[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Obama Would Consider Gore for Major Post
Source: AP
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VPS88O2&show_article=1
Published: Apr 2, 2008
Author: DEVLIN BARRETT
Post Date: 2008-04-02 13:57:38 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 1632
Comments: 109

WALLINGFORD, Pa. (AP) - Democrat Barack Obama says as president he would consider putting Al Gore in a Cabinet-level position—or higher. A woman at a town hall asked the Illinois senator if elected president would he consider tapping the former vice president for his Cabinet, or an even higher level office, to address global warming.

"I would," Obama said. "Not only will I, but I will make a commitment that Al Gore will be at the table and play a central part in us figuring out how we solve this problem. He's somebody I talk to on a regular basis. I'm already consulting with him in terms of these issues but climate change is real."

-Snip


Poster Comment:

Armand Hammer, Occidental Petroleum, and the Gore Family

 

* Lenin presented an inscribed portrait to "Comrade Armand Hammer" in 1921, The inscription has Lenin in parentheses & Ulanioff, his birth name.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 90.

#29. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

A Commentary on the War Against Terror: Our Larger Tasks Author: Al Gore

February 12, 2002 Council on Foreign Relations

www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=4343 [snip] "As important as identifying Iraq, Iran and North Korea for what they are, we must be equally bold in identifying other evils that confront us. For there is another Axis of Evil in the world: poverty and ignorance; disease and environmental disorder; corruption and political oppression. We may well put down terror in its present manifestations. But if we do not attend to the larger fundamentals as well, then the ground is fertile and has been seeded for the next generation of those born to hate us, who will hold these things up before the world's poor and dispossessed, and say that all these things are in our image, and rekindle the war we are now hoping to snuff out. “Draining the swamp” of terrorism must of course in the first instance mean destroying the ability of terrorist networks to function. But drying it up at its source must also mean draining the aquifer of anger that underlies terrorism: anger that enflames the hearts of so many young men, and makes them willing, dedicated recruits for terror. Anger at perceived historical injustices involving a mass-memory throughout the Islamic world of past glory and more recent centuries of decline and oppression at the hands of the West. " [snip]

Bombing them into prosperity and good govenors of the earth. Presidential logic. I guess he didn't read the CFR reports on the ME before he opened his yap.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   14:54:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Peppa (#29)

Too easy.

I wonder why so many supposed Conservative-Constitutionists that supported Ron Paul buy into the Globalist-Commie-Fascists' schtick?

Maybe they want the Nanny State...

FOH  posted on  2008-04-02   14:56:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: FOH (#30)

Maybe they want the Nanny State...

Who knows. Control over others. They're wired different.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:00:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Peppa (#33)

They're wired different.

I guess I am. I'm wired to want an end to the aggressive wars and violations of civil liberties of the Bush regime.

You folks seem wired to have different priorities.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   15:04:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: aristeides (#36)

To: Peppa

They're wired different. I guess I am. I'm wired to want an end to the aggressive wars and violations of civil liberties of the Bush regime.

You folks seem wired to have different priorities.

Sorry, you support a candidate that has not voted according to your values. Period.

That you continue to stick a fork in your own eye isn't my fault, but unfortunately, becomes everyones problem. Frankly, I consider it cowardly. Maybe you just want to BELIEVE. Well believe this, the more power you give to government over you, the more they will take. And who are you to condemn us all for your weakness?

My folks? Ah, you mean freedom loving Americans? Yes, we do have different priorities than you. You need a government teat and a sick need to control everyone else.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:13:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Peppa (#40)

You must be confusing me with someone else. As I have said repeatedly, what I want is an end to the Bush regime's wars of aggression and violations of civil liberties. What is cowardly about that?

I think the cowardly people are the ones who want -- or at least are willing -- to see those atrocities continue, just so that they can feel safe.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   15:19:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: aristeides (#43) (Edited)

You must be confusing me with someone else. As I have said repeatedly, what I want is an end to the Bush regime's wars of aggression and violations of civil liberties. What is cowardly about that?

I think the cowardly people are the ones who want -- or at least are willing -- to see those atrocities continue, just so that they can feel safe.

You want to believe that Obama is different on the war and he isn't. His advisors want bigger wars, globalism and further suspension of civil liberties. Why you refuse to acknowledge this is perplexing, if you were in control of common sense. You are a neo-con and perhaps don't realize it. Your position is that you will sacrifice everything for something you imagine is true. That you can't face it, is cowardly.

No one wants the atrocities to end more than the Ron Paul folks, and I think you know that. That he is not going to win doesn't mean people abandon their principles, or what is right in nature. That you feel you must embrace 'something' that sounds good, when under the smallest scrutiny is abhorrent, is contemptable and worse.

There are hundreds of thousands of soldiers around the world who are now slaves to the madness, and you are not doing your part to defend or support them, who believe, they are supporting you.

What twisted mind can say that Obama's advisors blueprints for bigger wars, is somehow better is beyond my understanding.

That he is able to dance around direct answers and you swallow it, is unbelievable.

You constantly hide behind Party labels to make your case for you... since you can NOT make a good one for BO.

He's a globalist, and their first order of business is to destroy what's left of our country. You will have your way, and I suspect you will be the biggest flag waver if your guy is leading the charge.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:32:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Peppa (#50)

His advisors want bigger wars, globalism and further suspension of civil liberties. Why you refuse to acknowledge this is perplexing

Where you ever came up with this baseless smear is what's perplexing.

iconoclast  posted on  2008-04-02   15:55:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: iconoclast (#59)

Where you ever came up with this baseless smear is what's perplexing.

I've posted quite a bit about the Grand Chessboard by Zbig.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   15:58:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Peppa (#61)

I've posted quite a bit about the Grand Chessboard by Zbig.

And I have repeatedly pointed out to you that The Grand Chessboard, from a decade ago, no longer represents Brzezinski's thinking. The more recent The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership (2004) and Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower (2007) are very different in their thinking.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   16:03:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: aristeides (#63)

And I have pointed out to you that his blueprint led to disaster and is hurting the cause of imperialism. That his plan was a bad and deadly one, and his aim is to move for a wider and bigger war. A bad plan with yet another bad plan for the cause of globalism and one world order.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   16:08:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Peppa (#67)

Have you read either of the books I just cited?

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   16:12:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: aristeides (#71)

Have you read either of the books I just cited?

Have you read the Grand Chessboard yet, or still jonesing to ignore the glaring goals of Zbig and the CFR? Of course his strategy changes, to find the best path to create the least resistance to Global Corporate control. It's hideous.

Have you read ANYTHING about how we got here, or are you satisfied to fill your shelves with only that which agrees with your opinion at the moment?

History is not something you can choose, and if it were so, there are millions buried whose families would love to change it as well.

Are you so divorced from reality that you CAN not see, or is it easier to hide your eyes?

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   16:22:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: Peppa (#78)

I have read The Choice, a much more recent book than The Grand Chessboard. I doubt if anybody else on this thread or forum has read even that much Brzezinski. If I ever get around to reading another book by him, it will be his most recent one. Since it deals something close to the current world, it would be a more productive use of my time.

I see no reason why I should waste my time reading a book he published about a decade ago, in a very different world.

Brzezinski recognizes that the world has changed. Other people seem stuck in Cold War thinking.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   16:25:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: aristeides (#81)

I see no reason why I should waste my time reading a book he published about a decade ago, in a very different world.

If you deny history, you repeat it, and it appears you are happy to embrace it under the perversion of our language.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02   16:35:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Peppa (#86)

I take it you have not read a single book by Brzezinski, and yet you feel able to demand that I read a book about a world very different from the current one.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-02   16:45:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 90.

#92. To: aristeides (#90)

I take it you have not read a single book by Brzezinski, and yet you feel able to demand that I read a book about a world very different from the current one.

You'd be wrong, and still try to dance your way around history. We are different world, by whose hand? Do you understand how we got here, or is here enough and trusting the same evil to set forth the next blueprint?

It really doesn't appear that you've read his last book either. Zbig doesn't write in code, he makes the goals quite clear.

But, considering that history is not your concern, could you have him rewrite the laws of gravity, cause and effect, and reverse the rotation of the Earth?

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-02 16:54:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 90.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]