[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

NC STATE POLICE WILL START ARRESTING FEDS THAT ARE BLOCKING AIDE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES

France BANS ARMS SALES To Israel & Netanyahu LASHES OUT At Macron | Iran GETS READY

CNN Drops Bomb on Tim Walz, Releases Blistering Segment Over Big Scandals in His Own State

EU concerned it has no influence over Israel FT

How Israels invasion of Lebanon poses risks to Turkiye

Obama's New Home in Dubai?,

Vaccine Skeptics Need To Be Silenced! Bill Gates

Hillary Clinton: We Lose Total Control If Social Media Companies Dont Moderate Content

Cancer Patients Report Miraculous Recoveries from Ivermectin Treatment

Hurricane Aid Stolen By The State Of Tennessee?

The Pentagon requests $1.2bn to continue Red Sea mission

US security officials warn of potential threats within two weeks, ramped-up patrols.

Massive Flooding Coming From Hurricane Milton

How the UK is becoming a ‘third-world’ economy

What Would World War III Really Look Like? It's Already Starting...

The Roots Of The UK Implosion And Why War Is Inevitable

How The Jew Thinks

“In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer" John Kerry in 2009

Jewish FEMA disaster relief handbook actually mandates prioritising non-Whites for disaster relief

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: What Obama Could Have Said About His Pastor Rev. Wright, a True Patriot
Source: Counterpunch
URL Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/korb04052008.html
Published: Apr 6, 2008
Author: Lawrence Korb and Ian Moss
Post Date: 2008-04-06 07:01:57 by Zoroaster
Keywords: None
Views: 711
Comments: 64

Subscribe Online Weekend Edition Apri1 5 / 6, 2008

What Obama Could Have Said About His Pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright, a True Patriot By LAWRENCE KORB and IAN MOSS

In 1961, a young African-American man, after hearing President John F. Kennedy's challenge to, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country," gave up his student deferment, left college in Virginia and voluntarily joined the Marines. In 1963, this man, having completed his two years of service in the Marines, volunteered again to become a Navy corpsman. (They provide medical assistance to the Marines as well as to Navy personnel.)

The man did so well in corpsman school that he was the valedictorian and became a cardiopulmonary technician. Not surprisingly, he was assigned to the Navy's premier medical facility, Bethesda Naval Hospital, as a member of the commander in chief's medical team, and helped care for President Lyndon B. Johnson after his 1966 surgery. For his service on the team, which he left in 1967, the White House awarded him three letters of commendation. What is even more remarkable is that this man entered the Marines and Navy not many years after the two branches began to become integrated.

While this young man was serving six years on active duty, Vice President Dick Cheney, who was born the same year as the Marine/sailor, received five deferments, four for being an undergraduate and graduate student and one for being a prospective father. Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, both five years younger than the African-American youth, used their student deferments to stay in college until 1968. Both then avoided going on active duty through family connections.

Who is the real patriot? The young man who interrupted his studies to serve his country for six years or our three political leaders who beat the system? Are the patriots the people who actually sacrifice something or those who merely talk about their love of the country?

After leaving the service of his country, the young African-American finished his final year of college, entered the seminary, was ordained as a minister, and eventually became pastor of a large church in one of America's biggest cities.__This man is Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the retiring pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, who has been in the news for comments he made over the last three decades.

Since these comments became public we have heard criticisms, condemnations, denouncements and rejections of his comments and him. We've seen on television, in a seemingly endless loop, sound bites of a select few of Rev. Wright's many sermons. Some of the Wright's comments are inexcusable and inappropriate and should be condemned, but in calling This him "unpatriotic," let us not forget that this is a man who gave up six of the most productive years of his life to serve his country.

How many of Wright's detractors, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly to name but a few, volunteered for service, and did so under the often tumultuous circumstances of a newly integrated armed forces and a society in the midst of a civil rights struggle? Not many. While words do count, so do actions. Let us not forget that, for whatever Rev. Wright may have said over the last 30 years, he has demonstrated his patriotism.

Lawrence Korb and Ian Moss are, respectively, Navy and Marine Corps veterans. They work at The Center For American Progress. Korb served as assistant secretary of Defense in the Reagan administration.

This piece ran in the Chicago Tribune on April 3, 2008.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Ah, that is ancient history. What he has been saying recently and more importantly what he has been saying while Obama has been going to his church is highly racist. Obama will never get elected becasue of this. It won't happen. McNuts will be president before that happens.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-04-06   7:08:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: RickyJ (#1)

If you're right, hard times are ahead for America:

A few hundred corpses will not be enough for McCain

Thousands will still be too few.

Before it's over, the Electric Jew will still be going on, but even it can't count all the dead

Everywhere you look.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2008-04-06   7:25:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: RickyJ (#1)

What he has been saying recently and more importantly what he has been saying while Obama has been going to his church is highly racist.

Oh really? How's that? Can you provide some example of 'highly racist' statements? Not that there's anything wrong with racism. Racism is as legitimate, if not more so because it comes to one naturally, than globalism or collectivism/socialism.

Anyways, what I heard from that priest was that God was not going to bless America but God was more likely to damn America for burning 100,000 innocent people in Hiroshima or for killing a million Iraqis. Compare that with the so-called 'right-winger evangelists' who expect God to damn and punish America for performing abortions and for glorifying anal intercourse.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-04-06   7:43:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3)

The people attacking Rev. Wright and Obama on this forum have little, if anything, to say in the way of criticism of the Bush/Cheney/McCain/neocon policy of aggression in the Middle East. (At the same time, strangely, they try to tar Obama with guilt by association: because Brzezinksi advises Obama, and because Brzezinski supported aggression many years ago, therefore Obama is somehow tarnished by association with the policy of aggression that they otherwise won't condemn.)

Most of them won't come out and say it, but I suspect they secretly support that policy of aggression.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   9:44:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: aristeides (#4)

I don't like any politician. I'm an equal-opportunity despiserer.

"I can kill you with my brain." - River Tam

YertleTurtle  posted on  2008-04-06   9:48:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Zoroaster (#0)

Korb served as assistant secretary of Defense in the Reagan administration.

Fact about one of the authors that is worth underlining.

From Korb's Wikipedia entry:

Korb served an advisor to the Reagan-Bush election committee in 1980 and was then appointed Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs, Installations and Logistics) from 1981 to 1985. In that position, he administered about seventy percent of the Defense budget. For his service he was awarded the Department of Defense’s medal for Distinguished Public Service.

By the time I worked in the Pentagon 1992-4, Korb was gone from there, but was still remembered with respect.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   10:14:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: aristeides (#4)

The people attacking Rev. Wright and Obama on this forum have little, if anything, to say in the way of criticism of the Bush/Cheney/McCain/neocon policy of aggression in the Middle East. (

you have got to be kidding. you won't find a more anti war, anti MIC, anti us government, anti bush/cheney, anti neocon group of posters than here on 4um.

christine  posted on  2008-04-06   10:15:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3)

Not that there's anything wrong with racism. Racism is as legitimate,

but racism is only acceptable by persons of color.

christine  posted on  2008-04-06   10:21:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: christine (#7) (Edited)

you have got to be kidding. you won't find a more anti war, anti MIC, anti us government, anti bush/cheney, anti neocon group of posters than here on 4um.

Apparently you didn't see the reaction my suggestion that we should negotiate with Iran got here on Friday. On this thread.

Whether or not you care to admit it, we have been infiltrated by Ziobots and neocons.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   10:23:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, aristeides, christine (#3)

larouchepac.com/news/2008...ders-jeremiah-wright.html

To Defenders of Jeremiah Wright
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

April 1, 2008

Under the combined influence of Karl Rove and the kind of
"Liberation Theologists" typified by the depraved Reverend
Jeremiah Wright, a wave of cultural pessimism was spread among
what had been that army of heroes who had formerly rallied behind
the uniquely gifted leadership of the truly Reverend Martin
Luther King, The name of this corruption promoted by Rove et al.
was "Faith-based initiative." The slogan of those who deserted
the cause back in the electoral year 2004 was, to my face (again
and again): "We need that money," That is the moral corruption of
those pulpits which preach the way of Jeremiah Wright today.

Where do these dupes of "Liberation Theology" con-men such as
Wright stand on the British-led program of genocide against
Africa today? Are they backers of London's genocide against
Black Africa, as typified by the attack of the British planters
on the liberation forces led by the President of Zimbabwe? Are
they fighting against the mass-murderers of Africans, the British
and those supporters of the British genocide against Africa
supported presently by the George W. Bush government? In whose
pockets, and under whose skirts do we find these so-called
"Liberation Theologists," the Elmer Gantrys" of today's
zombie-like revival ceremonies, preachers who create more souls
behind the tent than they save before the altars?

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   10:27:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: buckeye (#10)

So LaRouche doesn't like Rev. Wright. Is that supposed to persuade us?

Have you noticed all the sympathetic comments about Rev. Wright on Lew Rockwell's site and blog? Personally, I find Lew Rockwell a much more persuasive source than Lyndon LaRouche.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   10:31:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: aristeides (#4)

ari, obama is the news of the day. not bush/cheney. we've been railing against bush/cheney and the neocons for 7 years now.

christine  posted on  2008-04-06   10:32:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: christine (#7)

you won't find a more anti war, anti MIC, anti us government, anti bush/cheney, anti neocon group of posters than here on 4um.

amen.

Lod  posted on  2008-04-06   10:32:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: aristeides (#11) (Edited)

Have you noticed all the sympathetic comments about Rev. Wright on Lew Rockwell's site and blog? Personally, I find Lew Rockwell a much more persuasive source than Lyndon LaRouche.

My point is that not all Democrats are lining up behind Obama with wide eyes and love in their hearts. As LaRouche says, he really doesn't offer anything in detail or of substance.

Instead of throwing up a smokescreen of Lew Rockwell, deal with LaRouche's criticisms of Wright. What has liberation theology done for the third world? Nothing. Wright is a phony. Obama was indoctrinated by phonies. But you've been amply warned. Do not expect people who tack Trilateralists onto their campaigns to lead you to freedom.

Ain't gonna happen.

You may think Lew Rockwell is our savior because he's against the war and speaks out against Zionist domination of our political system. He's just one voice. There need to be many. LaRouche gets to the source of the economic control, which makes him interesting in his own way.

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   10:34:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: christine (#12) (Edited)

And that justifies cursing at the idea of negotiations with Iran?

And posting a cartoon suggesting Iranians being subhuman, just along the lines of the worst propaganda products of Zionist extremists?

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   10:34:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: christine (#8)

You are talking about the public expression of racism. It is true that it is generally viewed as unacceptable for Whites to express racial pride and for anyone 'mainstream' to promote or approve of even voluntary racial segregation. While it is true that 'public life' is important, it is not the most important aspect of most people lives. Privately, Whites are as racist as anyone else - I believe that racism is a natural behavior, a lot more healthy than, let's say, homosexuality. It's only that, to their shame, some Whites are more reluctant to express their views when anyone other than close friends and family is present - and I plea guilty to this myself. This is unhealthy because it creates tensions that become anger and are likely to resolve themselves through violence or mental disturbances.

Regarding certain people claiming that they can't support Obama BECAUSE his pastor said something 'racist' (it was really anti-statist from what I heard), it's possible that they just don't want to see a semi-Negro in the White House but they are afraid to say it.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-04-06   10:35:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#16)

For those of us how lived outside the US the term racism is a American invention which has been exported to many other parts of the globe it is an artificial construct designed to control the dispersal of wealth the support for Obama is more a case of "white guilt" I've seen this before in South Africa where a people shamed into silence for being politically incorrect voted for their own destruction

robnoel  posted on  2008-04-06   10:46:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: robnoel (#17)

Our own destruction? Seems to me, it's much clearer that a vote for McCain's policy of perpetual war is a vote for this country's destruction.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   10:48:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: robnoel (#17)

I've been wondering if the British found it easier to dominate the flow of natural resources out of its former colonies after the original colonists were disenfranchised. Consider the support the British gave to the American Indians during the American Revolution.

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   10:48:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: robnoel (#17)

Thank you from diagnosing 'us' from wherever in the world you might be right now. Clearly, you have some insight and it's very original - never heard of 'White guilt' before.

You do seem to concur with my conclusion that at least some of those who so desperately seek to find some 'non racist' fault in Obama are really anti-O because he's colored. They seem to be so desperately anti-Negro that they would rather have monsters such as Hillary or McCain in the White House - which IS sick. Like I said, a healthy amount of racism comes naturally and there's no need to suppress it. However, morbid racism - people who identify themselves with their race and nothing else - is just that: morbid. I consider people who view themselves as 'Whites' or 'Blacks' to be as sick and stupid as those who define themselves through their homosexual deviations or idiot feminists, obsessed with and defining themselves by their gender.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-04-06   10:54:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#20)

I diagnosed you as a gun-toting hippie quite a while back. It continues to fit.

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   10:56:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: aristeides (#18)

McCain as you pointed out is for perpetual war so is Hillary who in my opinion will win based on the fact that the Jewish Lobby has more supper delegates that favour her over Obama in other words either way Israel will decide who becomes the next president and they are proud to boast about it

Dozens of Jewish Super-Delegates May Hold Key to Democratic Race Campaign Marks a Communal Coming of Age in Party Politics By Jennifer Siegel Thu. Mar 20, 2008

According to a new survey conducted by the Forward, a disproportionately large share of the Democratic party’s super-delegates are Jewish. Many of them have declared their support for Hillary Clinton, accounting for more than 15% of her current backers.

www.forward.com/articles/12998/

robnoel  posted on  2008-04-06   10:58:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: robnoel (#22)

McCain as you pointed out is for perpetual war so is Hillary who in my opinion will win based on the fact that the Jewish Lobby has more supper delegates that favour her over Obama in other words either way Israel will decide who becomes the next president and they are proud to boast about it

Well, those sound to me like arguments for favoring the nomination and election of Obama.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   11:00:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: buckeye (#21)

:))) 'diagnosed'????

So you believe that you're a doctor. That's okay. It's not as bad as believing that you are Napoleon (the pig in the Animal Farm) or, worse, Lincoln, the neighbor's pet piggy.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-04-06   11:00:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: robnoel (#22)

It's amazing to see so many people succumbing to the idea that there is some sort of hope for a decent outcome in this Presidential election with a controlled media, legal conditions stacked against change, and the Bushes in power.

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   11:00:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#24)

LOL

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   11:01:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: buckeye (#19)

The Rothchilds more so than the British have controlled the mineral wealth in Africa for the past century

robnoel  posted on  2008-04-06   11:02:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: robnoel (#27)

That has not changed regardless of any "democratic" revolutions, has it?

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   11:03:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: The Thread (#28)

Humor break -

David Letterman's Top 10 reasons why there are no black NASCAR drivers:

#10 - Have to sit upright while driving.

#9 - Pistol won't stay under front seat.

#8 - Engine noise drowns out the rap music.

#7 - Pit crew can't work on car while holding up pants at the same time.

#6 - They keep trying to carjack Dale Earnhardt Jr.

#5 - Police cars on track interfere with race.

#4 - No passenger seat for the Ho.

#3 - No Cadillac's approved for competition.

#2 - When they crash their cars, they bail out & run.

AND THE NUMBER ONE REASON WHY BLACKS CAN'T BE IN NASCAR...

#1 -They can't wear their helmets sideways.

Lod  posted on  2008-04-06   11:05:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: lodwick (#29)

#7 should have been #1. It's very funny.

I didn't get #10 and #9.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-04-06   11:08:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: aristeides (#23)

For Obama to win he will have to embrace Israel which will inflame the folks who subscribe to the "black liberation theology" he will be seen and called a "Uncle Tom" push comes to shove although Americans maybe ready for a women president they will choke when it comes to pulling the lever for a black one

robnoel  posted on  2008-04-06   11:08:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: buckeye (#28)

Nope....old saying he who owns the gold makes the rules

robnoel  posted on  2008-04-06   11:09:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: robnoel (#31) (Edited)

He's already done that. His trek to Israel is done, and his homage to AIPAC is complete.

Text of Obama's AIPAC speech in 07.

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   11:10:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: robnoel (#31)

although Americans maybe ready for a women president they will choke when it comes to pulling the lever for a black one

If, as I suspect, Obama gets the nomination, we will get to see whether or not you are right.

Since, as you say, Hillary is as much for perpetual war as McCain, I don't see why Americans shouldn't be given the chance of voting for a candidate who seems to be against it.

Political realities probably do dictate that Obama will be making pro-Israel statements during the campaign, as you say, but it is possible to believe that, in making those statements, he's only paying lip service to political realities. I see no reason to believe Hillary and McCain do not wholeheartedly believe in supporting Israel down the line, even including Israeli aggression.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   11:13:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: buckeye (#33)

Obama's speech to AIPAC, to which you link, is dated March 2, 2007.

Obama's statement calling for negotiating with Iran was made at the end of October 2007.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   11:15:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: aristeides (#35)

Your point?

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-06   11:16:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#20)

Although people of different races can co-exist forced integration and affirmative action policies always causes tensions and in fact does the exact opposite of what it attempts to do America will only become a colour blind nation when the government stops asking me which box to fill in

robnoel  posted on  2008-04-06   11:19:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: buckeye (#36) (Edited)

My point is that, despite that speech to AIPAC, Obama, unlike the other candidates, has the courage to call for something -- negotiating with Iran -- that the other candidates are deadset against, and that the Israeli lobby vociferously opposes.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-06   11:21:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: aristeides (#34)

Have you read this by Shelby Steele like Obama has a white mother

The Identity Card By SHELBY STEELE www.time.com/time/magazin...le/0,9171,1689619,00.html

robnoel  posted on  2008-04-06   11:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: robnoel (#37)

America can not become 'a color-blind' nation for a number of reasons, the main one being that 'America' is not and can not become 'a nation'. Of course, color-blindness is not desirable. People have ways of self-segregating themselves and that's a reality - or there wouldn't be homo bars or 'black' record labels.

However, for as long as 'America' stays together as a state, one needs to do his best to minimize the bad that any state inflicts on the populace. I reject the claims that 'America' needs 'a woman' or 'a Black' in the White House. However, given the quality of the 'woman' (so to speak) and the 'White' currently in the running, 'the Black' gets the job by default. I happen to believe that he happens to be a reasonably decent guy, for a black and for a human in general but that's not as important as preventing Hillary and McCain from getting the job.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-04-06   11:27:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 64) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]