Title: Ron Paul on Monday Night (03/24/08) Coast to Coast AM Show Source:
Coast to Coast AM URL Source:http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ Published:Mar 23, 2008 Author:George Noory Post Date:2008-03-23 22:17:34 by TwentyTwelve Keywords:Ron Paul Views:883 Comments:57
1. Why did you recently refer to the issues raised by the 911 truth movement as 'preposterous' when you had previously said, a few months prior, to a 911 truth activist, that government can't be trusted and that you stand with Kucinich in supporting a new impartial investigation into 9/11? What made you so drastically change your position on this issue?
2. What has been done to determine where the missing 2.3 trillion dollars went, which was missing from the Pentagon budget, as Rumsfeld announced in a press conference on 9/10/2001?
3. CBS Marketwatch reported that Halliburton recieved a 400 million dollar contract to build detainment camps in the U.S. Are there any of these camps in your congressional district, and what are these camps for?
Is this related to the REX 84 program?
4. You said in 1988 on the MORTON DOWNEY tv show that George Bush and the CIA are 'dealing in drugs'. As a sitting congressman, have you ever followed up and investigated this activity? Has it continued into 2008?
1. Why did you recently refer to the issues raised by the 911 truth movement as 'preposterous' when you had previously said, a few months prior, to a 911 truth activist, that government can't be trusted and that you stand with Kucinich in supporting a new impartial investigation into 9/11? What made you so drastically change your position on this issue?
Which message of Ron Paul's are the PTB deathly afraid that the people will hear?
What's the best way to make sure that the people never hear it?
If Ron Paul dares to confirm our and his suspicions about 9/11 without the proof in his hand the moment he says it then the MSM would fill the airways with deafening shrieks of simulated outrage and drive the 90 percentile away from the candidate.
The only people who would benefit from Paul being completely candid about 9/11 now would be 1) those who don't care about winning, but who just don't want to be "alone" in kook korner anymore, and 2) the goddam enemy who will do anything to crush Ron Paul!
Those who keep insisting that Ron Paul "come clean on the campaign trail" either don't understand or are so goddam blinded by their own egocentric wishes that they simply don't care enough to trust Ron Paul's professional instincts on this "sudden death" issue.
So, yeah, go ahead and start trying to corner Ron Paul before the convention just to make absolutely sure that there's no prayer of him winning even if McCain walks out in a SRV flag diaper and confesses to treason. After all you know what's really important and, how to save America.
The only people who would benefit from Paul being completely candid about 9/11 now would be 1) those who don't care about winning, but who just don't want to be "alone" in kook korner anymore, and 2) the goddam enemy who will do anything to crush Ron Paul!
Those who keep insisting that Ron Paul "come clean on the campaign trail" either don't understand or are so goddam blinded by their own egocentric wishes that they simply don't care enough to trust Ron Paul's professional instincts on this "sudden death" issue.
I actually had thought about it last night, asked my wife what she thought, and decided against it. I did not call into the show and confront him on the 911 issue. Because I do respect Paul and as i've discussed before, I understand his decision on how to deal with the 911 conspiracy issue.
You might find this thread interesting which touches on the same topic- posted by honway, someone I respect a great deal.
#54. To: Artisan, Jethro Tull, christine, honway, nobody, castletrash (#33)(Edited)
Ron Paul: Idiot or Coward?
Well, to those of us who were traumatized by the assassination of JFK that issue is as important as ever.
But, if I were to say, "Unless Ron Paul stands up and guarantees the truth about the assassination he fails my test and fails the whole of the American people!" you and others might think I was a bit of a self centered egomaniac.
The JFK conspiracy is actually more important because back then people didn't expect our govt to commit heinous crimes in broad daylight and get clean away with it. It was the soul shattering precedent that paved the way for that terrible September day. Juxtapose that with the fact that people actually played the market because of apparent foreknowledge of 9/11, and scientific "experts" are lining up to perjure themselves and wash to the elbows in innocent blood to cozy up to the goddam Bush criminal cartel. Do you think that this bloodlust and official corruption would have been possible if not for JFK's awful murder?
I'm very sorry that you folks who think 9/11 was the end of America use that to measure Ron Paul's courage and integrity. But, sadly, you're mistaken. 9/11 is a grim symptom of a long term systemic infection and getting Ron Paul into the White House was our only chance of making it right without collapsing the country or civil war.
But, sadly, too many crack brains think that 9/11 is the problem and they don't understand the "third rail danger" that it poses to any who dare accuse without the proof in hand. (Remember what happened to Joe McCarthy when he made charges that were probably true but he couldn't prove at the time) If Ron Paul "came clean about 9/11" he'd never be able to rent another hall in America.
He tried to run a positive campaign knowing all too well that there would be rivers of blood if he won and the conspirators are hunted down and punished. And, some assholes demand to know why he didn't switch over to the "Vote for me and I'll paint America crimson with the blood of criminals" platform?
And, from a tactical point of view if you and others expected Ron Paul to be completely candid even to the detriment of his campaign then A) you never expected him to win and B) you don't understand the American people. Do you think American voters want the truth? Why do you think that Ron Paul stayed away from the issue of social security and entitlements on talk shows and interviews?
The bottom line is Ron Paul had no obligation to flaky Pollyannas and dilettantes who don't know shit about how things really work. If he got elected he could have done great things, but he had zero chance of winning the nomination and pleasing folks who wanted him to settle personal scores because they have to stand alone on 9/11. I've been crossing swords with ignorance about the JFK assassination since 1963 and my advice is this. If you can't stand being ridiculed then stay out of the fray. But, no one has the right to say "Ron Paul is a bad person because he wouldn't shock my parents who refuse to believe me about 9/11."
Those who ask "Idiot or Coward?" are more than welcome to run for the presidency on "The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about 9/11" and we'll see how far they get.
Hell, the insurance companies paid off knowing full well that buildings don't collapse into their own footprints. Now, why is that?
And, there have been virtually no changes in high rise construction since that terrible day despite the fact that according to the official story the laws of physics are now mere suggestions that may be disregarded if Zionists and warmongers stare you down and demand double indemnity.
No, it was not yet the time to call out the bastards who could "accidentally crash" a C5 Galaxy right into his hotel room window. If he was the president he could have taken steps to survive and see the investigation through. But, to alert the Satanic evil doers of his intentions prematurely would have almost certainly resulted in his death. Of course, those who so badly want to hear some official say "9/11 was an inside job" were willing to take the risk with Ron Paul's life as they pop their bubble gum while posting anonymously on the internet.
Ron Paul is not stupid. He's a physician, a former air force officer and a seasoned politician who stuck to his principles and stood alone or with a small caucus of like minded others, and he won the respect of millions because he was positive in his leadership. And, when he saw people talking about his imminent demise because of the danger his campaign posed to the federal reserve, he may have asked himself if he was obligated to be martyred for Americans who seemingly are willing to risk nothing and who still dare to criticize him from the safety of the sidelines. Americans don't deserve Ron Paul. As Ben Franklin said, we're getting the government we deserve.
To any assholes who called Ron Paul a coward, well, I'll be watching the news to see where they took their rifles and led other hairy chested patriots in attacks on the system. If they can't win the presidency then they should do the next best thing and martyr themselves just as they cheerfully demanded of Ron Paul.
Good post, thanks for the thought and time that went in to it. You are right. You are right that frustration with the way things are shouldn't be directed towards a guy who did nothing to cause it, and who has been fighting the system for years.