[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: The friends of Barack Obama
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.observer.com/node/36953
Published: Feb 26, 2008
Author: NY Observer
Post Date: 2008-02-26 15:08:38 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 1713
Comments: 99

Barack Obama

When Barack Obama snagged the support of billionaire bundler George Soros just hours after he announced his bid for President, the ladies and gents of the donor-sphere (particularly the Hillary partisans) had to work hard to stifle a collective gasp. Then came the news that Orin Kramer, a well-established supporter of the Clintons, had defected to Mr. Obama’s camp. Now the Senator has begun throwing full-on fund-raisers, and the list of names he’s lined up for his host committees is impressive. There are prominent African-American business leaders and entertainment execs. There are old-time Democrats and young machers-in-training—some of whom were actually graduates of the first Clinton White House. There is even a reformed Bush-campaign “Pioneer”: Chelsea Piers president Tom Bernstein.

Naturally, opponents are waiting for them to stumble on their own hype.

Tom Bernstein—president and co-founder of Chelsea Piers and one of the principal owners of the Texas Rangers with George W. Bush

Michael Froman—a Citigroup executive who befriended Mr. Obama at Harvard Law School and, later, spent seven years in the Clinton administration, including several as Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin’s chief of staff

Anne Fudge—chairman and C.E.O. of Young and Rubicam Brands and the first African-American woman to head a global advertising agency

Earl Graves—publisher of Black Enterprise magazine who spent a cozy night at Camp David during the late Clinton years

Andre Harrell—former Motown Records president and music impresario who helped to launch the careers of Mary J. Blige, Jodeci and boy-band crooners 98 Degrees

Orin Kramer—hedge-fund manager who Bill Clinton appointed to the Commission to Study Capital Budgeting

Jeh Johnson—partner at Paul Weiss who served as general counsel of the Air Force during the Clinton White House years and special counsel to John Kerry’s 2004 Presidential campaign

Tracy Maitland—young asset-management executive who happens to manage Russell Simmons’ fortune

Brian Mathis—managing director of Provident Group and Friend of Obama from the Harvard days who also worked in the Treasury Department during the Clinton administration

Ray McGuire—prominent Citigroup investment banker and fellow Harvard Law School alum

Eric Mindich—Wall Street whiz-kid who became a partner at Goldman Sachs at 27 and has since served as an advisor to John Kerry

Antonio (L.A.) Reid—chairman of Island Def Jam Music Group and one of the country’s most influential African-American record executives

James Rubin—private equity manager (and son of Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin) who served as a New York finance director during Bill Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign

George Soros—billionaire financier who conservatives believe runs the world

Jonathan Soros—son of George

Josh Steiner—managing principal of Steve Rattner’s Quadrangle Group and onetime chief of staff to Clinton Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen

James Torrey—mega-fund manager who was one of Howard Dean’s prominent New York supporters in 2004

Jamie Whitehead—New York finance director for John Kerry’s 2004 campaign

Robert Wolf—chief operating officer of UBS Investment Bank

Chris Dodd

Senator Christopher Dodd is not part of his party’s Big Three Presidential contenders, but pol-watchers would be foolish to underestimate his fund-raising muscle. He’s a likeable guy and he’s well-known, at least in this part of the country. He’s also chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, putting him in a plum position to make big asks of big Wall Street players, many of whom have already proved all too happy to oblige. As of the last campaign-finance filing, he had $5 million in his war chest, placing him second only to Hillary in the money race. Said his old pal Richard Plepler: “He has a lot of friends here, and I am not having a hard time gathering money.”

Ken Brody—investment banker and former Goldman Sachs partner who was nominated by Bill Clinton to be president and chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States

John Eastman—entertainment lawyer and brother of Linda McCartney

Dick Ebersol—NBC Sports czar and member of the Democratic Martha’s Vineyard vacation crew

Tom Flexner (co-chair)—vice chairman of Bear Stearns

Jane Hartley (co-chair)—C.E.O. of the G7 Group, associate director in the Carter White House and Friend of Dodd since the 1970’s

Richard Plepler—executive vice president of HBO who got his start as an aide to Senator Dodd in the early 1980’s

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-59) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#60. To: Jethro Tull (#58)

Lets drink to the hard working people...

buckeye  posted on  2008-02-26   20:58:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Jethro Tull, Aristedes (#58)

Seems like I remember that Reagan had even more Jews than FDR. 84 rings a bell

Dems and pubs alike, perhaps a token black but the Jews run their government for them. I wonder why that is?????

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-26   21:00:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Cynicom (#61)

Yep, then Clinton had 22 in his cabinet IIRC. Can you please enlighten me as to why anyone with anyone with any degree of political acumen would try and raise the ghost of FDR???

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-26   21:05:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

The friends of Eddie Coyle.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2008-02-26   21:07:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Jethro Tull (#62)

Can you please enlighten me as to why anyone with anyone with any degree of political acumen would try and raise the ghost of FDR???Can you please enlighten me as to why anyone with anyone with any degree of political acumen would try and raise the ghost of FDR???

Ari likes Lincoln also, does that ring a bell?

Jews owned and operated Lincoln. No blacks there either.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-26   21:20:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Cynicom (#64)

The Jewish Confederates
www.nytimes.com/books/first/r/rosen-confederates.html

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-02-26   21:23:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: robin (#65)

I cant go there...

Judah Benjamin was the largest slaveholder in the US, he was Jew.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-26   21:27:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Cynicom (#66)

64.233.167.104/search?q=c...lnk&cd=2&gl=us&lr=lang_en

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-02-26   21:29:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: robin (#67)

Thanks...

I figured Benjamin would be a part of whatever you referred to.

Benjamin had wealth and 150 black people that slaved seven days a week to make that wealth.

Benjamin later ran so as to not be tried by the Yankees. He lived out his life in England.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-26   21:39:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Cynicom (#68)

Benjamin later ran so as to not be tried by the Yankees. He lived out his life in England.

Oh that's interesting.

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-02-26   21:42:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: robin (#69)

If you check you will find that it was a crime to buy southern cotton.

The South sold it to finance the war. The major buyers were northern Jews that shipped it overseas at huge profits. Grand and sherman had them banned ferom their command areas. Two days later the Jew controllers in DC came into Lincolns office and made him over rule Sherman and Grant.

That was 150 years ago, look what we have now, no blacks and wall to wall Jews in government.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-26   21:50:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: robin (#69)

And who and what are the people buying and owning Obama??????

They aint Irish.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-26   21:54:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Jethro Tull (#58)

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (photo at right), president of the United States of America, 1933-1945, was himself partly of Dutch-Jewish ancestry.

Well, Joseph Goebbels and his Ministry of Propaganda certainly repeatedly made that claim. But I can't say I've ever seen it supported in a reliable source.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   7:09:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: aristeides, cynicom, all (#72)

But I can't say I've ever seen it supported in a reliable source.

So let me understand what it is you're saying; you disregard my source as Goebbels-like propaganda, without offering a source of your own as rebuttal. I'd say your argument resembles the blind loyality FReeple People show to Herr Bush.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   7:18:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Jethro Tull (#73) (Edited)

You want a source? The Wikipedia entry on the Roosevelt family certainly mentions the family's Dutch origins, but makes no mention of any Jewish ancestry.

By the way, if you bother to look at pp. 84-86 of Jeffrey Herf's The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust, you will see that claims like yours about Roosevelt's Jewish ancestry and lists of all the Jews in his administration are to be found in such documents coming out of Goebbels's Propaganda Ministry as the Directive: Jews in the USA [Hauptthema: Juden in den USA] of May 30, 1941.

By the way, here's an interesting passage from Hitler's Table Talk, dated July 1, 1942 [I quote from Hugh Trevor-Roper's translation, but I checked the original German, and it's there too]:

Roosevelt, who both in his handling of political issues and in his general attitude, behaves like a tortuous, pettifogging Jew, himself boasted recently that he had "noble" Jewish blood in his veins. The completely negroid appearance of his wife is also a clear indication that she, too, is a half-caste.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   8:02:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: aristeides (#74)

Wikipedia Censorship, Corruption Deletes Criticism - The Washington Post was more blunt adding that the Lay story "further exposed the critical weakness of Wikipedia that prevents it from becoming the go-to source for Internet knowledge....unlike, say, the Encyclopedia Britannica, Wikipedia has no formal peer review for its articles. They may be written by experts or insane crazy people. Or worse, insane crazy people with an agenda. And Internet access."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   8:11:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Jethro Tull (#75)

If you know of a better encyclopedic source of information on line, nothing is stopping you from linking to it.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   8:21:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: aristeides, Jethro Tull (#72)

Ari...

Give it up. To you there is no reliable source on anything.

And Hitler seems to have a special niche in your mind for some reason, never mention his idol Stalin. I suspect it is other than an intellectual interest.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-27   8:48:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: aristeides (#76)

Why should I bother when anything I post that doesn't fit your leftist agenda is criticized?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   8:49:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3)

To conclude, McCain is evil, Hillary is the lesser evil and Obama is a small, possibly VERY small retreat from the current evil. And these 3 are all we got to work with at this time.

Very good summary.

Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-27   9:01:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: robin (#10)

Yes, compare Wolf and Soros to the worst of what McCain and Hillary have supporting them.

What is exactly known about this Wolf?

Did you expect these guys to sit out 2008?

I don't know anything about Wolf either. Soros is strongly anti-Iraq war, but I suspect it comes down, from his perspective, as the least of three evils.

Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-27   9:33:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: aristeides (#17)

Soros is certainly no neocon. As his piece On Israel, America and Aipac from a year ago makes clear, he considers himself a nonpractising Jew who wants to see Israel survive but who very much dislikes the way AIPAC has shut down discussion on Israel and Palestine.

Soros is very concerned about rising worldwide anti-semitism.

Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-27   9:44:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Jethro Tull (#78)

Why should I bother when anything I post that doesn't fit your leftist agenda is criticized?

I guess I have to conclude that the only sources you could cite are ones with a pretty obvious pro-Nazi agenda.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   9:55:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Cynicom (#77)

And Hitler seems to have a special niche in your mind for some reason, never mention his idol Stalin. I suspect it is other than an intellectual interest.

I'm not the one who first brought up one of Hitler's idées fixes on this thread, am I?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   9:57:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: iconoclast (#81)

Soros is very concerned about rising worldwide anti-semitism.

No doubt. But from that he does not conclude that everything Israel does should be defended. Rather, he concludes that organizations like AIPAC should avoid conduct (like shutting down discourse) that will provoke anti-Semitism.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   10:00:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: aristeides (#82)

I suppose so. Anything you disagree with seems to get your pro-Nazi treatment.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   10:00:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Jethro Tull (#85)

Anything you disagree with seems to get your pro-Nazi treatment.

I think my #73 proves that you were spouting a favorite item in the Nazis' propaganda agenda.

That doesn't necessarily mean it's false, of course. But ideas coming from that sort of source should be backed up by proof.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   10:02:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: aristeides (#84)

Socialist Soros to build competing organization to AIPAC

The spat Soros is having with AIPAC is more about him doing business as usual than any fundamental disagreement. What he can't buy and control, he attempts to destroy and rebuild in his own image and likeness. That he is among Obama's earliest supporter is nothing more than this strategy on display. He is in the process of filling the empty suit with his own hot air, much to the delight of the less politically astute.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   10:10:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: aristeides (#86)

I feel certain that you feel that way about your #73.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   10:11:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Jethro Tull (#88)

You don't believe that that line you were spouting was a favorite item in the Nazis' propaganda agenda?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   10:12:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Jethro Tull (#87)

Soros's pursuit of that "open society" line is nothing new. He was funding projects along those lines from his foundation back when I was in law school, 15 years ago. It comes from his experiences as a student of Karl Popper's in England back when he was a student decades ago. The title of one of Popper's chief books is The Open Society.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   10:15:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Jethro Tull (#73)

So let me understand what it is you're saying; you disregard my source as Goebbels-like propaganda, without offering a source of your own as rebuttal. I'd say your argument resembles the blind loyality FReeple People show to Herr Bush.

Early on in the Bush administration I predicted calamity for our nation, but wow, things are really becoming scary.

What is it with all the anti-Jew hemorrhaging on these threads? It's not like Jewish wealth and influence just popped up like mushrooms this morning.

What's y'alls answer ... mass lobotomies, ovens, yellow stars?

It's beginning to smell a lot like pre-Hitler Germany here. If we plummet all the the way to depression, I fear for Jewish lives.

I have often said that if a sudden government overturn occurs in this country it is far more likely to come from a strong-man military coup than from folks in Idaho. Part of such a scenario would be likely to include the historical scapegoat.

And, voila, we have our very own Kristallnacht. Down goes my urologist right along with Soros, Sulzberger, et al.

Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-27   10:28:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: aristeides (#74)

By the way, if you bother to look at pp. 84-86 of Jeffrey Herf's The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust, you will see that claims like yours about Roosevelt's Jewish ancestry and lists of all the Jews in his administration are to be found in such documents coming out of Goebbels's Propaganda Ministry as the Directive: Jews in the USA [Hauptthema: Juden in den USA] of May 30, 1941.

I don't recall all this crap when the sainted Barry came on the scene as our conservative savior.

Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-27   10:34:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: aristeides (#84)

Soros is very concerned about rising worldwide anti-semitism.

No doubt. But from that he does not conclude that everything Israel does should be defended.

Totally agree, ari, but I said "anti-semitism", not anti-zionism.

Soros is a non-practicing Jew.

Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-27   10:39:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: iconoclast (#92) (Edited)

That's one of the reasons I am very doubtful of that story of FDR having Jewish ancestors. It was a minor news story when Goldwater ran for president that he was half-Jewish, and I recall no mention of Jewish ancestors of FDR's at that time. For that matter, I recall no mention of them when Lieberman recently ran for VP.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   10:42:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: iconoclast (#91)

It's beginning to smell a lot like pre-Hitler Germany here. If we plummet all the the way to depression, I fear for Jewish lives.

I called this irrational fear, years ago, Ovenphobia. It's a disorder characterized by excessive reliance on established mythology, irrational fear, liberalism, a strong desire to be accepted my miscreants, a knee-jerk acceptance to political correctness and the hallmark sign is the need to be surrounded by filtered information. Iconoclast my friend, you seem to be dancing to the tune of both the shofar and the Congo drum. Dance on....

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   10:44:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: aristeides (#90)

I'm familiar with his Open Society and I didn't even have to attend law school to recognize it was a string of NGOs, hellbent on nation building. Soros is NTBT and I'd think even lawyers would recognize that.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-27   10:51:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: Jethro Tull (#96) (Edited)

Soros is NTBT and I'd think even lawyers would recognize that.

How can I do that when I have no idea what "NTBT" means?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-27   10:54:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: Jethro Tull (#95)

Iconoclast my friend, you seem to be dancing to the tune of both the shofar and the Congo drum. Dance on....

Nope, good ole American drum and fife. ;-)

Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot

iconoclast  posted on  2008-02-27   10:54:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: iconoclast (#98)

Ha.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-27   10:55:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]