[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Why Putin Can NEVER Use a Nuclear Weapon

Logical Consequence of Freedom4um point of view

Tucker Carlson: This current White House is being run by Satan, not human beings

U.S. Submarines Are Getting a Nuclear Cruise Missile Strike Capability: Destroyers Likely to Follow

Anti-Gun Cat Lady ATTACKS Congress Over Mexico & The UN!

Trump's new border czar will prioritize finding 300,000 missing migrant children who could be trafficking victims

Morgan Stanley: "If Musk Is Successful In Streamlining Government, It Would Broaden Earnings Growth And Stock Performance"

Bombshell Fauci Documentary Nails The Whole COVID Charade

TRUTH About John McCain's Service - Forgotten History

Bombshell Fauci Documentary Nails The Whole COVID Charade

Joe Rogan expressed deep concern that Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Zelensky will start World War III

Fury in Memphis after attempted murder suspect who ambushed FedEx employee walks free without bail

Tehran preparing for attack against Israel: Ayatollah Khamenei's aide

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)

France reacted to the words of a US senator on sanctions against allies

Trump nominates former Soros executive for Treasury chief

SCOTUS asked to review if Illinois can keep counting mail-in ballots 2 weeks after election day

The Real Reason Government Workers Are Panicking About ElonÂ’s New Tracking System

THEY DON'T CARE ANYMORE!


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Obama's main advisor--New World Order promotor Brezinski
Source: losangeles.craigslist
URL Source: http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/pol/569259248.html
Published: Feb 10, 2008
Author: craigslist member
Post Date: 2008-02-13 11:31:17 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Ping List: *Bilderberg and NWO Watch*     Subscribe to *Bilderberg and NWO Watch*
Keywords: None
Views: 2194
Comments: 88

Obama's main advisor--New World Order promotor Brezinski

Date: 2008-02-10, 8:15AM PST

Are people bothering to dig slightly deeper into Obama's background and realize that Zbenew Brezinski is his main advisor?

The man practically created the Trilateral Commission, and works with the Council on Foreign Relations to erase our borders and create a " New World Order ". Just read articles in their journal Foreign Affairs, for confirmation. They are open about their ideals.

Globalism means combining with Mexico and Canada to create a giant economic zone called the North American Union. Hence, Obama's support of 20 million illegal aliens gaining citizenship.

The Dems keep funding Bush's Iraq war. THEY ARE HIS PARTNERS! Wake up. The only anti-war candidate is Ron Paul.

Obama was voted the most liberal Senator, to the left of Kennedy. Is this what people want? A big spender, and more big government???

Learn the truth about the New World Order. Go to jimmarrs.com, infowars.com, rense.com, newswithviews.com and start educating yourself. Subscribe to *Bilderberg and NWO Watch*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-7) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#8. To: aristeides, _______ (#3)

Brzezinski opposed Bush's war in Iraq from the start. I remember hearing him speak very critically of it back in 2003, when I still supported it. His most recent book, The Choice, is devastatingly critical of that war and of Bush's foreign policy in general, and advocates a peace policy of engagement with Iran, peacemaking in the Middle East and Kashmir, and a regional nuclear nonproliferation pact.

So Obama is in agreement with ZBig in this. A far cry from Hillary and McCain on this very critical issue.

from 2002:
en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech

I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   12:39:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: robin (#7)

Like Hillary and McCain are better?

They're all 3 exactly the same. McHillobama was the plan from the get go.

I have to question how ANY Ron Paul supporter could get it on with any of those 3 Council on Foreign Relations puppets.

Seriously question.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   12:40:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: robin (#8)

LOL

Some people will buy anything.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   12:41:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: _______ (#10)

You find it amusing that Obama was against the war in 2002, stated so publicly and attacked Wolfowitz and Perle by name.

Show me anyone you would vote for (with a chance of winning) who did that, in 2002 or even now.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   12:45:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: robin (#11)

I find it sad that you believe a word he says.

OBAMA'S GLOBAL TAX PROPOSAL UP FOR SENATE VOTE (#1) [Full Thread]

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   12:50:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: robin (#11)

McHillobama will win.

I support none of it.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   12:50:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, _______, robin, iconoclast, aristeides, TwentyTwelve (#0)

From DeepBlackLies

"The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens."

Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner (2001)

"The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."

Zbigniew Brzezinski.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-02-13   12:53:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: FormerLurker (#14)

Zbigniew Brzezinski

I guess some people better start sucking up to the NWO.

Supporting anything about McHillobama would be a start.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:06:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: _______ (#12)

It is sad that you would prefer to see McCain in the WH. Not that he would be there long, the entire country would be destroyed.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   13:08:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: _______ (#13)

There are clear differences, you just choose not to see them.

Right now the REAL choices in REALITY are McCain, Hillary and Obama.

Make your choice or someone else will.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   13:09:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: FormerLurker (#14)

And you think McCain and Hillary are not a part of this?

They are and McCain is promising us 100 years of wars.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   13:10:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: robin (#17)

Make your choice or someone else will.

LOL. Choice? I'm surprised you're falling for this.

Obama is a gun grabbin', NAU pushin', infanticide lovin' Marxist, but hey, he made a passing comment once or twice against the neocons, so he's my guy! Doesn't take much to win your heart, I guess!

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-13   13:14:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: robin (#17)

There are clear differences, you just choose not to see them.

Robin, it's a play and you've fallen for it.

You can pretend they are different, you can pretend you're making a difference in their charade but in the end you've latched onto one of them.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:16:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: robin (#18)

They are and McCain is promising us 100 years of wars.

For some odd reason you believe that McHillobama actually will run their WH.

They're puppets going the same place just with different lies and manipulations.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:17:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Vitamin Z (#19)

LOL. Choice? I'm surprised you're falling for this.

Obama is a gun grabbin', NAU pushin', infanticide lovin' Marxist, but hey, he made a passing comment once or twice against the neocons, so he's my guy! Doesn't take much to win your heart, I guess!

I wonder what percentage of Ron Paul supporters are in the same league.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:18:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: _______ (#21)

But not all puppets are exactly alike. The Bush regime is the worst we've seen yet.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   13:27:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: robin (#23)

Have fun.

You don't get it and are now playing their game, latching onto a NWOist.

Take care.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:31:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: _______ (#24)

OH I get it, but if there is a chance there is a difference I will vote for that chance.

You are just going to let someone else make the decision for you, or are you voting for McCain?

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   13:32:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: _______ (#21)

Do you think FDR was just doing the bidding of his masters, that any differences from the policies of his Republican predecessors were cosmetic and superficial? The Roosevelt haters among our upper classes sure didn't think so.

It's beginning to look as if Obama may win as sweeping a victory as FDR did in 1932. That would presumably give him the power to make real changes in our system, if he is so inclined.

Who do you think stole the NH primary from Obama, and why do you think they did so?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-13   13:32:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: aristeides (#26)

Et tu, ari?

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-02-13   13:34:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: robin (#25)

Every one of them is playing for the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateralists and Bilderbergs.

ALL 3.

I don't play their games, but if it gives you something to do GO FOR IT!

If there isn't a candidate that I can support, then I won't be supporting a candidate.

I don't have to be busy with a candidate to have a life.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:36:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Vitamin Z (#27)

You're surprised?

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:37:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: aristeides (#26)

Hitlery will be the next POTUS, but McHillobama is good theater for the suckers.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:38:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: _______ (#30)

It could well be theatre, but they could always make a mistake. I wondered aloud the other day that perhaps healthy 3rd party runs are being discouraged or even threatened because it is a more difficult task for Diebold.

And as I've posted before, McCain could get hit by lightening before Nov.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   13:41:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: robin, _______ D (#25)

Don't fight, we're all screwed except if RP gets in.

Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC

"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2008-02-13   13:42:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: aristeides (#26)

It's beginning to look as if Obama may win as sweeping a victory as FDR did in 1932. That would presumably give him the power to make real changes in our system, if he is so inclined.

Are you serious? If Obama is placed in power he'll be the establishment House butler. If his learning curve is delayed for any reason, they'll nudge him out and replace him with a more compliant servant. This is America we're talking about....

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-13   13:44:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

Do you think FDR was just doing the bidding of his masters, that any differences from the policies of his Republican predecessors were cosmetic and superficial? The Roosevelt haters among our upper classes sure didn't think so.

Who do you think stole the NH primary from Obama, and why do you think they did so?

Since you didn't answer my questions, let me repeat them.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-13   13:49:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#32)

Mika's kind of hot.

_______  posted on  2008-02-13   13:50:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#32)

Well I am praying for lightening, while looking for any possible ray of light.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised!
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson

robin  posted on  2008-02-13   13:51:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: aristeides (#34)

Who do you think stole the NH primary from Obama

If he had NH stolen why is he now winning?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-13   13:55:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Jethro Tull (#37)

Vote-stealing can only do so much.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-13   14:05:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: aristeides (#38)

Sooooooo......you're saying they stole NH on him, then stopped?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-13   14:18:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Jethro Tull (#39)

I suspect stealing in NH was easier: Clinton supporters were in power in the state government; Republican operatives wanted to run against Clinton, not Obama; a very fishy outfit with criminal and Republican associations had the contract to monitor the voting computers in NH.

Repeating the crime elsewhere would have been more difficult, perhaps impossible.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-13   14:20:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: robin (#18)

And you think McCain and Hillary are not a part of this?

They are and McCain is promising us 100 years of wars.

Of course they are. We are left with nothing but NWO sock puppets as our "viable choices" for President of the United States.

I'll either be writing in Ron Paul, or my own name on the November ballot, failing any sort of miraculous rise of a popular third party candidate.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-02-13   14:58:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#32)

She didn't get her father's good looks.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2008-02-13   15:45:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: aristeides (#3)

Brzezinski opposed Bush's war in Iraq from the start.

Trying to reason with fringe nutters is fruitless.

They've got facts from nutter blogs, don'tcha know.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-13   18:56:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: _______ (#35)

Mika's kind of hot.

Don't be beguiled ... she's undoubtedly subversive.

Blog slop to follow.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-13   18:59:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: TwentyTwelve (#5)

Tarpley said that if Obama wins the election there will be a major war between Russia and the U.S. Tarpley said that Obama is a warmonger and is very dangerous.

Well, if Webster said it you can put it in the bank.

Republicans (Democrats for that matter) ....... HAD ENOUGH?

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-13   19:18:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: FormerLurker (#41)

Excellent post. I've been doing just that since the early 90's.

Mark

If America is destroyed, it may be by Americans who salute the flag, sing the national anthem, march in patriotic parades, cheer Fourth of July speakers - normally good Americans who fail to comprehend what is required to keep our country strong and free - Americans who have been lulled into a false security (April 1968).---Ezra Taft Benson, US Secretary of Agriculture 1953-1961 under Eisenhower

Kamala  posted on  2008-02-13   19:27:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: iconoclast (#43)

Zbenew Brezinski

This author can't even spell the guy's name.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-13   19:32:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (48 - 88) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]