[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

How The Jew Thinks

“In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer" John Kerry in 2009

Jewish FEMA disaster relief handbook actually mandates prioritising non-Whites for disaster relief

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams

FEMA whistleblowers revealed a treasonous misuse of taxpayer funds.

Exposing how useless FEMA is in Asheville, NC.

Kamala Harris Admin ARRESTED a man for bringing a helicopter full of supplies to Hurricane Helene victims.

MSNBC brings on an anti-Trump impeachment witness, only to be stunned when he announces he's voting for Trump.

She escaped the religious sect she grew up in. Now she says Trump’s MAGA movement is eerily similar

Federal Law REQUIRES Car Makers to MONITOR You

Candace Owens: When are you going to address this, KAMALA?

Democrats Celebrate a Seemingly Impressive September Jobs Report – What They are Not Telling You

The Boiling Point – America Have You Had ‘Enough,’ Yet?

Shopping Malls Implementing Curfews And Teen "Waiting Zones" To Try And Curb Chaos, Theft And Fights

US Public Debt Grew $115 Billion A Day For the Past 3 Days Totaling $345 Billion.

Dramatic Footage Shows Tanker Blown Up In Critical Maritime Chokepoint As Disasters Mount For Biden-Harris

The Remdesivir Papers: Did Service Members Deserve to Die?

“My Blood is Boiling”: Furious Elon Musk Goes Off on FEMA for Blocking SpaceX Engineers from Assisting

“The Stench is Unbearable”: Dead Bodies Piling Up, FEMA Abandons NC Residents Amid Hurricane Helene

Cash and the Constitution


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Grief Stricken Father Sentenced to Six Years in Prison (My Title)
Source: Toledo Blade
URL Source: http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dl ... 80301/NEWS02/803010412/-1/NEWS
Published: Mar 1, 2008
Author: BLADE STAFF WRITER
Post Date: 2008-03-01 09:07:05 by iconoclast
Keywords: None
Views: 1517
Comments: 139

Article published Saturday, March 1, 2008

Fackelman given nearly 6 years in home invasion

Sentence includes ban from Bedford Twp.

By MARK REITER BLADE STAFF WRITER

MONROE - A Toledo man who claimed he couldn't recall pulling a loaded handgun on the man he held responsible for causing the road-rage death of his teenage son will serve at least 5 3/4 years in prison.

At the sentencing for Charles Fackelman in Monroe County Circuit Court, Judge Joseph Costello, Jr., said the defendant's actions in the March 24 gun toting attack on Randy Krell and his neighbor were methodical and controlled.

"Everything you did that day demonstrates to me that you knew what you were doing," the judge said.

Fackelman, 47, was convicted after a jury trial in January on two counts of felonious assault, home invasion, and gun possession. He will receive credit for the 31 days he has served in the county jail.

At his trial, Fackelman took the stand and claimed he didn't remember driving to the Lambertville home of Mr. Krell, pulling a loaded gun, pursuing him to the home of the neighbor, Thomas Williams, and kicking down the steel door of Mr. Williams' house in an attempt to get to Mr. Krell.

Not guilty by reason of insanity was among the verdicts that the jury could have reached. Instead, the panel found Fackelman guilty but mentally ill.

Judge Costello imposed a two-year mandatory sentence for the gun possession conviction and added 3 3/4 years to 20 years to the punishment for the other offenses. Fackelman also was ordered to never enter Bedford Township upon his release from prison without the court's permission.

Mr. Krell, 52, was released from the county jail Feb. 20 for the sentence he received for chasing after a carload of teenagers in June, 2006, after one of them tossed a water bottle at his car.

The car, driven by Austin Oberle, went out of control at a Whiteford Township intersection and crashed into a tree, killing Charlie Fackelman, the defendant's 17-year-old son, and seriously injuring a teenage girl.

Mr. Krell, a former Bedford Public Schools board member, was convicted in a jury trial in August of negligent homicide. He served about five months of a nine-month jail sentence.

Mr. Williams, who is an assistant principal at Dundee High School, and Mr. Krell were in the courtroom for the sentencing yesterday, but neither victim wanted to make a statement to the court. They left the packed courtroom immediately.

Fackelman, who was dismissed from his job with the U.S. Postal Service, didn't make a statement at his sentencing.

A day before the confrontation at Mr. Krell's home - and 32 days after the crash that killed his son - Fackelman attended the Whitmer High School baseball team's first home game of the season. His son would have been a senior and the team's starting shortstop.

According to testimony, the defendant acted strangely and stood alone at the game. Witnesses said he stared into the infield at the position that Charlie would have played. His wife, Janet, testified that her husband came home from the game, went to his bedroom, and cried himself to sleep.

Kenneth Simon, a Wayne County, Michigan, assistant prosecutor who handled the case, argued to Judge Costello that a message needed to be sent to discourage others from taking the law into their own hands.

"What would have happened in this case if Randy Krell had not gone to Mr. Williams' house? I think at the very least that Mr. Fackelman's intent was more than pointing a gun at Mr. Krell," Mr. Simon said.

Defense attorney Asad Farah argued for leniency and asked the judge to depart from state sentencing guidelines.

Mr. Farah said the tragic death of his son threw Fackelman into mental illness and he couldn't deal with the loss, causing unusual mitigating factors in the case.

"He needs help. He needs to continue on with his medication. He needs to continue on with his therapy," Mr. Farah said. "There is no dispute that he has a mental illness. The question is whether he will receive help under a prison sanction."

Judge Costello said that Fackelman put the victims and their families as well as their neighborhood in a state of fear, to the point that Mr. Williams became suspicious when a strange vehicle drove past.

"No one should have to live like that," the judge said.

Under state law, Fackelman will not be eligible to appear before the parole board until he serves the minimum punishment of 69 months.

Fackelman also was ordered by Judge Costello to pay restitution of $1,564 to Mr. Williams and his insurance carrier for the damage that he did to the home.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 116.

#3. To: iconoclast (#0)

the bastard kills someone and he gets 5 months....the kids dad didn't kill anyone and he gets 3 years....American Justice....what a crock of shit!

lizza76  posted on  2008-03-01   9:18:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: lizza76 (#3)

the bastard kills someone and he gets 5 months....the kids dad didn't kill anyone and he gets 3 years....American Justice....what a crock of shit!

From what I read of the story he killed nobody. The idiot driver killed his son, not the man chasing them for throwing a water bottle at his car. Maybe I missed something, I don't know.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-01   10:23:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: RickyJ (#8)

Maybe I missed something

Maybe I missed am missing something.

You sure are, IMO.

I was fully expecting some replies like yours.

iconoclast  posted on  2008-03-01   10:41:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: iconoclast (#13)

I was fully expecting some replies like yours.

Logical VS. emotional.

If the dad would have used logic instead of emotion then he wouldn't be in jail right now.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-01   15:31:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: RickyJ (#29)

If the dad would have used logic instead of emotion then he wouldn't be in jail right now.

That's kindof a tough thing to tell a dad whose son was killed.

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-03-01   18:40:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Pinguinite (#59) (Edited)

That's kind of a tough thing to tell a dad whose son was killed.

Why? Should he have a license to terrorize whomever he chooses just becasue his son was in an accident?

Krell didn't cause the accident and had every right to try to confront these people who were throwing objects at other cars. He didn't necessarily know they were teenagers. And it was just him vs. a whole car of teenagers. They would have whipped his ass if they would have stopped and confronted him. Krell was not using logic or he wouldn't have went after them. The Father also is not using logic by blaming the death of his son on an angry motorist. No one was using logic in this story or it wouldn't have ended so tragically. If the Judge didn't nip this in the bud then Krell could have been the next victim in this story.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   11:34:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: RickyJ (#66)

Krell didn't cause the accident and had every right to try to confront these people who were throwing objects at other cars.

BULLSHIT!!!

He chased them at a high speed until they crashed! The teenagers did not even know why they were being chased. Someone in the car threw out a plastic water bottle that hit Krell's car. They probably never knew the bottle hit anything.

No one has the right to chase a carload of people at high speed. Krell took the law into his own hands, and in so doing caused the death of one teenager and paralyzed a girl.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   11:38:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: robin (#67)

They probably never knew the bottle hit anything.

It takes two for a high speed chase to occur. If they weren't trying to get away there would have been no chase to start with. Of course they knew why the driver in the other car was coming after them or they wouldn't have tried to get away. He was only one man, they had a carload of people. Krell is guilty of being stupid, but he is not responsible for this accident. The idiot driver is for trying to get away from a lone man in a car.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   11:48:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: RickyJ (#71)

Of course they knew why the driver in the other car was coming after them or they wouldn't have tried to get away.

No, as Pinguinite pointed out, they did not know who or why.

But, they were well aware that someone was chasing them. That would be very frightening.

It is possible to litter, w/o realizing that the litter has hit anything.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   11:53:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: robin (#75)

No, as Pinguinite pointed out, they did not know who or why.

That's why they sped away? It takes two for a chase to occur. I would bet a million dollars they knew.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   11:58:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: RickyJ (#78)

All it takes is one enraged driver who decides to chase down a carload of teenagers he thinks intentionally threw a plastic bottle of water at his car.

One car that begins to chase the car in front, refusing to pass it; but maybe trying to force it off the road "to confront" them?

Oh yeah, Krell caused that accident. He's a monster.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:01:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: robin (#79)

Oh yeah, Krell caused that accident. He's a monster.

He made a stupid decision based on anger that could have led to his own death by the people he was chasing. At any moment one of the people in the car he was chasing could have shot at him. I don't see him as a monster. He didn't make anyone run off the road.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   12:11:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: RickyJ (#85)

He didn't make anyone run off the road.

He chased them at high speed with the intention of confronting them. It was called a Road Rage incident in this account:

Krell served six months and is already out of jail.

"Six years to six month is an incredible difference considering the results of their actions," said Eric Fackelman, family member. "Both people made a threat. One used a gun, one used a car. The end result with the car was death and maiming, and the end result with the gun was nothing."

In January, a jury found the elder Fackelman guilty but mentally ill of the charges. Attorney Asad Farah says his client is currently on anti-psychotic medication and fears in prison Fackelman won't get the treatment he needs.

"We have an individual who has a mental illness who has a psychotic break for whatever reason," Farah said.

...

The Monroe County Sheriff said that alcohol was not involved in the accident, but excessive speed did play a factor.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:20:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: robin (#87) (Edited)

He chased them at high speed with the intention of confronting them.

Which was a stupid thing to do but he did not cause the accident. If he would have caused the accident then Austin would have never been convicted of two felonies. This whole thread boils down to logic vs. emotion.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   12:30:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: RickyJ (#91)

As the driver, but the state of the driver's mind due to being chased was clearly not taken into consideration.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:33:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: robin (#93)

" .the state of the driver's mind due to being chased"

You're right. those kids had every reason to run for it. Why would they stop,

the man chasing at high speed wasn't going to be interested in just talking it out and for all

they knew he was armed.

castletrash  posted on  2008-03-03   12:44:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: castletrash, rickyj (#98)

their would be nothing to 'talk out' if the stupid hoodlums had not lived their lives in a fashion that they thought it was cool to go around assaulting strangers for nothing. hence they died and are paralyzed. there is no escaping ther fact, they started, caused, and initiated their own demise. i have never seen a stranger and got the sick idea it was fun to assault or harass them for fun. have you? if not, that is why we're probably both healthy and alive today.

the dead and paralized idiots didn't know as much. maybe bad parenting?

Artisan  posted on  2008-03-03   12:52:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: Artisan (#101)

A plastic water bottle that may have been tossed out as litter is not "assualting strangers". No damage was suffered to Krell's vehicle.

There was no alcohol involved, and so far I've read nothing that states the plastic water bottle was thrown at Krell's car intentionally.

There is no evidence that these were bad kids.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:55:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: robin (#103)

There is no evidence that these were bad kids.

There is in the article.

"Oberle pleaded guilty last week to two felonies resulting from his role in the crash."

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   13:09:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: RickyJ (#111)

You are referencing the charges against the teenage driver, there is nothing mentioned about any previous records for any of the teenagers.

He was the driver of the car and he was driving too fast. His mental state at having been chased was not taken into consideration, IMO. I believe Krell should be held at least partially responsible.

But there is no evidence that these teenagers were ever "bad kids".

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   13:15:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 116.

#132. To: robin (#116) (Edited)

You make these teenagers out to be poor little children being chased by a mean angry man. Krell may not even have known they were teenagers, and even if he did that doesn't make them little children. Teenagers can be just as big or bigger than an average adult so it is not immediately clear to anyone driving by them that they are teenagers. Krell wasn't thinking clearly by chasing down a car load of people that could have harmed him if they wanted to. They had already threw something at him and could have done more damage at any time. If these "kids" where really good and done nothing wrong they could have handled Krell in a reasonable manner, not by running from him. They never had to run from him. Krell didn't threaten them in any way.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03 15:25:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 116.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]