See other Religion Articles
Title: Obama Race Speech: The Full Text
Source:
Huff Po
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 18, 2008
Author: Barack Obama
Post Date: 2008-03-18 11:13:50 by ghostdogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 3395
Comments: 286
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-229) not displayed.
.
.
.
#230. To: aristeides (#229)
Yes, you are a very polite Deconstructionist Communist Progressive Liberal Left Wing Marxist asswipe. But you are a polite one, ari.
Our last hope for peace I repeat: Everybody on this forum can see what you are. And it's certainly not a gentleman. Nor a credit to any cause you may support. Like Ron Paul's.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Could be he's trying to hold his party together. If he gets a chance to go one on one with McInsane the picture may become clearer. He has hinted at bipartisanship, even to the point of implying non-Dims in his administration. I will be anxious to see if he expands on this at cutting time,
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else. You Obamaphile knob polisher...
Our last hope for peace Sadly, you and I both know that when it comes to policies, you and Ron Paul have very little in common. He loves America. You love Liberalism.
Our last hope for peace Nor to win any supporters for the causes you support, apparently. Or should I say -- for the causes you say you support.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
And, since you admit you're no gentleman, I continue to have a hard time believing someone as courtly as Ron Paul would confide in you.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Or should I say -- for the causes you say you support. I leave the subtleties to others. I'll take a patriot that is less gentlemanly over a polite traitor like you every day of the week and twice on Tuesdays...
Our last hope for peace The Democrat party is pretty much in a civil war right now. That much we know for a fact. If Obama is truly trying to be the "coalition" candidate, he will announce how he will deliver this. Many people are so cynical with regards to Government right now that they don't believe it until they see it. Obama bought himself a pass with his speech today, but the price is stepping up to the plate and being a leader. Delivering on his words begins with articulating a vision and then a plan. Without that, he falls on his face as being an empty suit. Thinking about some of his comments, his "My mother looked over her shoulders for ni**ers" echoes CHRIS ROCK. Is Obama going to blast Chris Rock now? I don't think so. As time goes on and people have time to think about this speech, more "WTF?" items like that will come out.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.
I have several times flashed on the thought that FOH may have been a key member of Ron's crack campaign committee. ;-)
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
Are you throwing in with these Establishment suckup Obama supporters too, lod?
Our last hope for peace It was his grandmother ... and he wasn't "blasting" her but was in the midst of professing his undiminished love for her.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
Yeah, it was a good speech and it seems that some people are bound and determined to overlook the fact that he is an establishment puppet just like those they rail against. ONE decent man running but he didn't get much play in the establishment media. But notice how there is no shortage of it for this guy. Obama, Clinton, McCain, all just alike other than the obvious difference of gender and color.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Still, these are the questions that will be raised. Watch the blogosphere for reaction.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.
My friend, the frauds that have exposed themselves over this are the same type of stealth fake patriots that poisoned Ron Paul's campaign inner circle.... You summed it up nicely. Good to see you.
Our last hope for peace I suspect ghost did'nt.
One of the false-flag operators?
Our last hope for peace This lovefest by 4um members for Obama is downright laffable. White guilt? Hardshell democrats? Naive and or without a clue? We got sandbagged with Clinton and Bush from the same organization and now they offer up Obama and the sheep slobber all over themselves to be first in line for the slaughter. The elite in the back room must be having a real gut busting laff.
Talk is cheap. How did he vote on the funding for the war? Did he not vote in favor of the funding? He is allegedly against the war but votes for all the funding.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Some people are totally transparent.
White guilt? Hardshell democrats? Naive and or without a clue? We got sandbagged with Clinton and Bush from the same organization and now they offer up Obama and the sheep slobber all over themselves to be first in line for the slaughter. The elite in the back room must be having a real gut busting laff. I couldn't have said it any better...
Our last hope for peace I don't give a damn which of the three leading puppets wins the election.
There is, of course, a very simple way to prove your claims -- or at least to make them a lot more believable. If Ron Paul did confide his plans to you, surely you posted something about that here, or elsewhere on the Web. Or at least you must have made some mention of this breakfast meeting you claim to have had with him. You have only to point us to those earlier postings. If, however, this thread is the first time you have mentioned Ron Paul's assurance or your breakfast meeting with him, and that only in response to my challenge, you will have to accept the fact that no one will believe you.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
heheheheh
Our last hope for peace !!!!!!!!!!
Our last hope for peace Checkmate.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
ari, you're a legend in your own mind. I had lunch with Warren Buffet a few weeks ago, too. Want me to prove that as well? LOLOL I have nothing to prove to a false flag flying traitor like you...
Our last hope for peace Yeah, sure, and you have the time to spend all day posting on this forum. But you somehow never post anything about your meetings with these important people, until somebody challenges you. Yeah, sure. As if we are supposed to believe that somebody with your obvious lack of manners and breeding gets to meet all these important people.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Now now Ari, your elitism is showing again.
I'm trying to provoke FOH into proving his claims. And you've got to admit, he's given me plenty of cause to provoke him. Look at the language he's used -- about me and about others -- in this thread.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Ari... You are fair game here as is everyone else. I do give you credit for civility and manners. When is your fitting for your cheer leaders uniform??? I can hear it now, (Murrow) "rah rah for Old BO"....just kiddin
And very clearly.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" Agreed.
Red states? Blue states? It's an Obama nation!
They that swim with Teddy, become like Teddy.
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
You summed it up nicely. Good to see you. Likewise. Hope all is well 'round your 'hood. ;^)
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. White guilt? Hardshell democrats? Naive and or without a clue? We got sandbagged with Clinton and Bush from the same organization and now they offer up Obama and the sheep slobber all over themselves to be first in line for the slaughter. The elite in the back room must be having a real gut busting laff. It is sad to me when otherwise intelligent people can be snookered so easily by the establishment and its puppets.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. You single thought CFR harranguers are those MOST controlled by the CFR. Ironic.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
uh huh. I didn't mention the CFR but talked about the establishment. You know, the establishment that owns the guy you are touting for president. The CFR is a part of it but only a part.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Evasive hairsplitting and hardly a reply at all. My old mind must be slipping faster than I feared ... I thought the establishment instigated and went ape shit over the illegal invasion of Iraq. Or as Obama puts it so fundamentally and right on, dumb.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
It is sad to me when otherwise intelligent people can be snookered so easily by the establishment and its puppets. Evasive hairsplitting and hardly a reply at all. My old mind must be slipping faster than I feared ... I thought the establishment instigated and went ape shit over the illegal invasion of Iraq. Or as Obama puts it so fundamentally and right on, dumb.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
Iraq is not our only problem.
Comments (271 - 286) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#231. To: FOH (#230)
(Edited)
#232. To: mirage (#184)
All eyes are on Obama now. It is "lead or die" for his campaign at this moment.
#233. To: aristeides (#231)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#234. To: aristeides (#231)
Nor a credit to any cause you may support. Like Ron Paul's.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#235. To: FOH (#233)
I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else.
#236. To: FOH (#233)
I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else.
#237. To: aristeides, buckeye (#235)
Nor to win any supporters for the causes you support, apparently.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#238. To: iconoclast (#232)
He has hinted at bipartisanship, even to the point of implying non-Dims in his administration.
#239. To: lodwick, FOH (#185)
You're not winning friends, nor influencing people
#240. To: iconoclast, lodwick (#239)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#241. To: mirage (#238)
Thinking about some of his comments, his "My mother looked over her shoulders for ni**ers" echoes CHRIS ROCK. Is Obama going to blast Chris Rock now? I don't think so.
#242. To: FOH (#43)
That's the most patriotic bag of horse puckey I've ever seen handled by a Black Panther Marxist quisling Council on Foreign Relations puppet...
Lord Acton
#243. To: iconoclast (#241)
#244. To: James Deffenbach (#242)
Yeah, it was a good speech and it seems that some people are bound and determined to overlook the fact that he is an establishment puppet just like those they rail against. ONE decent man running but he didn't get much play in the establishment media. But notice how there is no shortage of it for this guy. Obama, Clinton, McCain, all just alike other than the obvious difference of gender and color.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#245. To: FOH (#207)
How did you manage to go from supporting the Constitution-candidate to whoring yourself for the Establishment selection(s)?
#246. To: Cynicom (#245)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#247. To: James Deffenbach (#242)
#248. To: aristeides (#76)
Are those the words of a warmonger?
Lord Acton
#249. To: FOH (#246)
#250. To: Cynicom (#249)
This lovefest by 4um members for Obama is downright laffable.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#251. To: FOH (#237)
I leave the subtleties to others.
#252. To: FOH (#237)
#253. To: aristeides (#252)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#254. To: buckeye (#251)
I don't give a damn which of the three leading puppets wins the election.
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#255. To: FOH (#253)
#256. To: aristeides (#255)
What North American Union? ~~~~~ Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...
#257. To: FOH (#256)
(Edited)
I had lunch with Warren Buffet a few weeks ago, too.
#258. To: aristeides (#257)
As if we are supposed to believe that somebody with your obvious lack of manners and breeding gets to meet all these important people.
#259. To: Cynicom, FOH (#258)
#260. To: aristeides (#259)
And you've got to admit, he's given me plenty of cause to provoke him. Look at the language he's used -- about me and about others -- in this thread.
#261. To: aristeides (#229)
Everybody on this forum can see what you are.
#262. To: FOH (#178)
Interestingly, it appears that MOST of the faux RP supporters came from the traditionally labeled Liberal wing of the CFR Party...
#263. To: FOH (#178)
Interestingly, it appears that MOST of the faux RP supporters came from the traditionally labeled Liberal wing of the CFR Party...
#264. To: FOH (#244)
My friend, the frauds that have exposed themselves over this are the same type of stealth fake patriots that poisoned Ron Paul's campaign inner circle....
Lord Acton
#265. To: Cynicom (#247)
This lovefest by 4um members for Obama is downright laffable.
Lord Acton
#266. To: James Deffenbach (#265)
It is sad to me when otherwise intelligent people can be snookered so easily by the establishment and its puppets.
#267. To: iconoclast (#266)
Lord Acton
#268. To: James Deffenbach (#267)
It is sad to me when otherwise intelligent people can be snookered so easily by the establishment and its puppets.
#269. To: James Deffenbach (#267)
uh huh. I didn't mention the CFR
#270. To: iconoclast (#269)
.
.
.