[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Limbaugh Urges Republicans to Vote for Hillary
Source: Newsmax
URL Source: http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/ ... 79.html?s=al&promo_code=4616-1
Published: Feb 28, 2008
Author: Jim Meyers
Post Date: 2008-02-28 12:58:38 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 839
Comments: 73

It may be sound unbelievable, but conservative Rush Limbaugh is urging Republicans to cross party lines this Tuesday in primaries in Ohio and Texas and vote for Hillary Clinton.

During his No. 1 rated radio show and on his Web site, www.rushlimbaugh.com, the former Clinton archenemy has told listeners to “pimp themselves” for just one day vote by voting for Hillary to keep the Democratic Party “at war with itself.”

Citing a story in a Texas newspaper headlined “Many Republicans to Vote for Obama," Limbaugh told listeners this week: “I understand I've got a big challenge here to try to get Republicans to change their minds on this and vote for Hillary to keep her in the race, to keep that party at war with itself . . .

“It's clear that Republicans in Texas have been listening to this program where we have advised Republicans to pimp themselves for a day and go vote in the Democrat primary . . . I just think, at this stage, the longer Hillary can stay in this, the better for us.”

Limbaugh said he wants to see Hillary and Barack Obama continue battling, noting that the battle will end if Hillary is vanquished and Obama can focus completely on presumptive GOP nominee John McCain.

“I know I'm fighting an uphill battle . . . vote for Hillary to keep this campaign going, this 'uncivil war,'” Rush said.

“Remember what this is, this is about us winning. You have to understand, it's not about Hillary winning; It's about us winning. It's about our party winning. It's about those people losing. They've got some problems in the Democratic Party. It's not all sweetness and light over there . . .

“If Hillary loses this thing, all of that's going to come to a screeching halt. We want all the disruption in that party as possible. It's about us winning.”


Poster Comment:

This is the kiss of death for Hillary. She has the endorsement of Ann Coulter because she is better on torture and more defensive of what Bush has been doing in Gitmo than McCain. Now she has the endorsement of Rush Limbaugh. Hillary is toast. But this does not make me happy.

I will refuse to vote for either Obama or McCain.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-29) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#30. To: Original_Intent (#26)

3. I don't accept the line that it is impossible to elect a woman or a black

How about a female and a black?????

Two things are skewing this primary thing, namely gender and race.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-28   16:37:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: christine (#28)

2. The Hegelian Dialectic used by our semi-hidden rulers would seem to necessitate the (s)Election of a Demoncrat this time in order to push through the National Deathcare Initiative necessary for their eugenics programs.

{{{shiver}}}

Agreed.

The people we are being ruled over by ARE monsters.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-28   16:39:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Cynicom, aristeides, Jethro Tull, christine, TwentyTwelve, FOH, _______, Wudidiz, robin, Peppa, Pinguinite, Kamala, all (#30)

3. I don't accept the line that it is impossible to elect a woman or a black

How about a female and a black?????

Two things are skewing this primary thing, namely gender and race.

In both cases there is a baseline constituency who will not think and will vote for either or both merely because it is a woman or a black man.

There is another sizable group who will vote for them merely because they are Demoncrats.

The repulsion many people now seem to have developed for the Grand Old Pedophile Party appears to be real and many will vote AGAINST ANY Republican.

That constitutes a sufficient plurality to carry the (s)Election before the VoteFraud Machines are factored in.

The media will feed on McLame like Pirahnas on a luckless bovine in the Amazon Basin.

My "Crystal Ball" is a little cloudy as some confusion factors have been inserted into the existing scene, but if Hitlery is properly chastened in her independence I still think she will be "allowed" to win.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-28   16:47:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Horse (#0)

It may be sound unbelievable, but conservative Rush Limbaugh is urging Republicans to cross party lines this Tuesday in primaries in Ohio and Texas and vote for Hillary Clinton.

Makes sense to me. The GOP is coming apart at the seams and needs another Clinton in office as their rallying cry. I figured that the "R"s would find some way to justify voting a "D" into office.

"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me.

"If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.

Pissed Off Janitor  posted on  2008-02-28   16:49:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#13)

the Blackchurian candidate

Fair warning, OI. I'm stealing the above line :)

Please feel free - "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery". :-)

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-28   16:51:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Original_Intent, Christine, Jethro Tull (#31)

OI...

I assume you have long been aware of this concerning the Rockefeller family and the Dulles brothers.

The last para is indeed chilling as John Foster was deep into eugenics when young.

"That same year, J.D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, a business partner of Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker in Brown Brothers Harriman, gave $11 million to create the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Built on Manhattan property owned by the Dulles brothers, it spawned America’s ground-breaking “eugenics” research and the world’s first “racial hygiene” laws.

By 1907, Rockefeller funding was heavily influencing America’s medical institutions. The Rockefeller Institute created the first genetics lab in 1909. The following year, the Eugenics Research Association and the Eugenics Records Office were founded near Cold Spring Harbor, New York, on land donated by the widow of Averell Harriman.

In 1911, John Foster Dulles summed up eugenics, saying that by eliminating “the weakest members of the population” a purer race could be created."

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-28   16:51:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Cynicom, Christine, Jethro Tull (#35)

I assume you have long been aware of this concerning the Rockefeller family and the Dulles brothers.

The last para is indeed chilling as John Foster was deep into eugenics when young.

"That same year, J.D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, a business partner of Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker in Brown Brothers Harriman, gave $11 million to create the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Built on Manhattan property owned by the Dulles brothers, it spawned America’s ground-breaking “eugenics” research and the world’s first “racial hygiene” laws.

By 1907, Rockefeller funding was heavily influencing America’s medical institutions. The Rockefeller Institute created the first genetics lab in 1909. The following year, the Eugenics Research Association and the Eugenics Records Office were founded near Cold Spring Harbor, New York, on land donated by the widow of Averell Harriman.

In 1911, John Foster Dulles summed up eugenics, saying that by eliminating “the weakest members of the population” a purer race could be created."

Yes, I have been aware of the eugenics/depopulation agenda for a while. In the last couple of years I have spent more time on it and these Psychotics are serious. Of course they see their own inbred drooling lines as "superior".

Does anyone in their right mind regard Duhbya as a member of a "superior" caste?

What people don't seem to get despite the repetition is that Hitler got the ideas for his "racial purity" and "racial hygiene" programs from the English and the Americans. That has been thoroughly buried and is not talked about, except to spin it and discount it, in History Books or the "Popular" Media.

The Cold Springs Harbor "Lab" still exists although it has a new name for its eugenics programs. People might recall that one of their top researchers got canned last year for some improvident remarks that shed light on the "thinking" there.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-28   17:01:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Cynicom (#35)

i wasn't aware, Cyni. thanks for the info.

christine  posted on  2008-02-28   17:02:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Original_Intent (#36)

"Racial hygiene" and "racial purity" are not the only ideas Adolf Hitler got from this country. Not for nothing was Hitler a big fan of Karl May's Wild West novels in his youth. The whole idea of Lebensraum in the East, with the Jews killed off, the Slavs made slaves, and the Germans colonizing rulers, was in imitation of what had happened or he imagined had happened in our Wild West.

Much if not all of what Hitler espoused was a reaction to the German defeat in World War One. Britain had better propaganda, so the New Germany would have to do better propaganda. The U.S. with a continental economy had outproduced Germany, so Germany would have to create its own continental economy. The Jews (he thought) had subverted the German war effort, so this time he would have to make sure there were no Jews around to do it again.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-28   17:10:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: aristeides (#38)

The Jews (he thought) had subverted the German war effort, so this time he would have to make sure there were no Jews around to do it again.

Odd since Chancellor Bruning said that the two largest and consistent donators to Hitler were...two Jewish bankers in Berlin...

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-28   18:12:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Cynicom (#39)

They must not have read Mein Kampf.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-28   18:46:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: aristeides (#40)

Most at least were aware of what was in the book even if they had not read. The elite left in plenty of time. Many others went to Russia (surprise) and when the Russians came marching in, (surprise) the German Jews were with them.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-28   18:50:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Cynicom (#41)

when the Russians came marching in, (surprise) the German Jews were with them.

Who do you suppose did the interpreting for the U.S. Army when it got to Germany?

By the way, even for those who did get away in time, their families often did not. E.g., Stefan Zweig's mother and sister, Billy Wilder's parents.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-28   19:03:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Horse (#0)

She has the endorsement of Ann Coulter because she is better on torture and more defensive of what Bush has been doing in Gitmo than McCain.

It just goes to show how phony all of the anti-Clinton talk from Limbaugh, Coulter, and all the other GOP talking heads has always been. She's one of them and they know it. They've known it all along, all of the chest thumping about Hillary being a "liberal" and neocons being "conservatives" was just circus for those who fall for the act. It's political Pro-Wrestling.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-02-28   19:06:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: aristeides (#42)

Who do you suppose did the interpreting for the U.S. Army when it got to Germany?

It was not the grunts that did the fighting and dying.

I had a family member that in 1944, Dec. was on R and R in England, because he knew someone and he had a job where dirty hands never occurred. My brother went into the lines in Sept and never left, dying in March 1945.

Some people have a knack for saving their own hide at the expense of others.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-28   19:15:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Original_Intent (#26)

You think Obama has the diebold nod?

______ please.

nobody  posted on  2008-02-28   19:21:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Cynicom (#44)

You were just complaining about German Jews with the Red Army. Do you have any idea what death rates the Red Army suffered?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-28   19:23:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: aristeides (#46) (Edited)

Do you have any idea what death rates the Red Army suffered?

Yes and I will tell you why.

In the push West, life meant nothing to them. As they fed humans into the line, many times without training and often with no arms, they were ordered to advance behind the armed men and pick up arms of those disabled or dead.

There were NKVD behind that shot any laggards.

By the way, the German Jews that fled to Russia were not among those dying in the front lines.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-28   19:34:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Original_Intent (#32) (Edited)

Two things are skewing this primary thing, namely gender and race.

In both cases there is a baseline constituency who will not think and will vote for either or both merely because it is a woman or a black man.

Heard some chatter today along these lines... there are some that are looking at Pebbles and BamBam as the Affirmative Action candidates. It's one thing to let your little company be run into the ground by incompetents, as long as the real boss was also taking a loss.. It's another altogether to put them in charge of the world having known questionable records, positions, involvements, associations, endorsements and happy to side step real issues, for those precisely around gender, race, and ethnic bating. The intent to distract from their keepers looting your pockets and rights.

McCain is a hard sell submitted from the Old Boys Melanoma Club, hence the need for the Baker endorsement. Vote for the Mestasticizer.. the faster the demise the shorter the pain. The Sunshine Club now presents their rendition of 'Smiling Faces'.

"Permanent good can never be the outcome of untruth and violence." Gandhi

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-28   19:50:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: aristeides, Cynicom (#46)

Do you have any idea what death rates the Red Army suffered?

60% of all Russian casualties were inflicted on each other according to neutral Swedish observers.

Someday we will have a documentary on TV about Operation Keelhaul. FDR and Stalin agreed at Yalta to turn over all Russians who had been taken prisoner by the Nazis and held in either concentration camps or used as forced laborers. The Wall Street Journal released their FOIA investigations in 1975. Over 4,000,000 concentration camp survivors were killed after the war by Stalin FDR, Truman and General Eisenhower. Stalin said he would treat these returning Russians as traitors under Soviet law.

The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie

Horse  posted on  2008-02-28   19:52:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Peppa (#48)

Vote for the Mestasticizer.. the faster the demise the shorter the pain.

that is one heck of a choice/strategy, isn't it? jeez.

christine  posted on  2008-02-28   19:55:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: christine (#50)

Vote for the Mestasticizer.. the faster the demise the shorter the pain. that is one heck of a choice/strategy, isn't it? jeez.

Only those given immunity are immune. Partisanship is an incurable condition, as proven again and again.

"Permanent good can never be the outcome of untruth and violence." Gandhi

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-28   20:06:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Horse (#0)

“Remember what this is, this is about us winning.

Yes THIS is a party man. The country may go to pot, economic calamity may engulf the world, and the military may be ravaged with casualties but, so help me god, if Republicans win the Whitehouse then all of that means NOTHING!!!

Those of you who have a problem with Ron Paul merely saying that the R party is where his official affiliation belongs, the difference between what he said and what Rush is saying here should be very, very clear. There is no comparison. Ron would never say the R party needs to win.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-02-28   20:43:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Pinguinite (#52)

Ron would never say the R party needs to win.

And if Paul by some matter of divine intervention did manage to win the party nomination, Limbaugh and company would again employ the vote for Hillary strategy. RP sleeps with mangy mutts.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-28   20:50:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Pinguinite (#52) (Edited)

Ron would never say the R party needs to win.

True. Never a GOP sign behind him ever. But can you convince the blind though they have eyes that see? No. Clearly, most were waiting to fit him for cement shoes the first chance they got. Just for having an R.

As the table spins, the short sighted, will be blind sighted and disposed with in equal haste.

"Permanent good can never be the outcome of untruth and violence." Gandhi

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-28   21:38:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Jethro Tull (#53)

RP sleeps with mangy mutts.

Mutts R Us.

"Permanent good can never be the outcome of untruth and violence." Gandhi

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-28   21:39:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Peppa (#55)

Lower than whale dung. I've felt this way since the Newtster sold up down the river in '95.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-02-28   21:42:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Jethro Tull (#56)

Lower than whale dung. I've felt this way since the Newtster sold up down the river in '95.

I wasn't awake in '95. However as I read it now, the subversion was at minimum 3 decades before. What's most odd, even now.... those that see, won't.

"Permanent good can never be the outcome of untruth and violence." Gandhi

Peppa  posted on  2008-02-28   21:47:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Horse (#0)

It's about us winning.

define "us"

and define "winning"

I doubt that limbaugh understands either as they apply to real Americans.

what a tool

Stop foreign welfare NOW!

WhiteGuy  posted on  2008-02-28   21:50:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Horse (#49)

Stalin said he would treat these returning Russians as traitors under Soviet law.

Of the nearly 100,000 Germans from Stalingrad that disappeared into Russia, less than 5000 returned home. Compare that to the POWs we housed and the number that returned home.

If one does a comparison, they learn of the brutality of Russia. Human life of the masses is worthless.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-28   21:56:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: aristeides (#38)

"Racial hygiene" and "racial purity" are not the only ideas Adolf Hitler got from this country. Not for nothing was Hitler a big fan of Karl May's Wild West novels in his youth. The whole idea of Lebensraum in the East, with the Jews killed off, the Slavs made slaves, and the Germans colonizing rulers, was in imitation of what had happened or he imagined had happened in our Wild West.

Much if not all of what Hitler espoused was a reaction to the German defeat in World War One. Britain had better propaganda, so the New Germany would have to do better propaganda. The U.S. with a continental economy had outproduced Germany, so Germany would have to create its own continental economy. The Jews (he thought) had subverted the German war effort, so this time he would have to make sure there were no Jews around to do it again.

Goebbles got a lot of his "inspiration" from the American Nephew of of Sigmund Freud - Edward Bernays.

He is reputed to have had Bernays' Book "Propaganda" on his Office Bookshelf.

For more on Bernays, if you have not already read it, read this: Why Americans Will Believe Almost Anything. It is very illuminating and a must read for anyone who wants to escape being manipulated.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-29   0:49:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: nobody (#45)

You think Obama has the diebold nod?

______ please.

Data insufficient. Certainly Hitlery had it early on in New Hampshire. What I haven't decided is whether Hitlery is being chastized for being "too independent" or whether Obummer has received the Nod from his Bankster Masters.

McInsane is flat nuts and corrupt - which makes him good material for the Rothschilds/Rockefellers that run the show. However, he has too big of an odor and my earlier reasoning stands - it would be easier for a Demoncrat to push through National Deathcare.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-29   0:53:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Peppa (#48)

Heard some chatter today along these lines... there are some that are looking at Pebbles and BamBam as the Affirmative Action candidates. It's one thing to let your little company be run into the ground by incompetents, as long as the real boss was also taking a loss.. It's another altogether to put them in charge of the world having known questionable records, positions, involvements, associations, endorsements and happy to side step real issues, for those precisely around gender, race, and ethnic bating. The intent to distract from their keepers looting your pockets and rights.

Nicely put - piquant with just a touch of acid.

Yes, I have no objection to either a woman or a black man in the Presidency, or a Black Woman, but I do object to these two particular individuals.

I do like your phrase for the Metasticizer Bunny. Brings the image of a cross between Emperor Palatine and the Energizer Bunny.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-02-29   0:59:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Horse (#0)

Rush's endorsement of Hillary is no mystery. The GOP would rather take the next four years and remake the party into a winner. They can't do that or distance themselves from the sitting president in the short time span until the election.

McCain would only hurt the party by serving one term and making the Pubs even more despised and un-electable.

If the GOP takes a 4 yr break and comes up with a new spin then they may be able to unseat Hillary using all the stuff they were going to use this time if they had a nominee to back other than McCain.

So, The party has decided to throw this election and let the next DEM prez deal with the consequences of BushCo's insanity then come back tanned, rested and ready and then hopefully re-take White House down the road.

"Furio"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-02-29   3:16:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Cynicom (#47)

But at the same time you seem to despise the people who served as translators for the U.S. Army.

For your information, I was a German linguist for the U.S. Air Force in Berlin in 1970-72.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-29   10:07:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: aristeides (#64)

But at the same time you seem to despise the people who served as translators for the U.S. Army.

For your information, I was a German linguist for the U.S. Air Force in Berlin in 1970-72.

Despise???

Truth often is twisted by those that find it uncomfortable.

The majority of the "linguists" at the time were Jews that never got their hands dirty. They got the R/R to England because of their "stress". The grunts got nothing.

Your time period there was a rather tranquil time as I recall. Not to many people were shedding blood.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-29   10:47:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Cynicom (#65)

Your time period there was a rather tranquil time as I recall. Not to many people were shedding blood.

Oh, really? Haven't you forgotten a war that was going on at the time?

And, as for the truth being uncomfortable, I notice you mentioned the Jews who came with the Red Army after I mentioned the fates of the families of people like Zweig and Wilder.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-29   11:00:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: aristeides (#66)

Oh, really? Haven't you forgotten a war that was going on at the time?

In Germany??? News to me.

You ever get your hands dirty??? I seriously doubt it. We on the same page????

You know we are Ari...

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-29   11:05:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Cynicom (#67)

I was indeed rather safe in Berlin. Safer than the translators in the U.S. Army in 1944-5 that you despise.

What does that imply about your attitude towards my work?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-02-29   11:20:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#21)

I agree that 'the American dream' of today is more like hoping that things don't get a lot worse too fast.

Agree.

Join the Ron Paul Revolution
Freedom*Peace*Prosperity

Lod  posted on  2008-02-29   11:35:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: aristeides (#68)

What does that imply about your attitude towards my work?

Attitude????

Any further discussion about what you did or did not would not be productive.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-02-29   11:37:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (71 - 73) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]