[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

How The Jew Thinks

“In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer" John Kerry in 2009

Jewish FEMA disaster relief handbook actually mandates prioritising non-Whites for disaster relief

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams

FEMA whistleblowers revealed a treasonous misuse of taxpayer funds.

Exposing how useless FEMA is in Asheville, NC.

Kamala Harris Admin ARRESTED a man for bringing a helicopter full of supplies to Hurricane Helene victims.

MSNBC brings on an anti-Trump impeachment witness, only to be stunned when he announces he's voting for Trump.

She escaped the religious sect she grew up in. Now she says Trump’s MAGA movement is eerily similar

Federal Law REQUIRES Car Makers to MONITOR You

Candace Owens: When are you going to address this, KAMALA?

Democrats Celebrate a Seemingly Impressive September Jobs Report – What They are Not Telling You

The Boiling Point – America Have You Had ‘Enough,’ Yet?

Shopping Malls Implementing Curfews And Teen "Waiting Zones" To Try And Curb Chaos, Theft And Fights

US Public Debt Grew $115 Billion A Day For the Past 3 Days Totaling $345 Billion.

Dramatic Footage Shows Tanker Blown Up In Critical Maritime Chokepoint As Disasters Mount For Biden-Harris

The Remdesivir Papers: Did Service Members Deserve to Die?

“My Blood is Boiling”: Furious Elon Musk Goes Off on FEMA for Blocking SpaceX Engineers from Assisting

“The Stench is Unbearable”: Dead Bodies Piling Up, FEMA Abandons NC Residents Amid Hurricane Helene

Cash and the Constitution


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Grief Stricken Father Sentenced to Six Years in Prison (My Title)
Source: Toledo Blade
URL Source: http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dl ... 80301/NEWS02/803010412/-1/NEWS
Published: Mar 1, 2008
Author: BLADE STAFF WRITER
Post Date: 2008-03-01 09:07:05 by iconoclast
Keywords: None
Views: 1443
Comments: 139

Article published Saturday, March 1, 2008

Fackelman given nearly 6 years in home invasion

Sentence includes ban from Bedford Twp.

By MARK REITER BLADE STAFF WRITER

MONROE - A Toledo man who claimed he couldn't recall pulling a loaded handgun on the man he held responsible for causing the road-rage death of his teenage son will serve at least 5 3/4 years in prison.

At the sentencing for Charles Fackelman in Monroe County Circuit Court, Judge Joseph Costello, Jr., said the defendant's actions in the March 24 gun toting attack on Randy Krell and his neighbor were methodical and controlled.

"Everything you did that day demonstrates to me that you knew what you were doing," the judge said.

Fackelman, 47, was convicted after a jury trial in January on two counts of felonious assault, home invasion, and gun possession. He will receive credit for the 31 days he has served in the county jail.

At his trial, Fackelman took the stand and claimed he didn't remember driving to the Lambertville home of Mr. Krell, pulling a loaded gun, pursuing him to the home of the neighbor, Thomas Williams, and kicking down the steel door of Mr. Williams' house in an attempt to get to Mr. Krell.

Not guilty by reason of insanity was among the verdicts that the jury could have reached. Instead, the panel found Fackelman guilty but mentally ill.

Judge Costello imposed a two-year mandatory sentence for the gun possession conviction and added 3 3/4 years to 20 years to the punishment for the other offenses. Fackelman also was ordered to never enter Bedford Township upon his release from prison without the court's permission.

Mr. Krell, 52, was released from the county jail Feb. 20 for the sentence he received for chasing after a carload of teenagers in June, 2006, after one of them tossed a water bottle at his car.

The car, driven by Austin Oberle, went out of control at a Whiteford Township intersection and crashed into a tree, killing Charlie Fackelman, the defendant's 17-year-old son, and seriously injuring a teenage girl.

Mr. Krell, a former Bedford Public Schools board member, was convicted in a jury trial in August of negligent homicide. He served about five months of a nine-month jail sentence.

Mr. Williams, who is an assistant principal at Dundee High School, and Mr. Krell were in the courtroom for the sentencing yesterday, but neither victim wanted to make a statement to the court. They left the packed courtroom immediately.

Fackelman, who was dismissed from his job with the U.S. Postal Service, didn't make a statement at his sentencing.

A day before the confrontation at Mr. Krell's home - and 32 days after the crash that killed his son - Fackelman attended the Whitmer High School baseball team's first home game of the season. His son would have been a senior and the team's starting shortstop.

According to testimony, the defendant acted strangely and stood alone at the game. Witnesses said he stared into the infield at the position that Charlie would have played. His wife, Janet, testified that her husband came home from the game, went to his bedroom, and cried himself to sleep.

Kenneth Simon, a Wayne County, Michigan, assistant prosecutor who handled the case, argued to Judge Costello that a message needed to be sent to discourage others from taking the law into their own hands.

"What would have happened in this case if Randy Krell had not gone to Mr. Williams' house? I think at the very least that Mr. Fackelman's intent was more than pointing a gun at Mr. Krell," Mr. Simon said.

Defense attorney Asad Farah argued for leniency and asked the judge to depart from state sentencing guidelines.

Mr. Farah said the tragic death of his son threw Fackelman into mental illness and he couldn't deal with the loss, causing unusual mitigating factors in the case.

"He needs help. He needs to continue on with his medication. He needs to continue on with his therapy," Mr. Farah said. "There is no dispute that he has a mental illness. The question is whether he will receive help under a prison sanction."

Judge Costello said that Fackelman put the victims and their families as well as their neighborhood in a state of fear, to the point that Mr. Williams became suspicious when a strange vehicle drove past.

"No one should have to live like that," the judge said.

Under state law, Fackelman will not be eligible to appear before the parole board until he serves the minimum punishment of 69 months.

Fackelman also was ordered by Judge Costello to pay restitution of $1,564 to Mr. Williams and his insurance carrier for the damage that he did to the home.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 134.

#3. To: iconoclast (#0)

the bastard kills someone and he gets 5 months....the kids dad didn't kill anyone and he gets 3 years....American Justice....what a crock of shit!

lizza76  posted on  2008-03-01   9:18:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: lizza76 (#3)

the bastard kills someone and he gets 5 months....the kids dad didn't kill anyone and he gets 3 years....American Justice....what a crock of shit!

From what I read of the story he killed nobody. The idiot driver killed his son, not the man chasing them for throwing a water bottle at his car. Maybe I missed something, I don't know.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-01   10:23:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: RickyJ (#8)

Maybe I missed something

Maybe I missed am missing something.

You sure are, IMO.

I was fully expecting some replies like yours.

iconoclast  posted on  2008-03-01   10:41:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: iconoclast (#13)

I was fully expecting some replies like yours.

Logical VS. emotional.

If the dad would have used logic instead of emotion then he wouldn't be in jail right now.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-01   15:31:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: RickyJ (#29)

If the dad would have used logic instead of emotion then he wouldn't be in jail right now.

That's kindof a tough thing to tell a dad whose son was killed.

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-03-01   18:40:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Pinguinite (#59) (Edited)

That's kind of a tough thing to tell a dad whose son was killed.

Why? Should he have a license to terrorize whomever he chooses just becasue his son was in an accident?

Krell didn't cause the accident and had every right to try to confront these people who were throwing objects at other cars. He didn't necessarily know they were teenagers. And it was just him vs. a whole car of teenagers. They would have whipped his ass if they would have stopped and confronted him. Krell was not using logic or he wouldn't have went after them. The Father also is not using logic by blaming the death of his son on an angry motorist. No one was using logic in this story or it wouldn't have ended so tragically. If the Judge didn't nip this in the bud then Krell could have been the next victim in this story.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   11:34:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: RickyJ (#66)

Krell didn't cause the accident and had every right to try to confront these people who were throwing objects at other cars.

BULLSHIT!!!

He chased them at a high speed until they crashed! The teenagers did not even know why they were being chased. Someone in the car threw out a plastic water bottle that hit Krell's car. They probably never knew the bottle hit anything.

No one has the right to chase a carload of people at high speed. Krell took the law into his own hands, and in so doing caused the death of one teenager and paralyzed a girl.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   11:38:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: robin (#67)

They probably never knew the bottle hit anything.

It takes two for a high speed chase to occur. If they weren't trying to get away there would have been no chase to start with. Of course they knew why the driver in the other car was coming after them or they wouldn't have tried to get away. He was only one man, they had a carload of people. Krell is guilty of being stupid, but he is not responsible for this accident. The idiot driver is for trying to get away from a lone man in a car.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   11:48:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: RickyJ (#71)

Of course they knew why the driver in the other car was coming after them or they wouldn't have tried to get away.

No, as Pinguinite pointed out, they did not know who or why.

But, they were well aware that someone was chasing them. That would be very frightening.

It is possible to litter, w/o realizing that the litter has hit anything.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   11:53:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: robin (#75)

No, as Pinguinite pointed out, they did not know who or why.

That's why they sped away? It takes two for a chase to occur. I would bet a million dollars they knew.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   11:58:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: RickyJ (#78)

All it takes is one enraged driver who decides to chase down a carload of teenagers he thinks intentionally threw a plastic bottle of water at his car.

One car that begins to chase the car in front, refusing to pass it; but maybe trying to force it off the road "to confront" them?

Oh yeah, Krell caused that accident. He's a monster.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:01:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: robin (#79)

Oh yeah, Krell caused that accident. He's a monster.

He made a stupid decision based on anger that could have led to his own death by the people he was chasing. At any moment one of the people in the car he was chasing could have shot at him. I don't see him as a monster. He didn't make anyone run off the road.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   12:11:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: RickyJ (#85)

He didn't make anyone run off the road.

He chased them at high speed with the intention of confronting them. It was called a Road Rage incident in this account:

Krell served six months and is already out of jail.

"Six years to six month is an incredible difference considering the results of their actions," said Eric Fackelman, family member. "Both people made a threat. One used a gun, one used a car. The end result with the car was death and maiming, and the end result with the gun was nothing."

In January, a jury found the elder Fackelman guilty but mentally ill of the charges. Attorney Asad Farah says his client is currently on anti-psychotic medication and fears in prison Fackelman won't get the treatment he needs.

"We have an individual who has a mental illness who has a psychotic break for whatever reason," Farah said.

...

The Monroe County Sheriff said that alcohol was not involved in the accident, but excessive speed did play a factor.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:20:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: robin (#87) (Edited)

He chased them at high speed with the intention of confronting them.

Which was a stupid thing to do but he did not cause the accident. If he would have caused the accident then Austin would have never been convicted of two felonies. This whole thread boils down to logic vs. emotion.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   12:30:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: RickyJ (#91)

As the driver, but the state of the driver's mind due to being chased was clearly not taken into consideration.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:33:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: robin (#93)

" .the state of the driver's mind due to being chased"

You're right. those kids had every reason to run for it. Why would they stop,

the man chasing at high speed wasn't going to be interested in just talking it out and for all

they knew he was armed.

castletrash  posted on  2008-03-03   12:44:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: castletrash (#98)

You're right. those kids had every reason to run for it.

If they did then Austin wouldn't be in jail right now convicted of two felonies.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-03-03   12:48:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: RickyJ (#99)

So if someone starts chasing you at a high speed, and you are clueless as to why (consider, even if one teen in the car had thrown the bottle deliberately - which I doubt - the driver may well have had no knowledge), you would have pulled over and asked the unknown why are you chasing me?

Do you really think that's reasonable? And these were teenagers.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   12:50:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: robin (#100)

So if someone starts chasing you at a high speed, and you are clueless as to why

a chase must be reciproal. I believe human nature and reason would prevent any person from fleeing at high speed someone on a busy city street for absoluetely no known reason, theyd never seen them before and had no reason to fear or run. it would merely be a bad rear end accident, with the potential chaser hitting a parked car.

Artisan  posted on  2008-03-03   12:59:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Artisan (#105)

I believe human nature and reason would prevent any person from fleeing at high speed someone on a busy city street for absoluetely no known reason,

Being chased down by some unknown who won't pass is a good enough reason to flee for most people.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   13:02:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: robin (#106)

I'm really trying to understand your position about this running/chasing/fleeing issue. for example say i'm in 7-11 getting a big gulp and someone walks up to me very fast. i wouldnt run, they would bump into me. there would be no chase because there is no context for it.

if i had pickpocketed their wallet, and they approached me, then yes i would run .

whereas if a total stranger had come up and hit me, and tried worse, i might run because that would be an attack. there would be a reason to run. but their mere coming towrds me would not predicate a fight or flight response. this arguement boils down to, what would initiate a fight or flight response in someone.

something MUST initiate or predicate a fight or flight response,. That is what i meant when i refered to human nature above.

Artisan  posted on  2008-03-03   13:12:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: Artisan (#113)

A plastic water bottle that did no damage to Krell's vehicle is what started his road rage.

He chased the vehicle in front of him. They became aware they were being chased and drove faster to get away.

Why is this a puzzle to you?

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   13:20:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: robin (#120)

i am not aware of being chased unless there is a context or event that predicates the FIGHT OR FLIGHT response in me. if i am minding my business and done nothing wrong i would never 'run' like a scared jackrabbit. even the rabbit knows he is fleeing a specific danger, the coyote, who wants to eat him.

i contend it is not a normal reaction for anyone of any age, to run from nothing for nothing. hence the kids did not run from nothing, they started a conflict on purpose which they could then not handle the fallout. their reaction negates the arguement that they were innocent and unknowing.

otherwise we may have to agree to disagree on this one. ;-)

Artisan  posted on  2008-03-03   13:28:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: Artisan (#123)

They were fleeing a car that was chasing them. I would too.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   13:30:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#127. To: robin (#125)

well if you threw something at a car and it chased you, it may be a good idea to flee the victim of your assault. if however youre minding your own business on the street or freeway, you wouldnt even know and could not possibly be 'chased' unless you were running, and had reason to know you had a reason to run. otherwise as i stated earlier in my 7-11 example, all it would be is a rear-end situation where some loon rear ended your vehicle. there would be no chase if you had no reason to run. it would be, driving along and bam, a rear end collision.

Artisan  posted on  2008-03-03   13:48:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#134. To: Artisan (#127) (Edited)

First of all, we do not even know if the plastic bottle had any water in it. However, we do know that there was no damage to Krell's vehicle.

People are usually innocent until proven guilty.

Krell was found guilty of something, he was given 6 months in jail.

It is possible to know you are being chased w/o the reason. Consider all the road rage cases on L.A. freeways.

If someone is dangerously tailgating you at any speed and refuses to pass you, then you can be sure he is chasing you. Also, if he tries to run you off the road or into a tree.

robin  posted on  2008-03-03   16:26:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 134.

#138. To: robin (#134)

Krell was found guilty of something, he was given 6 months in jail.

He served even less.

Here is more on this tragedy ... all available, although apparently inaccesible to those of the contra opinion on this series of tragedies (including, of course the outrageous sentence of Mr. Fackelman):

www.monroenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?

AID=/20070817/NEWS01/108170049/-1/RSSNEWS

Two sentences, two approaches

One of the final chapters in a sad story played out in a packed, emotional courtroom Thursday.

Two people were sentenced to jail. One is Austin Oberle, a 19-year-old Toledo honor student who plans to attend college. The other is Randy Krell, a 52- year-old Lambertville man who has a family, a career and has dedicated much of his life to education.

Both were involved in a crime that led to death, injuries and anguish for many. Observers, such as Monroe County Prosecutor William P. Nichols, believed they were equally responsible. So for their roles, both were convicted of similar charges.

But for all the similarities in the case, the way they approached their involvement in the court of law was strikingly different.

The younger man pleaded guilty to negligent homicide and felonious driving, faced the victims and their families - not to mention a throng of media - and apologized, adding that he was accepting responsibility for his actions.

The other, who was convicted of negligent homicide, never looked at the families and directed his words only toward the judge. His back remained to the courtroom. He denied involvement from the beginning and during his trial in June told a story on the witness stand that neither the judge nor the jury believed.

On Thursday, the differences in demeanor and approaches cost Mr. Krell three months of freedom. Circuit Judge Michael W. LaBeau clearly was as impressed with Mr. Oberle as he was disenchanted with Mr. Krell.

"Mr. Krell has shown no remorse for his actions," Judge LaBeau said. "Mr. Krell told a ridiculous story ... bordering on the absurd. If Mr. Krell stood up like a man, the victims could have accepted this much better."

Mr. Oberle will spend the next six months in jail. Mr. Krell was given nine months. Both were handcuffed and led away. They also were sentenced to three years of probation.

Mr. Oberle also must peform community service.

It was the end of one story that began happily enough with a carload of good teenagers, who all are excellent students, athletic and good looking. They were out having some fun on a summer night and were playing pranks that eventually led to disaster.

A thrown water bottle, a passing car getting hit, a chase through darkness, a crash and then death and injuries. Charlie Fackelman was one of the teenagers in that car. By all accounts, he was happy, full of life, charming and had a great future ahead of him. He loved baseball and was hoping to teach it at the high school level.

He was the only one of the five teens in the car who died in the accident that June night. He was 17.

"There is a hole in our family," his mother, Janet, said tearfully in court on Thursday. "The anguish is extreme. Our family will never be the same without Charlie."

Charlie was shown in the funeral home last Father's Day. His dad was so distressed he reportedly snapped and went after Mr. Krell with a gun months after the accident. Mr. Fackelman will be in court again next week, but this time as a defendant.

On Thursday, he wore his son's Whitmer High School baseball uniform. The No. 21 and "Fackelman" were stitched on the back. When Mr. Krell read his statement in court, Mr. Fackelman turned around and faced the courtroom wall. Afterward, he said he turned his back to the court proceeding while Mr. Krell read his statement for a reason.

"He never faced us," Mr. Fackelman said. "It was typical of the whole situation from beginning to end. He never faced up to anything."

For Mr. Krell, the incident also has been a nightmare. He said in court that he has been stalked, attacked and terrorized. He has spent his life savings defending himself and remains concerned for his family's safety.

"I still live in fear," he told the judge. "This case has taken a toll on my family as well as myself. Nothing I can do will change what has happened. We all must move on."

For many, however, moving on is no simple task. Stevie Beale is another victim in this case. Bright, beautiful and smart, she has impressed the judge and almost everyone else who has come in contact with her.

Confined to a wheelchair because of injuries suffered in the accident, she always has maintained grace and dignity while on the witness stand or with the media. Many in court wore "Super Stevie" T-shirts.

"I prayed I would be like her," Alexa, her 12-year-old sister, told the court.

At the sentencing, Stevie sat in the wheelchair and could not hide her disdain for Mr. Krell, telling him that he should have known better. She also could not help but wonder about her one-time friend Austin, who she feels abandoned her.

In the end, she said, she lost her mobility and a friend.

"I began to pick up the pieces of my broken heart," Stevie said. "I'm serving a life sentence in this chair."

Now comes the final chapter for this group of teenagers and their families. Out of the glare of the media spotlight and courtroom, one family tries to move forward without a beloved young man.

A second is faced with years of therapy and the challenges of the handicapped world. And yet another must share time with felons and drug dealers instead of preparing for college.

Mr. Oberle, who drove at high speeds trying to flee the pursuing car that night, pleaded guilty to negligent homicide and felonious driving a day before the trial. On Thursday, wearing a striped dress shirt and white necktie, he faced the courtroom and addressed his friends, their families and a full courtroom.

"I'd like to apologize," he said. "I wish I used better judgment. I have taken responsibilities for my actions. I stand before you today as a man. I'm so sorry I caused all this tragedy."

In the back of the room, amid a group of people, stood Al Beale, Stevie's father. He said later that the sentence was fair. Like the judge, he noted the difference in the way the two defendants acted.

"I thought it was very responsible for an 18-year-old," Mr. Beale said. "He stood there like a man. He didn't cower."

iconoclast  posted on  2008-03-03 20:59:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 134.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]