See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Toxic or magic? Nation needs a fresh look at nuclear power
Source:
AZ Central
URL Source: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarep ... ions/articles/0627mon1-27.html
Published: Jun 27, 2005
Author: none listed
Post Date: 2005-06-27 13:27:39 by Mr Nuke Buzzcut
Keywords: nuclear, magic?, Nation
Views: 63
Comments: 6
Toxic or magic? Jun. 27, 2005 12:00 AM The nuclear option is back. The real one. Nuclear power has been on the back burner in U.S. energy policy for years, with no new plants in more than a quarter century. But global climate change and rising demands for energy are compelling reasons to reconsider our nuclear options. Developing countries, with China in the lead, are showing an insatiable appetite for electricity. Meanwhile, the "greenhouse gases" emitted by traditional power generation are big contributors to global warming. Conservation and alternative sources of energy, such as solar and wind power, should be leading strategies to expand energy supplies. But we shouldn't ignore what nuclear plants can accomplish: Producing large amounts of electricity with virtually no emission of greenhouse gases. The nuclear debate in America is historically black and white. Supporters tend to dismiss any obstacles with the cheery optimism of the old Atoms for Peace program of the 1950s. Opponents are still pointing to the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island in 1979 and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, without recognizing the strides in safety and technology. America gets more electricity from nuclear power than most people realize: 20 percent of the total. The nation's largest plant is the Palo Verde facility outside the Valley. Using nuclear instead of fossil fuel is keeping tens of thousands of tons of pollutants and greenhouse gases out of our air in Arizona every year. There apparently are no plans for the state to get another nuclear power plant. Certainly, siting and water would be major hurdles. President Bush is eager to jump-start nuclear power - supporters note that it supplies 78 percent of electricity in France - and he underlined the issue by traveling to a nuclear generator in Maryland last week. Certainly, public perceptions are a barrier to building more plants. But the obstacles go far beyond public relations. One of the most vexing is how to store waste that remain highly radioactive for centuries. In the United States, the proposed storage site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada has failed to go forward. So U.S. plants are storing reactor waste for decades, a task they were never designed to do. We need a solution for waste storage before adding nuclear facilities. Cost is another stumbling block. Although nuclear plants have an advantage in fuel costs - especially with soaring prices for oil and natural gas - the construction costs are enormous. Nuclear power proponents argue that we must supply a financial boost to start the next generation of nuclear power plants in the United States. There's already a substantial stepstool. Under a program designed to encourage new investment in nuclear power plants, for instance, a consortium called NuStart Energy Development is set to tap $260 million in matching funds from the Department of Energy. For too long, the words "nuclear power" have been either toxic or magic. Putting aside the rhetoric, there is real promise in nuclear power for meeting our energy needs and reducing global warming.
Nation needs a fresh look at nuclear power
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#0)
And then promptly attacked Albany in retaliation for the bloodshed in Kosovo.
in advanced countries nuclear power is relied upon because it produces less pollution and costs less than other types of electricity. America is the only advanced country that has had an effective prohibition against nuclear power plants. Our government literally regulated this industry to death whereas in other countries nuclear power is a good economical source of power. It would've been a good economical source for power here too except our government purposely regulated it to death. Now the economy is tanking badly. they want to do something to get the economy going. This will do it. But think, we've paid huge costs and tens of thousands of americans have died as well from the air pollution due to the fact that we decided not to use nuclear power.
back in 1980 General Electric held a press conference and said that it cost 3 times as much to build a new nuclear power plant in the US than in France. The reason for this dramatic difference in cost is entirely 100% due to unreasonable regulations imposed by our government. They purposely put regulations onto the process that had no real bearing on safety at all, but drove costs sky-high. It was not easy to kill this industry, but our government did do it, they did it on purpose. It had nothing to do with the environment or safety. It was a purposeful desire to kill a very good industry.
And we're supposed to HATE France, aren't we? I'm eating my "Freedom Toast" with some "Freedom Fries" on the side, I've totally internalized my raging hatred for the French, heck, they've been the feature attraction at all of the government sponsored five-minute hate rallys for years now. So now our Fearless Leader is telling us to emulate the French? Sorry, but it's going to take a few for me to shift gears that far that fast. I'm not like the politicians in Washington, I can't go from hating someone to emulating them in two seconds flat like they do. I guess that's why they're professionals.
President Bush is eager to jump-start nuclear power - supporters note that it supplies 78 percent of electricity in France - and he underlined the issue by traveling to a nuclear generator in Maryland last week.
#2. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#0)
#3. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#0)
Cost is another stumbling block
#4. To: Dakmar (#1)
President Bush is eager to jump-start nuclear power - supporters note that it supplies 78 percent of electricity in France
 | Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#5. To: Elliott Jackalope (#4)
Freedom hater! :)
#6. To: Dakmar (#5)
Aaaaaack! Incoming! Take cover!!!!! Urk. Too late. I'm hit. It's all over for me. It's getting dark.......
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest