[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Obama Would Consider Gore for Major Post
Source: AP
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VPS88O2&show_article=1
Published: Apr 2, 2008
Author: DEVLIN BARRETT
Post Date: 2008-04-02 13:57:38 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 1609
Comments: 109

WALLINGFORD, Pa. (AP) - Democrat Barack Obama says as president he would consider putting Al Gore in a Cabinet-level position—or higher. A woman at a town hall asked the Illinois senator if elected president would he consider tapping the former vice president for his Cabinet, or an even higher level office, to address global warming.

"I would," Obama said. "Not only will I, but I will make a commitment that Al Gore will be at the table and play a central part in us figuring out how we solve this problem. He's somebody I talk to on a regular basis. I'm already consulting with him in terms of these issues but climate change is real."

-Snip


Poster Comment:

Armand Hammer, Occidental Petroleum, and the Gore Family

 

* Lenin presented an inscribed portrait to "Comrade Armand Hammer" in 1921, The inscription has Lenin in parentheses & Ulanioff, his birth name.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 76.

#29. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

A Commentary on the War Against Terror: Our Larger Tasks Author: Al Gore

February 12, 2002 Council on Foreign Relations

www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=4343 [snip] "As important as identifying Iraq, Iran and North Korea for what they are, we must be equally bold in identifying other evils that confront us. For there is another Axis of Evil in the world: poverty and ignorance; disease and environmental disorder; corruption and political oppression. We may well put down terror in its present manifestations. But if we do not attend to the larger fundamentals as well, then the ground is fertile and has been seeded for the next generation of those born to hate us, who will hold these things up before the world's poor and dispossessed, and say that all these things are in our image, and rekindle the war we are now hoping to snuff out. “Draining the swamp” of terrorism must of course in the first instance mean destroying the ability of terrorist networks to function. But drying it up at its source must also mean draining the aquifer of anger that underlies terrorism: anger that enflames the hearts of so many young men, and makes them willing, dedicated recruits for terror. Anger at perceived historical injustices involving a mass-memory throughout the Islamic world of past glory and more recent centuries of decline and oppression at the hands of the West. " [snip]

Bombing them into prosperity and good govenors of the earth. Presidential logic. I guess he didn't read the CFR reports on the ME before he opened his yap.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   14:54:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Peppa (#29)

Too easy.

I wonder why so many supposed Conservative-Constitutionists that supported Ron Paul buy into the Globalist-Commie-Fascists' schtick?

Maybe they want the Nanny State...

FOH  posted on  2008-04-02   14:56:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: FOH (#30)

Maybe they want the Nanny State...

Who knows. Control over others. They're wired different.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:00:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Peppa (#33)

They're wired different.

I guess I am. I'm wired to want an end to the aggressive wars and violations of civil liberties of the Bush regime.

You folks seem wired to have different priorities.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   15:04:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: aristeides (#36)

To: Peppa

They're wired different. I guess I am. I'm wired to want an end to the aggressive wars and violations of civil liberties of the Bush regime.

You folks seem wired to have different priorities.

Sorry, you support a candidate that has not voted according to your values. Period.

That you continue to stick a fork in your own eye isn't my fault, but unfortunately, becomes everyones problem. Frankly, I consider it cowardly. Maybe you just want to BELIEVE. Well believe this, the more power you give to government over you, the more they will take. And who are you to condemn us all for your weakness?

My folks? Ah, you mean freedom loving Americans? Yes, we do have different priorities than you. You need a government teat and a sick need to control everyone else.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:13:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Peppa (#40)

You must be confusing me with someone else. As I have said repeatedly, what I want is an end to the Bush regime's wars of aggression and violations of civil liberties. What is cowardly about that?

I think the cowardly people are the ones who want -- or at least are willing -- to see those atrocities continue, just so that they can feel safe.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   15:19:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: aristeides (#43) (Edited)

You must be confusing me with someone else. As I have said repeatedly, what I want is an end to the Bush regime's wars of aggression and violations of civil liberties. What is cowardly about that?

I think the cowardly people are the ones who want -- or at least are willing -- to see those atrocities continue, just so that they can feel safe.

You want to believe that Obama is different on the war and he isn't. His advisors want bigger wars, globalism and further suspension of civil liberties. Why you refuse to acknowledge this is perplexing, if you were in control of common sense. You are a neo-con and perhaps don't realize it. Your position is that you will sacrifice everything for something you imagine is true. That you can't face it, is cowardly.

No one wants the atrocities to end more than the Ron Paul folks, and I think you know that. That he is not going to win doesn't mean people abandon their principles, or what is right in nature. That you feel you must embrace 'something' that sounds good, when under the smallest scrutiny is abhorrent, is contemptable and worse.

There are hundreds of thousands of soldiers around the world who are now slaves to the madness, and you are not doing your part to defend or support them, who believe, they are supporting you.

What twisted mind can say that Obama's advisors blueprints for bigger wars, is somehow better is beyond my understanding.

That he is able to dance around direct answers and you swallow it, is unbelievable.

You constantly hide behind Party labels to make your case for you... since you can NOT make a good one for BO.

He's a globalist, and their first order of business is to destroy what's left of our country. You will have your way, and I suspect you will be the biggest flag waver if your guy is leading the charge.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:32:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Peppa (#50)

He's a globalist, and their first order of business is to destroy what's left of our country.

Damn few politicians of any stripe aren't right now.

In the meantime I'll sleep better with one of the alliance types than the pre-emptive war types in office.

PS Obama is also not the type of globalist that considers protectionism a bad word.

iconoclast  posted on  2008-04-02   15:52:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: iconoclast (#57)

In the meantime I'll sleep better with one of the alliance types than the pre-emptive war types in office.

You better read up on Zbig then. As a reminder, he and his son Mark are advisors to Obama. I would say that alliance is one that requires some attention.

As I mentioned the other day, Obama should run as 3rd party and declare the positions that are his own, and toss the globalists from his circle.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:57:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Peppa (#60)

You better read up on Zbig then. As a reminder, he and his son Mark are advisors to Obama.

Zbig's foreign policy philosophy is rooted in WWII and cold war western alliances. It bears little or no resemblance to the neocon, imperialistic globalism of the highjacked Republican party.

It is not congruent with my own politics of populist protectionism and isolationism but it's miles closer that what your (my old) party has arrived at. In the words of RR, I didn't leave the party, it left me.

iconoclast  posted on  2008-04-02   16:10:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: iconoclast (#69)

Zbig's foreign policy philosophy is rooted in WWII and cold war western alliances. It bears little or no resemblance to the neocon, imperialistic globalism of the highjacked Republican party.

It is not congruent with my own politics of populist protectionism and isolationism but it's miles closer that what your (my old) party has arrived at. In the words of RR, I didn't leave the party, it left me.

Incredible. Your reading comprehension and the inability to connect the events that transpired as a result, is off the chart.

What a lazy mind.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   16:17:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 76.

#79. To: Peppa (#76)

You've lifted my spirits today! Thanks!!

Gotta run, and NOT for office...;)

FOH  posted on  2008-04-02 16:22:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Peppa (#76)

Your reading comprehension and the inability to connect the events that transpired as a result, is off the chart.

What a lazy mind.

Do you never tire of substituting ad hominem attacks for fact based rebuttal?

What are the "events" to which you refer? Cite/source them and we will stand or fall on our responses to them.

iconoclast  posted on  2008-04-02 17:03:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 76.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]