[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: NBC-WSJ POLL: NEW CLINTON LOWS
Source: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/
URL Source: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/26/821438.aspx
Published: Mar 27, 2008
Author: Chuck Todd
Post Date: 2008-03-27 01:36:44 by robin
Keywords: None
Views: 131
Comments: 7

From NBC's Chuck Todd
As expected, one of the two major Democratic candidates saw a downturn in the latest NBC/WSJ poll, but it's not the candidate that you think. Hillary Clinton is sporting the lowest personal ratings of the campaign. Moreover, her 37 percent positive rating is the lowest the NBC/WSJ poll has recorded since March 2001, two months after she was elected to the U.S. Senate from New York.

The poll was conducted Monday and Tuesday this week by Hart-McInturff and surveyed 700 registered voters, which gives the poll a margin of error of +/- 3.7 percent. In addition, we oversampled African-Americans in order to get a more reliable cross-tab on many of the questions we asked in this poll regarding Sen. Barack Obama's speech on race and overall response to last week's Rev. Jeremiah Wright dustup. (Watch Tim Russert's analysis of the poll results.)

On that issue specifically, 32 percent of voters overall said Obama "sufficiently addressed the issue," while 26 percent of folks believe he needs to address the Wright controversy further; 31 percent did not see the speech or had no opinion.

Interestingly, of those voters who said they saw the speech, 47 percent said Obama sufficiently addressed the Wright issue while 37 percent said he needs to address it further. Among whites, 45 percent were satisfied with Obama's explanation, 38 percent were not. Among blacks, 67 percent said the speech was sufficient, while 25 percent want him to address it further.

Overall, 55 percent of voters told us that they were "disturbed" by the videos of Wright that circulated so widely on cable TV and the Internet.

As for the damage this controversy did or didn't do to Obama, it's a mixed bag. Yes, Obama saw some of his numbers go down slightly among certain voting groups, most notably Republicans. But he's still much more competitive with independent voters when matched up against John McCain than Hillary Clinton is. And he still sports a net-positive personal rating of 49-32, which is down only slightly from two weeks ago, when it was 51-28. Again, the biggest shift in those negative numbers were among Republicans.

On one of the most critical questions we've been tracking for a few months, Obama showed resilience. When asked if the three presidential candidates could be successful in uniting the country if they were elected president, 60 percent of all voters believed Obama could be successful at doing this, 58 percent of all voters said McCain could unite the country while only 46 percent of voters said the same about Clinton. All three candidates saw dips on this issue, by the way. In January, 67 percent thought Obama could unite the country; 68 percent thought McCain could do it; and 55 percent said Clinton would be able to pull it off.

The fact that all three dropped equally in the last three months is a sign that the campaign is becoming more ideological and partisan.

In the head-to-head matchups, there weren't huge shifts in the numbers, with Obama and Clinton dead even at 45 percent in the national Democratic primary matchup (a slight increase for Obama from early March). In the general-election matchups, Obama led McCain by 2 points, and McCain led Clinton by 2 points; all margin of error results and nothing to get too excited over.

One thing about these head-to-head matchups: Our pollsters found that for the second poll in a row, more than 20 percent of Clinton and Obama supporters say they would support McCain when he's matched up against the other Democrat. There is clearly some hardening of feelings among some of the most core supporters of both Democrats, though it may be Obama voters, who are more bitter in the long run.

Why? Because among Obama voters, Clinton has a net-negative personal rating (35-43) while Clinton voters have a net-positive view of Obama (50-29). Taken together, this appears to be evidence that Obama, intially, should have the easier time uniting the party than Clinton.

Considering the doom-and-gloom some predicted for Obama with regard to the Wright controversy, the overall tenor of the electorate appears to still be favorable for him. He's mortal, but he's survived ... for now. It's not clear whether he'd be this resilient if another controversy exploded as big as Wright, but it appears that voters are giving him the benefit of doubt. There's lots of evidence inside these numbers that voters still would like to know more about Obama, and that is both an opportunity and a potential obstacle.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: robin (#0)

GOOD, power mongering NWO bitch!

MING THE MERCILESS  posted on  2008-03-27   10:36:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: robin (#0)

Hillary actually repeated her remark about Rev. Wright (wouldn't be her pastor) on Fox News yesterday!

I saw the clip on Good Morning America this morning.

Good Morning America also mentioned how new anti-Israel passages have been dug up from the newsletter of Rev. Wright's church.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-27   10:57:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: aristeides, MING THE MERCILESS, robin (#2)

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90852/6381662.html

McCain beats both U.S. Democratic candidates in presidential "matchups"

McCain, who has secured the Republican presidential nomination, led Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) 50 percent to 43 percent.

He led her fellow Democrat Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) 51 percent to 41 percent

As I said before, the Dems are out of touch as is McCain. All 3 want to pass Amnesty. All 22,000,000 new citizens will have to import all the oil they consume. To get that oil all we have to do is to bid it away from other nations. As the dollar collapses in value we can just continue to do what we have done for the past 60 years which is to print more dollars. Oil will go to $150 then $200 and then $300 and $400. Eventually, half the people in America will no longer be able to afford to drive to work. Then we might be able to say conclusively that OVER POPULATIONG YOUR COUNTRY IS A FATAL MISTAKE. But the illegal alien lobby will be so powerful that you will be killed if you say it over the TV.

The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie

Horse  posted on  2008-03-27   12:20:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Horse (#3)

Early on, Obama vs McCain showed Obama ahead in the polls.

Since all the infighting, McCain has had a slight boost.

It is only March, and the attacks against McCain have barely started. By November, McCain's misdeeds (like Keating Five, helping a foreign nation get the Airbus contract, his airheaded lobbyist/prostitute, his inability to understand economics, or Iraq, etc.) will be better known to Americans.

'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz

robin  posted on  2008-03-27   12:41:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Horse, robin (#3)

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90852/6381662.html

[People's Daily Online (China)
Source:Xinhua

McCain beats both U.S. Democratic candidates in presidential "matchups"]

The attributed source is a recent Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll.

Why would we use a source from China to selectively tell us what the Rasmussen Report says? Why not use the Rasmussen Report?

The article left something out:

Rasmussen Report

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll Thursday, March 27, 2008

Looking ahead to the General Election in November, John McCain continues to lead both potential Democratic opponents. McCain leads Barack Obama 51% to 41% and Hillary Clinton 51% to 41% (see recent daily results). McCain is now viewed favorably by 56% of voters nationwide and unfavorably by 41%. Obama’s reviews are 46% favorable and 52% unfavorable. For Clinton, those numbers are 44% favorable, 54% unfavorable (see recent daily results).

. . .

The Rasmussen Reports Balance of Power Calculator shows the Electoral College race is much more competitive than it was a month ago. Democrats leading in states with 200 Electoral Votes while the GOP has the advantage in states with 189. When “leaners” are added, the Democrats lead 247 to 240.

. . .

Rasmussen Markets data now give Obama a 79.5 % chance to win the Democratic nomination while expectations for a Clinton victory are at 20.0%. Market data also suggests that Obama has a 48.0 % chance to become the next President. Expectations for McCain to become President are at 39.6 % while Clinton’s prospects are at 13.5 %. Numbers in this paragraph are from a prediction market, not a poll.

nolu_chan  posted on  2008-03-27   13:47:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Horse (#3)

Beyond the nomination race, in hypothetical matchups for November's election Sen. Obama still edges Sen. McCain 44% to 42%. That is nearly the same result as in the early March poll, before videos of Mr. Wright's most fiery sermons spread over the Internet. But Sen. Clinton, who likewise had a narrow advantage over Sen. McCain in the earlier survey, trails in this one by two points, 44% to his 46%.

New WSJ-NBC poll.

According to this poll, Obama edges out McCain, whereas McCain edges out Hillary.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-27   14:09:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: nolu_chan (#5)

Gallop poll shows 1% diff in McCain vs Obama.

Gallup Daily: Obama Now at 48% to Clinton 44%

'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz

robin  posted on  2008-03-27   14:34:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]