[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics
Minnesota Shooter's Family Has CIA and DOD ties
42 GANGSTERS DRAGGED From Homes In Midnight FBI & ICE Raids | MS-13 & Trinitarios BUSTED
Bill Gates EXPOSED: Secret Operatives Inside the CDC, HHS, and NIH REMOVED by RFK, Jr.
Gabriel Ruiz, a man who dresses up as a woman was just arrested for battery (dating violence)
"I'm Tired Of Being Trans" - Minneapolis Shooter Confesses "I Wish I Never Brain-Washed Myself"
The Chart Baltimore Democrats Hope You Never See
Woman with walker, 69, fatally shot in face on New York City street:
Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025
FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines
NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall?
Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?
Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class
SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video
Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...
Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System
Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians
Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188
New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into
RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data
I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!
Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered
Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else
Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation
UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)
How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch
The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)
This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’
LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists
Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out
Title: The Hour of Our Time - The Legacy of William Cooper Source: Ether Films URL Source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2829245257205113781 Published: Mar 22, 2007 Author: James Jankiewicz Post Date: 2008-03-14 21:30:43 by buckeye Keywords: NoneViews: 397 Comments: 27
William (Bill) Cooper was a former naval officer, decorated veteran, short wave radio broadcaster and world renound lecturer and author, he ... all » was shot and killed November 5th 2001 under suspicious circumstances. This is his story. Poster Comment:What common bond do we have, people? Freedom. A Clinton White house memo is rumored to have called Cooper "the most dangerous radio host in America." (See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_William_Cooper. A Jim Jankiewicz film It's interesting that he started wondering if the UFO information he had seen while in Navy intelligence was "fed" to him.
William (Bill) Cooper was a former naval officer, decorated veteran, short wave radio broadcaster and world renound lecturer and author, he ... all » was shot and killed November 5th 2001 under suspicious circumstances. This is his story.
Poster Comment:
What common bond do we have, people? Freedom.
A Clinton White house memo is rumored to have called Cooper "the most dangerous radio host in America." (See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_William_Cooper.
A Jim Jankiewicz film
It's interesting that he started wondering if the UFO information he had seen while in Navy intelligence was "fed" to him.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#1. To: christine, robin, Dakmar, iconoclast, Jethro Tull, YertleTurtle, angle, farmfriend, Cynicom (#0) I look at heavy focus on any occult aspect of conspiracy theories as a form of symbolism used by the "researcher" to either attract attention or represent evil in a most direct manner possible. This can be for his own benefit, for the audience, or both. Still, the things that bother them, almost like the silhouettes of truth when truth seems difficult to grasp, are interesting. While they ramble about owls or lizards, or they hearken back to sun worship or fast forward to UFOs, they also tend to talk about imminently relevant facts like why the media can visit with Osama bin Laden but the CIA "can't find him." This is an interesting film, and worth watching if you have time. I see a lot of talk about the potential for these researchers to be intelligence operatives. So what? Some of the things they question are not being discussed in TV, but everyone with any sense of perception is wondering them. If anything, conspiracy "researchers" like Cooper serve as a reminder that there are unexplored regions in our understanding of how the contemporary world functions. buckeye posted on 2008-03-14 21:44:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #5. To: buckeye (#1) I see a lot of talk about the potential for these researchers to be intelligence operatives. So what? Some of the things they question are not being discussed in TV, but everyone with any sense of perception is wondering them. If anything, conspiracy "researchers" like Cooper serve as a reminder that there are unexplored regions in our understanding of how the contemporary world functions. great post, buckeye. i look foward to watching this film. also, i very much appreciate your use of the term conspiracy "researchers." christine posted on 2008-03-15 9:58:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #12. To: christine (#5) i very much appreciate your use of the term conspiracy "researchers." Thanks, but I'm not flattering them. I put the term in quotes because there is no standard method for supporting their arguments, little attempt to build a position based on a chain of proof, and no apparent standard for community review. They often just have a haunch that something is wrong and they work from personal observations or intuition. Of course the establishment they criticize funds "formal" denial of their assertions, and group think carries the day. I look at the "researchers" as lone analysts who are frequently mistaken, products of their own personal struggles, and potentially misled by disinformation themselves. But they release observations and provable facts from time to time that force us to rethink our understanding of the world. To suppress this kind of speech is one of the worst forms of soft tyranny we see today. Clinton Confronts Heckler over 9/11 Conspiracy The argument that most conspiracy researchers are disinformation specialists seems irrelevant to me. People either accept that something is wrong with the official story, or they don't. Once the official story becomes unbelievable, the dissent is effectively begun. Dissent is critical, even if somewhat misguided. Dissent at a time when accepted media sources are owned by a few corporate interests is even more critical. buckeye posted on 2008-03-15 10:30:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 12. There are no replies to Comment # 12. End Trace Mode for Comment # 12. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
I look at heavy focus on any occult aspect of conspiracy theories as a form of symbolism used by the "researcher" to either attract attention or represent evil in a most direct manner possible. This can be for his own benefit, for the audience, or both. Still, the things that bother them, almost like the silhouettes of truth when truth seems difficult to grasp, are interesting. While they ramble about owls or lizards, or they hearken back to sun worship or fast forward to UFOs, they also tend to talk about imminently relevant facts like why the media can visit with Osama bin Laden but the CIA "can't find him." This is an interesting film, and worth watching if you have time. I see a lot of talk about the potential for these researchers to be intelligence operatives. So what? Some of the things they question are not being discussed in TV, but everyone with any sense of perception is wondering them. If anything, conspiracy "researchers" like Cooper serve as a reminder that there are unexplored regions in our understanding of how the contemporary world functions.
This is an interesting film, and worth watching if you have time.
I see a lot of talk about the potential for these researchers to be intelligence operatives. So what? Some of the things they question are not being discussed in TV, but everyone with any sense of perception is wondering them. If anything, conspiracy "researchers" like Cooper serve as a reminder that there are unexplored regions in our understanding of how the contemporary world functions.
buckeye posted on 2008-03-14 21:44:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
I see a lot of talk about the potential for these researchers to be intelligence operatives. So what? Some of the things they question are not being discussed in TV, but everyone with any sense of perception is wondering them. If anything, conspiracy "researchers" like Cooper serve as a reminder that there are unexplored regions in our understanding of how the contemporary world functions. great post, buckeye. i look foward to watching this film. also, i very much appreciate your use of the term conspiracy "researchers."
great post, buckeye. i look foward to watching this film. also, i very much appreciate your use of the term conspiracy "researchers."
christine posted on 2008-03-15 9:58:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
i very much appreciate your use of the term conspiracy "researchers." Thanks, but I'm not flattering them. I put the term in quotes because there is no standard method for supporting their arguments, little attempt to build a position based on a chain of proof, and no apparent standard for community review. They often just have a haunch that something is wrong and they work from personal observations or intuition. Of course the establishment they criticize funds "formal" denial of their assertions, and group think carries the day. I look at the "researchers" as lone analysts who are frequently mistaken, products of their own personal struggles, and potentially misled by disinformation themselves. But they release observations and provable facts from time to time that force us to rethink our understanding of the world. To suppress this kind of speech is one of the worst forms of soft tyranny we see today. Clinton Confronts Heckler over 9/11 Conspiracy The argument that most conspiracy researchers are disinformation specialists seems irrelevant to me. People either accept that something is wrong with the official story, or they don't. Once the official story becomes unbelievable, the dissent is effectively begun. Dissent is critical, even if somewhat misguided. Dissent at a time when accepted media sources are owned by a few corporate interests is even more critical.
i very much appreciate your use of the term conspiracy "researchers."
Thanks, but I'm not flattering them. I put the term in quotes because there is no standard method for supporting their arguments, little attempt to build a position based on a chain of proof, and no apparent standard for community review.
They often just have a haunch that something is wrong and they work from personal observations or intuition.
Of course the establishment they criticize funds "formal" denial of their assertions, and group think carries the day.
I look at the "researchers" as lone analysts who are frequently mistaken, products of their own personal struggles, and potentially misled by disinformation themselves. But they release observations and provable facts from time to time that force us to rethink our understanding of the world. To suppress this kind of speech is one of the worst forms of soft tyranny we see today.
The argument that most conspiracy researchers are disinformation specialists seems irrelevant to me. People either accept that something is wrong with the official story, or they don't. Once the official story becomes unbelievable, the dissent is effectively begun. Dissent is critical, even if somewhat misguided. Dissent at a time when accepted media sources are owned by a few corporate interests is even more critical.
buckeye posted on 2008-03-15 10:30:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There are no replies to Comment # 12.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest