Title: Ron Paul on Monday Night (03/24/08) Coast to Coast AM Show Source:
Coast to Coast AM URL Source:http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ Published:Mar 23, 2008 Author:George Noory Post Date:2008-03-23 22:17:34 by TwentyTwelve Keywords:Ron Paul Views:821 Comments:57
I'm glad Paul is on, he's worth listening to. but let me say about george noory/art bell & their radio show - that is an outfit that is 'under the influence' of CIA. just as I'm sure about all of big media is. That show has more ridiculous stuff on it that is just outright foolishness. I think it is a system for discrediting anything 'alternative' in our news or culture or thinking.
sure you can sit in a room and see what's happening at a specific spot 2000 miles away by looking in your mind - sure you can. Sure you can time travel. Sure, there's green lizards that kidnap women and give them the time of their lives. sure his wife died from asthma attack, etc etc etc. art bell is 'under the influence' big-time.
That show has more ridiculous stuff on it that is just outright foolishness.
I agree with you to a point. OTOH Ron Paul's message needs exposure and most people should be able to separate the ridiculous from the rational. People find some things entertaining just to consider.
I pretty much quit listening to Coast 12-13 years ago when Bell started chasing chubacabras and big foot. I definitely see your point, but the upside is that millions of people will get more familiar with Ron Paul, as they have with Alex Jones, and once alerted are able to become more educated on the subjects being spoken about. There may be some drawbacks but overall it's a win.
I've heard that many have made a career from a guest shot on Coast.
I've heard that many have made a career from a guest shot on Coast.
I would imagine so. It seems like a racket. I only listen rarely if I can't sleep. but I've heard some wild stuff. and some guests do over a period of years tell a successive series of wild stories. and I remember when Art Bell was arrested on sex charges a 10-12 years ago. that show is 'under the influence'. when a guy says he specializes in 'remote viewing' where he can see things halfway round the world, and he says for 10+ years he trained people in the US Army to do this technique, then you know the US Army is even cooperating with the scam.
I remember when Art Bell was arrested on sex charges a 10-12 years ago. that show is 'under the influence'.
Bell had his son's teacher arrested for giving him pot and there were charges of sexual misconduct on the part of the teacher. Bell also sued someone over sexual accusations made against him, and I believe he (Bell) won.
I too think Bell has been co-opted by government, or at least his program has been. I wrote Bell many times and was even on his program for 30-45 minutes one night back in the mid 90's. (Before he went paranormal). I don't recall that he was ever arrested ... I'll google it later.
His wife's death and his almost immediate remarriage in the Philipines (where he had moved) struck me as weird too. His wife (Ramona was 47 years old and died of asthma).
I concur with you that Art Bell's show was much better years ago. I remember back in summer of 1994 I was on a schedule where I was up all night and listened to him every night. and it was a great show. He would take all calls with no screener whatsoever. he would just pick up the phone & say hello to each caller and he would engage each caller on the subject they were interested in. He had no limits. and then he started having limits based on people calling in & talking about Clinton scandals. The very first guy I remember him censoring was the guy from Montana who called every night with a bible quote and short bible lesson. but his show is nothing like it was back then.
Yes, its true that Art bell really was arrested on child molestation charges. It was right on the national news somewhere around 1998. The national news said he was arrested on child molestation charges and held in solitary confinement. He was only in jail for about 3-4 days. After that they let him go and they explained in a big story that it was all a mistake. Art Bell matched the description of a man who had been socializing with Bell's teen son and the teen son's friends. The teenagers said this other guy had been giving them drugs and engaging them in sex. The description the teens gave also fit Art Bell. So the police arrested Art Bell. This is a crazy story I'm telling you in that the police couldn't possibly have made such a mistake. Yet this is the story they gave when they released him.
Look, he was in jail, the national news was saying that he was a child molester, then he was released. You know they put some heavy pressure on him & he yielded. I would yield too under those conditions.
After this jail stint he was off the air for a long time. They brought in George Noory as the top guy. Then they paid him a huge amount of money to buy his show from him. Then he became a part-time host.
That is really something that you were on his show for 30 minutes.
You could be right. I just don't recall his being arrested. I do recall his son was the central figure in a molestation situation. I too listened most every night back in those days, but it was political.
I was on Coast that night debating a guy named Steve about the Montana Freemen. I had faxed Bell with some info regarding my knowledge of what the Freemen were doing and he called me at home to participate in a debate on air. It went on for quite awhile. When Bell called I had a feeling it would be him, so I answered "West of the Urals". [I often accused Bell of being a 99th degreee Mason.]
I know Wm Cooper also hated Bell. (Heidi Fleiss (another whore) was recently arrested in Pahrump !)
On April 3, Stephens was the guest on Oates' Saturday night radio show. It was a planned attack on Bell. Stephens alleged (among other things) that Bell had been arrested years ago in California. The next day, Stephens put up his new webpage which was primarily a personal attack on Bell, and included the same allegations he had made on the Oates show. Bell soon posted information on his own website refuting Stephens' claim that he had been arrested and served time on pornography charges, and threatened a lawsuit against Stephens, and perhaps others.
Bell unexpectedly left the airwaves again after the April 14 show. The reasons were apparently the same family problems that forced him to quit radio temporarily the previous October. He mysteriously quoted H.L. Mencken: "Every normal man must be tempted at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." Code words, to be sure, but aimed at which target?
During Bell's hiatus, radio veteran Hilly Rose manned the microphone, just as he had when Bell left in October. Many listeners were puzzled, however, when they discovered that Rose was broadcasting on some affiliates, and Whitley Strieber, another Regular Guest, was heard broadcasting on others at the same time--both claiming to be Art's guest host!
The newsgroups, chat rooms, and message boards were awash with the conundrum. Was Art coming back? Had his radio network fired him? And why two guest hosts at the same time? Some fans e-mailed the radio network. Others complained they wanted Bell on the show and no one else. What were these personal problems, and would they ever be resolved? Some must have wished a black helicopter would come and take them away from all this.
On April 28, Michael Lindemann, a regular on the Jeff Rense show, said Whitley Strieber told him he was broadcasting on Bell's show in some markets as a "test host" and would be filling in for him at some point in the future. It was suggested that Bell was tired and perhaps a bit burned out.
Bell returned May 4, and left the impression he would be taking more personal time off in the future, leaving the show in the hands of Rose and Strieber.
Enter "Skarlet." (There's always a woman involved, isn't there?) Claiming to be a former intimate of Oates, she posted logs of her Internet chats with him on her own new website. In one of them, Oates revealed he was the person behind Robert Stephens' anti-Bell website. Stephens had agreed to be the front man and take the heat for him. Oates has apparently denied it, and claims he barely knew Skarlet. Is Oates really behind the Stephens website? Is there really a Face on Mars? The website started as an anti-Bell page, then metamorphosed into an anti-Skarlet site.
Swept up in the whirlwind, Dreamlanders began taking sides, sensing (sometimes incorrectly) who their enemies in The Feud were, and going on the attack on behalf of their champion. Most of the assaults were anonymous, standard for the Internet. Dreamland had become a nightmare.
The denizens of Dreamland read the message boards and listen all night to the talk shows, waiting for a statement on The Feud, or a few sly code words intended for the edification of the opposing camp to chew on; or perhaps they would hear a veiled call to arms from their champion beseeching them to harry the enemy.
Someone somewhere in Dreamland is turning on a computer, is logging onto the Internet, is reading a message board. He is typing on his keyboard and is posting his own message. And if he claims to be Oates or Bell, how to know if he is the Real McCoy or an impostor? Uncertainty is the principle in Dreamland, where Schroedinger's Cat is prowling the streets day and night.