4um: Obama Race Speech: The Full Text

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Title: Obama Race Speech: The Full Text
Source: Huff Po
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 18, 2008
Author: Barack Obama
Post Date: 2008-03-18 11:13:50 by ghostdogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 3239
Comments: 286

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 260.

#135. To: ghostdogtxn (#0)

This is a very good speech, but it has the typical Obama signature to it.

So...what to do now?

Invariably, Obama leaves that out.

I'll refrain from commenting further.

mirage posted on 2008-03-18 15:08:37 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#139. To: mirage (#135)

ghostdogtxn posted on 2008-03-18 15:11:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#141. To: ghostdogtxn (#139)

I read platforms to decide who I vote for; rhetoric and charisma carry zero weight here. If what is under the hood is undesirable, it doesn't get my vote, regardless of what else is going on.

So far, no Democrat has a platform that I would vote for.

mirage posted on 2008-03-18 15:15:14 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#145. To: mirage (#141)

ghostdogtxn posted on 2008-03-18 15:20:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#149. To: ghostdogtxn (#145)

Of the 3 he's POTENTIALLY worth a shit. The others aren't, and that's certain.

That's what it boils down to.

Out of 300M people, what a 'choice.'

Lod posted on 2008-03-18 15:31:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#152. To: lodwick (#149)

ghostdogtxn posted on 2008-03-18 15:37:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#175. To: ghostdogtxn, the thread (#152)

He's not my first choice, not even my second choice, but out of what's left, he's my ONLY choice.

As I mentioned earlier, after the havoc wreaked on the entire world by 'my generation' presidents, bentmember and smirk; I'm ready to let the younger generation have a go at it.

My hope is that the awakening that Dr.Paul started across the country, and the world, will continue on the local level. That's where most all these criminal cretins that wind up in deecee got their start, after all.

Lod posted on 2008-03-18 16:24:44 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#178. To: lodwick (#175) (Edited)

My hope is that the awakening that Dr.Paul started across the country, and the world, will continue on the local level.

If RP's support included as large of a % of latent McHillObama supporters as it appears, then truly the movement was MUCH smaller than anyone knew...

Interestingly, it appears that MOST of the faux RP supporters came from the traditionally labeled Liberal wing of the CFR Party...

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 16:26:25 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#182. To: FOH (#178)

The 'Help America' voting machines could elect Christine's cat, who, knowing him personally, would do a fine job in the oval office.

Dr.Paul had the support, the donors, just not the black box programmers.

Lod posted on 2008-03-18 16:38:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#183. To: lodwick (#182)

Even knowing the outcome was rigged, I supported the anti-Establishment patriot and would never ever consider playing the McHilloBama goose step.

Most of the stalwart RP supporters on 4um have proven to be frauds in their support now of the Marxist Mulatto Panther Barack Hussein Council on Foreign Relations member Obama...

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 16:41:26 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#191. To: FOH (#183)

Even knowing the outcome was rigged, I supported the anti-Establishment patriot and would never ever consider playing the McHilloBama goose step.

Funny, I could have sworn you posted on this forum you would abandon your support for Ron Paul unless he publicly disowned Kucinich.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 16:47:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#194. To: aristeides (#191)

Damned straight, if I found out that RP was a fraud like you Obamaphiles are, I'd have dropped him in a heart beat too.

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 16:50:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#195. To: FOH (#194)

He never did disown Kucinich, did he?

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 16:51:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#198. To: aristeides (#195)

He never did disown Kucinich, did he?

He didn't have to, putz.

He never said he'd be on the same ticket as DK either, did he?

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 16:54:14 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#201. To: FOH (#198) (Edited)

He didn't have to, putz.

Well, I suppose he didn't have to, unless he paid attention to you.

As you just admitted a few posts back, you demanded that he publicly disown Kucinich or you would drop your support of him.

Some diehard support that is.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 16:57:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#204. To: aristeides (#201)

I received direct personal assurances that no watermelons like dk would ever be considered on a Ron Paul ticket.

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:03:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#211. To: FOH (#204)

I received direct personal assurances

From Ron Paul? Oh really?

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 17:11:55 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#214. To: aristeides (#211)

From Ron Paul? Oh really?

You sound surprised.

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:13:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#217. To: FOH (#214)

You sound surprised.

I certainly am.

Ron Paul communicates with you?

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 17:14:50 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#219. To: aristeides (#217)

Ron Paul communicates with you?

I had the good pleasure of having breakfast with Ron on the campaign trail.

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:16:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#220. To: FOH (#219)

I had the good pleasure of having breakfast with Ron on the campaign trail.

You'll have to excuse me if I wait for proof before I believe that.

Ron Paul is obviously a very courteous gentleman, something very different from how you present yourself on this forum.

And, as you admitted above, Ron Paul and Kucinich are friends. I very much doubt if he would speak of him in anything like the terms you indicated above.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 17:18:42 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#222. To: aristeides (#220)

ari, unlike you, I'm serious about what I do.

As the blind man said to his wife after taking a dump: "Honey, can you proof read something for me".

So I say to you.

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:21:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#224. To: FOH (#222)

In other words, you can't prove it.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 17:22:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#227. To: aristeides (#224)

In other words, you can't prove it.

I don't have to prove it.

I was there.

My State Campaign Director was there.

My wife was there.

My partners were there.

You're a nobody Left Wing Progressive Communist sh*t for brains that is now sucking the Establishment's knob.

You deserve "proof"?! LOLOL

You deserve what you continually get.

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:25:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#229. To: FOH (#227)

You deserve what you continually get.

I try to act like a gentleman.

Everybody on this forum can see what you are.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 17:27:33 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#230. To: aristeides (#229)

Yes, you are a very polite Deconstructionist Communist Progressive Liberal Left Wing Marxist asswipe.

But you are a polite one, ari.

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:29:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#231. To: FOH (#230) (Edited)

I repeat:

Everybody on this forum can see what you are.

And it's certainly not a gentleman.

Nor a credit to any cause you may support. Like Ron Paul's.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 17:30:29 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#233. To: aristeides (#231)

I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else.

You Obamaphile knob polisher...

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:31:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#235. To: FOH (#233)

I repeat, I'm not HERE to be a gentleman, a friend, a buddy or ANYTHING else.

Nor to win any supporters for the causes you support, apparently.

Or should I say -- for the causes you say you support.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 17:33:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#237. To: aristeides, buckeye (#235)

Nor to win any supporters for the causes you support, apparently.
Or should I say -- for the causes you say you support.

I leave the subtleties to others.

I'll take a patriot that is less gentlemanly over a polite traitor like you every day of the week and twice on Tuesdays...

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 17:38:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#252. To: FOH (#237)

There is, of course, a very simple way to prove your claims -- or at least to make them a lot more believable. If Ron Paul did confide his plans to you, surely you posted something about that here, or elsewhere on the Web. Or at least you must have made some mention of this breakfast meeting you claim to have had with him. You have only to point us to those earlier postings.

If, however, this thread is the first time you have mentioned Ron Paul's assurance or your breakfast meeting with him, and that only in response to my challenge, you will have to accept the fact that no one will believe you.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 18:56:05 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#253. To: aristeides (#252)

heheheheh

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 19:01:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#255. To: FOH (#253)

Checkmate.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 19:03:27 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#256. To: aristeides (#255)

ari, you're a legend in your own mind.

I had lunch with Warren Buffet a few weeks ago, too.

Want me to prove that as well?

LOLOL

I have nothing to prove to a false flag flying traitor like you...

FOH posted on 2008-03-18 19:05:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#257. To: FOH (#256) (Edited)

I had lunch with Warren Buffet a few weeks ago, too.

Yeah, sure, and you have the time to spend all day posting on this forum.

But you somehow never post anything about your meetings with these important people, until somebody challenges you.

Yeah, sure.

As if we are supposed to believe that somebody with your obvious lack of manners and breeding gets to meet all these important people.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 19:08:37 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#258. To: aristeides (#257)

As if we are supposed to believe that somebody with your obvious lack of manners and breeding gets to meet all these important people.

Now now Ari, your elitism is showing again.

Cynicom posted on 2008-03-18 19:17:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#259. To: Cynicom, FOH (#258)

I'm trying to provoke FOH into proving his claims.

And you've got to admit, he's given me plenty of cause to provoke him. Look at the language he's used -- about me and about others -- in this thread.

aristeides posted on 2008-03-18 19:20:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#260. To: aristeides (#259)

And you've got to admit, he's given me plenty of cause to provoke him. Look at the language he's used -- about me and about others -- in this thread.

Ari...

You are fair game here as is everyone else.

I do give you credit for civility and manners.

When is your fitting for your cheer leaders uniform??? I can hear it now, (Murrow) "rah rah for Old BO"....just kiddin

Cynicom posted on 2008-03-18 19:23:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

Replies to Comment # 260.

There are no replies to Comment # 260.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 260.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]