[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Religion See other Religion Articles Title: The My Lai Massacre Revisited eyey The My Lai Massacre Revisited by Gary G. Kohls by Gary G. Kohls DIGG THIS Forty years ago this week, on March 16,1968, a company of US Army combat soldiers from the Americal Division swept into the South Vietnamese hamlet of My Lai, rounded up the 500+ unarmed residents, all women, children, babies and a few old men, and executed them in cold blood, Nazi-style. No weapons were found in the village, and the whole operation took only 4 hours. Although there was a serious attempt to cover-up this operation (which involved a young up-and-coming US Army Major named Colin Powell), those who orchestrated this "business-as-usual" war zone atrocity did not deny the details of the slaughter when the case came to trial several years later. But the story had filtered back to the Western news media, thanks to a couple of courageous eye-witnesses whose consciences were still intact. An Army court-marital trial eventually convened against a handful of the soldiers, including Lt. William Calley and Company C commanding officer, Ernest Medina. According to many of the soldiers in Company C, Medina ordered the killing of "every living thing in My Lai," including, obviously, innocent noncombatants – men, women, children and even farm animals. Lt. Calley was charged with the murder of 109 civilians. In his defense statement he stated that he had been taught to hate all Vietnamese, even children, who, he had been told, "were very good at planting mines." That a massacre had occurred was confirmed by many of Medina’s soldiers and recorded by photographers, but the Army still tried to cover it up. The cases were tried in military courts with juries of Army officers, which eventually either dropped the charges against all of the defendants (except Calley) or acquitted them. Medina and all the others who were among the killing soldiers that day went free, and only Calley was convicted of the murders of "at least 20 civilians." He was sentenced to life imprisonment for his war crime, but, under pressure from patriotic pro-war Americans, President Nixon pardoned him within weeks of the verdict. The trial stimulated a lot of interest because it occurred during the rising outcry of millions of Americans against the war that was acknowledged by many observers as an "overwhelming atrocity." Many ethical Americans were sick of the killing. However, 79% of those that were polled strenuously objected to Calley’s conviction, some veteran’s groups even voicing the opinion that instead of condemnation, he should have received medals of honor for killing "Commie Gooks." The Vietnam War was an excruciating time for conscientious Americans because of the numerous moral issues surrounding the mass slaughter in a war that uselessly killed 58,000 American soldiers, caused the spiritual deaths of millions more, killed 3 million Vietnamese (mostly civilians) and psychologically traumatized countless others on both sides of the conflict. Of course the Vietnam War was a thousand times worse for the innocent people of that doomed land than it was for the soldiers. The Vietnamese people were victims of an army of brutal young men from a foreign land who were taught that the "little yellow people" were pitiful sub-humans and deserved to be killed – with some GIs preferring to inflict torture first. "Kill-or-be-killed" is a reality that is standard operating procedure for military combat units of every nation of every era and of every ideology. Vietnam veterans tell me that there were scores, maybe hundreds, of "My Lai-type massacres " during that war. Not surprisingly, the Pentagon refuses to acknowledge that truth. Execution-style killings of "potential" Viet Cong sympathizers (i.e., anybody that wasn’t a US military supporter) were common. Many combat units "took no prisoners" (a euphemism for murdering captives, rather than having to follow the nuisance Geneva Conventions which requires humane treatment for prisoners of war). The only unusual thing about the My Lai Massacre was that it was eventually found out. The attempted Pentagon cover-up failed. Very few soldiers or their commanding officers have ever been punished for the many war crimes that occurred during that war because those in charge knew that killing (and torturing) of innocent civilians during war-time is simply the norm – excused as "collateral damage." After all, as US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld later infamously proclaimed, "stuff happens." The torture was enjoyable for some – for a while. And wars are profitable for many – and still are (witness the Krupp family of Nazi-era infamy and Halliburton, the Blackwater mercenaries, et al. today). Those who plan wars and/or participate in them, yet also profess to be Christians, pay no attention to the ethics of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5, 6 and 7) unless they are prepared to explicitly reject what their religion’s namesake repeatedly said about the issue of homicidal violence (for Jesus says, in so many words: "Violence is forbidden for those who wish to follow me"). And what is most hypocritical is the fact that many pro-war Christians also reject Jesus’ Golden Rule command: "Do onto others as you would have them do unto you." The rejection of the Way of Jesus also includes the rejection of his clear teachings on how his followers are to treat the neighbor, the stranger, the hungry, the naked, the captive, the enemy and all others in need of mercy and understanding. In order to participate in the legal homicide that takes place in all wars, the followers of Jesus have to reject Jesus’ teachings and adopt the un-Christ-like, anti-gospel Just War Theory of Augustine (which first appeared 3 centuries after Jesus’ death). There is no moral way for the follower of the nonviolent Jesus to participate in or support the mass slaughter of war. Christian discipleship requires making a choice between those two irreconcilable realities. The whole issue of the justification of war, with its inherent atrocities, never seems to be thoroughly examined in an atmosphere of openness and historical honesty. Full understanding of the realities of war and its spiritual, psychological and economic consequences for the victims is rarely attempted, even for American people of faith. If we who are non-soldiers ever truly experienced the horrors of combat, the effort to abolish war would suddenly be a top priority (perhaps even for the current crop of "Chicken Hawk" warmongers in the Bush Administration). If we actually knew the gruesome realities of war (or even understood the immorality of spending trillions of dollars on war preparation while hundreds of millions of people are homeless and starving) we would refuse to cooperate with the things that make for war. But that wouldn’t be good for the war profiteers who profit from war. So those "merchants of death" must hide the gruesome truths and try instead to make war look patriotic, with, for example, sloganeering like "Be All That You Can Be." Or they might try to convince the soon-to-be-childless mothers of doomed, dead or dying soldiers that their child had died fighting for God, Country and Honor instead of for domination of the Middle East’s oil reserves. Let’s face it. The US military standing army system has been bankrupting America at $500+ billion year after year after year – even in times of so-called "peace." The warmongering legacy of the Pentagon is still with us, particularly among those "patriots," including GOP presidential candidate John McCain, who wanted to "nuke the gooks" in Vietnam. A multitude of un-elected policy-makers of that ilk are still in charge of US foreign policy today, and they have been solidifying their power to continue America’s misbegotten, unaffordable and unsustainable militarism with the huge profits made off the deaths, screams, blood, guts and permanent disabilities of those hood-winked soldiers who were told that they were "saving the world for democracy" when in fact they were making the world safe for exploitive capitalism and obscene profits for the few. And the politicians entrenched in both major political parties, who are all-too-often paid lapdogs for the war profiteers, don’t want the gravy train to be derailed. Things haven’t changed much even from the World War II mentality that conveniently overlooked the monstrous evil that was perpetrated on tens of thousands of unarmed, innocent civilians at Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, a war crime so heinous that the psychological consequences, immune deficiency disorders and cancers from that nuclear holocaust are still being experienced in unimaginable suffering 6 decades later. Things haven’t really changed when one witnesses the political mentality that allows the 500,000 deaths of innocent Iraqi civilians in the aftermath of the first Gulf War or the 1,000,000 civilian deaths in the current fiasco in Iraq. So it appears that our military and political leaders haven’t learned anything since My Lai. And I’m sorry to have to conclude that it is still true of the churches. The person sitting next to you in the comfortable church pew is, like most unaware Americans, almost totally ignorant of the hellish realities of the war-zone, so he may continue to be blindly patriotic and indifferent to the plight of the "others" who suffer so much in war. He may think, contrary to Jesus’ clear teachings, that some people are less than human, and, therefore, if necessary, can be justifiably killed. As long as most American citizens continue to glorify war and militarism and ignore or denigrate the peacemakers; as long as the American public endorses the current spirit of nationalism and ruthless global capitalism; and as long as the American Christian church leadership remains prudently silent (and therefore consenting to the homicidal violence of war) we will not be able to effect a change away from the influence of conscienceless warmongers and war profiteers. The prophets and peacemakers are never valued in militarized nations, especially in times of war; indeed, they are always marginalized, demeaned and even imprisoned or executed as traitors. And one of the reasons is that there are no profits to be made in peacemaking, whereas there are trillions to be made in the biggest business going: the preparation for war, the execution of war and the highly profitable "re-building" efforts ("blow it up/build it up" economics) all the while ignoring the "inconvenient" but inevitable collateral damage to the creation and its creatures. As long as we continue to be led by unapologetic and merciless war-makers and their wealthy business cronies and as long as the ethical infants in Washington, DC continue to be corrupted by the big money bribes, there is no chance America will ever obtain true peace. And as long as America’s Christian religious leaders and their followers do not reject, as Jesus surely would have had them do, the merciless mass slaughter that is modern war, suffering humanity will be condemned to future wars, poverty, pestilence and starvation. And unless America stops the unjust carnage, fully repents and offers compensation for the damage it has caused, its turn as a recipient of retaliatory violence will surely come, and it will come from those foreign and domestic victims that our nation has treated so shamefully over the past half-century. March 14, 2008 Gary Kohls, MD [send him mail], an associate of Every Church a Peace Church, is a practicing physician in Duluth, MN.
Poster Comment: When My Lai first hit the headlines a rumor was going around that Calley marched his platoon before what was left of an American soldier captured near the village, caged and exposed to rats. Whether or not the rumor is true, Calley had no business exposing his men to the corpse of their fellow soldier. In my opinion Kohls' article may be somewhat harsh, but it emphasizes the folly of elevating punks of the privileged class to the highest office.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Zoroaster (#0)
Calley flunked out of a Florida junior college which is hard to do. He was a failure at every civialn job he held. He was rejected by the Army but they lowered their standards and made him a private. Somhow he got into OCS and became an officer. Calley had trouble reading maps and compasses. He was denied witnesses at his trial. He had received an order to kill everyone in the village, but he was the only one charged. Pilots were given medals for doing what he did. He served about 3 1/2 years under house arrest. After the war he married a woman whose father owned Vick's jewelry store in Atlanta. He managed the store until he retired.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
That seems the way we do it, always let the big boys walk.
In my opinion, now is the time for harshness. Making nice-nice doesn't cut it anymore. These chickenshit chickenhawks sitting in their, as the article states "comfortable church pews" (comfortable my ass. They are butt numbing torture devices) will have much to answer for. IMO they are willfully ignorant. They should be forced to look at the pics we all have seen, somewhat like those movies they used to show in drivers Ed classes showing accident victims. Let them see what they support.
I had in mind combat veterans who've actually experienced war when I referred to the harshness of Kohl's article. Unlike the warmongers Bush and McCain, the overwhelming majority of combat veterans are opposed to war unless it is absolutely necessary. "The soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war." Douglas MacAuthur, Address U.S. Military Academy, est Point, N.Y. May 12, 1962
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.
It's worse than that. They love it. A few years ago my local paper ran an editorial on these fellows from My Lai: http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mylai/Myl_hero.html Half the responces where from people how thought "we don't need heroes like this" and how awful it was that they defied orders and procedure in order to do the moral and right thing. Can't say Americans are alone in this. I met a German a while back who thought anyone who deserted from the military because they thought their leaders were evil should be imprisioned as traitors to their nation.
"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me. "If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.
In Korea, MacArthur asked to detonate about thirty A-bombs on the Korean side of the border with China, and the war would be over in ten days. Truman and the communists in our government opted to shed our blood instead.
I remember reading how frustrated all the companies were because of the VC's successful hit & run attacks, and the army's inability to engage and crush the enemy. Obviously. tiny villages were part of the enemy's extended support network and it was safe to assume that My Lai's missing young, able-bodied men were under arms against the US. But, the military command was also well aware that civilians could not run up either flag and declare allegiance to either side, so, these people were massacred for the crime of "Being Vietnamese". We saw in movies like PLATOON and APOCALYPSE NOW that GIs were "asked" to donate to buy toothpaste for natives, "winning of hearts and minds" and, remember when Marlon Brando as Col Kurtz related the story about his platoon inoculating children only to return and find the little arms severed and piled up? And, the explanation offered by Hollywood was, "If he runs he's VC. If he stands still he's a well disciplined VC." And, the folks back home in the war supply biz couldn't have been happier that the ratio of ammo expended to enemy killed was 500,000 to 1. So, Americans picked up where the French left off defending the wealthy rubber plantation owners while Rockefeller continued to extract oil and move it out of Haiphong harbor, which is why there was no declaration of war. To say that we lost in Vietnam is to miss the point-the people who profited from the sale of boots, mosquito spray, bullets and weapons never lose, and how was victory possible with no clear military objective on the big board? And, even those who collaborated with the US never changed their politics because we allowed them to wet their beaks. Those who committed the US and wasted the lives of countless soldiers and non combatants knew very well that victory was not possible. The teachings of Sun Tzu were not a secret, and in fact have been part of tactical military training for a thousand years. For the US to fight a proxy war with the USSR while simultaneously subsidizing them to maintain them as a credible threat only benefited banksters and war profiteers. And then as now the flag is used to blindfold chump Americans. Show us a war film with John Wayne and we'll send our kids off to indescribable shitholes to die in the name of profit. Mothers weeping at military funerals were never told (and most didn't ask) how their sons could make that country free by torching its inhabitants with flame throwers and white phosphorus. In fact, that explanation could shed much light on just how raping and murdering Iraqis today is making the world safe for democracy.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||