[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: A339-Bill to limit the number of guns people are allowed to buy
Source: letter to Lawrence C. Farrell, Jr.
URL Source: http://none
Published: Mar 5, 2008
Author: Lawrence C. Farrell, Jr
Post Date: 2008-03-05 09:17:14 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 76
Comments: 1

From : Lawrence C. Farrell, Jr. Subject : RE: A339 To : Asm. D.O. Bramnick

Tue, Mar 04, 2008 04:56 PM Reply Reply All Forward

"A339 appears to be a reasonable restriction by allowing people to buy 12 handguns a year. The purpose of the bill is to limit the number of total handguns in circulation and in my opinion, after listening to all the testimony, was that this did not significantly interfere with gun owners rights to purchase handguns."

Where do you find the authority to do such? On what basis do you think you have the authority to gut a component portion of the Bill of Rights? Is your knowledge of/disrespect for the the U.S. and NJ Constitutions so poor that you so readily oommit such legislative larceny?

Your job is to protect and extend freedom, not limit it! There is no scholarly evidence to support a claim that restricting, to one item per month, legal purchases of firearms has, on crime, any lessening of the amount of crime committed with a firearm.

On what alleged facts did you base this foolish action of yours? Where do you find the evidence to support such an act of legislative impropriety? In other words, do you have any idea as to the historical effect of actions such as yours? Have you ever bothered to study the issue of a priori restraint of the actionability of a Constitutionally guaranteed Natural Right, and the repugnance to the Constitution of that a priori restraint?

It would seem that the answer to the above questions is that you have not studied the issue, know not the repugnance of a priori restraint, and have so swallowed the lying propaganda of the Loony Left that you are unable to, on questions of the sanctity of the Bill of Rights, make an intelligent, reasoned decision as to what is within your job description, and what is not.

It is very troubling to me that elitist, statist, Loony Left propaganda driven, Constitutional ignoramuses such as you hold elective office in this, or any other, state.

You, Sir, are a poltroon, and you, Sir, should be ashamed of your wicked Rights stealing legislative actions. Your attempts to subvert the provisions of the U.S. and the NJ Constitutions are a public disgrace.

Have you, sir, no shame?

Lawrence C. Farrell, Jr.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ferret Mike (#0)

Have you, sir, no shame?

No, the gun grabbing leftists usually don't.

It will come to a point to where you will be disarmed by these power grabbing elitists. It's for the children, after all.

Do yourself a favor...move.

Pern  posted on  2008-03-05   9:20:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]