See other Religion Articles
Title: Obama Race Speech: The Full Text
Source:
Huff Po
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 18, 2008
Author: Barack Obama
Post Date: 2008-03-18 11:13:50 by ghostdogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 5763
Comments: 286
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-197) not displayed.
.
.
.
#198. To: aristeides (#195)
He didn't have to, putz. He never said he'd be on the same ticket as DK either, did he?
Our last hope for peace Actually none of them were surprises. There's plenty more, and a couple of them were surprises to me. But you'd know far better than I...
Our last hope for peace two hundred
Our last hope for peace Well, I suppose he didn't have to, unless he paid attention to you. As you just admitted a few posts back, you demanded that he publicly disown Kucinich or you would drop your support of him. Some diehard support that is.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Reading Bush's served you well. So did voting for Badnarik last time. Ho hum. Well, I s'pose that at least relieved your frustrations. Repeating the exercise when the choices are so starkly different may have a decidedly sour result.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
When confronted with the choice of "lesser of two evils" - recognize that you are still voting for evil and choose not to play.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.
I received direct personal assurances that no watermelons like dk would ever be considered on a Ron Paul ticket.
Our last hope for peace
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Why the hell not? Guys, you'll never be proven wrong by voting for no-chance candidates. Of course, you'll never know for sure if you were right, either.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
How did you manage to go from supporting the Constitution-candidate to whoring yourself for the Establishment selection(s)? (I already know the answer)
Our last hope for peace I certainly will never endorse, support or have a kind word for ANY of the Establishment candidates let alone put on the knee pads for one like you do...
Our last hope for peace If you bother to read Obama's speech, you may notice that he begins by talking about the Constitution, and ends by talking about the Constitution. In his previous speeches he has repeatedly spoken of his respect for the Constitution, denounced torture, called for restoring habeas corpus, etc. He occasionally mentions in his speeches that for years he taught constitutional law. Not just anywhere, but at the conservative University of Chicago Law School.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Some of these pathetic folks wouldn't know what to do with themselves if they couldn't at least pretend to be playing in the game...
Our last hope for peace From Ron Paul? Oh really?
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Don't let me get in the way of you falling for a good line! "Jesus Christ, because he changed my heart"TM
Our last hope for peace You sound surprised.
Our last hope for peace Obama is going down, and with him will crash the faux hopes of millions of naive brainwashed, feminist, socialist UN lovers. Ah yes, I love the smell of false dreams crashing in the morning...
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
I certainly am. Ron Paul communicates with you?
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Deep down, they love the thought of the North America Union/Zone/Community...
Our last hope for peace I had the good pleasure of having breakfast with Ron on the campaign trail.
Our last hope for peace You'll have to excuse me if I wait for proof before I believe that. Ron Paul is obviously a very courteous gentleman, something very different from how you present yourself on this forum. And, as you admitted above, Ron Paul and Kucinich are friends. I very much doubt if he would speak of him in anything like the terms you indicated above.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
An awful lot of the elitists start at at least the Congressional level. Caveat emptor.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
ari, unlike you, I'm serious about what I do. As the blind man said to his wife after taking a dump: "Honey, can you proof read something for me". So I say to you.
Our last hope for peace Its the canard of "don't throw your vote away!" that gets them every time.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.
In other words, you can't prove it.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Still trying to decided what a "Ron Paul Democrat" believes in? You're a joke...a clown asitwere.
Our last hope for peace Sadly, my friend, outside our little cybernet world I have not had my pathway encumbered by great numbers of Dr. Paul supporters.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
I don't have to prove it. I was there. My State Campaign Director was there. My wife was there. My partners were there. You're a nobody Left Wing Progressive Communist sh*t for brains that is now sucking the Establishment's knob. You deserve "proof"?! LOLOL You deserve what you continually get.
Our last hope for peace For some, but not for these particular clowns in my opinion. They just like 'the action'. That and they're Liberal Demopublicans to their core...
Our last hope for peace I try to act like a gentleman. Everybody on this forum can see what you are.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Yes, you are a very polite Deconstructionist Communist Progressive Liberal Left Wing Marxist asswipe. But you are a polite one, ari.
Our last hope for peace I repeat: Everybody on this forum can see what you are. And it's certainly not a gentleman. Nor a credit to any cause you may support. Like Ron Paul's.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Could be he's trying to hold his party together. If he gets a chance to go one on one with McInsane the picture may become clearer. He has hinted at bipartisanship, even to the point of implying non-Dims in his administration. I will be anxious to see if he expands on this at cutting time,
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else. You Obamaphile knob polisher...
Our last hope for peace Sadly, you and I both know that when it comes to policies, you and Ron Paul have very little in common. He loves America. You love Liberalism.
Our last hope for peace Nor to win any supporters for the causes you support, apparently. Or should I say -- for the causes you say you support.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
And, since you admit you're no gentleman, I continue to have a hard time believing someone as courtly as Ron Paul would confide in you.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Or should I say -- for the causes you say you support. I leave the subtleties to others. I'll take a patriot that is less gentlemanly over a polite traitor like you every day of the week and twice on Tuesdays...
Our last hope for peace The Democrat party is pretty much in a civil war right now. That much we know for a fact. If Obama is truly trying to be the "coalition" candidate, he will announce how he will deliver this. Many people are so cynical with regards to Government right now that they don't believe it until they see it. Obama bought himself a pass with his speech today, but the price is stepping up to the plate and being a leader. Delivering on his words begins with articulating a vision and then a plan. Without that, he falls on his face as being an empty suit. Thinking about some of his comments, his "My mother looked over her shoulders for ni**ers" echoes CHRIS ROCK. Is Obama going to blast Chris Rock now? I don't think so. As time goes on and people have time to think about this speech, more "WTF?" items like that will come out.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.
Comments (239 - 286) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestHe never did disown Kucinich, did he?
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#199. To: Cynicom, aristeides, ghostdogtxn, iconoclast, robin, Brian (#197)
So far it looks like ghost, Ari and icon in the running for head cheer leader for Obama.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#200. To: All (#199)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#201. To: FOH (#198)
(Edited)
He didn't have to, putz.
#202. To: mirage (#151)
#203. To: iconoclast (#202)
Repeating the exercise when the choices are so starkly different may have a decidedly sour result.
#204. To: aristeides (#201)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#205. To: FOH (#181)
#206. To: ghostdogtxn, mirage (#153)
(Edited)
Hey, I voted for Bednarick last time, too.
#207. To: aristeides (#201)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#208. To: ghostdogtxn (#205)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#209. To: FOH (#207)
go from supporting the Constitution-candidate
#210. To: mirage (#203)
When confronted with the choice of "lesser of two evils" - recognize that you are still voting for evil and choose not to play.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#211. To: FOH (#204)
I received direct personal assurances
#212. To: iconoclast (#206)
#213. To: aristeides (#209)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#214. To: aristeides (#211)
From Ron Paul? Oh really?
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#215. To: FOH (#207)
#216. To: FOH (#208)
#217. To: FOH (#214)
You sound surprised.
#218. To: Vitamin Z (#215)
the faux hopes of millions of naive brainwashed, feminist, socialist UN lovers.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#219. To: aristeides (#217)
Ron Paul communicates with you?
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#220. To: FOH (#219)
I had the good pleasure of having breakfast with Ron on the campaign trail.
#221. To: lodwick (#175)
My hope is that the awakening that Dr.Paul started across the country, and the world, will continue on the local level. That's where most all these criminal cretins that wind up in deecee got their start, after all.
#222. To: aristeides (#220)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#223. To: FOH (#210)
Some of these pathetic folks wouldn't know what to do with themselves if they couldn't at least pretend to be playing in the game...
#224. To: FOH (#222)
#225. To: ghostdogtxn (#216)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#226. To: lodwick (#182)
Dr.Paul had the support, the donors, just not the black box programmers.
#227. To: aristeides (#224)
In other words, you can't prove it.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#228. To: mirage (#223)
Its the canard of "don't throw your vote away!" that gets them every time.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#229. To: FOH (#227)
You deserve what you continually get.
#230. To: aristeides (#229)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#231. To: FOH (#230)
(Edited)
#232. To: mirage (#184)
All eyes are on Obama now. It is "lead or die" for his campaign at this moment.
#233. To: aristeides (#231)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#234. To: aristeides (#231)
Nor a credit to any cause you may support. Like Ron Paul's.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#235. To: FOH (#233)
I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else.
#236. To: FOH (#233)
I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else.
#237. To: aristeides, buckeye (#235)
Nor to win any supporters for the causes you support, apparently.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#238. To: iconoclast (#232)
He has hinted at bipartisanship, even to the point of implying non-Dims in his administration.
.
.
.