[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Counting The Dead in Iraq
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2008
Author: http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/03/co
Post Date: 2008-03-21 11:37:23 by tom007
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 48
Comments: 1

Counting The Dead in Iraq By David Hambling EmailMarch 20, 2008 | 3:07:00 PMCategories: Iraq's Insanity

17iraq600 There has been a flurry of media activity here in the UK covering the fifth anniversary of the war in Iraq, with newspapers, TV and radio all launching special series. One of the more analytical pieces is a feature in the the Guardian asking, "What is the real death toll in Iraq?" It makes a serious attempt to consider all the different conflicting figures and how they have been arrived at, including the WHO/Iraq Health Ministry study. Different methodologies were used, and these are discussed, especially the much-criticized Lancet study which showed 601,000 excess deaths from violence in Iraq:

The estimates were explosive and were widely reported in the Middle East and around the world. They met instant dismissal from the White House and Downing Street. "I don't consider it a credible report," Bush told reporters. Blair's spokesman said the study's result "was not one we believe to be anywhere near accurate".

Sitting in his office in Camden in north London, where every surface is covered with wobbly piles of files, the Lancet's editor, Richard Horton, admits that the figure "seems crazy". "But the second study validated the first one. The pre-invasion mortality rate is the same in both, and the upward lines of the post-invasion rate are exactly the same", he says.

He is particularly pleased by information unearthed last year by a Freedom of Information request by the BBC's Owen Bennett-Jones. This found that the chief scientific adviser to the Ministry of Defence described the methods used by the second survey as "close to best practice" and added that the "study design is robust". The adviser warned the government to be "cautious" about criticising the survey findings .

Even the Lancet study's figure is by no means the highest:

The British polling firm Opinion Research Business (ORB) asked 1,720 Iraqi adults last summer if they had lost family members by violence since 2003; 16% had lost one, and 5% two. Using the 2005 census total of 4,050,597 households in Iraq, this suggests 1,220,580 deaths since the invasion. Accounting for a standard margin of error, ORB says, "We believe the range is a minimum of 733,158 to a maximum of 1,446,063."

This is compared with the death toll during the Saddam years:

Estimates of the Iraqi deaths caused by Saddam's regime amount to a maximum of one million over a 35-year period (100,000 Kurds in the Anfal campaign in the 1980s; 400,000 in the war against Iran; 100,000 Shias in the suppressed uprising of 1991; and an unknown number executed in his prisons and torture chambers). Averaged over his time in power, the annual rate does not exceed 29,000.

This is all highly contentious to say the least -- and it shows the need for an accurate assessment of civilian casualties right from the outset. General Tommy Franks stated flatly that "We don't do body counts." But the vast and seemingly unbridgeable gulf between the estimate of 100,000 dead at one end and over a million at the other suggests that this was a mistake. An accurate, official figure is required, to prevent inflated claims on one hand -- and denials about the level of civilian suffering on the other. Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tom007, *WAR CRIMES* (#0)

It's a war crime, just not to have kept track.

I recently read that this was the one thing we learned from the Vietnam War - don't count their dead.

Or as Donald Rumsfeld put it "we don't do body counts".

'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz

robin  posted on  2008-03-21   11:45:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]