[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Russia's Dark Future

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: March of the Obamacons
Source: http://www.takimag.com/
URL Source: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/morning_links1/
Published: Mar 31, 2008
Author: Justin Raimondo
Post Date: 2008-03-31 15:04:14 by robin
Ping List: *Justin Raimondo*     Subscribe to *Justin Raimondo*
Keywords: None
Views: 2652
Comments: 170

March of the Obamacons—The New York Sun notes that the “surge” is working ... that is, the surge of support for Obama among antiwar Republicans. Lincoln Chafee, Douglas Kmiec, Susan Eisenhower, and, perhaps, Senator Chuck Hagel. As the Sun notes: “Asked yesterday on CNN whether he would endorse his party’s presumptive nominee, Mr. Hagel said he would base his support on the candidates’ positions on withdrawing from Iraq.” While neocon hacks of the Rush Limbaugh variety are calling out the thinning ranks of the GOP troops to switch parties for a day and support Hillary, antiwar Republicans are switching and supporting Obama all without prompting from anyone, and the numbers are impressive in Pennsylvania, where the upcoming Democratic primary is going to be decisive. As the Sun reports:

“Of the 140,000 Pennsylvania Republicans and independents who switched registration in the last year to Democrat, the majority are Obama voters, the director of the Franklin and Marshall College poll, G. Terry Madonna, said. Registration for the state’s closed April 22 primary ended March 24. ‘If 2 million people vote in Pennsylvania, which would be a huge number, I think Obama gets 85,000 to 90,000 switchers,’ Mr. Madonna said. ‘That’s 3 or 4 or 5%, which is a big deal.’”

The Ron Paul Republicans are making a difference, albeit, at this point, a purely negative one. Here’s a nice touch from the Sun piece:

“Another Pennsylvania Republican who supports Mr. Obama is retired Major General Walter Stewart, a township supervisor in Burks County who says he has given money both to an anti-Bush Texas Republican, Rep. Ron Paul, and Mr. Hagel, who he said was his first choice for president this election season.

“General Stewart said he was supporting Mr. Obama because he could not endorse a candidate who voted to authorize the war in Iraq, which he compared to King George’s decision to send the British army and Hessian mercenaries into New York Harbor in the Revolutionary War. In 2004, General Stewart said, he supported Mr. Kerry, the Democratic nominee, over Mr. Bush. ‘I think there is a general feeling in the military that this war in Iraq has been a catastrophe,’ he said.”

Gen. Stewart, meet Andy Bacevich ....

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment: other topics at link Subscribe to *Justin Raimondo*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-70) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#71. To: aristeides (#60)

I'm a lawyer

Careful ari, your elitism is showing again.

If we are supposed to be impressed, I apologize for myself not showing proper respect.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:20:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Cynicom (#71)

My point is, it's no surprise that I should care about the rule of law.

I guess, unfortunately, it's also no surprise that some people do not share that concern.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   17:22:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Vitamin Z (#70)

Hey Z, haven't said 'hello' in awhile.

"Hello Z!"


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   17:22:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: aristeides (#72)

My point is, it's no surprise that I should care about the rule of law.

The vast majority of AT-TORN'EYs that I've dealt with care about BENDING, CHANGING, PERVERTING and DISREGARDING the rule of law and have been key players in the fall of America...and you certainly seem like the 'vast majority'.


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   17:24:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: aristeides (#72)

My point is, it's no surprise that I should care about the rule of law.

Then why are so many lawyers in jail or disbarred every year.

The last I knew there were about 150 law schools in this country, way more than medical schools. Law has been a business for many years and needs overhauling, akin to the medical profession.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:25:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Cynicom (#75)

So, because you despise lawyers, therefore I have to have my opinion because of white guilt?

Is that your brand of logic?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   17:27:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: FOH (#73)

"Hello Z!"

Word up, FOH!

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-03-31   17:27:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: Jethro Tull (#64)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-03-31   17:28:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: aristeides (#72)

My point is, it's no surprise that I should care about the rule of law.

The rule of law is whatever the lawyer in the black robe says it is, so why in the world should we take it seriously?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-31   17:28:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: FOH (#68)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-03-31   17:29:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: aristeides (#72)

Doctors and lawyers are both a lot alike.

While shaking your hand, both check you wallet, if it is light, they cannot help you. You need to see someone else.

If you have a heavy wallet, both give you BS reasons on what they can do for you, without a clue of what your problem is.

I met an honest lawyer once, you could tell because he turned no one away and always kept his word.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:30:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Jethro Tull (#79)

why in the world should we take it seriously?

Plenty of inmates in Guantanamo and in secret prisons already have reason to take very seriously the Bush administration's attack on habeas corpus.

I hope you never have personal reason to regret this attack.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   17:31:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: aristeides (#82)

In my years of wrangling in the "justice" system, I found the only way was to find the best Judge that money could buy.

Didnt you find that true????

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:34:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: Cynicom (#81)

Even if lawyers are as dishonest as you claim, they can still decide how to vote for reasons having to do with the law.

Your attacks on lawyers are beside the point here. My point was, I have perfectly good reasons having nothing to do with "white guilt" for favoring Obama.

I notice you aren't attacking my other motive, having to do with being a veteran and consequently opposing unnecessary wars.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   17:34:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: ghostdogtxn (#78)

We don't get Ron Paul because we didn't earn him

BS on a stick. RP never, ever had a chance at being selected, and I suspect he knew that himself. I never forgive him for allowing Anderson Cooper to hush him up at his last public debate. Had he been a real revolutionary, he'd have flung one of his penny loafers at that CIA mole's head.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-31   17:34:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: aristeides (#84)

Ari...

YOU brought it up that somehow being a lawyer gave you some respect for the law that the unwashed masses did not have.

I read your posts Ari...

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:36:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Cynicom (#83)

I clerked for a judge for two years, and never had a hint of a suspicion that my judge or any of the other judges on the court were being bribed.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   17:36:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: aristeides (#82)

I hope you never have personal reason to regret this attack.

And Obama will make all the nasty stuff disappear? Just because he says so? You're too old for such naivitee.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-03-31   17:36:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Cynicom (#86)

YOU brought it up that somehow being a lawyer gave you some respect for the law that the unwashed masses did not have.

As I have now said to you repeatedly, my point was that, as a lawyer, I understandably care about the rule of law, and am therefore inclined to favor the candidate who calls for respecting the Constitution and restoring habeas corpus. Plenty of nonlawyers share that concern.

Some other people apparently do not.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   17:37:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Jethro Tull (#85)

Had he been a real revolutionary, he'd have flung one of his penny loafers at that CIA mole's head.

Hear Hear...

A little revolution now and then is good for the unwashed masses, it is ONLY the self appointed elite that abhor revolutions.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:37:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Jethro Tull (#88)

And Obama will make all the nasty stuff disappear?

Oh, so now it's nasty?

I guess that means you now admit we should take it seriously.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   17:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

if Obama is elected he'd make for the most left leaning president in this nations history. I couldn't ever be part of that legacy.

Thank you for the kind words, and I understand your concerns. But do consider, Europe and Scandinavia have survived liberal govts. OTOH, we won't survive a McCain Regime. We could recover from a liberal govt, but not from McCain.

'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz

robin  posted on  2008-03-31   17:39:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: Jethro Tull (#85)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-03-31   17:40:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: aristeides (#89)

, as a lawyer, I understandably care about the rule of law,, as a lawyer, I understandably care about the rule of law,

Understandably?????

Do you think everyone else lacks this vital key to understanding the law???

Is there some magic formula that is advanced ONLY in law schools concerning the law???

ghost looks down his nose at white trash and now it seems you do also, that makes me feel bad. Law you may learned, but was there something else you are missing that Yale does not teach?

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:42:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: aristeides (#60)

But one thing I am clear on: Obama is the best of the three major candidates. He's the only one who speaks clearly about civil liberties, and he's also the one who seems most opposed to the war

I'm with you, though I'm uncertain whether or not I'll vote for Obama. I know I'll not vote for Hillary or McCain.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2008-03-31   17:46:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: ghostdogtxn (#78)

You can be like FOH, a purist, and sit on a fence and condemn anyone who decides they should make a comparison of the 3 choices that remain, or you can swallow your bile and pick one of them or another.

There aren't 3 choices.

That's where you're either a liar or an ignoramus...the Founding Fathers and you have little in common.


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   17:49:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: robin (#92)

We could recover from a liberal govt, but not from McCain.

We are not going to survive this current government, the cancer is metastasizing, not as a liberal conservative cancer, not as a pub or dem, just a cancer that is past surgery.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:50:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: ghostdogtxn (#78)

But as for sitting on a high horse and calling everyone who isn't a purist a "sell out" or a "traitor" or a "quisling?"

At least you know what you are...


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   17:50:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: ghostdogtxn (#80)

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

I sure got you Obamaphiles' number...


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   17:50:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: All (#99)

100


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   17:50:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: Jethro Tull (#88) (Edited)

And Obama will make all the nasty stuff disappear? Just because he says so?

With all his talk of hope and change, I have a feeling that many people are going to be disappointed if Obama gets in...like more disappointed than people are with GW Bush right now.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-03-31   17:52:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: aristeides (#19)

you think mcCain can make that decision unilaterally? mcCain won't do anything, nor will clinton or obama, that he isn't instructed to do by his CFR masters. imo, if obama is the selection, then the PTB have in mind for him to do something (that clinton or mcCain couldn't) to advance their anti-america(n) plan.

christine  posted on  2008-03-31   17:52:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: FOH (#98) (Edited)

Founding Father material here on 4um is sadly lacking.

More of a "fifth column type".

Of course after the Revolution, a lot of the nay sayers ran off to Canada to hide.

They ran because they feared the Patriots would hang 'em.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-03-31   17:53:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: Cynicom (#103)

Freaking Tories and their Kings/Queens...elitist trash that should have been snuffed out lo those years ago.


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   17:58:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: christine (#102)

if obama is the selection, then the PTB have in mind for him to do something (that clinton or mcCain couldn't) to advance their anti-america(n) plan.

I totally agree! North American Soviet Union...here we come.

Live Free or Die (or, run away)


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   18:00:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Cynicom (#103)

They ran because they feared the Patriots would hang 'em.

They still kiss the Queen's a** to this day...


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   18:01:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: ghostdogtxn (#36)

and who dropped some live bombs on the deck of the USS Forestall that killed over 160 of his fellow sailors. That's not fair to McCain. He didn't "drop bombs" on the deck; he performed an illegal flare up of his engine and ignited the bombs on other airplanes. Fortunately, he was able to run away to safety while the rest of the Forrestal's crew battled the fire and lost their lives being recklessly heroic. I'm glad McCain had the good sense not to be a hero.

I stand corrected, I should have re-read the USS Forestall article before making my comment. Needless to say McCain is/was reckless, criminally reckless, whether it involved bombs or illegal flare up of his jet engine is of small matter. The end result is the same, 160 dead sailors. The SOB should have faced a general court-martial.

Talk about fairness. Among McCain's first acts after the "Dinks" let him go and he came home to America was to divorce his wife, a woman who stood faithfully by his side during his five years as a POW.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2008-03-31   18:10:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: Zoroaster (#107)

Among McCain's first acts after the "Dinks" let him go and he came home to America was to divorce his wife, a woman who stood faithfully by his side during his five years as a POW.

That's the tip of that smelly ice berg..."SONGBIRD" is a schmuck's-schmuck.


What North American Union? STOP the North American Union!
~~~~~> Have you seen THIS yet? TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

FOH  posted on  2008-03-31   18:15:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: Cynicom (#103)

You think we wouldn't join you if it came to that? Just b/c we want the lesser of 3 evils?

This is a delaying tactic, to hopefully (yes it's a gamble) gain time to alert more sheeple.

There is no gamble with McCain or Hillary - they are proven quantities.

Voting 3rd party is a nice statement, for what's worth, but it's not like that's all there is to be done.

I spoke with a guy from the 9/11 LA group; he doesn't even care what's going on with the voting right now. He's focused just on getting info on 9/11 out and all the knowledge about New World Order that goes with it.

'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz

robin  posted on  2008-03-31   18:25:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: Cynicom (#103)

Of course after the Revolution, a lot of the nay sayers ran off to Canada to hide.

Whereas you guys don't even care enough about liberties, habeas corpus, aggressive war, and all the tyrannical acts of the Bush regime to have said anything on my Bob Barr thread.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-03-31   18:57:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (111 - 170) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]