Title: Is anyone here NOT sick of the Bush/Clinton crime families as Presidents? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Mar 5, 2008 Author:me Post Date:2008-03-05 07:52:57 by Itisa1mosttoolate Keywords:None Views:683 Comments:44
Well, are you beginning to get the picture yet?
Do I have to post the way Rockefeller forced Reagan to take Bush 1 as VP?
#6. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, buckeye, cristine, All (#0)
Is anyone here NOT sick of the Bush/Clinton crime families as Presidents?
Well, I'll point to a sizable group right here on 4um.
Yesterday four states cast their votes in their primaries.
Of the the counts available at press time this morning, six and a half million total votes were cast. About four and a half million of those votes went to the two Democrat candidates.
A tiny bit over two million were shared by the three Republican candidates.
Of the total 6.5 million Dr. Paul got 1.2 percent!
Wake up and smell the coffee, buckeye, cristine et al.
The Clintons are going to be back in the White House if something dramatic doesn't happen in PA (and probably MI and FL, if Hitlery get's her way).
For heaven's sake "put your dreams away for another day" as old Blue Eyes used to croon.
I worked at a polling place in a slightly upscale precinct in our town yesterday. The Democrat votes cast were hugely greater than Republicans in that precinct ... many, many of them by women. Sadder yet, of the pitiful out turn of "Republican" voters, I saw the woman of the family declare Democrat and the husband Republican. I leave it to you to guess where those votes went.
Can Paul-ites alone turn this around? Obviously not. But can they help by shaking their friends and relatives out of a coma? They can at least try.
Best as I can determine, PA is same as Oh in respect to the ability to declare party affiliation at the primary polling location, Independents vote "issues only" (PA'ites correct me if I'm wrong, please).
As McInsane would say, "my Keystone State friends, PLEASE urge your Republican and Independent friends and relatives to change their affiliation and vote for Obama on Mar 24".
Otherwise, sit on your butts and pout .... that's all it will take to bring about another 4-8 years of Hill and Bill. Save your protest vote for November. Stop be'in mad, and start gettin' even. Stop the establishment in its tracks.
Best as I can determine, PA is same as Oh in respect to the ability to declare party affiliation at the primary polling location, Independents vote "issues only" (PA'ites correct me if I'm wrong, please).
PA is Hillary country. Fast Eddie Rendell - the former DNC chairman and current governor - is firmly in the Clinton's pocket. The only possibly good news coming from Kunta's effort is that Blacks will once again get the wear the victim yoke, which empowers the American racial huckster industry. Change? What a totally laughable campaign slogan :)
But not if conservatives in this country opt out of the Plutocrat Party and begin the long tough chore of creating a true Constitution based party.
Let's take the 5-8% that Ron Paul got in the primaries as a starting base. I'll bet that a lot of those people voted for Bush in 2000 or 2004 because he was a lesser evil or something like that.
If just that fraction were to withold their votes from people like Bush or McCain in the general election, the GOP wouldn't win a single election from now on. With the Democrats and charge and the GOP obsolete, a third party could definitely break through - but not until conservatives realize that McCain and Bush are not a lesser evil, but peas in a pod with Clinton Democrats.
Let's take the 5-8% that Ron Paul got in the primaries as a starting base.
Perot had a sizable base of 3rd party independents in '92. They went poof. He'd did 8% in '96, at the same time Buchanan was actually beating Bob Dole in Iowa and NH. Both bases have since went belly up. In '00, Nader & Buchanan (along w/the Constitution Party) had an app 5-8% base. They also have done a Claude Rains impression. My point? The National Party, with it's two wings, are all the sheeple 'get' and want. Depressing but true.
Either alternative is sad ... the second even worse than the first
A lot of otherwise decent and sensible people that I know were spooked aboard the Bush gravy train by the events of 9/11. Even those who didn't like Bush and didn't vote for him started repeating all the lines about how "everything changed" how we need to "stand behind our President" and all that crap.