See other World News Articles
Title: Obama's main advisor--New World Order promotor Brezinski
Source:
losangeles.craigslist
URL Source: http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/pol/569259248.html
Published: Feb 10, 2008
Author: craigslist member
Post Date: 2008-02-13 11:31:17 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Ping List: *Bilderberg and NWO Watch* Subscribe to *Bilderberg and NWO Watch*
Keywords: None
Views: 2074
Comments: 88
Obama's main advisor--New World Order promotor Brezinski Date: 2008-02-10, 8:15AM PST Are people bothering to dig slightly deeper into Obama's background and realize that Zbenew Brezinski is his main advisor? The man practically created the Trilateral Commission, and works with the Council on Foreign Relations to erase our borders and create a " New World Order ". Just read articles in their journal Foreign Affairs, for confirmation. They are open about their ideals. Globalism means combining with Mexico and Canada to create a giant economic zone called the North American Union. Hence, Obama's support of 20 million illegal aliens gaining citizenship. The Dems keep funding Bush's Iraq war. THEY ARE HIS PARTNERS! Wake up. The only anti-war candidate is Ron Paul. Obama was voted the most liberal Senator, to the left of Kennedy. Is this what people want? A big spender, and more big government??? Learn the truth about the New World Order. Go to jimmarrs.com, infowars.com, rense.com, newswithviews.com and start educating yourself.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Here's your NWO boy. You have plenty of time to get good and geeked to elect this phony bologna puppet. Let him whisper sweet nothings in your ear, pass it on.
Brzezinski opposed Bush's war in Iraq from the start. I remember hearing him speak very critically of it back in 2003, when I still supported it. His most recent book, The Choice, is devastatingly critical of that war and of Bush's foreign policy in general, and advocates a peace policy of engagement with Iran, peacemaking in the Middle East and Kashmir, and a regional nuclear nonproliferation pact.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
All that talk is 'distraction.' The same as the Pentagon "attacking itself."
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
A few days ago I heard Webster Tarpley discussing Obama. Tarpley said that if Obama wins the election there will be a major war between Russia and the U.S. Tarpley said that Obama is a warmonger and is very dangerous. Tarpley warned that America should not be fooled by Obama, as Obama is not who we think he is.
Better somebody with Brzezinski as an advisor than somebody who tap-dances to Norman Podhoretz's song. It's too bad that the only "choice" we get is between having one leg or both legs broken, but that's what it may be down to.
Like Hillary and McCain are better?
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! So Obama is in agreement with ZBig in this. A far cry from Hillary and McCain on this very critical issue. from 2002: I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! They're all 3 exactly the same. McHillobama was the plan from the get go. I have to question how ANY Ron Paul supporter could get it on with any of those 3 Council on Foreign Relations puppets. Seriously question.
LOL Some people will buy anything.
You find it amusing that Obama was against the war in 2002, stated so publicly and attacked Wolfowitz and Perle by name. Show me anyone you would vote for (with a chance of winning) who did that, in 2002 or even now.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! I find it sad that you believe a word he says. OBAMA'S GLOBAL TAX PROPOSAL UP FOR SENATE VOTE (#1) [Full Thread]
McHillobama will win. I support none of it.
From DeepBlackLies "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens." Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner (2001) "The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities." Zbigniew Brzezinski. I guess some people better start sucking up to the NWO. Supporting anything about McHillobama would be a start.
It is sad that you would prefer to see McCain in the WH. Not that he would be there long, the entire country would be destroyed.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! There are clear differences, you just choose not to see them. Right now the REAL choices in REALITY are McCain, Hillary and Obama. Make your choice or someone else will.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! And you think McCain and Hillary are not a part of this? They are and McCain is promising us 100 years of wars.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! LOL. Choice? I'm surprised you're falling for this. Obama is a gun grabbin', NAU pushin', infanticide lovin' Marxist, but hey, he made a passing comment once or twice against the neocons, so he's my guy! Doesn't take much to win your heart, I guess!
Robin, it's a play and you've fallen for it. You can pretend they are different, you can pretend you're making a difference in their charade but in the end you've latched onto one of them.
For some odd reason you believe that McHillobama actually will run their WH. They're puppets going the same place just with different lies and manipulations.
Obama is a gun grabbin', NAU pushin', infanticide lovin' Marxist, but hey, he made a passing comment once or twice against the neocons, so he's my guy! Doesn't take much to win your heart, I guess! I wonder what percentage of Ron Paul supporters are in the same league.
But not all puppets are exactly alike. The Bush regime is the worst we've seen yet.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! Have fun. You don't get it and are now playing their game, latching onto a NWOist. Take care.
OH I get it, but if there is a chance there is a difference I will vote for that chance. You are just going to let someone else make the decision for you, or are you voting for McCain?
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! Do you think FDR was just doing the bidding of his masters, that any differences from the policies of his Republican predecessors were cosmetic and superficial? The Roosevelt haters among our upper classes sure didn't think so. It's beginning to look as if Obama may win as sweeping a victory as FDR did in 1932. That would presumably give him the power to make real changes in our system, if he is so inclined. Who do you think stole the NH primary from Obama, and why do you think they did so?
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Et tu, ari?
Every one of them is playing for the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateralists and Bilderbergs. ALL 3. I don't play their games, but if it gives you something to do GO FOR IT! If there isn't a candidate that I can support, then I won't be supporting a candidate. I don't have to be busy with a candidate to have a life.
You're surprised?
Hitlery will be the next POTUS, but McHillobama is good theater for the suckers.
It could well be theatre, but they could always make a mistake. I wondered aloud the other day that perhaps healthy 3rd party runs are being discouraged or even threatened because it is a more difficult task for Diebold. And as I've posted before, McCain could get hit by lightening before Nov.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! Don't fight, we're all screwed except if RP gets in. Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC "You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
Are you serious? If Obama is placed in power he'll be the establishment House butler. If his learning curve is delayed for any reason, they'll nudge him out and replace him with a more compliant servant. This is America we're talking about....
Who do you think stole the NH primary from Obama, and why do you think they did so? Since you didn't answer my questions, let me repeat them.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Mika's kind of hot.
Well I am praying for lightening, while looking for any possible ray of light.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! If he had NH stolen why is he now winning?
Vote-stealing can only do so much.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Sooooooo......you're saying they stole NH on him, then stopped?
I suspect stealing in NH was easier: Clinton supporters were in power in the state government; Republican operatives wanted to run against Clinton, not Obama; a very fishy outfit with criminal and Republican associations had the contract to monitor the voting computers in NH. Repeating the crime elsewhere would have been more difficult, perhaps impossible.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
They are and McCain is promising us 100 years of wars. Of course they are. We are left with nothing but NWO sock puppets as our "viable choices" for President of the United States. I'll either be writing in Ron Paul, or my own name on the November ballot, failing any sort of miraculous rise of a popular third party candidate.
Comments (42 - 88) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestObama's main advisor--New World Order promotor Brezinski
#2. To: robin, iconoclast (#0)
#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
#4. To: aristeides (#3)
#5. To: _______, robin, iconoclast, all (#2)
Here's your NWO boy. You have plenty of time to get good and geeked to elect this phony bologna puppet. Let him whisper sweet nothings in your ear, pass it on.
#6. To: aristeides (#3)
(Edited)
Brzezinski opposed Bush's war in Iraq from the start. I remember hearing him speak very critically of it back in 2003, when I still supported it. His most recent book, The Choice, is devastatingly critical of that war and of Bush's foreign policy in general, and advocates a peace policy of engagement with Iran, peacemaking in the Middle East and Kashmir, and a regional nuclear nonproliferation pact.
#7. To: _______ (#2)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#8. To: aristeides, _______ (#3)
Brzezinski opposed Bush's war in Iraq from the start. I remember hearing him speak very critically of it back in 2003, when I still supported it. His most recent book, The Choice, is devastatingly critical of that war and of Bush's foreign policy in general, and advocates a peace policy of engagement with Iran, peacemaking in the Middle East and Kashmir, and a regional nuclear nonproliferation pact.
en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#9. To: robin (#7)
Like Hillary and McCain are better?
#10. To: robin (#8)
#11. To: _______ (#10)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#12. To: robin (#11)
#13. To: robin (#11)
#14. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, _______, robin, iconoclast, aristeides, TwentyTwelve (#0)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#15. To: FormerLurker (#14)
Zbigniew Brzezinski
#16. To: _______ (#12)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#17. To: _______ (#13)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#18. To: FormerLurker (#14)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#19. To: robin (#17)
Make your choice or someone else will.
#20. To: robin (#17)
There are clear differences, you just choose not to see them.
#21. To: robin (#18)
They are and McCain is promising us 100 years of wars.
#22. To: Vitamin Z (#19)
LOL. Choice? I'm surprised you're falling for this.
#23. To: _______ (#21)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#24. To: robin (#23)
#25. To: _______ (#24)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#26. To: _______ (#21)
#27. To: aristeides (#26)
#28. To: robin (#25)
#29. To: Vitamin Z (#27)
#30. To: aristeides (#26)
#31. To: _______ (#30)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#32. To: robin, _______ D (#25)
#33. To: aristeides (#26)
It's beginning to look as if Obama may win as sweeping a victory as FDR did in 1932. That would presumably give him the power to make real changes in our system, if he is so inclined.
#34. To: Jethro Tull (#33)
Do you think FDR was just doing the bidding of his masters, that any differences from the policies of his Republican predecessors were cosmetic and superficial? The Roosevelt haters among our upper classes sure didn't think so.
#35. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#32)
#36. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#32)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#37. To: aristeides (#34)
Who do you think stole the NH primary from Obama
#38. To: Jethro Tull (#37)
#39. To: aristeides (#38)
#40. To: Jethro Tull (#39)
#41. To: robin (#18)
And you think McCain and Hillary are not a part of this?
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
.
.
.