Title: Ron Paul on Monday Night (03/24/08) Coast to Coast AM Show Source:
Coast to Coast AM URL Source:http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ Published:Mar 23, 2008 Author:George Noory Post Date:2008-03-23 22:17:34 by TwentyTwelve Keywords:Ron Paul Views:799 Comments:57
1. Why did you recently refer to the issues raised by the 911 truth movement as 'preposterous' when you had previously said, a few months prior, to a 911 truth activist, that government can't be trusted and that you stand with Kucinich in supporting a new impartial investigation into 9/11? What made you so drastically change your position on this issue?
2. What has been done to determine where the missing 2.3 trillion dollars went, which was missing from the Pentagon budget, as Rumsfeld announced in a press conference on 9/10/2001?
3. CBS Marketwatch reported that Halliburton recieved a 400 million dollar contract to build detainment camps in the U.S. Are there any of these camps in your congressional district, and what are these camps for?
Is this related to the REX 84 program?
4. You said in 1988 on the MORTON DOWNEY tv show that George Bush and the CIA are 'dealing in drugs'. As a sitting congressman, have you ever followed up and investigated this activity? Has it continued into 2008?
1. Why did you recently refer to the issues raised by the 911 truth movement as 'preposterous' when you had previously said, a few months prior, to a 911 truth activist, that government can't be trusted and that you stand with Kucinich in supporting a new impartial investigation into 9/11? What made you so drastically change your position on this issue?
Which message of Ron Paul's are the PTB deathly afraid that the people will hear?
What's the best way to make sure that the people never hear it?
If Ron Paul dares to confirm our and his suspicions about 9/11 without the proof in his hand the moment he says it then the MSM would fill the airways with deafening shrieks of simulated outrage and drive the 90 percentile away from the candidate.
The only people who would benefit from Paul being completely candid about 9/11 now would be 1) those who don't care about winning, but who just don't want to be "alone" in kook korner anymore, and 2) the goddam enemy who will do anything to crush Ron Paul!
Those who keep insisting that Ron Paul "come clean on the campaign trail" either don't understand or are so goddam blinded by their own egocentric wishes that they simply don't care enough to trust Ron Paul's professional instincts on this "sudden death" issue.
So, yeah, go ahead and start trying to corner Ron Paul before the convention just to make absolutely sure that there's no prayer of him winning even if McCain walks out in a SRV flag diaper and confesses to treason. After all you know what's really important and, how to save America.
The only people who would benefit from Paul being completely candid about 9/11 now would be 1) those who don't care about winning, but who just don't want to be "alone" in kook korner anymore, and 2) the goddam enemy who will do anything to crush Ron Paul!
Those who keep insisting that Ron Paul "come clean on the campaign trail" either don't understand or are so goddam blinded by their own egocentric wishes that they simply don't care enough to trust Ron Paul's professional instincts on this "sudden death" issue.
I actually had thought about it last night, asked my wife what she thought, and decided against it. I did not call into the show and confront him on the 911 issue. Because I do respect Paul and as i've discussed before, I understand his decision on how to deal with the 911 conspiracy issue.
You might find this thread interesting which touches on the same topic- posted by honway, someone I respect a great deal.
I actually had thought about it last night, asked my wife what she thought, and decided against it. I did not call into the show and confront him on the 911 issue. Because I do respect Paul and as i've discussed before, I understand his decision on how to deal with the 911 conspiracy issue.
Art...
If you recall two or so times, Paul made a statement that to me satisfied my 9/11 interest. He said very emphatically, "If I am elected President, I will open ALL the books"....
Many people seemed not to understand or accept that as his way of saying, "I will help to discover any wrong doing".... to me that was sufficient.
right. But as the mainstream media kept pressing him, and in nearly every interview the neocon host would ask Paul almost the identical question, about 911 conspiracies and then they would specifically mention Alex Jones. I have a collection of these interviews from different networks, radio and TV both. it was as if they all had a master script. as they kept asking, i think he got annoyed and as time went on, further distanced himself from the issue, in the end calling the idea 'presposterous'.