Title: Is Obama More Believable than Bush in 2000? Source:
Youtube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX-FiXTgKFo Published:Aug 4, 2007 Author:merrimac290 Post Date:2008-03-21 18:27:15 by buckeye Keywords:None Views:456 Comments:14
My poison of choice, at this time, shall be Obama.
None of us has a crystal ball, but at least we can cast a vote against more of the last two decades.
Those who would cast a a vote for for Clinton, McCain/Bush, or just sit home and let one of these two scoundrels waltz into the the White House wish to say "thank you very much, give me a third helping"?
The road to perdition .... Bush/Clinton/Bush/McClinton
why is that you feel compelled to drink poison at all?
And do what in exchange? Sit around and 'piss and moan' all day on an internet forum?
I'm going with the least establishment, least pro-zionist candidate running that does have a chance to win in Nov.
Besides, why break my trend of supporting awful candidates. I voted for jorge in 2000 and for him in every Texas election when he was running for gov. That adds up to about 6 times I voted for the bastard.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
Besides, why break my trend of supporting awful candidates.
ok, that made me laugh. :P
you know my point of view on this. i think by our voting for a dem or pub, we're aiding the legitimization of the fraud. if we all sat it out or, even better, wrote in RP or voted a 3rd party candidate, then that would send the bastards a huge message. enough. no more of their awful selections.
I'm proud to say that I didn't find (either) Bush believeable in 1988, 1993, 2000, or 2004. Therefore I voted for Ron Paul, Ross Perot, Harry Browne, and Michael Badnarik in 2004.