricane Helene victims.

MSNBC brings on an anti-Trump impeachment witness, only to be stunned when he announces he's voting for Trump.

She escaped the religious sect she grew up in. Now she says Trump’s MAGA movement is eerily similar

Federal Law REQUIRES Car Makers to MONITOR You

Candace Owens: When are you going to address this, KAMALA?

Democrats Celebrate a Seemingly Impressive September Jobs Report – What They are Not Telling You

The Boiling Point – America Have You Had ‘Enough,’ Yet?

Shopping Malls Implementing Curfews And Teen "Waiting Zones" To Try And Curb Chaos, Theft And Fights

US Public Debt Grew $115 Billion A Day For the Past 3 Days Totaling $345 Billion.

Dramatic Footage Shows Tanker Blown Up In Critical Maritime Chokepoint As Disasters Mount For Biden-Harris

The Remdesivir Papers: Did Service Members Deserve to Die?

“My Blood is Boiling”: Furious Elon Musk Goes Off on FEMA for Blocking SpaceX Engineers from Assisting

“The Stench is Unbearable”: Dead Bodies Piling Up, FEMA Abandons NC Residents Amid Hurricane Helene

Cash and the Constitution

Disaster Relief (INSIDER) Tells Why FEMA Won't Let Citizens Help.

The $212 Billion Dollar Food ingredient poisoning your Brain

"Last Election EVER" - Elon Musk vs Mark Cuban: Billionaires BATTLE Over Dangers If Trump Loses 2024


Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Ron Paul's Goodbye (Jeff Rense)
Source: Rense
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general80/goodbye.htm
Published: Feb 9, 2008
Author: Jeff Rense
Post Date: 2008-02-10 17:10:32 by robin
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President 2008*     Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
Keywords: None
Views: 27364
Comments: 501

Ron Paul's Goodbye

By Jeff Rense
2-9-8

The real issue now is that Ron Paul is effectively out of the race ....whether he directly came out and said it or not. In his statement of thanks to his supporters (see below), he also announced he's cutting his staff way back. The message is clear.
The last Ron Paul 'money bomb' showed a substantial loss of support momentum...which was/is largely the result of his complete public disassociation and denouncement of the entire 911 Truth Movement during that national 'debate' several weeks ago.

That was either a bald-faced, enormous, lie to try to keep himself politically 'alive' ... OR that is HIS truth.
Either way, it cost him a lot of support.
We know several Ron Paul backers who dropped him at that moment... and it was reflected in the failed, subsequent fundraising.
His poor showing (absolutely expected) in the primaries was the final truth his devoted supporters had to swallow: the system is totally owned and operated by the controllers. Period.

Many Paulites will now walk away from this obviously, hopelessly corrupt and manipulated political charade in America...and will never look back. Some will stay.
Ron announced."I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican"and will not leave the party to run as an independent. (A Paul-Kucinich ticket would have at least been FUN).
WHAT Republican party?? That was a lamentable statement to read. Ron must be thinking it is still the Republican Party of the 19th century.

The Republican 'party' NOW stands for the BIG LIE, it stands for CRIME and DEATH, for GENOCIDE and PERVERSION, for TAXATION and GRAFT, for the FED and FINANCIAL RAPE, for DOMESTIC SPYING and the PATRIOT ACT, ...it stands for the end of LIBERTY and of our CONSTITUTION. Above all, it now stands for Zionism and WAR.
That statement alone probably ended about half of his remaining support. As we said many months ago, if he does NOT run as an independent, he will effectively put 'finis' to great portion of the majority of patriotic passion and commitment of the small, brave patriotic awakening he awakened in this rat hole political paradigm. And if the controllers are as smart as we think, they may well have orchestrated much of the 'Paul phenomena' to ultimately send the message, yet again, that 'resistance is futile!'
Ron said he needs to go home to Texas and work for his re-election to the House. That's a wise decision because the enemies of freedom and the Constitution, knowing all along he never had a chance in hell of gaining the nomination, will now try to unseat him...and they can do so if it be their will. Ask Cynthia McKinney.
So, even though he says he's 'still in the race' it is totally meaningless. Publicly, via his disassociation from 911 Truth, he is 'officially' standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Bush/Cheney and Zionism on 911.

He had a GREAT opportunity to bring 911 Truth forward during the campaign...and chose to hide it.
And, God forbid, if he really spoke HIS truth in the debate about the whole 911 issue, he is clearly, totally, disconnected from the biggest reality of our time: that 911 was an inside job.
Sad to see him give it up...but it was totally predictable and comes as no surprise. For his die-hard supporters and those who cherish America's nearly vanquished past magnificence, keep at it. Work at the local level...run for office... just know that the clock is ticking and the enemies of Freedom stand all around us and often in between us.

Of all the great American political leaders who sacrificed their lives for freedom, Ron chose, instead, to quote the zionist maniac killer Communist Trotsky about the 'revolution being permanent.' A strange choice. The statement could have been made without the need to acknowledge a Bolshevik madman.
In any case, the 'Ron Paul Revolution' is over... now just a footnote, an asterisk, in the grim record of these darkening times. Certainly, some will endeavor to carry on his themes...something the CIA/NSA supercomputer models knew and predicted long ago.
Ron Paul is a grand anachronism...a principled man out of time, as it were. He truly made a difference. And for that we owe him much.

Ron Paul - 'There Will Be
No Third Party Run'
Turns Attention To Keeping His Congressional Seat

Message from Ron Paul
2-9-8
Whoa! What a year this has been. And what achievements we have had. If I may quote Trotsky of all people, this Revolution is permanent. It will not end at the Republican convention. It will not end in November. It will not end until we have won the great battle on which we have embarked. Not because of me, but because of you. Millions of Americans -- and friends in many other countries -- have dedicated themselves to the principles of liberty: to free enterprise, limited government, sound money, no income tax, and peace. We will not falter so long as there is one restriction on our persons, our property, our civil liberties. How much I owe you. I can never possibly repay your generous donations, hard work, whole-hearted dedication and love of freedom. How blessed I am to be associated with you. Carol, of course, sends her love as well.

Let me tell you my thoughts. With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero. But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get. But with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter. Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties -- just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.
I also have another priority. I have constituents in my home district that I must serve. I cannot and will not let them down. And I have another battle I must face here as well. If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas. I cannot and will not let that happen.
In the presidential race and the congressional race, I need your support, as always. And I have plans to continue fighting for our ideas in politics and education that I will share with you when I can, for I will need you at my side. In the meantime, onward and upward! The neocons, the warmongers, the socialists, the advocates of inflation will be hearing much from you and me.
Sincerely,

Ron
Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-448) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#449. To: lodwick (#447)

What else can we do when fighting for the very life of our country?

Figure out who to trust.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   15:55:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#450. To: christine (#96)

with everything you've said about the corrupt two party system, you'd now take part in it and lend legitimacy to it? good grief. i thought you and everyone else here KNEW it's a rigged system. the selection has already been made.

IF NOT RON PAUL. NO ONE. ROCK THE NO VOTE ONCE AGAIN.

Ya damn skippy! There certainly isn't anything worth voting for other than Ron, not unless Chuck Baldwin might run on the CP ticket. I would proudly vote for Chuck. Otherwise I haven't seen or heard of anyone I thought would be any good. I have been a longtime supporter of Ron's and I had hoped he was "in it to win it" as they say but this latest announcement doesn't look good.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-11   16:08:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#451. To: Cynicom (#252)

Makes me sick.

As well he should. His precious House seat is 95% safe - as in incumbency is the ultimate job insurance for politicians - and he absconded with untold millions of dollars in "money bombs." Toss his aging semi revolutionary carcass into the Republican Party bone yard with those of all the other political saviours who have come and gone in our lifetime.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-11   16:14:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#452. To: robin (#128)

OK, do you prefer McCain or Hillary? Those are your only other real alternatives at this point.

The alleged "choice" between McLame, Hitlery and Obammer is much akin to choosing between deciding whether to commit suicide by hanging yourself or ingesting rat poison. Neither is much of a way to go and those "choices" are not my idea of anyone I could ever vote for. I would rather stay home and not waste gas.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-11   17:55:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#453. To: HOUNDDAWG (#446)

Some won't believe in Ron Paul now unless he shows them the nail holes in his hands and feet.

What you say is gospel, dawgie.........and how very, very sad.

And all along he's tried to say its the message, its the message, and that he might not be the right messenger....but since he didn't walk on water, or at least turn it to wine, he's a phony, a fake, a money-hungry fanatic, a sleeze bag with no conscience or principles, no better than the rest, and if you read between the lines, you'll find that he's in bed with the man who represents all that Ron Paul despises! And I'll betcha someone will arrive at the 'fact' that he is a jew or some such......at least anything but white!

Hard to believe that everyone was duped--well, ceptin me and a handful of others.........I mean, the masses were really taken for a ride by this tinhorn texan.

God wants spiritual fruits, not religious nuts!

rowdee  posted on  2008-02-11   18:34:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#454. To: Peppa (#407)

If the man took a dive which some here seem to believe, uhh, why would you support him ever again?

That's f-ing stupid statement/question.

Therein, you ASSUME AND AVER that I, wbales, are among those "some" which here seem to believe that Ron Paul took a dive. There is NOTHING in my posts serving as a factual basis for your query. That being said, I support the Political Revolution which far exceeds the man, Ron Paul. I shall, however, support him and anyone associated therewith, even tangentially.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:28:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#455. To: christine (#96)

with everything you've said about the corrupt two party system, you'd now take part in it and lend legitimacy to it? good grief. i thought you and everyone else here KNEW it's a rigged system. the selection has already been made.

IF NOT RON PAUL. NO ONE. ROCK THE NO VOTE ONCE AGAIN.

I understand and I respect your disappointment.

My views on the corrupt 2-party system have not changed a bit. If I vote for Obama in November, and it's very likely that I will if McCain would become the US president unless someone defeats him, I would not do it with pleasure. There are many things I don't care about in Obama's views. However, there are some positives that I would like to point:

- He is not taking PAC money. Unless he lies, this is very positive. My hope is that, once president, he would pressure the congress to end the PAC and the lobbying.

- He appears to be intelligent and he does not seem to be evil. Bill Clinton's evil nature was apparent to me from the second I saw/heard him and so was Bush's near-infinite dark stupidity but, in the case of Obama I can't see much evil.

- He is more white than black, and this is probably his darkest and deepest secret. It's possible that not even his wife are aware of it.

- His partial black nature should help the white-black reconciliation a lot more than Clinton demagoguery.

- While clearly leaning toward socialism and collectivism, his mind does not appear to be completely closed.

- He does not seem to be seeking power for the sake of possessing it and exercising it.

- As someone who taught 'Constitution' he may be showing more respect for that document than a Clinton or a Bush.

- He is neither Clinton and he is not Bush.

- As one who doesn't care for PAC financing, he might be less vulnerable to AIPAC's attempts at control.

He is more a populist than he is a Demo. I doubt that the Demo establishment wishes to have Obama in the WH.

I understand why not everyone would want to vote for Obama and I will not try to persuade anyone to do so. I know that my own kids would have a hard time voting for him if they were of voting age - Obama says keep the kids away from the Teevee unless you want them to grow up dumb so, when I asked them to choose between the 'no Teevee' Obama and the McCain alternative who would send them to fight some stupid wars, they both demanded for a third alternative. To conclude, if I end up pulling the lever (so to speak) for Obama, I will do it not only for reasons of he being the lesser evil but also because I do see some qualities in him.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:28:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#456. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#455)

he might be less vulnerable to AIPAC's attempts at control.

Nonsense. Excuse my cynicism, but Obama wouldn't be where he is today but for the blessing of Tel Aviv. They are ALL under thier thumb.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:32:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#457. To: wbales (#456)

There was some score that Ha'aretz is assigning to the candidates to the US presidency, from the p.o.v. of how good they were for Israel. Obama had the lowest score of them all. The article was posted at this site a couple of weeks ago.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:35:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#458. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#420)

What I find very strange is that he won't commit his energy, his supporters, and his substantial campaign contributions to keeping up the fight against a McCain victory. It's obvious that he won't win, but if his goal was to be a "message candidate," what better time to get the message out when the likely GOP nominee is the worst that they've ever had? Why won't he come out and say that he will refuse to endorse McCain's candidacy for President?

A very valid and asute observation.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:36:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#459. To: wbales (#456) (Edited)

You got that right. Go Mcbamaton!

nobody  posted on  2008-02-11   19:36:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#460. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#457)

Obama had the lowest score of them all.

And what was that? 94 out of 100?

An American presidential candidate must have the blessing of Tel Aviv as a condition precedent to running.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:38:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#461. To: wbales (#460)

I believe, and my recall may not be perfect, Giuliani had the highest score, in the 700's, followed closely by McCain and Hillary. Obama had something like 300. Perhaps someone can find that article.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:44:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#462. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#457)

Obama had the lowest score of them all.

As an aside and I was pondering, where was Ron Paul in that scoring??

Was he totally left out as per federal Ziomedia procedure??

Did this poll not mention Paul as he was in negative numbers???

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:47:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#463. To: Peppa (#212)

Don't trip on your ego, it's the only thing that makes you half way attractive.

You should find the strength and the intelligence inside yourself to acknowledge your mistakes and misjudgments. The ability to learn from past mistakes is not even reserved to human nature, it's part of most sentient beings' nature.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:49:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#464. To: wbales (#462)

Yes, the article stated that RP's Israel attitude was so low, he didn't get a score. It was probably close to zero or maybe negative.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:50:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#465. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#461)

Giuliani had the highest score, in the 700's, followed closely by McCain and Hillary. Obama had something like 300.

So, a perfect score for Israel would have been 200 or so.

HHHHMM, I wonder if any other countries have polls on which American president would be best for thier particular country? Or, does only Israel do this?

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#466. To: wbales (#454)

Therein, you ASSUME AND AVER that I, wbales, are among those "some" which here seem to believe that Ron Paul took a dive

No, that's not what I said. I said some here said he took a dive. And why would you want a that sort of candidate to lead your new effort. And further, why should his supporters rally around a new Party label, since the party is unnamed and unknown. You have a known entity, Ron Paul, but that is just not good enough. You have to know that people took ron paul out from the inside, are smearing him now, to force their will and desire of a new undefined party down our throats, or they'd rather see the message die, and RP go down in flames. It's their way or the highway. But worse.

The outrage should be directed at those who are dancing in glee over this smear of Ron Paul and those parading as 3rd party promoters, in that they have guaranteed more of the status quo.

That's my take Wbales. That you want to have new parties, when I myself rather see a No Party system, are equal gaps in attainable reality, in the near future anyway. I was voting the the message and the man. If a new party can deliver such a person, that can especially drive home the 9/11 truthers issues... good luck. I simply read through the bitching carping and complaining about everything RP was not, and can't imagine this group finding a candidate again, that can even or would even, meet them half way.

It's not my problem anymore anyway. It's up to the dancers to find their guy.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   19:51:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#467. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#464)

RP's Israel attitude was so low, he didn't get a score

And which co-incides, serendipitously, with Ron Paul's covereage in the "American" federal media.

Well, well......

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:52:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#468. To: wbales (#465)

It's likely that Mexico might have something like this. I would be surprised if the Chinese politburo didn't score the candidates.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:53:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#469. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#463)

You should find the strength and the intelligence inside yourself to acknowledge your mistakes and misjudgments. The ability to learn from past mistakes is not even reserved to human nature, it's part of most sentient beings' nature.

Are you typing with both hands, or congratulating yourself again?

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   19:53:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#470. To: Peppa (#469)

See? Can't admit to your own mistakes. This is very bad. I recall that Bush was unable to name even one mistake of his. Hillary is always placing blame on others for her mistakes.

This is bad, bad, bad. Almost hopeless.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   19:55:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#471. To: Peppa (#466)

That you want to have new parties, when I myself rather see a No Party system

A joint effort of like minded shall be a party regardless. And, yes, we needed a new one. I'm already a member of it. The "No Party" party moniker would be fine with me.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   19:57:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#472. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#468)

It's likely that Mexico might have something like this. I would be surprised if the Chinese politburo didn't score the candidates.

I bet you are right. But none hold the sway and influence of that shitty little pile of sand in the middle east.

It is distressing that foreign interests direct our internal politics so.

They are very of afraid of Ron Paul. Good.

wbales  posted on  2008-02-11   20:00:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#473. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#470)

See? Can't admit to your own mistakes. This is very bad. I recall that Bush was unable to name even one mistake of his. Hillary is always placing blame on others for her mistakes.

This is bad, bad, bad. Almost hopeless.

Show me my mistake Maha bedwetter.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   20:07:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#474. To: wbales (#471)

A joint effort of like minded shall be a party regardless. And, yes, we needed a new one. I'm already a member of it. The "No Party" party moniker would be fine with me.

Please let me know of your progress. Love to hear it.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   20:10:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#475. To: Peppa (#473)

Your biggest mistake is refusing to learn from your own mistakes.

Or... is it an inability? Or, rather... disability? In which case it wouldn't be a mistake. Only a limitation. A rather severe one. A VERY severe limitation but not everyone is born perfect, even though some do manage to improve themselves while others... don't or can't.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   20:10:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#476. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#475)

Your biggest mistake is refusing to learn from your own mistakes.

Or... is it an inability? Or, rather... disability? In which case it wouldn't be a mistake. Only a limitation. A rather severe one. A VERY severe limitation but not everyone is born perfect, even though some do manage to improve themselves while others... don't or can't.

You sure know me well.

I suppose you best not bother with me then. I have no intention of becoming anything like you. You're actually repulsive. But keep the ego flowing, I LOVE the entertainment.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-11   20:14:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#477. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#457)

There was some score that Ha'aretz is assigning to the candidates to the US presidency, from the p.o.v. of how good they were for Israel. Obama had the lowest score of them all.

He also does not score high with the un-guested worker crowd. He's also the only candidate in either party that opposed the Iraq idiocy.

That's why so many Republicans and Independents are voting for him.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-11   20:24:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#478. To: Peppa (#476)

This is one out of the one or 2 posts from you I found to be even remotely coherent. And, yet, so completely wrong and disconnected from reality, it boggles the normal mind. All posts that followed this one were just stupid BS of the stupidest kind. Not that this one was in any way brilliant.

#187. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#182)

is 70% behind George W. Bush and George W. Bush's agenda of war, torture, outsourcing out economy, trading individual liberty for 'security', national bankruptcy via over-spending and borrowing and cancer-like growing state. If I am the only one who finds this a bit bizarre, then I beg for everybody else's pardon.

Vast, the last election proved that not to be the case.

Dems were 'swept' into power for a change. His poll numbers and those that support him reflect the ignorant and his real benefactors. All bottom feeders.

Dem poll numbers have tanked.

Congress' numbers blow.

These are for the people paying attention.

There are a large number of voters now that are not captured in true polling, as you are no doubt aware.

I think the light is brighter than you might think. I think the people are smarter than ever given credit for. And that is evident, by the smell of fear in the media.

Peppa posted on 2007-11-11 13:11:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   21:50:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#479. To: iconoclast (#477)

I am in the process of educating myself on the topic. Just saw his wife on L King. She's impressive.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-02-11   21:52:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#480. To: christine (#399)

where's V

It's time.

It's too bad, but it is time. There is no other way.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-12   1:05:41 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#481. To: PnbC (#433)

At least Ron Paul's exit this early gives everyone some extra time to consider what happens next.

Yes. It allows us to begin survival preparations.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-12   1:18:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#482. To: HOUNDDAWG (#445)

In fact, I'm probably done voting.....forever

IMO, America will not survive long enough for us to vote again after this "election."

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-02-12   1:20:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#483. To: wudidiz, Pinguinite (#344)

Since you are going to give yukon a piece of your mind and another one for Pinguinite maybe you could give him another one for me. Who knows, with three pieces that might get the boy up to about the level of an amoeba.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-12   7:33:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#484. To: christine (#399)

where's V?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-02-12   7:57:20 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#485. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#479)

I am in the process of educating myself on the topic. Just saw his wife on L King. She's impressive.

Quite a refreshing contrast to Hill and Bill, eh? ;-)

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-12   8:11:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#486. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#478)

And that is evident, by the smell of fear in the media.

They have the herd somewhat contained but there is danger of a stampede.

angle  posted on  2008-02-12   8:27:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#487. To: Peppa (#478) (Edited)

Oh... I see that should have been directed to you. Quel surprise! I though VWR had a post I supported, but no, upon more careful inspection...it was yours.

Some operatives on this board, do you think?

angle  posted on  2008-02-12   8:34:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#488. To: angle (#487)

Some operatives on this board, do you think?

Oh yes. Many more than I thought.

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-12   9:01:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (489 - 501) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]