See other War, War, War Articles
Title: We'll nuke Iran - Bush promises Israel
Source:
presscue.com
URL Source: http://presscue.com/node/38692
Published: Jan 10, 2008
Author: whitehouse.gov
Post Date: 2008-02-13 14:12:55 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 435
Comments: 17
We'll nuke Iran - Bush promises Israel Thu, 01/10/2008 - 16:08 - Wire Services US President George W. Bush promised Israel's opposition leader Binyamin Netanyahu that the United States will join the Jewish state in a nuclear strike against Iran, Israel Radio reported today. Former Prime Minister Netanyahu, opposition Likud party's hardline chairman who opposes the US-backed Annapolis peace process, reiterated to President Bush his stance, that a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Iran's nuclear installations was the only way to stop the Islamic nation's nuclear weapons ambitions. "I told him my position and Bush agreed," Netanyahu told Israel Radio. During their 45-minute meeting at King David hotel in Jerusalem Netanyahu also told Bush that "Jerusalem belongs to the Jewish people and will remain under Israeli sovereignty for eternity." President Bush issued a stark warning to Iran over Strait of Hormuz incident, saying that "all options are on the table to protect our assets." “There will be serious consequences if they attack our ships, pure and simple,” Bush said during the joint news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080109-4.html . “And my advice to them is, don't do it.” Bush criticized those who interpret the National Intelligence Estimate, which found that Iran gave up its nuclear weapons program in 2003, as a sign that Iran was no longer a threat. "Let me remind you what the NIE actually said," Bush stold reporters. "It said that as far as the intelligence community could tell, at one time the Iranians had a military -- covert military program that was suspended in 2003 because of international pressure. My attitude is that a non-transparent country, a country which has yet to disclose what it was up to, can easily restart a program."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
(Edited)
How many people on this forum knows that UK actually can't fire no nuclear weapons. You see,all nukes in the UK are under the control of US and any decision on their use must first be approved in the Washington. Once approved, nukes will be launched but again not by UK military but by the US-ans from the one or more military bases stationed on the UK. UK has nukes but have no control over them. I have no first hand info about Israel, but would be very surprised that Israel has ability to launch anything on it's own. Everything is under control of US army stationed in Israel. And order to launch will come from Washington.
How do you know all that about the UK? The UK is NOT even mentioned in the article.
"You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
intriguing
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! Indeed, but is good reference point to try to explain that the very same thing probably apply to Israel. US don't allow lots of freedom to it's allies, that's my point.
It's hard for me to believe that zion would have their launch-codes in the hands of the chimperor...really hard.
Join the Ron Paul Revolution Something non-kosher here.
Then you are free to believe whatever your little hart desires. Your beliefs will not change the order of things.
I don't think you specifically said that the chimperor was in control. Not by a long shot.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today! The Revolution will not be televised! No i didn't. I also said that I don't have first hand info about Israel. But I will bet my bottom dollar that Israel is on the same level as UK. Chimperor, of course, is not in control. But, I believe that he has to sign order to use nukes (commander in chief joke).
Yeah, and the whole USS Liberty thing was an effort to cover up how the US controls Izzystan.
"I told him my position and Bush agreed," Netanyahu told Israel Radio Remembe that you dumb fucks when Russia pre-emptively strikes the US for beginning wars of aggression against others worldwide. Chimp belongs at the end of a rope. ..along with the jew leaders of course..
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition "Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx No i didn't. I also said that I don't have first hand info about Israel. Thanks for clarifying, and letting us know that this scenario is just your opinion, and not based on any hard evidence.
Join the Ron Paul Revolution Utter nonsense.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" Baloney. Mordeaci Vanunu said that Israel killed JFK because he did not want the Israelis to have nuclear weapons. JFK was killed 90 days after he was refused permission to inspect the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona. www.americanfreepress.n et/html/vanunu.html I sincerely dobt the veracity of the wild statement that the U,S, controls the British nukes. I also doubt that they have control of the Pakistani nukes either. We will probably find out soon enough if we allow President Stupid to join Israel in nuking the Mideast this summer as suggested by another article posted today on 4um.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
What would be the point of other countries giving over to us their launch-codes? The more that I think about it, the goofier, and goofier, it sounds to me.
Join the Ron Paul Revolution lodwick: I, too, have reservations about any claim that a sovereign nation would surrender control of its nuclear weapons to a foreign government. The UK, Pakistan, et cetera, have such weapons not because of, but in spite of, the US. Israel, on the other hand, continues to deny that it has nuclear weapons, even though it now possesses submarines that are capable of launching nuclear-tipped missiles. Further, and contrary to gord's assertion, there are no US troops stationed in Israel. Lastly, gord's allegations lack credibility. This is not against gord personally, but he has nothing to substantiate anything he wrote -- and rumors and gossip don't count. RO
Fair enough. Further, I did never mention Pakistan, but Pakistan is case in point. It points to the scale of efforts USA is making in order to control nuclear arsenal of its allies. USA is paranoid about it. About rumors and gossip - until someone from the inner circles speaks out, everything is in domain of rumors (we don't torture, etc.). About UK - it's not my claim. It's a claim made by someone from the inner circles and I trust it to be accurate. About Israel - they got nukes from the US. Do you, or anybody, believes that US will gave away dozens upon dozens of nukes away without ability to control them?
#2. To: gord (#1)
#3. To: gord, *Iranian Conflict* (#1)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#4. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#2)
The UK is NOT even mentioned in the article.
#5. To: gord (#4)
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity
#6. To: lodwick (#5)
#7. To: lodwick (#5)
It's hard for me to believe that zion would have their launch-codes in the hands of the chimperor...really hard.
#8. To: gord, Cynicom, lodwick (#7)
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.-T Jefferson
#9. To: robin (#8)
I don't think you specifically said that the chimperor was in control. Not by a long shot.
#10. To: gord (#9)
#11. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
(Edited)
Former Prime Minister Netanyahu, opposition Likud party's hardline chairman who opposes the US-backed Annapolis peace process, reiterated to President Bush his stance, that a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Iran's nuclear installations was the only way to stop the Islamic nation's nuclear weapons ambitions.
"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx
#12. To: gord (#9)
I don't think you specifically said that the chimperor was in control. Not by a long shot.
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity
#13. To: lodwick (#5)
really hard.
#14. To: nobody, Itisa1mosttoolate, gord, lodwick, robin (#10)
#15. To: tom007, Horse, all (#13)
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity
#16. To: lodwick (#15)
The more that I think about it, the goofier, and goofier, it sounds to me.
#17. To: ReallyOrnery (#16)
(Edited)
Lastly, gord's allegations lack credibility. This is not against gord personally, but he has nothing to substantiate anything he wrote -- and rumors and gossip don't count.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest