[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Angry Barack Obama bombarded by media
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol ... _obama_bombarded_by_media.html
Published: Mar 4, 2008
Author: Michael Saul
Post Date: 2008-03-04 14:47:26 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 370
Comments: 26

Tuesday, March 4th 2008, 1:51 AM

SAN ANTONIO, Tex. - An exasperated Barack Obama scurried away Monday from the toughest news conference of his campaign, telling reporters who kept shouting questions that he'd spent enough time on the grill.

"Come on! I just answered, like, eight questions," Obama, looking surprised, told shouting reporters as he fled the room. "We're running late."

The Clinton campaign has long complained that Obama gets soft treatment from the press corps. But Monday's exchange was no pillow fight.

The first question was about a private talk an Obama economic adviser had with a Canadian official - reportedly saying that the harshness of Obama's criticisms of the North American Free Trade Agreement was for political show.

Last week, Obama denied an initial media report about the conversation. But after a Canadian government memo surfaced, he acknowledged yesterday there was a conversation.

"When I gave you that information, that was the information that I had at the time," he said. His camp still disputes the memo's account of the discussion.

The questioning then turned to Obama's links to ex-fund-raiser Tony Rezko, who went on trial in Chicago Monday on corruption charges. A reporter asserted Obama hadn't fully answered journalists' questions on Rezko.

Obama insisted he had - during a past news conference with Chicago media. But another persisted that questions remain unanswered, such as ones about fund-raisers Rezko held for him.

Obama replied, "These requests, I think, can just go on forever. ..." He said the "pertinent" information had been provided.

When Obama declared the press conference over, one reporter yelled that he was dodging questions just minutes after claiming he wasn't.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: christine (#0)

Michael Saul seems to have been covering Hillary's campaign for the pro-Hillary NY Daily News up to now.

I wonder why he was covering this Obama event.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-04   14:51:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: christine (#0)

Barry better get used to it. By the time the Clintons and/or the GOP machines are done with him, he'll be lucky to keep his Senate seat.

This is just the beginning.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-03-04   14:51:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Vitamin Z (#2)

Barry better get used to it. By the time the Clintons and/or the GOP machines are done with him, he'll be lucky to keep his Senate seat.

This is just the beginning.

No kidding. He thinks the MSM crowd is rough now, he ain't seen nothing yet.

Thing is, I've listened to a couple of his speeches...and they are totally hollow...no substance.

The man really doesn't have a clue.

Pern  posted on  2008-03-04   14:54:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#0)

ex-fund-raiser Tony Rezko

The Man in the Yellow Hat.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2008-03-04   14:58:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Pern (#3) (Edited)

We know it’s time to time to restore our Constitution and the rule of law. This is an issue that was at the heart of Senator Dodd’s candidacy, and I share his passion for restoring the balance between the security we demand and the civil liberties that we cherish.

The American people must be able to trust that their president values principle over politics, and justice over unchecked power. I’ve been proud to stand with Senator Dodd in his fight against retroactive immunity for the telecommunications industry. Secrecy and special interests must not trump accountability. We must show our citizens – and set an example to the world – that laws cannot be ignored when it is inconvenient. Because in America – no one is above the law.

It’s time to reject torture without equivocation. It’s time to close Guantanamo and to restore habeas corpus. It’s time to give our intelligence and law enforcement agencies the tools they need to track down and take out terrorists, while ensuring that their actions are subject to vigorous oversight that protects our freedom. So let me be perfectly clear: I have taught the Constitution, I understand the Constitution, and I will obey the Constitution when I am President of the United States.

Is it hollow to call for closing Guantanamo, restoring habeas corpus, and starting to observe the Constitution again?

Link to Obama's speech.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-04   14:58:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Vitamin Z (#2)

Barry better get used to it.

"Barry" LOL

christine  posted on  2008-03-04   15:00:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: christine (#6)

Obummer better get use to the back of the bus.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-04   15:03:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: aristeides (#5)

Is it hollow to call for closing Guantanamo, restoring habeas corpus, and starting to observe the Constitution again?

Every politician says this, but how many actually believe it?

Sorry, I don't think he'll end the war, close Gitmo, or any of the hundreds of other things he'll promise while campaigning.

It's not that I dislike the man, it's just that I don't believe a word he says...too many politicians have uttered the same words, and look where we're at.

There is only one politician I trust, Dr. Ron Paul. All one has to do is look at his record.

Pern  posted on  2008-03-04   15:17:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Pern (#8)

Every politician says this

Have you heard McCain or Hillary say this? I haven't.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-04   15:20:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Pern (#8)

Sorry, I don't think he'll end the war, close Gitmo, or any of the hundreds of other things he'll promise while campaigning.

Some people would vote Bush for a third term.

Campaign rhetoric is just that, hot air.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-04   15:22:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: aristeides (#9)

Have you heard McCain or Hillary say this? I haven't.

Well hell no they won't say it...they're both perfectly happy in maintaining the status quo.

McCain has already said he'll maintain a presence in Iraq for '100 years' and Hillary...well...who knows what that crazy bitch will do.

Pern  posted on  2008-03-04   15:25:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Pern (#11)

McCain has already said he'll maintain a presence in Iraq for '100 years' and Hillary...well...who knows what that crazy bitch will do.

We will leave the ME when Tel Aviv tell us to. Of course that will be never.

Who the President is makes not a whit of difference.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-04   15:27:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Pern (#11)

Well hell no they won't say it...they're both perfectly happy in maintaining the status quo.

Meanwhile, Obama says it.

Maybe that says something about his not being perfectly happy in doing that?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-04   15:36:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Pern (#3)

and they are totally hollow...no substance.

The man really doesn't have a clue.

Ron Paul has the clue.

angle  posted on  2008-03-04   15:39:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: aristeides, Pern (#13)

He would have fewer critics among the powerful if he went along with everyone else.

When he gave that speech in 2002 against the Iraq war, it was really not a popular sentiment.

'He will make Cheney look like Gandhi.'
U.S. conservative pundit Pat Buchanan, imagining presidential hopeful John McCain in the White House.

robin  posted on  2008-03-04   15:39:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: aristeides (#13)

Meanwhile, Obama says it.

Yeah, well Obama is saying to rescind NAFTA, but in Canada, his spokeman is quoted as saying Obama doesn't really mean it.

angle  posted on  2008-03-04   15:41:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: angle (#16)

He may not mean what he's been saying recently about NAFTA, but he's been calling for restoring habeas corpus for months.

Why do you think Hillary and McCain don't echo his calls?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-04   15:44:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: robin (#15)

When he gave that speech in 2002 against the Iraq war, it was really not a popular sentiment.

Of course not. IMO, those that are so pro-war are gaining something from it, money, power...whatever.

Most of the population are simply sheep, just bahh-ing along their merry way, eyes glued to the idiot box.

Like I said in a previous thread, the sudden downturn of our economy might just well be a blessing in disguise...exposing the 'approved candidates' for the frauds they really are.

Pern  posted on  2008-03-04   15:49:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: aristeides (#17)

He may not mean what he's been saying recently about NAFTA, but he's been calling for restoring habeas corpus for months.

So, just selective misportraying of his real intentions, then?

McCain and Hillary...no thank you, either, but I surely don't see Obaba as any better.

angle  posted on  2008-03-04   15:49:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: angle (#16)

Yeah, well Obama is saying to rescind NAFTA, but in Canada, his spokeman is quoted as saying Obama doesn't really mean it.

Perhaps the spokesman is not really his.

As we meandered our way through the ever busy Bree Street, Harry could not help observing how filthy downtown Johannesburg had become. I had made the same disturbing observation myself the day I arrived, but had been reluctant to accept the disturbing fact that decay of public infrastructure seems to be the story in areas of the city inhabited by blacks. Predominantly black areas have become an eyesore. The beautiful lawns and flowerbeds I noticed in some areas three years earlier now tell sad stories of degradation. Some of them have become open-air urinals.

Tauzero  posted on  2008-03-04   15:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Tauzero (#20)

Perhaps the spokesman is not really his.

Have you read the story? It's his economic policy advisor.

angle  posted on  2008-03-04   15:55:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: christine (#0)

An exasperated Barack Obama scurried away Monday from the toughest news conference of his campaign, telling reporters who kept shouting questions that he'd spent enough time on the grill.

Couldn't have happened to a more deserving man....

"There is a Providence that protects idiots, drunkards, children and the United States of America." - Otto von Bismarck

X-15  posted on  2008-03-04   15:59:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: angle (#21)

Have you read the story?

But of course.

As we meandered our way through the ever busy Bree Street, Harry could not help observing how filthy downtown Johannesburg had become. I had made the same disturbing observation myself the day I arrived, but had been reluctant to accept the disturbing fact that decay of public infrastructure seems to be the story in areas of the city inhabited by blacks. Predominantly black areas have become an eyesore. The beautiful lawns and flowerbeds I noticed in some areas three years earlier now tell sad stories of degradation. Some of them have become open-air urinals.

Tauzero  posted on  2008-03-04   16:17:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Vitamin Z (#2)

His Kunta Kinte is beginning to show.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-04   16:21:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Jethro Tull (#24)

Maybe some will want their welfare money returned from Kunta?

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-04   16:25:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Cynicom (#25)

Kunta don't do returns. "The Kingfish" does the rules.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-04   17:21:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]