Title: Ron Paul on Monday Night (03/24/08) Coast to Coast AM Show Source:
Coast to Coast AM URL Source:http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ Published:Mar 23, 2008 Author:George Noory Post Date:2008-03-23 22:17:34 by TwentyTwelve Keywords:Ron Paul Views:2069 Comments:57
1. Why did you recently refer to the issues raised by the 911 truth movement as 'preposterous' when you had previously said, a few months prior, to a 911 truth activist, that government can't be trusted and that you stand with Kucinich in supporting a new impartial investigation into 9/11? What made you so drastically change your position on this issue?
2. What has been done to determine where the missing 2.3 trillion dollars went, which was missing from the Pentagon budget, as Rumsfeld announced in a press conference on 9/10/2001?
3. CBS Marketwatch reported that Halliburton recieved a 400 million dollar contract to build detainment camps in the U.S. Are there any of these camps in your congressional district, and what are these camps for?
Is this related to the REX 84 program?
4. You said in 1988 on the MORTON DOWNEY tv show that George Bush and the CIA are 'dealing in drugs'. As a sitting congressman, have you ever followed up and investigated this activity? Has it continued into 2008?
1. Why did you recently refer to the issues raised by the 911 truth movement as 'preposterous' when you had previously said, a few months prior, to a 911 truth activist, that government can't be trusted and that you stand with Kucinich in supporting a new impartial investigation into 9/11? What made you so drastically change your position on this issue?
Which message of Ron Paul's are the PTB deathly afraid that the people will hear?
What's the best way to make sure that the people never hear it?
If Ron Paul dares to confirm our and his suspicions about 9/11 without the proof in his hand the moment he says it then the MSM would fill the airways with deafening shrieks of simulated outrage and drive the 90 percentile away from the candidate.
The only people who would benefit from Paul being completely candid about 9/11 now would be 1) those who don't care about winning, but who just don't want to be "alone" in kook korner anymore, and 2) the goddam enemy who will do anything to crush Ron Paul!
Those who keep insisting that Ron Paul "come clean on the campaign trail" either don't understand or are so goddam blinded by their own egocentric wishes that they simply don't care enough to trust Ron Paul's professional instincts on this "sudden death" issue.
So, yeah, go ahead and start trying to corner Ron Paul before the convention just to make absolutely sure that there's no prayer of him winning even if McCain walks out in a SRV flag diaper and confesses to treason. After all you know what's really important and, how to save America.
I have no idea what RP said last night, I'll listen later today (I subscribe to C2C, so I can get in in archive), but I'd argue that the end result of Paul's retreat from the battlefield has further fractured our side, a la, Perot and Buchanan before him. The members of RP's Revolution that haven't as yet chucked it in, are a leaderless few, trying desperately to resuscitate what was a once viable money making machine, capable of launching a 3rd party alternative to the National Party. RP himself said he never expected his candidacy to take off as it did, and when it did, the lack of fire in the belly was appalling to me at least. Leo Durocher must have had RP in mind when he said, "nice guys finish last."
If RP wins his House seat in Nov., and chooses to remain in the Republican party, rather than go Independent, he is just another in a long line of political patriot hopes, sent into the fray to gauge the level of discontent, only to retreat back to safety when their mission is complete.
The only people who would benefit from Paul being completely candid about 9/11 now would be 1) those who don't care about winning, but who just don't want to be "alone" in kook korner anymore, and 2) the goddam enemy who will do anything to crush Ron Paul!
Those who keep insisting that Ron Paul "come clean on the campaign trail" either don't understand or are so goddam blinded by their own egocentric wishes that they simply don't care enough to trust Ron Paul's professional instincts on this "sudden death" issue.
I actually had thought about it last night, asked my wife what she thought, and decided against it. I did not call into the show and confront him on the 911 issue. Because I do respect Paul and as i've discussed before, I understand his decision on how to deal with the 911 conspiracy issue.
You might find this thread interesting which touches on the same topic- posted by honway, someone I respect a great deal.