See other Resistance Articles
Title: This is What A Police State Looks Like (Video)
Source:
informationclearinghouse
URL Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19347.htm
Published: Feb 14, 2008
Author: informationclearinghouse
Post Date: 2008-02-14 14:04:22 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: Police State
Views: 143
Comments: 7
www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19347.htm
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
This is What A Police State Looks Like
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
I was there. Why don't I hide that fact? I was victim to one of their techniques of following you until you are more isolated, got grabbed, unmasked and videoed and then released. It is like a game to them; ID the leaders, decapitate command and control by seizing them. Someone is wearing a mask; do what it takes to ID them. People need to wake up. Po-Po (POrtland Police are very aggressive and have received the cutting edge equipment and training to handle Little Beirut (slang name for Portland) because there are so many of us anarchists and political activists there. Portland is a testing ground for tactics and techniques to be vetted there for use in less politically active and aggressive parts of the country. Pay real close attention to the get the media to repeat the excuse mantra ("someone broke a bottle") because that is a tried and true technique they use all the time, and an organization can counter and neutralize if they recognize it quickly and aggressively debunk it. We are fast reaching the point where because of the apartheid of "free speech zones," quick and aggressive neutralization of demonstrations with the threat of using homeland security laws to prosecute activists who don't back down and who continue to organize, and other elements that are working to suppress and end legal dissent make it inevitable an insurgency starts. And of course the reaction to the violence inherent to an insurgency is met aggressively and ruthlessly to make those in the insurgency afraid to act more because of the retaliatory harm caused by the authorities. To do an insurgency an organization has to be braced and ready to ignore the retaliatory harm the authorities do knowing that in the long run that will feed the strength and effectiveness of the insurgency. I don't see us as going anywhere else but the choice of insurgency or going quietly into the night of extinction of many of us and all of our freedoms. It behooves people to learn, network and educate themselves. I have seen this video many times, and I am very familiar with this subject matter; from experience.
Good video, with quite compelling narration.
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
This event was why during the last presidential election, smirk spoke to a safe crowd who had signed loyalty statements in an auditorium in Beaverton. Beaverton is a nearby city where the authorities have better command and control, and demonstrators have fewer safe rallying points. It is easier for them to turn off cell phone facilities to cut the communication between organizers of an event in Beaverton then in downtown Portland. One thing that is a disturbing development is that they have a phone system that turns off use to basic users of the system, but still takes the calls of those authorized by government to still be able to have phone service. All those out there who don't get independent dedicated communication equipment to run a demonstration and who rely on the system's communication tools are making a big mistake.
Hide those rifles and keep them safe. They are asking troops those questions in questionnaires to have the information for better planning on dependable assets to do the weapons seizing they are going to eventually do in this part of the North American Union (NAU). They plan on pulling the teeth from the serfs eventually. If they have to, they will use foreign (NATO) troops to do this. The questionnaires are just to find out how far back from the front lines of this operations they have to have American troops. Because if they can't use them to bust heads, neutralize, and seize, they still need them to fill logistical holes in the larger picture of the entire operation.
#2. To: TwentyTwelve (#1)
#3. To: TwentyTwelve (#1)
#4. To: TwentyTwelve (#1)
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#5. To: Ferret Mike (#3)
#6. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
#7. To: ghostdogtxn (#5)
"They sure don't know much about operating in rifle country."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest