See other Editorial Articles
Title: State of the Revolution
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/state1.htm
Published: Feb 18, 2008
Author: Edgar J. Steele
Post Date: 2008-02-18 00:22:29 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 950
Comments: 92
It seems only fair to me. A couple of weeks ago, our so-called President got his say, then the so-called Democrats gave their response. Now, all that is missing is the truth. I intend to give at least part of that to you today. What's more, I see this "State of the Revolution" report being necessary at least once each year, until it no longer is necessary because America has ceased to exist or until it no longer is possible, likely because I am dead or in jail. Others will pick up the standard, in that event. I have deferred release of this for a time, just in case the "Super Tuesday" primary elections might have been allowed to be somewhat real (they weren't) and in order to mull over the significance of what I saw occur. Executive Summary Here is the Executive Summary, for those who simply must get back to Jeopardy after the break: basically, we are screwed and simply waiting for them to start shooting us so that we can shoot back. The morons who seized control of America after killing JFK have botched everything so badly that there is no way back not involving extensive pain and deprivation, at a minimum. And they certainly will not cede the power they have stolen from us peacefully. More likely: bloodshed and death far in excess of that seen during America's first Civil War... per capita! Why should we suffer for their mistakes and intentional misconduct? Because we let them get away with it, that's why! In recent years, we pulled the levers for Bush, then Clinton, then...er...Bush...and now....Clinton (again?), calling each the lesser of evils, though we always have had men like Ron Paul available to us, men whom we have dismissed as having "no serious chance" at becoming President. Else, we watched while they pulled the levers for us and pretended not to notice the obvious vote fraud - same result, exactly, in any event. 2008 Presidential Election I pledged my troth to Ron Paul as a last-ditch effort, just as I always said. Indeed, already I had come to the conclusion that voting was a waste of time, but I wanted just one last swing at the ball before calling the game altogether. Well...the fat lady has sung. Every single primary caucus and election this year has been tainted by evidence of fraud. Coincidence? Could be. Or it could be ... fraud! Come on! Wake up and smell the corruption in the air. Ron Paul has all this massive support, as far as the eye can see, and he draws precisely 3 or 4% of the vote in each and every election?!? Yeah ... right. I receive emails from list members who have participated (as officials) in various state primary elections and caucuses. All say the same thing: Fraud is taking place on all fronts. That was obvious the day after New Hampshire, when one family called the game after seeing its entire precinct generate precisely zero votes for Ron Paul, though they all voted for him. That was the same election in which we learned that the vote matched the polls just in the precincts where ballots were hand counted - precisely just those precincts, too, while in all the others, voters apparently lied about for whom they intended to vote. Super Tuesday's elections patently were fraudulent, but already you aren't hearing about them any more: silverstockreport.com/2008/california_fraud.html www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/30888 www.dcdave.com/article5/080209.htm Then, of course, there is the matter of those polls - those jiggered poll numbers themselves, particularly since we began to make so much noise about them: christianparty.net/ronpaul.htm . And then there was the marginalization of Dr. Paul in the debates, so painfully obvious, particularly after Fox News got so badly skewered for having excluded him altogether from one debate. The evidence is everywhere, if you are but willing to see it. No matter now, though, because Dr. Paul effectively has withdrawn ... and with millions of those dollars unspent - the dollars that we gave him to fight the good fight in our name. His staff announced seeing no evidence of vote fraud in New Hampshire, in explaining why they never challenged any of what was so painfully obvious to the rest of us. In leaving the building, Dr. Paul stated: "With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero. But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get. But with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter. Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties -- just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican. I also have another priority. I have constituents in my home district that I must serve. I cannot and will not let them down. And I have another battle I must face here as well. If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas. I cannot and will not let that happen." ("Message From Ron" email, Ron Paul, February 8, 2008). Yeah, I know it sounds reasonable. Too reasonable. Remember, this is the same guy who refused to spend the money we gave him to go after all the obvious election fraud. That was the only way he possibly could have put right the process and gotten a level playing field. We gave him the money to accomplish it. He chose not to do it. Go figure. Ron Paul is history. Get over it. So is the upcoming election. What I find amazing is that his grassroots organization still is blindly flailing about like a newly-headless chicken, raising money, holding "meetups" and talking up the possibility of a brokered convention (though McCain already has effectively sewn up the nomination). What does it matter whether the next President is Hillary, McCain or OBama? They all serve the same master as George Bush. It's going to be more of the same: more killing in the Middle East, more death for our children, more tyranny and poverty for us and more money for the bankers. Now I am torn between advocating not voting altogether and voting for the one person likely to bring America into total chaos most quickly (so that we can get it over with, of course).
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-21) not displayed.
.
.
.
#22. To: iconoclast (#16)
They are, on the other hand, very useful to the powers that be.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
that's when he lost me....
Two wings of the same bird. Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn't change.
i'll believe it when i see it. call me cynical...and, btw, i'll be the first in line to eat crow if it does!
Two wings of the same bird. Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn't change.
The Paultards are such drama queens. This guy has no clue as to what REAL tyranny and poverty is.
Aren't they though.
"Tune in next week to see if doing nothing helps." -Deek Jackson
Chuck Baldwin -- GOP "Party Of Death," "You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
No offense, but in the meantime your cynicism in the face of the work at hand and at the people trying to move it forward only drags down that which you stated you supported. It's ok to post whatever you like in the form of Edgar Steele, but after the last week of non stop slamming of RP on this forum, your continuing to post the same diatribe is perplexing. You wanted RP to run 3rd party. he made it clear he would not do that from the get go. You wanted RP to attack voter fraud in NH...how far did that effort get...see my post above. You want RP to give up his base of support in the 14th Congressional District. He is not going to do that. How has HE failed YOU? Lay down your cards and let's get on with it.
"Tune in next week to see if doing nothing helps." -Deek Jackson
MSM just announced that Papa Bush (foster father of Bubba) just announced his endorsement of McInsane. For heaven's sake, give it up!
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things ... T. S. Eliot
yet PB still votes GOP, does he not?
Two wings of the same bird. Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn't change.
Then enlighten us, what tyranny and poverty have you suffered? Tell us.
Give what up, asshole?
"Tune in next week to see if doing nothing helps." -Deek Jackson
He was 'demonized", by the media, after he said "When I raise my hand (taking the oath of office)the NWO will come crashing down." SKULL and Bones: Order of Death "You can not save the Constitution by destroying it."
That's the point. There is no REAL tyranny or poverty in this country.
it was the announcement that RP and his staff saw no evidence of vote fraud in NH that was extremely upsetting to me. i never said RP failed ME, but if i were to point at one thing, that would be it. vote fraud is rampant and happened not only in NH, but in each subsequent primary and RP remained mute on it. there's where he could have demonstrated the most leadership and also could have done the most for the american people for without honest elections, we have nothing. it's one thing to not want to spend the money on the fight. it's quite another to deny its existence.
Two wings of the same bird. Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn't change.
We're supposed to wait until it is too late to speak up. The domestic wiretapping, the FEMA response to Katrina, the empty and waiting FEMA camps, the UNPatriot Act, the Executive Orders that have made this President a Dictator, the Torture Renditions, arguing over what constitutes "torture", the loss of writ of Habeas Corpus, proof of voter fraud, the expensive war designed to make Cheney and his friends multi-billionaires and reduce the country to 3rd world status: these are to be endured without complaint until even your right to speak up is denied.
'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.' So you believe in a big government nanny State rather than personal responsibility. Would Ron Paul approve? tsk. tsk.
500 Americans in flotillas full of water and food were blocked by FEMA from reaching dehydrated Americans. Trucks full of water were blocked by FEMA from reaching Americans. You don't have your facts, you should be quiet. The so-called nanny state of George W. Bush was ensuring that Americans could not help their fellow Americans. Instead, the 3rd world levees were intentionally compromised to save the French Quarter, drowning Ward 9 even more. Elderly people who survived Katrina for the first few days, drowned later. Did you miss the heart-rendering news video of the official who lost his own mother b/c, as he told her on the phone "the cavalry was coming" to save her, but the FEMA calvary preferred to drown her.
'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.' www.fpp.co.uk/online/05/09/Chosen_few.html
'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.' Suggest you read this: Debunking the Myths of Hurricane Katrina http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/2315076.html?page=1
Hahahahaha! Another article by DHS Michael Chertoff's cousin!
'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.' www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0112-15.htm
'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.' We never actually thought to doubt this claim, simply believing it irrelevant. The piece needs to be judged on its contents, not the surname of one of those involved. But then we heard a suggestion that Benjamin Chertoff denied the story altogether, so decided to email him to hear what he had to say. Was he really related to Michael Chertoff? And if he wasn't, then how could he explain the quote from his mother? This is what he had to say. *************************************************** Here's the story, as best as I know: I'm not related to Michael Chertoff, at least in any way I can figure out. We might be distant relatives, 15 times removed, but then again, so might you and I. Bottom line is I've never met him, never communicated with him, and nobody I know in my family has ever met or communicated with him. As for what my mom said: When Chertoff was nominated to be head of homeland security it was the first I'd heard of him, and the same for my family (and, FYI, we'd already sent the 9/11 issue to the press by then!). My dad and I thought there might be some distant relation. When Chris Bollyn called and asked my mom if there was a relation (introducing himself as only "Chris"), she said "they might be distant cousins." Like much in the conspiracy world, this was taken WAY out of context. (Another case in point: Bollyn called me earlier and asked "Were you the senior researcher on the story?" I said, "I guess so," -- that's not a title I have ever used, nor is it at all common in magazine journalism, but I was the research editor at the time, so it kinda made sense.) Nonetheless, I was one of 9 reporters on the story, not counting editors, photo researchers, photo editors, copy editors, layout designers, production managers, fact-checkers, etc., etc., etc. who worked on this story.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/arti...070305chertoffscousin.htm crimesofthestate.blogspot...tcher-of-new-orleans.html "Benjamin's mother in Pelham, New York, however, was more willing to talk. Asked if Benjamin was related to the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Judy said, "Yes, of course, he is a cousin." http://educate-yourself.org/cn/c...11propaganda06mar05.shtml 'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.' Rebates for Ron - Ron Paul For Dummies - New R3volution
You're enabling the shill to hijack this thread which is about Ron Paul.
"Tune in next week to see if doing nothing helps." -Deek Jackson
Gee, I wonder why I didn't get pinged to this? ;)
Rebates for Ron - Ron Paul For Dummies - New R3volution
i thought about doing an "asshole" ping to you. ;P
Two wings of the same bird. Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn't change.
I see though that the term still applies to steele. :)
Rebates for Ron - Ron Paul For Dummies - New R3volution
The Ron Paul surrender monkeys are the real rectal orifices.
Doesn't steele qualify as a Ron Paul surrender monkey? Or am I misunderstanding your comment?
Rebates for Ron - Ron Paul For Dummies - New R3volution
Sure he does, but Steele's thoughts about politics hold no sway. McCain has already won the nomination on the Republican side so any discussion of Paul is a time drain.
Ron Paul’s Congressional Seat In Trouble For the most part, Ron Paul’s constituents have tolerated his more quixotic political views because he’s delivered for the district, now it seems that he might be in trouble: Troubled by internal polls showing insurgent challenger Chris Peden having pulled ahead shockingly in the Texas 14th congressional district, Congressman Ron Paul will be pulling out of the Republican presidential race in advance of his home state’s March 4 primary, The FDH Lounge blog has learned. This news comes from a source with access to Paul’s congressional campaign and it parallels a recent move on the Democratic side of the White House run as fellow party establishment irritant Dennis Kucinich was forced to abandon his efforts in order to focus on a threat to his congressional seat.
Kind of appropriate that somebody who uses the wallowing hog John Hagee as a screen name has a pig for an avatar.
what's the source of this?
Two wings of the same bird. Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn't change.
Don't you have some terrorists hiding under your bed you need to flush out or some infant wisdumb to share with your comrades at Freeptardia?
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I remember hearing the same prediction after Super Tuesday, so far it hasn't happened. Source?
http://thefdhlounge.blogspot.com/2008/02/ron-paul-to-withdraw-from-presidential.html
Right. Even when Bush can call you an "enemy combatant" and have you put in jail without a trial, there is no tyranny. Sometime maybe you can go get that operation you need and get the rectal cranial inversion reversed. Surely the people who have to hear your retarded ramblings would take up a collection to pay for it. "In another shining example of modern day corporate fascism, it was announced recently that Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root had been awarded a $385 million dollar contract by Homeland Security to construct detention and processing facilities in the event of a national emergency. The language of the preamble to the agreement veils the program with talk of temporary migrant holding centers, but it is made clear that the camps will also be used "as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency." Discussions of federal concentration camps is no longer the rhetoric of paranoid Internet conspiracy theorists, it is mainstream news. Under the enemy combatant designation anyone at the behest of the US government, even if they are a US citizen, can be kidnapped and placed in an internment facility forever without trial. " (And if I remember correctly, Hamdi, an American citizen was held for over THREE YEARS without a trial--J.D.) link: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080215045002AAMvAcp&show=7
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Rebates for Ron - Ron Paul For Dummies - New R3volution
I pinged you.
"Tune in next week to see if doing nothing helps." -Deek Jackson
Source? The voices in his head.
"Tune in next week to see if doing nothing helps." -Deek Jackson
Comments (63 - 92) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestSpokesmen who sound like they are one step from suicide and are holding back only until they make one more check under the bed for "conspirators" do not make good comrades in arms.
#23. To: wbales (#15)
Yeah, I know it sounds reasonable. Too reasonable. Remember, this is the same guy who refused to spend the money we gave him to go after all the obvious election fraud. That was the only way he possibly could have put right the process and gotten a level playing field. We gave him the money to accomplish it. He chose not to do it. Go figure.
#24. To: angle (#17)
#25. To: christine (#0)
more tyranny and poverty for us
#26. To: aristeides, christine (#22)
They are, on the other hand, very useful to the powers that be.
#27. To: christine (#18)
Oct 27, 2006 ... Pat Buchanan was absolutely right when he said that the two major
parties are "two wings of the same bird of prey.
www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin330.htm
#28. To: christine (#24)
i'll believe it when i see it. call me cynical...and, btw, i'll be the first in line to eat crow if it does!
#29. To: angle (#17)
So get your heads out of the MSM garbage!!! . . .
#30. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#27)
#31. To: longnose gar (#25)
This guy has no clue as to what REAL tyranny and poverty is.
#32. To: iconoclast (#29)
For heaven's sake, give it up!
#33. To: christine (#30)
excommunicate.net/skull-and-bones
#34. To: Pern (#31)
Then enlighten us, what tyranny and poverty have you suffered?
#35. To: angle (#28)
You wanted RP to attack voter fraud in NH...how far did that effort get
#36. To: longnose gar, Pern (#34)
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.
#37. To: robin (#36)
the FEMA response to Katrina, the empty and waiting FEMA camps
#38. To: longnose gar (#37)
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.
#39. To: longnose gar (#37)
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.
#40. To: robin (#38)
#41. To: longnose gar (#40)
Photograph by Benjamin Chertoff
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.
#42. To: longnose gar (#40)
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.
#43. To: robin (#41)
The senior researcher on Popular Mechanics March 2005 "911: Debunking the Myths" story, Ben Chertoff, is a cousin of Department of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff.
#44. To: longnose gar (#43)
Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press: "(Benjamin) Chertoff said he was the "senior researcher" of the piece. When asked if he was related to Michael Chertoff, he said, 'I don't know.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.
#45. To: longnose gar (#25)
#46. To: robin (#44)
#47. To: christine (#1)
To: Jethro Tull, Cynicom, iconoclast, Kamala, robin, Esso, Dakmar, Brian S, Arator, PnbC, Original_Intent, buckeye, TwentyTwelve, James Deffenbach, FOH, angle, Elliott Jackalope, Pern, mirage, who knows what evil, lodwick, noone222, HOUNDDAWG
#48. To: Critter (#47)
#49. To: christine (#48)
#50. To: Critter (#49)
#51. To: Hagee (#50)
The Ron Paul surrender monkeys are the real rectal orifices.
#52. To: Critter (#51)
#53. To: christine (#0)
#54. To: Hagee (#50)
#55. To: longnose gar (#53)
#56. To: longnose gar (#25)
This guy has no clue as to what REAL tyranny and poverty is.
Lord Acton
#57. To: longnose gar (#53)
Congressman Ron Paul will be pulling out of the Republican presidential race in advance of his home state’s March 4 primary,
#58. To: christine (#55)
#59. To: longnose gar (#34)
There is no REAL tyranny or poverty in this country.
Lord Acton
#60. To: longnose gar (#58)
#61. To: Critter (#47)
#62. To: Pern (#57)
Congressman Ron Paul will be pulling out of the Republican presidential race in advance of his home state’s March 4 primary,
.
.
.